Go Back   MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Jun 5, 2014, 10:08 AM   #1
MacRumors
macrumors bot
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Apple Researching Solar Cell Ambient Light Sensors Embedded in Displays




Apple continues to explore the various ways solar cell technology can be used to enhance the operation of electronic devices with a new patent application no. 20140152632 published on Thursday by the U.S. Patent and Trademark office. The document describes a method of using solar cells as ambient light sensors for an iPad, iPhone, or other display-equipped device, reports Patently Apple. The patent application was filed in December 2012, but was just published today.

One advantage to integrating the ambient light sensor into the display would be the ability to reduce bezel sizes around the display, allowing more of the device's surface to be dedicated to display. For example, the iPhone currently includes several components embedded in the bezel above the display, including the earpiece, FaceTime camera, ambient light sensor, and proximity sensor. Moving at least some of those components into the display itself could allow Apple to reduce the height of the top bezel.

According to the patent, a solar cell's ability to sense incoming light could be connected to circuitry that adjusts the display brightness in response to the solar cell input, as with current sensors. When not being used to adjust the display, this solar cell technology could provide a trickle charge to the device's battery.
Quote:
An electronic device is provided with a display and a solar cell ambient light sensor that receives light through a portion of the display. The solar cell ambient light sensor may include one or more thin-film photovoltaic cells. A voltage that accumulates within the thin-film photovoltaic cell in response to ambient light is sampled and converted into ambient light data. The device includes control circuitry that modifies the intensity of display light generated by the display based on the ambient light data from the photovoltaic cell. The solar cell ambient light sensor is attached to a transparent cover layer, a color filter layer, or any other layer of the display. When the accumulated voltage is not being sampled for ambient light measurements, the voltage may be used to provide charge to a battery in the device.
Apple has long expressed an interest in solar cell technology with patent applications and solar-related rumors extending back at least six years. More recently, Apple was awarded a patent that describes a method of integrating a solar panel into a mobile touchscreen device with a flexible display.

Article Link: Apple Researching Solar Cell Ambient Light Sensors Embedded in Displays
MacRumors is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 5, 2014, 10:12 AM   #2
Rumourhasit
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Its about time...
Rumourhasit is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 5, 2014, 10:12 AM   #3
Avieshek
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Can anyone tell me when Apple will light their LCD screens with 'Quantum-dots display'

Last edited by Avieshek; Jun 5, 2014 at 10:39 AM.
Avieshek is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 5, 2014, 10:14 AM   #4
1Zach1
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Northern Va
Getting rid of the home button, and dropping the Facetime camera to the side of the speaker would probably also help reduce bezel size as well.
__________________
Canon and Mac
1Zach1 is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 5, 2014, 10:16 AM   #5
Avieshek
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1Zach1 View Post
Getting rid of the home button, and dropping the Facetime camera to the side of the speaker would probably also help reduce bezel size as well.
No, no my friend, the home button is my favorite thing.
Avieshek is offline   12 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 5, 2014, 10:20 AM   #6
dannyyankou
macrumors 68020
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Can't wait for the day where I never have to plug my phone in again.
dannyyankou is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 5, 2014, 10:20 AM   #7
Avieshek
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
So, when is this coming, 2015's iPhone 6s, 2016's iPhone 7

[pls people, don't expect in this year's iPhone 6]

Last edited by Avieshek; Jun 5, 2014 at 10:37 AM.
Avieshek is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 5, 2014, 10:22 AM   #8
Cyborg21
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1Zach1 View Post
Getting rid of the home button, and dropping the Facetime camera to the side of the speaker would probably also help reduce bezel size as well.
Removing Touch ID and destroy the point of FaceTime camera is a weird option
__________________
Retina MacBook Pro 13-inch 2.6 ghz haswell with OS X Mavericks (10.9.2)
iPod Shuffle Space Gray 4th gen.
Cyborg21 is offline   8 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 5, 2014, 10:24 AM   #9
Serban
macrumors 68030
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
So we are expecting iPhone 6 bezel free?
Serban is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 5, 2014, 10:24 AM   #10
TWSS37
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
It's a good thing I keep my phone in my back pocket for all the sunshine that comes out of my ***
__________________
HTC One (M8) Moto X Nexus 7 LTE Samsung Gear Live Moto 360
TWSS37 is offline   7 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 5, 2014, 10:24 AM   #11
Cuban Missles
macrumors 6502a
 
Cuban Missles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: East Coast, USA
Apple has always maintained the bezel size to be the same (top/bottom). If they reduce the top, that would require either reducing the size of the home button or eliminating it to keep the bezels the same size. Given Touch ID, I am not sure that is going to happen soon.
__________________
I have a collection of Apple stickers from all my Apple product purchases - they are white (the stickers not the products)
Cuban Missles is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 5, 2014, 10:29 AM   #12
Avieshek
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cuban Missles View Post
Apple has always maintained the bezel size to be the same (top/bottom). If they reduce the top, that would require either reducing the size of the home button or eliminating it to keep the bezels the same size. Given Touch ID, I am not sure that is going to happen soon.
👍 valid point, nice thinking
Avieshek is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 5, 2014, 10:30 AM   #13
1Zach1
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Northern Va
Quote:
Originally Posted by Avieshek View Post
No, no my friend, the home button is my favorite thing.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cyborg21 View Post
Removing Touch ID and destroy the point of FaceTime camera is a weird option
You guys missed my point. Moving the sensor behind the screen isn't what is holding back the "bezel free" design, or even reducing the bezel at this point.

Also, if we are assuming Apple can add sensors/PV panels behind the screen, then they can implement their TouchID behind the screen as well and get rid of the home button/move it to another position.

I don't understand how not staking the camera and speaker destroys the point of the Facetime camera, other than symmetry.
__________________
Canon and Mac
1Zach1 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 5, 2014, 10:30 AM   #14
Rogifan
macrumors G3
 
Rogifan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by Serban View Post
So we are expecting iPhone 6 bezel free?
Um, did you forget about TouchID?
__________________
"I have a very optimistic view of individuals. As individuals, people are inherently good. I have a somewhat more pessimistic view of people in groups." -- Steve Jobs , Wired interview
Rogifan is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 5, 2014, 10:36 AM   #15
sza
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Since the back panel of iPhone is made of kind of glass material, a solar panel could be put underneath it.
sza is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 5, 2014, 10:39 AM   #16
JHankwitz
macrumors 68000
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Wisconsin
Send a message via AIM to JHankwitz
Quote:
Originally Posted by serban View Post
so we are expecting iphone 6 bezel free?
no.
__________________
Proud Apple fanboy since '77
JHankwitz is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 5, 2014, 10:40 AM   #17
KazKam
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
I understand this could extend the time between wall charges in general, but it's my understanding that constant trickle charging of Li-Ion batteries is both a safety and battery-life/longevity concern, as is overcharging.

"A continuous trickle charge would cause plating of metallic lithium, and this could compromise safety." from http://batteryuniversity.com/learn/a..._ion_batteries
KazKam is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 5, 2014, 10:41 AM   #18
dlewis23
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1Zach1 View Post
Getting rid of the home button, and dropping the Facetime camera to the side of the speaker would probably also help reduce bezel size as well.
You can't get rid of the home button. I don't get why people keep bringing this up. Touch ID is not going to get moved into the screen or anywhere else on the phone anytime soon.

The entire OS and App system is designed with that physical home button being there. It's not going away.
__________________
SpeedSmart - The ultimate iOS speed test utility
FireFile.io - Cloud storage for all
dlewis23 is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 5, 2014, 10:45 AM   #19
Serban
macrumors 68030
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cuban Missles View Post
Apple has always maintained the bezel size to be the same (top/bottom). If they reduce the top, that would require either reducing the size of the home button or eliminating it to keep the bezels the same size. Given Touch ID, I am not sure that is going to happen soon.
Even the bottom can be reduced, there are still a few millimetres that can be remove (i guess around 2mm in total, 1mm from the space between home button and bottom frame and 1 mm from home button and display). So 2mm from bottom and another 2 mm from top, we will get a nice 4mm reduce from top/bottom bezels.

Last edited by Serban; Jun 5, 2014 at 11:01 AM.
Serban is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 5, 2014, 10:51 AM   #20
darkslide29
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: San Francisco, California
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cyborg21 View Post
Removing Touch ID and destroy the point of FaceTime camera is a weird option
Some thought the touch ID was going to be directly on the display itself. One of the early thoughts was having the sensor on the "swipe to unlock" portion of the screen, where it would scan as you swipe. However, we see touch ID does not require a swipe, so this may not be the solution.

I still do think eventually moving the touch ID to the display can and will be done. And it may be one of the reasons Apple is so interested in sapphire. (well first in iWatch probably, maybe iPhone a couple generations down the line). A sapphire display, like the touch ID button, would be less scratch prone and work better than embedding it into the existing screen glass today!
But this won't be any time soon.
__________________
iPhone 6 64GB Mac Mini (2011) Apple TV 3
darkslide29 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 5, 2014, 11:00 AM   #21
bedifferent
macrumors Demi-God
 
bedifferent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: NY
I read a patent filing here a few years ago on the idea of placing the front camera behind the display, don't know if that's even technically possible but interesting.

Is sapphire glass semi-pliable? Could they place the "home" button as part of the display, maintaining a physical mechanism and fingerprint sensor but in the display?
__________________
Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.
Arthur C. Clarke
bedifferent is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 5, 2014, 11:17 AM   #22
Piggie
macrumors 603
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by dlewis23 View Post
You can't get rid of the home button. I don't get why people keep bringing this up. Touch ID is not going to get moved into the screen or anywhere else on the phone anytime soon.

The entire OS and App system is designed with that physical home button being there. It's not going away.
Given than you hold the phone in your hand, and generally some fingers (middle 2 or 3) are around the back of the phone.
It would not be THAT impossible to put a home button and touch ID in a good location on the back.
Once you know it's there, it would actually probably be easier to operate, whilst still holding your phone securely with one hand) than it's current position.

It would not be hard either for case makers to have an area open for it, in the same way they do for the camera.

You could hold your phone one hand in a firm solid grip, even when running, and still use you middle fingers to press a home button on the back.
__________________
Amiga 500, N64, Dreamcast, Gamecube, Xbox360 Slim 250GB, PS3, Nokia 6210, 3 Home Made PC's, Adidas Watch, Nikon + Fuji Cameras, 32GB iPad, Furry Pigs (mainly pink!)
Piggie is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 5, 2014, 11:21 AM   #23
Cyborg21
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Quote:
Originally Posted by darkslide29 View Post
Some thought the touch ID was going to be directly on the display itself. One of the early thoughts was having the sensor on the "swipe to unlock" portion of the screen, where it would scan as you swipe. However, we see touch ID does not require a swipe, so this may not be the solution.

I still do think eventually moving the touch ID to the display can and will be done. And it may be one of the reasons Apple is so interested in sapphire. (well first in iWatch probably, maybe iPhone a couple generations down the line). A sapphire display, like the touch ID button, would be less scratch prone and work better than embedding it into the existing screen glass today!
But this won't be any time soon.
Oh my god I never thought that way, maybe Apple has some plans with Sapphire to integrate Touch ID to the screen! But that seems almost impossible with today's technology
__________________
Retina MacBook Pro 13-inch 2.6 ghz haswell with OS X Mavericks (10.9.2)
iPod Shuffle Space Gray 4th gen.
Cyborg21 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 5, 2014, 11:23 AM   #24
Cuban Missles
macrumors 6502a
 
Cuban Missles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: East Coast, USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Serban View Post
Even the bottom can be reduced, there are still a few millimetres that can be remove (i guess around 2mm in total, 1mm from the space between home button and bottom frame and 1 mm from home button and display). So 2mm from bottom and another 2 mm from top, we will get a nice 4mm reduce from top/bottom bezels.
I just looked at my iphone and agree it is posible to do that. However, you can do that now regardless of this new technology. What the original poster was trying to do was elimate a significant part of the top bezel without consideration of the bottom. So my point is that to stick with iPhone tradition, that seemed unlikely. Shaving a millimeter here or there is something Jony would do, but always maintaining eqaulity between the top and bottom.
__________________
I have a collection of Apple stickers from all my Apple product purchases - they are white (the stickers not the products)
Cuban Missles is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 5, 2014, 11:25 AM   #25
1Zach1
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Northern Va
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cyborg21 View Post
Oh my god I never thought that way, maybe Apple has some plans with Sapphire to integrate Touch ID to the screen! But that seems almost impossible with today's technology
Pretty sure Apple has a patent for it, or something similar that started up those comments/rumors.
__________________
Canon and Mac
1Zach1 is offline   0 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:57 AM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC