Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

bLaZ3n

macrumors regular
Original poster
Jul 9, 2010
143
0
I have a mid 2010, MBP 15in 2.4 Ghz Intel Core i5.. I just recently upgraded the ram to 8GB, and was wondering if there is a list of SSD's that work with my MBP? I need around 250GB space, 120GB can work too.. any deals? What are my best options?
 

SarcasticJoe

macrumors 6502a
Nov 5, 2013
607
221
Finland
Pretty much any 2,5" SATA SSD will work.

So I recommend that you just read up on reviews for the latest models in that market and buy what you all-in-all consider to be the best one.
 

DanGoh

macrumors 6502
Apr 6, 2014
366
506
MBP 2010 15in.. SSD suggestion?

If you can afford it, get the Samsung 840 Pro, which is $182 right now for the 250GB on Amazon. Otherwise I suggest the Samsung 840 Evo, which is $80 for 120GB, or $140 for 250GB.
 

Weaselboy

Moderator
Staff member
Jan 23, 2005
34,159
15,653
California
I have a mid 2010, MBP 15in 2.4 Ghz Intel Core i5.. I just recently upgraded the ram to 8GB, and was wondering if there is a list of SSD's that work with my MBP? I need around 250GB space, 120GB can work too.. any deals? What are my best options?

Any SATA 2.5" SSD will work. Probably the best deal for price/performance right now is the Samsung EVO or the Crucial MX100. Grab whichever you can find cheapest.

Read the final conclusions section of this review.
 

SarcasticJoe

macrumors 6502a
Nov 5, 2013
607
221
Finland
Personally I've stopped buying Samsung products for moral reasons after the worker deaths, child labor and cartels Samsung has not just been accused, but convicted, of actually running (rather than just taking part in).
 

BrettApple

macrumors 65816
Apr 3, 2010
1,137
483
Heart of the midwest
Fellow 2010 15" user here. I've been running 8GB RAM and an OWC SSD for 4 years now (originally from an '08 13" MB), and it's been great.

Today though, I'd lean towards the Crucial MX100 as suggested. The price is great for any capacity, though the 256GB model is the sweet spot at $109 on Amazon. I've put them in a MBP, iMac, Mac Mini, and a custom PC. They run great and will easily saturate the SATA II bus in your 2010. No use getting pro models when they will be bottlenecked by the SATA speed anyhow.
 

MCAsan

macrumors 601
Jul 9, 2012
4,587
442
Atlanta
I put a Samsung EVO 840 500GB in my niece's 2010 white macbook. It made a huge difference in boot time and in app opening times. Putting in 8GB and moving to an SSD will make the most out of your machine and give a couple more years of life.
 

bLaZ3n

macrumors regular
Original poster
Jul 9, 2010
143
0
If you can afford it, get the Samsung 840 Pro, which is $182 right now for the 250GB on Amazon. Otherwise I suggest the Samsung 840 Evo, which is $80 for 120GB, or $140 for 250GB.

Any SATA 2.5" SSD will work. Probably the best deal for price/performance right now is the Samsung EVO or the Crucial MX100. Grab whichever you can find cheapest.

Read the final conclusions section of this review.

Fellow 2010 15" user here. I've been running 8GB RAM and an OWC SSD for 4 years now (originally from an '08 13" MB), and it's been great.

Today though, I'd lean towards the Crucial MX100 as suggested. The price is great for any capacity, though the 256GB model is the sweet spot at $109 on Amazon. I've put them in a MBP, iMac, Mac Mini, and a custom PC. They run great and will easily saturate the SATA II bus in your 2010. No use getting pro models when they will be bottlenecked by the SATA speed anyhow.

I put a Samsung EVO 840 500GB in my niece's 2010 white macbook. It made a huge difference in boot time and in app opening times. Putting in 8GB and moving to an SSD will make the most out of your machine and give a couple more years of life.

What are the major differences between the Samsung 840 EVO-Series 250GB and the Crucial MX100 256GB? I'm really not familiar with the technical aspects but I see that the Samsung has faster/better write speeds?

I'm just looking for the best affordable option, which includes a great price, space, performance, and reliability.
 

Weaselboy

Moderator
Staff member
Jan 23, 2005
34,159
15,653
California
What are the major differences between the Samsung 840 EVO-Series 250GB and the Crucial MX100 256GB? I'm really not familiar with the technical aspects but I see that the Samsung has faster/better write speeds?

I'm just looking for the best affordable option, which includes a great price, space, performance, and reliability.

They use different types of NAND chips, but as a practical matter, there is no difference. The speeds are almost exactly the same in every test. EVO a bit faster in some tests and the MX100 a bit faster in others.

Thing is, your 2010 Macbook only has SATAII drive connections, so you are not going to get close to the max speeds in any SSD you buy.

Here is a quote from the article I linked:

And here's where the other shoe drops. The MSRPs (Manufacturer Suggested Retail Prices) are just insane; none of the big brands even come close to the prices of the MX100. You are basically getting a 256GB MX100 for the price of a 120/128GB SSD, which is awesome. Obviously these are not final prices but in my experience the MSRPs tend to be more conservative than aggressive, so final retail prices may end up being even lower. I wonder how Samsung in particular is going to respond because the 840 EVO should have a cost advantage due to the use of TLC NAND, but right now the EVO is priced $30 to $70 higher while not providing any substantial added value.

All in all, I have nothing negative to say about the MX100. With the performance and feature set, combined with pricing that basically doubles the amount of storage you get for your dollar, it's an absolute no-brainer. Unless you are an enthusiast or professional with a heavy IO workload, the MX100 is currently the drive with the best bang for the buck in the market by far.

Just get whichever one you can find on sale at the best price. You are not going to be able to tell the difference.
 

Freyqq

macrumors 601
Dec 13, 2004
4,038
181
I recommend any of the Samsung SSDs. Apple uses them in their computers, so you know they are quality. I use a Samsung 830 256GB in my 2010 MBP, and it works well. Any 2.5" SSD will work though.

----------

What are the major differences between the Samsung 840 EVO-Series 250GB and the Crucial MX100 256GB? I'm really not familiar with the technical aspects but I see that the Samsung has faster/better write speeds?

I'm just looking for the best affordable option, which includes a great price, space, performance, and reliability.

Doesn't matter at all for you because you are stuck at SATA II. Both will max out SATA II.
 

smithrh

macrumors 68030
Feb 28, 2009
2,723
1,732
Don't be scared off by being "stuck" at SATA II - it's still a no-brainer upgrade, do it. I've got a 2008 MBP that I used until just recently, the SSD upgrade breathed new life into it.
 

BrettApple

macrumors 65816
Apr 3, 2010
1,137
483
Heart of the midwest
Don't be scared off by being "stuck" at SATA II - it's still a no-brainer upgrade, do it. I've got a 2008 MBP that I used until just recently, the SSD upgrade breathed new life into it.

Ditto, I had one in a 2007 MacBook Pro capped at SATA I, and it was night and day. Booted in 10 seconds from power to Mavericks desktop. CS6 flew too.

Just get whichever one you can find on sale at the best price. You are not going to be able to tell the difference.

All good advice, as always :D
Whatever is cheaper is the answer here. Best of luck!
 

orestes1984

macrumors 65816
Jun 10, 2005
1,000
4
Australia
You wont run into the SATA3 issues of later MacBook Pros so any SSD will work., but the Crucial MX100 is right around $180 for 256GB which is ridiculously cheap and it will give you a nice speed bump. My 2011 MacBook Pro with SATA3 boots from power off to the OS in 5 seconds.
 

2984839

Cancelled
Apr 19, 2014
2,114
2,239
Kingston SSDNow V300

Newegg lists the 120 G for $55 and the 240 G for $95. Amazon prices are similar, sometimes lower. I use the 120 in my MBP and get 333 MB/S read times with full disk encryption and no TRIM. Anything faster than 300 MB/S won't be noticeable in a SATA II computer, so I'd get the cheapest.
 

PowerBook-G5

macrumors 65816
Jul 30, 2013
1,243
1,179
Another vote for the MC100 here. I replaced the original hard drive in my MacBook Pro worth the 512GB version, and the thing absolutely screams.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.