Not to mention that some reports are more "substantial" than others. If the first report of a post is "Die Spammer!" and the next one backs that up with discussion or links I want to see the more detailed one.
B
Doesn't the report come with a link to the post in question, where a mod can view the post and the comment made by the person reporting? And in your example, a moderator can easily see the recent post history of one being reported, whereby having members cut and paste examples from various threads really shouldn't be necessary. In regards to other issues such as harassing others or being a troll, having links can definitely save time.
When a report is made on our site, all of the staff is emailed and a thread is automatically created detailing who made the report, their email address and the post and link in question. Once the post has been reviewed by at least two mods for concurrence, the reported thread is locked. That way we know the issue has been resolved. If there is still some question as to concurrence, further mod input is requested. A lot of the time we do get commentary as to why a post was reported. And often times, the commentary is needless rhetoric that does not help us.
As long as the staff is happy with the current setup, that is all that really matters. I appreciate the replies.