Go Back   MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > Mac Blog Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Aug 5, 2014, 12:44 PM   #1
MacRumors
macrumors bot
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Google Launches 64-Bit Version of Chrome Canary Browser for OS X




Following the launch of a 64-bit beta version of Chrome for Windows 7 and 8 users last week, Google has quietly added 64-bit support to Chrome Canary for OS X, the experimental build of its Chrome web browser designed for Mac users, and to its Mac Dev channels.

As noted by The Next Web, the latest build of Chrome Canary, version 38.2114.2, has 64-bit clearly listed in the About section of the browser, but Google has not yet officially announced the addition of 64-bit support.

According to Google, 64-bit support adds speed, allowing the browser to take advantage of the latest processor optimizations, and stability on Windows, with the same benefits likely available on the Mac.

64-bit support for the Windows version of Canary arrived in early June, before making its way to Beta channels in late July, and it's possible 64-bit support for Mac could follow a similar timeline, eventually making its way to Google's stable Chrome browser.

Article Link: Google Launches 64-Bit Version of Chrome Canary Browser for OS X
MacRumors is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 5, 2014, 12:48 PM   #2
macgabe
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
This was important, I can't remember why.
macgabe is offline   4 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 5, 2014, 12:49 PM   #3
pedromcm.pm
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Porto, Portugal
Nice!

A few years late, and Safari clearly has become the better browser, on a Mac.

However, I use Android, and since Chrome is very good I use it, instead. Let's just hope that Chrome stops stealing my Media Keys functionality!
pedromcm.pm is offline   10 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 5, 2014, 12:51 PM   #4
PocketSand11
macrumors 6502a
 
PocketSand11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: ~/
Hmm, I wonder how much RAM this will use if the 32-bit version already takes more than anything on my computer. On the bright side, it should load things more quickly. The closer the browser race is, the better.
__________________
'08 MP, '09 MBP, JB iPhone 5
Fun fact: iPhone 5 aspect ratio = 640/1136 ≈ .5634. 9/16 = .5625. 639/1136 = .5625. Its screen is exactly one pixel too wide to be 9:16.

Last edited by PocketSand11; Aug 5, 2014 at 01:59 PM.
PocketSand11 is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 5, 2014, 12:53 PM   #5
roadbloc
macrumors 604
 
roadbloc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: UK
Yey. Sixty four bits web browsing!
__________________
roadbloc is online now   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 5, 2014, 01:01 PM   #6
CrazyForApple
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Buffalo, NY
Send a message via AIM to CrazyForApple
Screw Chrome, I use Safari
CrazyForApple is offline   14 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 5, 2014, 01:13 PM   #7
TsMkLg068426
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Waiting for 128 bit Google Chrome.
__________________
21.5" iMac, 2.7GHz, Intel Core i5, 4GB Memory, 1 TB HD, Mac OS X Lion 10.7.2; 32 GB iPod Touch iOS 5.0.1
TsMkLg068426 is offline   6 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 5, 2014, 01:15 PM   #8
b0rg
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
yeah there slow just like those LAGdroid devices..

Finally Java support in Chrome for mac users
__________________
Macbook Pro 15" Retina , 2.3GHz i7, 16 GB RAM, 512GB SSD
b0rg is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 5, 2014, 01:17 PM   #9
newagemac
macrumors 68000
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Welcome to 2009, Google.

I used to be a big fan of Chrome but it's amazing how far behind Chrome has become over the last few years. The speed and performance these days aren't even close. Safari 8 in Yosemite runs circles around Chrome while using far less battery and RAM.

Last edited by newagemac; Aug 5, 2014 at 01:33 PM.
newagemac is offline   13 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 5, 2014, 01:20 PM   #10
rhett7660
macrumors G3
 
rhett7660's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sunny, Southern California
Quote:
Originally Posted by newagemac View Post
Welcome to 2009, Google.
Better late than never.... no?
__________________
"It's quite an experience to hold the hand of someone as they move from living to dead."
"Times are looking grim these days, holding on to everything, it's hard to draw the line"
rhett7660 is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 5, 2014, 01:21 PM   #11
iStrikeRx
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Quote:
Originally Posted by b0rg View Post
yeah there slow just like those LAGdroid devices..

Finally Java support in Chrome for mac users
Poor attempt. 0/10.

My Note 3 makes the 5S look prehistoric when it comes to speed and stability.

OT, good to see there's finally some improvements being made. Hopefully they add a little bit more than just 64bit support though, as the Mac version of chrome still leaves a lot to be desired. Either way, more choice for us consumers who aren't walled into Apple's little garden of control is always a good thing.
iStrikeRx is offline   4 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 5, 2014, 01:28 PM   #12
lincolntran
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by iStrikeRx View Post
Poor attempt. 0/10.

My Note 3 makes the 5S look prehistoric when it comes to speed and stability.

OT, good to see there's finally some improvements being made. Hopefully they add a little bit more than just 64bit support though, as the Mac version of chrome still leaves a lot to be desired. Either way, more choice for us consumers who aren't walled into Apple's little garden of control is always a good thing.
And iPhone 6 will make your note 3 looks and performs like a prehistoric device.... And the cycle continues... Nothing new here

Edit: "android & stability" together? I don't believe they should go together in a sentence.
lincolntran is offline   4 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 5, 2014, 01:38 PM   #13
\-V-/
macrumors 65816
 
\-V-/'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by lincolntran View Post
And iPhone 6 will make your note 3 looks and performs like a prehistoric device.... And the cycle continues... Nothing new here

Edit: "android & stability" together? I don't believe they should go together in a sentence.
When's the last time you used an Android device? Froyo?


Anyway ... I'm glad they're finally doing this. Not sure what took them so long.
\-V-/ is offline   3 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 5, 2014, 01:42 PM   #14
ArtOfWarfare
macrumors 603
 
ArtOfWarfare's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Send a message via Skype™ to ArtOfWarfare
Quote:
Originally Posted by macgabe View Post
This was important, I can't remember why.
Because various other programs and plugins that previously played well with Chrome, when they were 32 bit, stopped playing well when they shifted over to 64 bit.

As someone else said, welcome to 2009 Google. Seriously, what the hell took them so long? The mass transition to 64 bit began somewhere around 8 years ago, and most software finished it several years ago.
__________________
Don't tell me Macs don't last: 2007 iMac, 2007 Mac Mini, 2008 MacBook Air, all Vintage.
(iMac obsoletion: April 28, 2015, MBA: October 14, 2015, Mac Mini: March 9, 2016)
ArtOfWarfare is online now   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 5, 2014, 01:45 PM   #15
DJJAZZYJET
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by iStrikeRx View Post
My Note 3 makes the 5S look prehistoric when it comes to speed and stability.
Lets face it. No it doesn't.
DJJAZZYJET is offline   20 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 5, 2014, 01:58 PM   #16
PocketSand11
macrumors 6502a
 
PocketSand11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: ~/
Quote:
Originally Posted by ArtOfWarfare View Post
Because various other programs and plugins that previously played well with Chrome, when they were 32 bit, stopped playing well when they shifted over to 64 bit.

As someone else said, welcome to 2009 Google. Seriously, what the hell took them so long? The mass transition to 64 bit began somewhere around 8 years ago, and most software finished it several years ago.
Maybe they were using uint32_t all over the place to represent memory addresses instead of uintptr_t.

----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by djjazzyjet View Post
lets face it. No it doesn't.
+1
__________________
'08 MP, '09 MBP, JB iPhone 5
Fun fact: iPhone 5 aspect ratio = 640/1136 ≈ .5634. 9/16 = .5625. 639/1136 = .5625. Its screen is exactly one pixel too wide to be 9:16.
PocketSand11 is offline   3 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 5, 2014, 02:32 PM   #17
JGIGS
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
I want to like and use safari but I hate the way the tabs are. They don't show the name or symbol of a website so I can't tell which tab is which. At least on the Yosemite preview that I currently am running. I don't like how they do a weird shift thing either. Prefer how chrome just makes them all the same size then smaller if you have that many open.

Also don't like the delay when you hit forward or back. The internals of Safari might be better but I find it less user friendly.
__________________
15" MacBook Pro Retina 2012, iPhone 6 2014
JGIGS is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 5, 2014, 02:43 PM   #18
britboyj
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
About ****ing time Google.
__________________
"No raindrop believes it is responsible for the flood."
 iMac 27" 2.8 Ghz Core i5 Quad-Core 12GB RAM  MacBook Pro 15" Retina 2.0Ghz i7 8GB RAM  16GB Wifi iPad 2  16GB Black Verizon iPhone "5"
britboyj is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 5, 2014, 02:44 PM   #19
rdlink
macrumors 68000
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by \-V-/ View Post
When's the last time you used an Android device? Froyo?


Anyway ... I'm glad they're finally doing this. Not sure what took them so long.
Yesterday (4.4.4). And the OP was right.
__________________
Desktop, Desktop, Laptop, Phone, Tablet
rdlink is online now   2 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 5, 2014, 02:55 PM   #20
PocketSand11
macrumors 6502a
 
PocketSand11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: ~/
Quote:
Originally Posted by \-V-/ View Post
When's the last time you used an Android device? Froyo?


Anyway ... I'm glad they're finally doing this. Not sure what took them so long.
I've used my friends' devices running some version of JellyBean, and yeah, I have to agree that it's slow and unstable.

----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by newagemac View Post
Welcome to 2009, Google.

I used to be a big fan of Chrome but it's amazing how far behind Chrome has become over the last few years. The speed and performance these days aren't even close. Safari 8 in Yosemite runs circles around Chrome while using far less battery and RAM.
Is the advanced HTML5 performance fast? I use Safari because it's faster for me, but it's happened a couple of times where I've had to use Chrome to use a site with special HTML5 content because it either wouldn't work in Safari or was slow. I'm looking at you, Megaupload. You don't need HTML5 to download a file. Sad, really, that we're reverting to the days of "this site looks best in Internet Explorer" except for Chrome.
__________________
'08 MP, '09 MBP, JB iPhone 5
Fun fact: iPhone 5 aspect ratio = 640/1136 ≈ .5634. 9/16 = .5625. 639/1136 = .5625. Its screen is exactly one pixel too wide to be 9:16.
PocketSand11 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 5, 2014, 02:57 PM   #21
Ichabod.
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
This must be for the iPhone's 64-bit processor.

OS X has been 64-bit for 5+ years.
__________________
13" Aluminum MacBook Late 2008, 2.0 GHz, 8GB RAM, 1 TB HD
iPhone 6+
Ichabod. is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 5, 2014, 03:23 PM   #22
ScottishDuck
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Argyll, Scotland
This has been present in canary for some time. Furthermore it's in the dev version too and will be in the beta version shortly.

Shoddy work as usual, macrumors.
ScottishDuck is offline   3 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 5, 2014, 03:41 PM   #23
Parasprite
macrumors 68000
 
Parasprite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Quote:
Originally Posted by ScottishDuck View Post
This has been present in canary for some time. Furthermore it's in the dev version too and will be in the beta version shortly.

Shoddy work as usual, macrumors.
Yeah, I remember noticing this at least a week ago, surprised that I hadn't heard anything about it until now.
__________________
Has anyone, anywhere, ever actually used ~/Pictures/iPod Photo Cache/ for anything besides deleting or hiding it?
Parasprite is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 5, 2014, 03:53 PM   #24
Parasprite
macrumors 68000
 
Parasprite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Quote:
Originally Posted by pedromcm.pm View Post
A few years late, and Safari clearly has become the better browser, on a Mac.
I keep trying Safari, but I usually end up going back after realizing it still has the "inexplicably disappearing cursor bug". It also doesn't help that I prefer the layout of Inspect Element in Chrome, but that's more preference than anything. I'm hoping that Yosemite will help me move back but somehow I doubt it.

At least I can finally get Safari to actually block popunders.
__________________
Has anyone, anywhere, ever actually used ~/Pictures/iPod Photo Cache/ for anything besides deleting or hiding it?
Parasprite is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 5, 2014, 04:04 PM   #25
Morod
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: On The Nickel, over there....
No, thanks.
Google already knows too much about me. No need to feed the fire.
__________________
Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler.
Albert Einstein
Morod is offline   2 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > Mac Blog Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:21 PM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC