Go Back   MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > iOS Blog Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Aug 19, 2014, 02:45 PM   #1
MacRumors
macrumors bot
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Yosemite National Park and Wellington, New Zealand Added to Apple Maps Flyover Feature




Apple has added two new locations to its Maps Flyover feature in iOS, including Yosemite National Park in California and Wellington, New Zealand. The new additions to Flyover allow users to take a close 3D look at the areas, zooming in on important buildings and landmarks.

Flyover data for Yosemite National Park comes as Apple prepares to launch OS X Yosemite, the newest version of its Mac operating system. As of OS X 10.9 Mavericks, Apple began naming its operating system updates after major California landmarks and with OS X Yosemite set to be released to the public later this year, it makes sense to add Yosemite's Flyover data to Maps.

With the addition of two new locations, Apple now provides Flyover data on more than 90 parks and cities around the world, with a full list available on its iOS 7 Feature website.

Over the last several months, Apple has been hard at work improving its Maps app. Users have reported significant improvements in Apple Maps data, with errors being fixed quickly and new Points of Interest popping up. Apple also made notable updates to Maps in China, Japan, and other countries earlier this year.

Article Link: Yosemite National Park and Wellington, New Zealand Added to Apple Maps Flyover Feature
MacRumors is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 19, 2014, 02:49 PM   #2
ricci
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: NYC
Another step In The right direction ! Truth is, a great mapping software takes years! Apple is still a few years away, I think!
ricci is offline   3 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 19, 2014, 02:56 PM   #3
LaurieF
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Wellington
Send a message via AIM to LaurieF
Smile It's true!

I can see my back deck.

41.25361s 174.76555e
LaurieF is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 19, 2014, 03:12 PM   #4
darknater
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Still no Wash DC

and still no Washington DC...
darknater is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 19, 2014, 03:14 PM   #5
smellalot
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
I'm sorry but:
Street View - very useful
Flyover - gimmicky.
smellalot is offline   9 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 19, 2014, 03:19 PM   #6
Crzyrio
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by smellalot View Post
I'm sorry but:
Street View - very useful
Flyover - gimmicky.
If you zoom in far enough with FlyOver you get a much better understanding of the area your looking and it is easier to look at.

StreetView is only nice for seeing the name of stores/numbers etc.
Crzyrio is offline   9 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 19, 2014, 03:40 PM   #7
Futurix
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: London
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crzyrio View Post
If you zoom in far enough with FlyOver you get a much better understanding of the area your looking and it is easier to look at.

StreetView is only nice for seeing the name of stores/numbers etc.
Street View is way better for pedestrians and cyclists - you can actually see some real detail. FlyOver is of course somwhat useful for drivers (I suspect Apple is being US-centric again) and also a great visual candy for advertising / new product introductions.
Futurix is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 19, 2014, 04:34 PM   #8
Doctor Q
Administrator
 
Doctor Q's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles
We'll have an interesting flyover to admire once Mac OS X 10.12 Death Valley comes out!
__________________
Oh do pay attention 007. In the wrong hands, this cylindrical 12-core Mac Pro with three 4K displays, FirePro graphics, and Thunderbolt 2 could be very dangerous.
Doctor Q is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 19, 2014, 05:46 PM   #9
69Mustang
macrumors 6502a
 
69Mustang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: In between a rock and a hard place
Quote:
Originally Posted by Futurix View Post
Street View is way better for pedestrians and cyclists - you can actually see some real detail. FlyOver is of course somwhat useful for drivers (I suspect Apple is being US-centric again) and also a great visual candy for advertising / new product introductions.
Genuinely curious. I have no dog in the fight. How would Flyover be useful for drivers? Don't pedestrians, cyclists, and drivers have the same POV?

__________________
I own products from Apple, Samsung, Google, MS, and a ton of other companies. All of it works and does exactly what I want it to do. Personal use case. Nothing else matters.
69Mustang is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 19, 2014, 05:48 PM   #10
Nevaborn
macrumors 6502a
 
Nevaborn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Yet my city is about 7 years old and hugely outdated. With major housing estates, a completely redesigned city centre with new shopping complex and completely new road networks.
__________________
(>^^)> *** A Wild Kirby Appeared ***
Nevaborn is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 19, 2014, 06:33 PM   #11
mw360
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by 69Mustang View Post
Genuinely curious. I have no dog in the fight. How would Flyover be useful for drivers? Don't pedestrians, cyclists, and drivers have the same POV?

I didn't really understand that either. it doesn't matter what mode of transport you're using, what matters is exactly what information you need.

If you need to see a particular address, say a house or office, so you'll recognise it when you arrive, then Street view is great.

But if you want to find parking spaces, or back alley shortcuts for pedestrians or cycles, or you want to plan an itinerary visiting landmarks, or you want to find a place you once visited but don't remember the address, Flyover is much, much quicker.
mw360 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 19, 2014, 06:52 PM   #12
mw360
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevaborn View Post
Yet my city is about 7 years old and hugely outdated. With major housing estates, a completely redesigned city centre with new shopping complex and completely new road networks.
Yeah, these stories aren't really necessary. Coverage maps are available from the mapping suppliers showing how recent their imagery is. Here's one of the UK, where you can see, unsurprisingly, they don't scan the entire country in the space of a year. You just have to wait until your turn comes around again. If it ever does.

http://www1.getmapping.com/Support/A...raphy-Coverage
mw360 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 19, 2014, 09:01 PM   #13
anarchos
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Malaysia/ New Zealand
Quote:
Originally Posted by smellalot View Post
I'm sorry but:
Street View - very useful
Flyover - gimmicky.
Not true. I use Flyover extensively to plan my cityscapes photoshoot.
anarchos is offline   3 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 19, 2014, 10:33 PM   #14
nagromme
macrumors G5
 
nagromme's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crzyrio View Post
If you zoom in far enough with FlyOver you get a much better understanding of the area your looking and it is easier to look at.

StreetView is only nice for seeing the name of stores/numbers etc.
I wish it was nice for that! Those signs are too rarely legible.

I originally though Street View was great for figuring out super-local details like which driveway goes with which building, or which doorway goes into which business. And I thought Flyover was just a super-cool gimmick that I'd play with and forget.

In reality--since my city DOES have flyover (and I appreciate that that doesn't help everyone) I use it all the time, and it does what street view used to do, only MUCH BETTER.

Street view: your view is directly at the familiar street level perspective, and will look just the way you expect when you're there in person. Nice!

But...

- Your view is often in the wrong lane, taking the "familiar" advantage away.

- It's often blurred and smeared beyond recognition, noisy, poor contrast, and obscured by lens flares, so you can't read most of the signs you need anyway. I was just trying to use it again this morning and gave up in disgust. What a mess (not always but FAR too often).

And...

Flyover view is WAY FASTER and WAY EASIER TO NAVIGATE.

Street View is such an awful experience (including terrible desktop navigation controls). Turn... turn some more... adjust... click to move forward... wait for loading... look around... oops, went down the wrong way... turn around again... turn some more... tap back where you came from... loading delay... turn again... click again... loading delay... can't quite see what I want... try a little farther ahead... loading delay... wish I could back up just a little... but I can't, I'm stuck with nodes 40 feet apart... give up.

Compare to Flyover: you can navigate instantly and smoothly using the SAME panning/zooming controls as 2D maps. It's not a separatre, awkward mode. It just works.

And you can easlly see the lay of the land, the driveways, etc. that Street View could show you. Not perfectly, but not worse either--just different. It turns out that the human brain actually has no trouble recognizing a place from an angle 50 feet in the air.

Try this experiment: find a square block of your city, and pretend you know a restaurant is in that area, and you know what it looks like but you don't remember the name. Now take a "walk" around that block, all the way around and back, four turns, in Street View. Now try it in Flyover.

No contest. You can spot the place in a few seconds in Flyover. With Street View you will spend minutes, and that's not counting the time you need to go get a shot of whisky to survive the hassle.

I hope Apple keeps bringing Flyover to more and more urban areas. For a landmark, it’s a gimmick. For a neighborhood, it’s awesome.
nagromme is offline   4 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 19, 2014, 11:01 PM   #15
KiwiAdventure
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: New Zealand
It's not much good when you cannot use Siri for locations in New Zealand. Apple mapping would have to be the biggest stuff up Apple has produced.
KiwiAdventure is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 20, 2014, 12:46 AM   #16
a0me
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Tokyo, Japan
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crzyrio View Post
If you zoom in far enough with FlyOver you get a much better understanding of the area your looking and it is easier to look at.

StreetView is only nice for seeing the name of stores/numbers etc.
But then again, the Satellite/Earth view in Google Maps is usually better than Flyover as it covers the whole world (Flyover is limited to 30-40 cities or so) and it's generally updated more often.
__________________
iMac 24"; MacBook Pro 15"; iPhone 4; iPhone 5s; iPod touch; tv
a0me is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 20, 2014, 01:03 AM   #17
ReanimationN
macrumors 6502a
 
ReanimationN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Australia
Quote:
Originally Posted by KiwiAdventure View Post
It's not much good when you cannot use Siri for locations in New Zealand. Apple mapping would have to be the biggest stuff up Apple has produced.
At least you can see the cake tin in flyover though! That's what's important, right?
__________________
2013 13" Retina MacBook Pro, 2.6GHz Core i5, 8GB RAM, 512GB HD, Windows 8 x64. iPad Air 64GB. 2013 Google Nexus 7 32GB. iPhone 5 32GB.
ReanimationN is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 20, 2014, 01:25 AM   #18
nagromme
macrumors G5
 
nagromme's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Quote:
Originally Posted by a0me View Post
But then again, the Satellite/Earth view in Google Maps is usually better than Flyover as it covers the whole world (Flyover is limited to 30-40 cities or so) and it's generally updated more often.
Actually, Apple Maps has satellite imagery and 3D terrain for the entire globe. FlyOver kicks in when available, offering greater 3D detail.

So Apple has both--and you don't even have to think about or enable anything (unlike the special mode that is Street View).
nagromme is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 20, 2014, 01:40 AM   #19
fawlty
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: New Zealand
Quote:
Originally Posted by KiwiAdventure View Post
It's not much good when you cannot use Siri for locations in New Zealand. Apple mapping would have to be the biggest stuff up Apple has produced.
It's way better than it was.

"How far to Auckland?"
"Guide me to Palmerston North"
"Rotorua"

All that's missing are restaurants and businesses, right?
fawlty is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 20, 2014, 02:36 AM   #20
AxoNeuron
macrumors 6502a
 
AxoNeuron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: The Left Coast
Quote:
Originally Posted by smellalot View Post
I'm sorry but:
Street View - very useful
Flyover - gimmicky.
That's not true. If you're walking in a crowded urban area it can be very useful and awesome. And it can be good for driving to a building in a crowded area you've never been to before.
__________________
Not happy with a congress that has been bought and paid for by corporate America? Then vote against any congressman that takes money from lobbyists, Super PAC's, and businesses. http://mayday.us
AxoNeuron is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 20, 2014, 03:55 AM   #21
a0me
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Tokyo, Japan
Quote:
Originally Posted by nagromme View Post
Actually, Apple Maps has satellite imagery and 3D terrain for the entire globe. FlyOver kicks in when available, offering greater 3D detail.
I am talking about the tilt view in Google Maps which give you something similar to Flyover for the entire globe, with usually more recent imagery.
Flyover does indeed offer greater 3D details (most of the time) but it's only available in a few cities around major landmarks, while Google Maps offer it everywhere.
__________________
iMac 24"; MacBook Pro 15"; iPhone 4; iPhone 5s; iPod touch; tv
a0me is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 20, 2014, 04:20 AM   #22
peterdevries
macrumors 68020
 
peterdevries's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Amsterdam, The Netherlands come onnnnnnnn
__________________
Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
peterdevries is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 20, 2014, 05:36 AM   #23
roadbloc
macrumors 604
 
roadbloc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: UK
There is still a non-existant bank down my road. Maybe in a few decades Apple will be ready to roll maps out of beta.
__________________
roadbloc is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 20, 2014, 06:17 AM   #24
Keane16
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by smellalot View Post
I'm sorry but:
Street View - very useful
Flyover - gimmicky.
I'm sorry too, because for me they're both useful.
  • Flyover for its speed.
  • Streetview for detail.

I was recently in Rome for the first time (beautiful city) and Flyover was my main navigation tool when wandering the streets. Streetview is great for intricate detail but navigation would've been too slow when on the go.

Like I say though, they're both useful in different situations, no need to pick and choose - we have access to both on iOS.
Keane16 is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 20, 2014, 07:39 AM   #25
RightMACatU
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: 192.168.1.1
I just love this stuff...
RightMACatU is offline   0 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > iOS Blog Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:45 AM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC