Go Back   MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Aug 19, 2014, 02:39 PM   #1
MacRumors
macrumors bot
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
4.7-Inch iPhone 6 Screen Put Under Microscope as New 1472 x 828 Resolution Emerges




Amid rumors of both 4.7-inch and 5.5-inch versions of the iPhone 6, speculation about what resolutions Apple will use for the new devices has generated a number of different theories. The most concrete suggestion so far has been a 1704 x 960 resolution that could see the current "2x" Retina display move to an even sharper "3x" display.

A new photo from Russian luxury modified iPhone vendor Feld & Volk [Instagram page] now shows the display of the 4.7-inch iPhone 6 under a microscope, with the firm telling MacRumors the panel does indeed carry a resolution of 1704 x 960.

The photograph posted by Feld & Volk does not, however, necessarily appear to agree with that claim, as it seems to show roughly 13 pixels per mm in the horizontal and vertical directions, while a 4.7-inch display at 1704 x 960 should be closer to 16 pixels per mm. The current iPhone 5s display is roughly 10.5 pixels per mm.

A potential answer to this problem arrives in another report today from 9to5Mac, which has discovered references to yet another resolution of 1472 x 828 within recent Xcode 6 beta releases.
Quote:
This particular file outlines for the system where icons, by default, will be placed on an iPhone's Home screen. This particular file, which was added in Xcode 6 beta 5 earlier this month and still exists in yesterday's Xcode 6 beta 6, is optimized for an iPhone with a resolution of 414 (width) x 736 (height). The iPhone SDK parses hardware resolutions via "point values," so the actual "Retina" resolution is in fact double (or potentially triple) whatever numbers the SDK presents.
While analysis quickly becomes speculative, one way Apple could use both of these rumored resolutions would be to to launch a 4.7-inch iPhone at 1472 x 828 and a 5.5-inch model at 1704 x 960. In that scenario, both iPhone 6 models would have pixel densities of 355-360 pixels per inch. This translates to roughly 14 pixels per mm in each direction, close to what is seen in the Feld & Volk photograph.

Depending on how the rumored 4.7-inch and 5.5-inch sizes have been rounded for convenience, the two iPhone 6 panels could actually offer the exact same pixel density, slightly higher than current iPhones and allowing for efficiencies in the manufacturing process if the same technologies and production methods are used in the two new models.

Apple is expected to introduce the iPhone 6 at a media event on September 9, but it remains unclear whether the company plans to show off both models at the same time, and even it does, there have been rumors that the larger model should ship up to several months later than the smaller version.

Article Link: 4.7-Inch iPhone 6 Screen Put Under Microscope as New 1472 x 828 Resolution Emerges
MacRumors is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 19, 2014, 02:41 PM   #2
SgtPepper12
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
I know a more precise method which involves a ruler and a laser pointer.
SgtPepper12 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 19, 2014, 02:42 PM   #3
LostMyiPhone
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Can't wait to not be able to tell the difference!!
LostMyiPhone is offline   59 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 19, 2014, 02:43 PM   #4
Milese3
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Southampton - United Kingdom
Hmm. I was hoping to see a resolution higher than that- I guess time will tell. I thought it'd make more sense to go with a x3 resolution.
__________________
iMac - Late 2013 (Maxed) - OS X Yosemite Developer Preview (Build 7)
iPhone 6 Plus - 64GB, Space Grey
Milese3 is offline   5 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 19, 2014, 02:43 PM   #5
maflynn
Moderator
 
maflynn's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Boston
Cool as we get closer to Sept, I'm getting more excited
__________________
~Mike Flynn
maflynn is online now   3 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 19, 2014, 02:44 PM   #6
MacSince1990
In Time-Out
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by SgtPepper12 View Post
I know a more precise method which involves a ruler and a laser pointer.
Not sure why they bother with this stuff. Just count the number of pixels and do the damn math.

Anyway, this will be helpful. Viewing web pages is often annoying on the 5.
MacSince1990 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 19, 2014, 02:44 PM   #7
farewelwilliams
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
What is Phil Schiller going to talk about on stage?
farewelwilliams is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 19, 2014, 02:44 PM   #8
Nungster
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by Milese3 View Post
Hmm. I was hoping to see a resolution higher than that- I guess time will tell. I thought it'd make more sense to go with a x3 resolution.
I wish I could "see" a resolution higher than that! Alas, age has caught up with my eyes.
Nungster is offline   12 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 19, 2014, 02:45 PM   #9
Radio
In Time-Out
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Central California
Hoping for non yellow tint screen this time around !
Radio is offline   9 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 19, 2014, 02:47 PM   #10
Razeus
macrumors 68040
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
1080p or don't even bother.
Razeus is offline   36 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 19, 2014, 02:47 PM   #11
Northgrove
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
I honestly think a full 3x resolution would be a waste of RAM and disk space. I certainly don't go around thinking, "man, I wish this one was a 1080p or 960p display, it's kind of blurry". But sure, it's not that I would complain if Apple would provide 3x resolution and it not affecting performance whatsoever. I don't see how a CPU bump alone would do the trick though. Pushing around 50% larger graphics all over the place tend to depend on more things than that.
__________________
iPhone 5 rMBP 15" (2012)
Northgrove is offline   6 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 19, 2014, 02:48 PM   #12
Anti-Lucifer
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Not quite 1080p, not quite 2014 technology either. these are daft screen resolution for something to be released in 2014.
Anti-Lucifer is offline   11 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 19, 2014, 02:49 PM   #13
Armen
macrumors 68030
 
Armen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Los Angeles
Quote:
Originally Posted by maflynn View Post
Cool as we get closer to Sept, I'm getting more excited
Why was I under the impression that you had a Windows Phone as your daily driver?
__________________
iPhone 5 32GB Black (A1429); Mid 2013 Macbook Pro 8GB, 500GB; iPad Mini, 1st Gen Apple TV
Armen is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 19, 2014, 02:49 PM   #14
Anti-Lucifer
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nungster View Post
I wish I could "see" a resolution higher than that! Alas, age has caught up with my eyes.
Right...when apple gives you sub 720p for the past 7 years, you say you can't tell the difference. When they give you 3X the pixels now you guys say it's all great. Lol, these numbers are just really daft.
Anti-Lucifer is offline   3 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 19, 2014, 02:50 PM   #15
AppleMactablet
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
In that scenario, both iPhone 6 models would have pixel densities of 355-360 pixels per inch...Meanwhile the Note 4's panel will sport a 515ppiI dont about u but I can actual tell a 300ppi vs a 450+ppi panel
__________________
20th Anniversary Mac, Hockey Puck" mouse, Pippin, 3rd Gen. iPod shuffle, Power Mac G4 Cube, and Ping
AppleMactablet is offline   10 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 19, 2014, 02:51 PM   #16
dlewis23
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
414 x 736 is such an odd res to have to update apps. Nothing is going to be same size.
__________________
SpeedSmart - The ultimate iOS speed test utility
FireFile.io - Cloud storage for all
dlewis23 is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 19, 2014, 02:51 PM   #17
Bibgibs
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by Anti-Lucifer View Post
Not quite 1080p, not quite 2014 technology either. these are daft screen resolution for something to be released in 2014.
1080p is so 1995. Why not higher?
Bibgibs is offline   11 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 19, 2014, 02:51 PM   #18
usamaah
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by Anti-Lucifer View Post
Not quite 1080p, not quite 2014 technology either. these are daft screen resolution for something to be released in 2014.
Oh you know Apple, it will say that there is no perceivable improvement. I disagree but some will agree so it'll work out for them.

Truth is people will buy an iPhone for all the other stuff you get with it, very few would refuse to buy an iPhone because the resolution isn't 1080p, so they're safe.

This is smart for app compatibility and also making it easier for the phone's graphics chip to not be burdened with higher resolutions, having to run it faster/hotter and thus killing battery life.

TL;DR -- this is what we all expected, and it's probably for the best
usamaah is offline   4 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 19, 2014, 02:51 PM   #19
Anti-Lucifer
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by Northgrove View Post
I honestly think a full 3x resolution would be a waste of RAM and disk space. I certainly don't go around thinking, "man, I wish this one was a 1080p or 960p display, it's kind of blurry". But sure, it's not that I would complain if Apple would provide 3x resolution and it not affecting performance whatsoever. I don't see how a CPU bump alone would do the trick though.
It won't even matter, apple is so far ahead of the curve when it comes to their GPU performance. Apple is always king when it comes to GPU performance but then you can always argue it's not 1080p so technically it doesn't even break a sweat in the GPU dept.

Android is always far behind in GPU performance; well, except for the nVidia K1
Anti-Lucifer is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 19, 2014, 02:52 PM   #20
DoctorKrabs
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
This is what I've been waiting for.
DoctorKrabs is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 19, 2014, 02:52 PM   #21
Milese3
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Southampton - United Kingdom
Quote:
Originally Posted by AppleMactablet View Post
In that scenario, both iPhone 6 models would have pixel densities of 355-360 pixels per inch...Meanwhile the Note 4's panel will sport a 515ppiI dont about u but I can actual tell a 300ppi vs a 450+ppi panel
Colour accuracy- maybe. However, with both resolutions pixels are too small for the eye to see, therefore the difference is minimal.
__________________
iMac - Late 2013 (Maxed) - OS X Yosemite Developer Preview (Build 7)
iPhone 6 Plus - 64GB, Space Grey
Milese3 is offline   5 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 19, 2014, 02:53 PM   #22
Anti-Lucifer
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bibgibs View Post
1080p is so 1995. Why not higher?
You need to address this question to apple. Of course they need more iPhoneX models each year to milk from you kool-aid lovers!
Anti-Lucifer is offline   4 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 19, 2014, 02:54 PM   #23
chrmjenkins
macrumors 603
 
chrmjenkins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: CA
While it does increase the burden on developers, it's better to not have extra resolution that the eye cannot distinguish. It would just waste power and be harder to yield.
__________________
Read my Apple A8, iPhone 6 preview and prediction thread here: http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=1770411
Twitter: @anexanhume
chrmjenkins is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 19, 2014, 02:56 PM   #24
Milese3
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Southampton - United Kingdom
Mind you- the resolution is still better than the 720p found on the Samsung Galaxy Alpha.
__________________
iMac - Late 2013 (Maxed) - OS X Yosemite Developer Preview (Build 7)
iPhone 6 Plus - 64GB, Space Grey
Milese3 is offline   10 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 19, 2014, 02:56 PM   #25
callea
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Italy
Quote:
Originally Posted by AppleMactablet View Post
In that scenario, both iPhone 6 models would have pixel densities of 355-360 pixels per inch...Meanwhile the Note 4's panel will sport a 515ppiI dont about u but I can actual tell a 300ppi vs a 450+ppi panel
Samsung will probably use a pentile matrix !
callea is offline   1 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:04 AM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC