Register FAQ/Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to the Mac Forums forums. Please read the FAQ if you have questions. Register to participate.

 
Go Back   Mac Forums > Archive > Archives of Old Posts > MacRumors News Discussion (archive)
TouchArcade.com - iPhone Game Reviews and News

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Jan 31, 2006, 01:42 PM   #1
MacRumors
macrumors bot
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Intel iMac CPU Swappable?

http://www.macrumors.com/images/macrumorsthreadlogo.gif

Xlr8yourmac provides a reader report on a recent article in MacFan magazine (Japanese). According to the report, the Intel iMac Core Duo CPU is mounted in the standard Intel socket, making it replaceable. As a test, a 1.83GHz iMac's CPU was swapped out for a 2GHz one:

Quote:
However, the author is not sure that it will run completely normally with an upgraded CPU. The author purchased a 2GHz T2500 from a PC shop and installed it in the socket of a 17" iMac and it booted OK. There seemed to be no problems and the About this Mac pane reported a 2GHz duo chip.
The cost of such a minor upgrade ($480 for a 2GHz chip) doesn't make sense at this time but does offer more of a upgrade path than previously available on the iMac.

Last edited by Doctor Q : Jan 31, 2006 at 02:17 PM.
MacRumors is offline  
Old Jan 31, 2006, 01:45 PM   #2
jacobj
macrumors 6502a
 
jacobj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Jersey
The big question is whether this is true of the MacBook Pro? Well for me anyway.
__________________
"Insanity in individuals is something rare - but in groups, parties, nations and epochs, it is the rule" - Friedrich Nietzsche
jacobj is offline  
Old Jan 31, 2006, 01:46 PM   #3
Mord
macrumors 601
 
Mord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: People's Republic of Yorkshire
Send a message via AIM to Mord
all pentium m notebooks that i have peaked inside have sockets, it'd be sweet if you could buy an ibook/mini and upgrade it with a T2500 or something.
__________________
Consider the lily.
Mord is offline  
Old Jan 31, 2006, 01:47 PM   #4
matthewHUB
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Sounds interesting... not.

M
matthewHUB is offline  
Old Jan 31, 2006, 01:48 PM   #5
yg17
macrumors Demi-God
 
yg17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: St. Louis, MO
Quote:
Originally Posted by matthewHUB
Sounds interesting... not.

M

Considering how Macs have always had VERY limited support for processor upgrades, this is very interesting
__________________
2.66 GHz quad core Mac Pro, 3 GB RAM, 2x500GB WD Black (RAID0),
2x1TB WD Black (RAID1), LG Blu-Ray Burner, GT120, Dell U2410
13" Unibody MacBook 2.4 GHz
120 GB iPod Classic; 16 GB iPhone 3G
yg17 is online now  
Old Jan 31, 2006, 01:49 PM   #6
The Red Wolf
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Occi Dens Pacifica
Pity...

Seems a good idea. But opening the G5 iMac as well as the iMac Duo is a level 3 task. They're not designed to be user friendly. Save for the "Hay if you can install ram and have a screwdriver, go for it!" slot on the bottom of the machine. The previous generation G5 iMac was quite lovely. The newer version is a bit of a hassle. The iMac Duo is hideous Intel Northbridge/Southbridge madness all shoved in and snapped inside the beautiful case.

Am I happy it's upgradable? Sure. Do I want to? No. And what happens when you install a chip with onboard memory rather than memory on the mainboard?

Le sigh.
__________________
Grimorium_000.0 - 2.33 GHz 15" MacBook Pro
System_000.0 - 2.26 GHz 3X GT120 + 1 X 4870 MacPro
Demeter_000.0 - 8GB iPhone
The Red Wolf is offline  
Old Jan 31, 2006, 01:50 PM   #7
Chaszmyr
macrumors Demi-God
 
Chaszmyr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Boulder, CO
Send a message via AIM to Chaszmyr
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hector
all pentium m notebooks that i have peaked inside have sockets, it'd be sweet if you could buy an ibook/mini and upgrade it with a T2500 or something.
You couldn't. The version of the Yonah used in the iMac is higher voltage than the one in the MacBook Pro. Even if/when higher performance low voltage chips come out, I'm not sure I'd want to mess with the thermal management in the MacBook Pro.
Chaszmyr is offline  
Old Jan 31, 2006, 01:54 PM   #8
Mord
macrumors 601
 
Mord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: People's Republic of Yorkshire
Send a message via AIM to Mord
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chaszmyr
You couldn't. The version of the Yonah used in the iMac is higher voltage than the one in the MacBook Pro. Even if/when higher performance low voltage chips come out, I'm not sure I'd want to mess with the thermal management in the MacBook Pro.
no both are T designated chips, if the ibook and mini use L designated chips you could still update them to L2400's
__________________
Consider the lily.
Mord is offline  
Old Jan 31, 2006, 01:54 PM   #9
Detlev
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Let the real rumors begin. Some companies do things like that as a strategic move. First, who thinks it's real? Second, who thinks it's a good move?
Detlev is offline  
Old Jan 31, 2006, 01:55 PM   #10
p0intblank
macrumors 68020
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: New Jersey, USA
Send a message via AIM to p0intblank
This is pretty cool for Mac users to hear. We have always been pretty limited when it comes to swapping CPUs. This may not have been a big swap, but it's a start.
p0intblank is offline  
Old Jan 31, 2006, 01:56 PM   #11
GFLPraxis
macrumors 601
 
GFLPraxis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
This is great- we can upgrade an iMac for as long as Intel uses that socket.

Somehow, some way, somebody will rate this negative, however.
__________________
Nintendo Players - the Ultimate Nintendo Resource
MacBook CD/2GHz/2GB/160GB/SD
Hackintosh Core 2 Quad/2.4 GHz/4GB/660GB/8800GT
16 GB iPhone
GFLPraxis is offline  
Old Jan 31, 2006, 01:57 PM   #12
Multimedia
Banned
 
Multimedia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Santa Cruz CA, Silicon Beach
Send a message via AIM to Multimedia Send a message via Yahoo to Multimedia Send a message via Skype™ to Multimedia
I wonder about heat

Thinking maybe when you put one in that's too fast - IE HOT for the slower cooling system, perhaps it will fry intself? But maybe not as the processors may have "auto shut or slow down before frying myself" firmware built in. Anyone know?

Last edited by Multimedia : Jan 31, 2006 at 02:12 PM.
Multimedia is offline  
Old Jan 31, 2006, 01:58 PM   #13
Yvan256
macrumors 68040
 
Yvan256's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Canada
What I want is a swappable GPU/VRAM option for all computers. Isn't there some mini-PCI standard for videocards in laptops? Something invented by AMD?

AMD? Oh wait, they're not Intel... Never mind.
__________________
Mac mini Core 2 Duo 1.83 GHz/2.5 GiB, Mac mini G4 1.42 GHz/1 GiB, 12" PowerBook G4 1.5 GHz/512 MiB, iPod touch 16 GiB, silver iPod shuffle 1 GiB.
Yvan256 is offline  
Old Jan 31, 2006, 01:59 PM   #14
shamino
macrumors 68040
 
shamino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Vienna, VA
Sounds great. But I'd be a bit concerned about cooling issues. A faster chip means more heat. At the least, the fans would spin faster. In the worst case, you may get overhating and instability.

The 20" model, although with a faster processor, also has more room for airflow than a 17" model.

It will be interesting to see how these upgraded iMacs do after a few months of heavy use.
__________________
In theory, theory is the same as practice. In practice, it isn't.
shamino is offline  
Old Jan 31, 2006, 01:59 PM   #15
combatcolin
macrumors 68020
 
combatcolin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Northants, UK
Quote:
Originally Posted by matthewHUB
Sounds interesting... not.

M
You are very, very wrong here.

"Please Welcome the Apple Mac to the land of the inexpensive PC upgrade."

Very, very good news - hopefully.
__________________
PC 24" Dell WS Monitor
500GB Lacie Triple
40 GB iPod, 1st gen iMac
Bought sister a 1.25Ghz eMac
Wide Aspect F810 Camera 1GB XD Card
combatcolin is offline  
Old Jan 31, 2006, 02:00 PM   #16
shamino
macrumors 68040
 
shamino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Vienna, VA
Quote:
Originally Posted by GFLPraxis
This is great- we can upgrade an iMac for as long as Intel uses that socket.
Of course, Intel is known for periodically changing sockets, even when it's not technically necessary. So this may not be the upgrade-path panacea you think.
__________________
In theory, theory is the same as practice. In practice, it isn't.
shamino is offline  
Old Jan 31, 2006, 02:02 PM   #17
nagromme
macrumors 601
 
nagromme's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Blinking blue dot
Cool!

I doubt you'll ever see official Apple support for an upgraded Mac, but you wouldn't need to do it during your warranty anyway.

And I think that any sales Apple loses this way (few: your everyday person doesn't DO CPU upgrades) will be minimal in the face of the coming surge in sales anyway.
__________________
nagromme
Would you like a treatment?
nagromme is offline  
Old Jan 31, 2006, 02:06 PM   #18
Glen Quagmire
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: UK
Quote:
Originally Posted by Multimedia
Thinking maybe when you put one in that's too fast for the slower cooling system, perhaps it will fry intself?
Well, it's still a laptop chip, so it won't put out that much more heat. If Apple have built the thing properly, the iMac will have temperature sensitive fans to preclude this from being an issue.
Glen Quagmire is offline  
Old Jan 31, 2006, 02:06 PM   #19
t^3
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Corvallis, OR
Quote:
Originally Posted by shamino
Of course, Intel is known for periodically changing sockets, even when it's not technically necessary. So this may not be the upgrade-path panacea you think.
Yes, and also periodically requiring new chipsets or motherboard support for newer processors, even with the same sockets.
__________________
15.4" MacBook Pro Core Duo 2.0GHz, 2GB RAM, 200GB 7200 rpm HD
8GB Black iPod nano, 10GB 3G iPod
t^3 is offline  
Old Jan 31, 2006, 02:08 PM   #20
neonart
macrumors 65816
 
neonart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Near a Mac.
This is really great news!

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Red Wolf
Seems a good idea. But opening the G5 iMac as well as the iMac Duo is a level 3 task. They're not designed to be user friendly. Save for the "Hay if you can install ram and have a screwdriver, go for it!" slot on the bottom of the machine. The previous generation G5 iMac was quite lovely. The newer version is a bit of a hassle. The iMac Duo is hideous Intel Northbridge/Southbridge madness all shoved in and snapped inside the beautiful case.

Am I happy it's upgradable? Sure. Do I want to? No. And what happens when you install a chip with onboard memory rather than memory on the mainboard?

Le sigh.
I totally understand Red Wolf here, but I think it's still great news. This means that for those of us who don't care how hard it is to open a machine, now it's actually doable.
I have 3 iMac 400's at my shop that would benefit from a speed bump for their basic tasks, but it's just not possible. If a processor upgrade was available I'd do it in a heartbeat. Same for my Powerbook and iBook.
Up to now only the G4 & G3 towers and old beige macs are upgradeable. Even at the relatively higher cost of those upgrades, they've allowed many to keep their G4's for half a decade running very well.
Once these chips make it to newegg.com, zipzoomfly.com, outpost.com, Fry's, Microcenter, etc., it's going to be more affordable (and yes easier) than ever to upgrade iMacs (and MacBooks I assume). Hopefully the rest of the Apple line goes this way!

And hopefully for others who feel like Red Wolf Apple makes the case designs a little easier to get into.

BTW, what if the new Mini's can be upgraded from a Core Solos to a Core Duos. Does anyone know if this is even a possibility?
__________________
MBP 2.4Ghz • 4GB • 250GB
Panasonic L1 • Leica 25 ƒ1.4 • Leica 14-50 ƒ2.8-3.5 • Leica 14-150 ƒ3.5-5.6 • Zuiko 35 ƒ3.5 • Zuiko 70-300 ƒ4-5.6 • FL-36R
neonart is offline  
Old Jan 31, 2006, 02:09 PM   #21
Lord Blackadder
macrumors 601
 
Lord Blackadder's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Sod off
This might signal the beginning of the end of the specialist Mac CPU upgrade vendors like PowerLogix, Daystar, Sonnet and OWC...

But I'm not necessarily weeping. The thought of being able to upgrade my CPU with a selection of off-the-shelf processors is pretty exciting.
__________________
Digital Audio G4 w/OWC 1.4GHz/1GB/2x250GB SATA/Pioneer DVR-107D/GeForce6800GT/Panther/2005FPW 20.1"
Oh, God, God, God! What on earth was I drinking last night? My head feels like there's a Frenchman living in it. - Edmund Blackadder
Lord Blackadder is offline  
Old Jan 31, 2006, 02:10 PM   #22
kwajo.com
macrumors 6502a
 
kwajo.com's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Bay of Fundy
Send a message via ICQ to kwajo.com Send a message via MSN to kwajo.com
great news, though I would rather hear that someone has come out with upgrades for G5 Powermacs
__________________
My Time on the Tropical Island of Newfoundland: http://gallery.mac.com/darkharbour/
kwajo.com is offline  
Old Jan 31, 2006, 02:10 PM   #23
Macmaniac
macrumors 68040
 
Macmaniac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: A tiny spec in the "Garden State", 1 square mile in area, somewhere on the outskirts of town by the railroad tracks
Very excited about this! This is great news, I had a feeling as soon as I saw the first Intel iMacs I was sure that the proc was upgradable. This is cool, I hope the MacBook can be upgraded as well
__________________
The customer is NOT always right
Macmaniac is offline  
Old Jan 31, 2006, 02:12 PM   #24
asphalt-proof
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Magrathea
The real advantage to this will be seen in a couple of years. When the first Macintel's get old and their AppleCare warranty is done. Pop in a new processor and you have a new machine!! Now if only the GPU were upgradeable. Seriously this is great news for people who like to keep ahold of their machines. Also, this could have the effect of lowering the prices of new macs. Why upgrade to a whole new machine every two or three years when you can pop in a $200 or so new CPU? Apple may need to lower prices of their machines in order to make it attractive to upgrade. Just my .02$
__________________
"Shoot the ones with swords first"
asphalt-proof is offline  
Old Jan 31, 2006, 02:13 PM   #25
TheMasin9
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Wright State University
Send a message via AIM to TheMasin9
hummm

this is interesting, but i will have to see more proof that this is actually feasable, one user report is not entirely a stable basis of conclusion for me....
__________________
15" Powerbook G4 1.5 ghz
Mac Pro Dual Quad 2.8 ghz
Nikon D50
PSWii60 on my 42" lcd
TheMasin9 is offline  

 

Mac Forums > Archive > Archives of Old Posts > MacRumors News Discussion (archive)

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:05 PM.

Mac News | Mac Rumors | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2002-2009, MacRumors.com, LLC