Register FAQ / Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   MacRumors Forums > Archive > Archives of Old Posts > MacBytes.com News Discussion

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Jan 31, 2006, 07:08 PM   #1
MacBytes
macrumors bot
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Move to Intel a Security Non-Issue for Apple




Category: Opinion/Interviews
Link: Move to Intel a Security Non-Issue for Apple
Description:: Opinion: OS vulnerabilities are a result of OS characteristics, and the CPU they run on is pretty much irrelevant.

Posted on MacBytes.com
Approved by Mudbug
MacBytes is offline   0
Old Jan 31, 2006, 07:48 PM   #2
yankeefan24
macrumors 65816
 
yankeefan24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: NYC
Didn't we already know that???
__________________

MacBook "Black Edition"
23" ACD

Disclaimer: Never take facts I state in a post as totally 100% correct unless otherwise stated.
yankeefan24 is offline   0
Old Jan 31, 2006, 11:29 PM   #3
Dr. Dastardly
macrumors 65816
 
Dr. Dastardly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: I live in a giant bucket!
Quote:
Originally Posted by yankeefan24
Didn't we already know that???
No, everyone should have known that, big difference. If you go back through the forums when it was announced you'll actually be suprised with how many people thought by just a proc change there would be an onslaught of viruses.
__________________
"Real men FTP/SSH their files"
Dr. Dastardly is offline   0
Old Jan 31, 2006, 11:31 PM   #4
Eidorian
macrumors Penryn
 
Eidorian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cuidad de México
Send a message via AIM to Eidorian
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr. Dastardly
No, everyone should have known that, big difference. If you go back through the forums when it was announced you'll actually be suprised with how many people thought by just a proc change there would be an onslaught of viruses.
Ugh, I remember those posts too. It's a CPU, not an OS.
__________________
Core i5 750 / 16 GB RAM / 500 GB SSD / HD 7950 / Windows 8.1
76 Month Old MacBook
Eidorian is offline   0
Old Jan 31, 2006, 11:37 PM   #5
~Shard~
macrumors P6
 
~Shard~'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: 1123.6536.5321
Send a message via Skype™ to ~Shard~
Yep, glad the record is finally being set straight. And with this latest power leak due to a Windows driver bug, this is even more proof that Macs will not be subjected the same ailments that their Windows counterparts will.
__________________
My riches consist not in the extent of my possessions, but in the fewness of my wants.
- J. Brotherton
~Shard~ is offline   0
Old Feb 1, 2006, 07:51 AM   #6
cwtnospam
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Why did he have to repeat the marketshare myth?
Quote:
They weren't worth exploiting because there are a dearth of actual Mac systems out there,...
There are at least 30 million Macs in service, and the Symbian OS for cell phones got its first virus when it had just a few hundred (<500,000) thousand users. At that rate, the Mac OS should have at least 60 times as many viruses as the Symbian OS, but it has none. How can anyone believe the marketshare myth?
cwtnospam is offline   0
Old Feb 1, 2006, 07:58 AM   #7
AlmostThere
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: The royal throne of kings, the sceptred isle, the other Eden, the fortress built
Quote:
Originally Posted by cwtnospam
Why did he have to repeat the marketshare myth?

There are at least 30 million Macs in service, and the Symbian OS for cell phones got its first virus when it had just a few hundred (<500,000) thousand users. At that rate, the Mac OS should have at least 60 times as many viruses as the Symbian OS, but it has none. How can anyone believe the marketshare myth?
Please provide another, more likely explanation. Provably exploitable vulnerabilities exist but there is no implementation of malware. Why?

[edit] on the topic of symbian viruses, any chance of a reference? As far as I was aware, these all require active user intervention from untrustworthy sources i.e. comparable to entering a password on OS X
__________________
Join the army of the dead: http://www.urbandead.com

Last edited by AlmostThere; Feb 1, 2006 at 08:13 AM.
AlmostThere is offline   0
Old Feb 1, 2006, 09:13 AM   #8
~Shard~
macrumors P6
 
~Shard~'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: 1123.6536.5321
Send a message via Skype™ to ~Shard~
Quote:
Originally Posted by cwtnospam
Why did he have to repeat the marketshare myth?

There are at least 30 million Macs in service, and the Symbian OS for cell phones got its first virus when it had just a few hundred (<500,000) thousand users. At that rate, the Mac OS should have at least 60 times as many viruses as the Symbian OS, but it has none. How can anyone believe the marketshare myth?
Not the best example, but I see what you mean.

I think the simpler and more accurate example is that OS X is UNIX/FreeBSD. Plain and simple. UNIX is inherently secure, so the fact that there isn't a large install base of OS X (and therefore hackers must not want to waste their time developing exploits for it) is simply inaccurate and irrelevant. UNIX = security.
__________________
My riches consist not in the extent of my possessions, but in the fewness of my wants.
- J. Brotherton
~Shard~ is offline   0
Old Feb 1, 2006, 11:44 AM   #9
nagromme
macrumors G4
 
nagromme's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Absolutely Macs are a target for crackers. A BIG one, an ATTRACTIVE one, and a PROFITABLE one, and they have been for years.

OS X has been around for years, now--and it's partly based on technologies and OS's (BSD, NeXT) familiar to tech afficianados for even longer. Crackers of a certain type have sought challenges and prestige for years. Macs have been worth extra points in cracking contests for years. Users of other platforms have long felt jealousy toward Macs, and would love to take them down a peg. More so now than ever before, with the Mac platform finally starting to be seen as the success that it is. And some high-profile specific targets, like universities, media companies, scientific research labs, and the US Army, use Mac OS X. Then throw in the specific challenges and prizes that have been offered from time to time for the first real-world, succesful Mac OS X virus.

The incentives ARE there, in a big way. AS big an incentive as Windows? Overall, no--but in some ways (prestige for instance) the incentive is higher for OS X than for Windows.

And what makes people think crackers would have no interest in any target BUT the single biggest? They have more interest in Windows, but plenty of interest in other platforms too--UNIXes included. (Honda Accords, last I heard, are the most common target of theft. That doesn't make them the ONLY target.)

There are a LOT of unethical programmers in the world... some with a desire to do more than be a "script kiddie."

So it's a certainty that at least SOME people have been trying to make OS X viruses--for quite some time. They've never managed it yet, but they WILL.

Then we'll have one virus instead of zero... and I'll still be safer than a Windows user

I'll also note that the raw "number of vulnerabilities" is not an accurate picture of an OS's security. You also have to look at two other factors: how EXPLOITABLE each vulnerability is, and what can be DONE with it if it is exploited. For instance, many Mac "vulnerabilities" seem to require an attacker to physically sit down at your computer. That's still an important problem to address, but it does NOT help make a virus. And other exploits are limited to a single user account, unable to modify the system itself. So they too don't help make a successful virus.
nagromme is offline   0
Old Feb 2, 2006, 05:59 PM   #10
jhu
macrumors 6502a
 
jhu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Quote:
Originally Posted by nagromme
Absolutely Macs are a target for crackers. A BIG one, an ATTRACTIVE one, and a PROFITABLE one, and they have been for years.

OS X has been around for years, now--and it's partly based on technologies and OS's (BSD, NeXT) familiar to tech afficianados for even longer. Crackers of a certain type have sought challenges and prestige for years. Macs have been worth extra points in cracking contests for years. Users of other platforms have long felt jealousy toward Macs, and would love to take them down a peg. More so now than ever before, with the Mac platform finally starting to be seen as the success that it is. And some high-profile specific targets, like universities, media companies, scientific research labs, and the US Army, use Mac OS X. Then throw in the specific challenges and prizes that have been offered from time to time for the first real-world, succesful Mac OS X virus.

The incentives ARE there, in a big way. AS big an incentive as Windows? Overall, no--but in some ways (prestige for instance) the incentive is higher for OS X than for Windows.

And what makes people think crackers would have no interest in any target BUT the single biggest? They have more interest in Windows, but plenty of interest in other platforms too--UNIXes included. (Honda Accords, last I heard, are the most common target of theft. That doesn't make them the ONLY target.)
we're long past the days when virus writers wrote their malware for prestige. now they work for the mob or spammers and use zombified machines for distributed denial of service attacks to extort money from websites, gather import passwords, etc. this slashdot post sums things nicely. i think there was a wired article detailing how a website was blackmailed by a russian mob.
__________________
athlon 64 :: debian 4.0
pentium 3 :: debian 4.0
bcm5352 :: openwrt rc4
powerpc750 :: mac os x 10.4.8
powerpc603 :: netbsd 3.1
jhu is offline   0
Old Feb 2, 2006, 07:07 PM   #11
nagromme
macrumors G4
 
nagromme's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Crime/profit is the norm for viruses now, certainly. But it's not the ONLY reason people make a virus. Tomorrow's Kama Sutra worm is evidence of that.

And there's ample reason to target Macs other than prestige, too.
nagromme is offline   0


 
MacRumors Forums > Archive > Archives of Old Posts > MacBytes.com News Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Did Apple Do The Right Thing in Moving To Intel From PowerPC??? rashdown_online MacRumors.com News Discussion 502 Jun 25, 2008 10:21 PM
Are the rank titles gonna change now that Apple has moved to Intel? dotdotdot Site and Forum Feedback 32 Jun 16, 2005 01:23 AM
Why Apple needs to move to Intel Chips NOW! puffmarvin General Mac Discussion 68 Nov 18, 2002 05:35 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:32 AM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC