|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Which One? | |||
| iPhoto |
|
92 | 57.86% |
| Aperture |
|
61 | 38.36% |
| iView |
|
3 | 1.89% |
| Portfolio |
|
2 | 1.26% |
| Cumulus |
|
0 | 0% |
| Other (list) |
|
17 | 10.69% |
| Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 159. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Poll: iPhoto , Aperture, Or iView
What do you use to catalog your digital images?
I was using iPhoto 6, but today made the move to Aperture. I'm loving it so far, so many advanced features Apple's made so easy too use. It's truly amazing software - only in its first version.
__________________
MacBook Pro 15.4". 2.4Ghz. 4GB RAM. 30" Apple Cinema Display iPod touch 16GB, iPod shuffle 1G Weblog. |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#2 |
|
I've been using Extensis Portfolio but it's such a pain that it's easier to keep track of them on my own, most of the time.
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#3 |
|
i Use iPhoto, it is built for someone like me. I just want an easy way to load and view my images and tweak them a bit. I also like all the printing services, I use those quite a bit for presents, people love them.
__________________
2.4GHz BlackBook; 32gig iPad (3rd Gen), iPhone 5 16gig Black; Nikon D50; 60gig iPod Video; 40gig PS3 - wwooden |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#4 |
|
I use iPhoto. iPhoto 6 is great! I love the full screen editing.
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Currently, I use Adobe Bridge to browse my serious photography, and I just keep them managed in folders, but I'm trying out Adobe Lightroom. It seems pretty nice, but it's just a beta version, and from what I hear, the fully developed version will be nothing like what it is now. If I had the money, I'd try Aperture, but I don't, and I'm not extremely serious about my photography, so it's not anything I really need.
I use iPhoto for all my other non-raw photos, and I've got quite a few at that. Last I tried, my Canon S50's raw format wasn't supported by iPhoto, and I prefer to use Adobe Raw to open and manage them.
__________________
Hook 'em Horns! |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Portfolio for the client, Aperture for me.
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Almost same as iGary - Portfolio for clients, currently iView for me. I'll upgrade to Aperture once the kinks are ironed out.
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Aperture and Adobe Bridge for me. haven't decided which I like better
iPhoto for my P&S and camera phone junk
__________________
My Time on the Tropical Island of Newfoundland: http://gallery.mac.com/darkharbour/
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Was using Adobe Bridge until I purchased Aperture. Still getting used to Aperture but it's a very powerful program and I think it will more than meet my needs.
I also have downloaded the beta of Lightroom, but haven't played around in it too much yet, and after I installed iLife 06 experimented some with iPhoto, which up until now I had flat-out refused to use because of the limitations the earlier versions of the program had set on organization of one's images. I think I'll probably wind up using Aperture most of the time with iPhoto here-and-there for more casual shots.
__________________
"...and all watched over by machines of loving grace." --Richard Brautigan |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Quote:
__________________
Hook 'em Horns! |
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Quote:
__________________
MacBook Pro 15.4". 2.4Ghz. 4GB RAM. 30" Apple Cinema Display iPod touch 16GB, iPod shuffle 1G Weblog. |
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Public Poll... nice...
![]() I'm using iPhoto, for now. I'm not too happy about it, but it's there, it's convenient, and cheap... I probably will go for another solution later... so I'm most likely not upgrading to '06 anytime soon, (especially since the EDU price for iLife '06 is more than double what '05 used to be...)
__________________
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it; those who fail to learn history correctly... why, they are simply doomed. |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Quote:
|
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#14 |
|
I voted for Aperture. Though its a bit rough right now, maybe in version 2.0 they'll fix a lot of current problems (like the ability to sync the library with iPod Photo & Video, make it's library available for use in iApps' Media Browser etc.)
__________________
My WoW videos
21.5" iMac 2.5 GHz | 12 GB | 500 GB | Radeon 6750 13" MacBook Pro 2.4 GHz | 4 GB | 250 GB | GeForce 320m |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Quote:
I'm struggleing to keep more than 6 GB free on my iBook's 60 GB HD, and I've heard some horror stories about the size of some of the apps in iLife '06. So, until I can afford a new laptop (or a desktop, that can double as file server for our laptops) I'm probably gonna use iPhoto for organizing and Photoshop (or maybe even Seashore) for editing. Once I get a camera shooting RAW images, then the game changes...
__________________
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it; those who fail to learn history correctly... why, they are simply doomed. |
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Quote:
Once you start taking RAW photos, you're probably gonna need a lot more space than 60GB.
|
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#17 |
|
I bought Aperture, but don't use it due to the fact that it doesn't support my Fuji S2 or my Nikon D200
.Maybe there is a work-around for the S2, but right now I'm playing with the Adobe Lightroom beta and I personally think its pretty cool. |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#18 |
|
I'd like to know how Aperture compares to Lightroom. I only have lightroom so I can't speak for myself.
__________________
Because I'm an ahole.
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Me too, Jessica. I'd love to hear some comparisons. Anyway, as of now, I use iPhoto 6, but I am considering purchasing Aperture.
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#20 |
|
I currently use Aperture (love it 110%) and have played around with the Lightroom beta.
The Aperture interface seems cleaner and it handles RAW files faster. From what I've seen, Lightroom performs better on slower machines, and Aperture is the better performer on faster machines. (For both, more than 1GB RAM is a necessity.) 2GB of RAM can make up for a slower processor with digital photo editing.
__________________
Canon 1Ds Mk III • Canon 5D MkII 16-35mm f/2.8L II • 24-70mm f/2.8L • 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II 50mm f/1.2L • 85mm f/1.2L • 135mm f/2L • 300mm f/2.8L IS |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#21 | |
|
Quote:
__________________
Because I'm an ahole.
|
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#22 |
|
FileMaker Pro
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#23 |
|
lightroom for me
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#24 |
|
iPhoto + CS2 (though, to open RAW in CS2 i have to find the actual SRF in Finder ... iPhoto converts it to JPEG).
Anyone know if Aperature supports Sony's RAW format (SRF)? I wasnt to use Aperature, but i do so much compisiting i'm not sure i can justify the cost ... though with more (better?) RAW options in the front end i could cut out some compositing. peace | neut |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#25 | |
|
Quote:
I use Image capture to import the phots from the camera to a folder with a name like "2006_03_25". I'll delete the junk and then go to iPhoto and import the folder into iPhoto library. I tell it to copy the file into the library so now I have the files in two systems and so the files are backed up as part of the download/import process. Next I asign keywords, comments and rattings. and do a first pass at minor changes and crops. |
||
|
|
0
|
![]() |
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Does iPhoto Import or Link? | ben1257sb | Mac Applications and Mac App Store | 4 | Nov 19, 2011 10:32 AM |
| Photo Apps - Not Lightroom, iPhoto, Aperture, or Photoshop | BornToMac | Mac Applications and Mac App Store | 0 | Jan 12, 2011 03:47 PM |
| Poll: Which do you use most - iPhoto, Lightroom, or Aperture? | Grimace | Digital Photography | 57 | May 11, 2008 11:46 PM |
| iPhoto vs. Aperture vs. iView | sebpayne | Digital Photography | 17 | Jan 20, 2006 10:06 PM |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:21 AM.











.
Linear Mode

