Register FAQ / Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   MacRumors Forums > Special Interests > Visual Media > Digital Photography

View Poll Results: Which One?
iPhoto 92 57.86%
Aperture 61 38.36%
iView 3 1.89%
Portfolio 2 1.26%
Cumulus 0 0%
Other (list) 17 10.69%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 159. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Feb 1, 2006, 12:59 AM   #1
Glenn Wolsey
macrumors 65816
 
Glenn Wolsey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: New Zealand
Send a message via AIM to Glenn Wolsey Send a message via Skype™ to Glenn Wolsey
Poll: iPhoto , Aperture, Or iView

What do you use to catalog your digital images?

I was using iPhoto 6, but today made the move to Aperture. I'm loving it so far, so many advanced features Apple's made so easy too use. It's truly amazing software - only in its first version.
__________________
MacBook Pro 15.4". 2.4Ghz. 4GB RAM.
30" Apple Cinema Display
iPod touch 16GB, iPod shuffle 1G
Weblog.
Glenn Wolsey is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 1, 2006, 01:17 AM   #2
bousozoku
Retired (Moderator emeritus)
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Gone but not forgotten.
I've been using Extensis Portfolio but it's such a pain that it's easier to keep track of them on my own, most of the time.
bousozoku is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 1, 2006, 08:11 AM   #3
wwooden
macrumors 68000
 
wwooden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Burlington, VT
Send a message via AIM to wwooden Send a message via Skype™ to wwooden
i Use iPhoto, it is built for someone like me. I just want an easy way to load and view my images and tweak them a bit. I also like all the printing services, I use those quite a bit for presents, people love them.
__________________
2.4GHz BlackBook; 32gig iPad (3rd Gen), iPhone 5 16gig Black; Nikon D50; 60gig iPod Video; 40gig PS3 - wwooden
wwooden is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 1, 2006, 08:59 AM   #4
FadeToBlack
macrumors 68000
 
FadeToBlack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Accoville, WV
Send a message via AIM to FadeToBlack
I use iPhoto. iPhoto 6 is great! I love the full screen editing.
FadeToBlack is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 1, 2006, 09:05 AM   #5
G4scott
macrumors 68020
 
G4scott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Austin, TX
Currently, I use Adobe Bridge to browse my serious photography, and I just keep them managed in folders, but I'm trying out Adobe Lightroom. It seems pretty nice, but it's just a beta version, and from what I hear, the fully developed version will be nothing like what it is now. If I had the money, I'd try Aperture, but I don't, and I'm not extremely serious about my photography, so it's not anything I really need.

I use iPhoto for all my other non-raw photos, and I've got quite a few at that. Last I tried, my Canon S50's raw format wasn't supported by iPhoto, and I prefer to use Adobe Raw to open and manage them.
__________________
Hook 'em Horns!
G4scott is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 1, 2006, 09:26 AM   #6
iGary
Guest
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Randy's House
Portfolio for the client, Aperture for me.
iGary is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 1, 2006, 11:12 AM   #7
aricher
macrumors 68020
 
aricher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Chi-il
Almost same as iGary - Portfolio for clients, currently iView for me. I'll upgrade to Aperture once the kinks are ironed out.
aricher is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 1, 2006, 03:23 PM   #8
kwajo.com
macrumors 6502a
 
kwajo.com's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Bay of Fundy
Send a message via ICQ to kwajo.com Send a message via MSN to kwajo.com
Aperture and Adobe Bridge for me. haven't decided which I like better

iPhoto for my P&S and camera phone junk
__________________
My Time on the Tropical Island of Newfoundland: http://gallery.mac.com/darkharbour/
kwajo.com is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 1, 2006, 09:30 PM   #9
Clix Pix
macrumors Demi-Goddess
 
Clix Pix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: 8 miles from the Apple Store at Tysons (Northern Virginia)
Was using Adobe Bridge until I purchased Aperture. Still getting used to Aperture but it's a very powerful program and I think it will more than meet my needs.

I also have downloaded the beta of Lightroom, but haven't played around in it too much yet, and after I installed iLife 06 experimented some with iPhoto, which up until now I had flat-out refused to use because of the limitations the earlier versions of the program had set on organization of one's images. I think I'll probably wind up using Aperture most of the time with iPhoto here-and-there for more casual shots.
__________________
"...and all watched over by machines of loving grace."
--Richard Brautigan
Clix Pix is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 1, 2006, 10:31 PM   #10
G4scott
macrumors 68020
 
G4scott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Austin, TX
Quote:
Originally Posted by kwajo.com
Aperture and Adobe Bridge for me. haven't decided which I like better
I would think Aperture is better for managing digital photos. Bridge was made as an all around file browser to work with all Adobe CS applications, and really has nothing specifically tailored for digital photography. That is why Adobe is creating Lightroom, so that they can have a product to compete with Aperture.
__________________
Hook 'em Horns!
G4scott is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 2, 2006, 04:19 PM   #11
Glenn Wolsey
Thread Starter
macrumors 65816
 
Glenn Wolsey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: New Zealand
Send a message via AIM to Glenn Wolsey Send a message via Skype™ to Glenn Wolsey
Quote:
Originally Posted by G4scott
I would think Aperture is better for managing digital photos. Bridge was made as an all around file browser to work with all Adobe CS applications, and really has nothing specifically tailored for digital photography. That is why Adobe is creating Lightroom, so that they can have a product to compete with Aperture.
Lightroom won't go anywhere without crop...
__________________
MacBook Pro 15.4". 2.4Ghz. 4GB RAM.
30" Apple Cinema Display
iPod touch 16GB, iPod shuffle 1G
Weblog.
Glenn Wolsey is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 2, 2006, 04:25 PM   #12
Mitthrawnuruodo
Demi-God (Moderator)
 
Mitthrawnuruodo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Bergen, Norway
Public Poll... nice...

I'm using iPhoto, for now. I'm not too happy about it, but it's there, it's convenient, and cheap... I probably will go for another solution later... so I'm most likely not upgrading to '06 anytime soon, (especially since the EDU price for iLife '06 is more than double what '05 used to be...)
__________________
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it; those who fail to learn history correctly... why, they are simply doomed.
Mitthrawnuruodo is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 2, 2006, 04:58 PM   #13
FadeToBlack
macrumors 68000
 
FadeToBlack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Accoville, WV
Send a message via AIM to FadeToBlack
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mitthrawnuruodo
Public Poll... nice...

I'm using iPhoto, for now. I'm not too happy about it, but it's there, it's convenient, and cheap... I probably will go for another solution later... so I'm most likely not upgrading to '06 anytime soon, (especially since the EDU price for iLife '06 is more than double what '05 used to be...)
You'd probably be a lot happier with iPhoto 6. I didn't upgrade to iLife '05, so I came straight from 4 to 6 and it's a huge improvement.
FadeToBlack is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 2, 2006, 05:21 PM   #14
eXan
macrumors 601
 
eXan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Near Korea, Japan and China.
Send a message via ICQ to eXan Send a message via AIM to eXan
I voted for Aperture. Though its a bit rough right now, maybe in version 2.0 they'll fix a lot of current problems (like the ability to sync the library with iPod Photo & Video, make it's library available for use in iApps' Media Browser etc.)
__________________
My WoW videos
21.5" iMac 2.5 GHz | 12 GB | 500 GB | Radeon 6750
13" MacBook Pro 2.4 GHz | 4 GB | 250 GB | GeForce 320m
eXan is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 2, 2006, 05:31 PM   #15
Mitthrawnuruodo
Demi-God (Moderator)
 
Mitthrawnuruodo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Bergen, Norway
Quote:
Originally Posted by FadeToBlack
You'd probably be a lot happier with iPhoto 6. I didn't upgrade to iLife '05, so I came straight from 4 to 6 and it's a huge improvement.
The problem is space...

I'm struggleing to keep more than 6 GB free on my iBook's 60 GB HD, and I've heard some horror stories about the size of some of the apps in iLife '06. So, until I can afford a new laptop (or a desktop, that can double as file server for our laptops) I'm probably gonna use iPhoto for organizing and Photoshop (or maybe even Seashore) for editing.

Once I get a camera shooting RAW images, then the game changes...
__________________
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it; those who fail to learn history correctly... why, they are simply doomed.
Mitthrawnuruodo is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 3, 2006, 01:37 AM   #16
FadeToBlack
macrumors 68000
 
FadeToBlack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Accoville, WV
Send a message via AIM to FadeToBlack
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mitthrawnuruodo
The problem is space...

I'm struggleing to keep more than 6 GB free on my iBook's 60 GB HD, and I've heard some horror stories about the size of some of the apps in iLife '06. So, until I can afford a new laptop (or a desktop, that can double as file server for our laptops) I'm probably gonna use iPhoto for organizing and Photoshop (or maybe even Seashore) for editing.

Once I get a camera shooting RAW images, then the game changes...
Ahhh, I see. I only have a 60GB HD, too, but I don't have it nearly filled up yet. I have 27.2GB free. But yeah, iLife does take up a lot of space and if you're struggling to keep more than 6GB free, then you probably shouldn't upgrade.

Once you start taking RAW photos, you're probably gonna need a lot more space than 60GB.
FadeToBlack is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 4, 2006, 03:27 PM   #17
Thomas S
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
I bought Aperture, but don't use it due to the fact that it doesn't support my Fuji S2 or my Nikon D200 .

Maybe there is a work-around for the S2, but right now I'm playing with the Adobe Lightroom beta and I personally think its pretty cool.
Thomas S is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 26, 2006, 12:42 AM   #18
GoCubsGo
macrumors Nehalem
 
GoCubsGo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
I'd like to know how Aperture compares to Lightroom. I only have lightroom so I can't speak for myself.
__________________
Because I'm an ahole.
GoCubsGo is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 26, 2006, 10:11 AM   #19
Caitlyn
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Me too, Jessica. I'd love to hear some comparisons. Anyway, as of now, I use iPhoto 6, but I am considering purchasing Aperture.
Caitlyn is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 26, 2006, 10:24 AM   #20
Grimace
macrumors 68040
 
Grimace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: with Hamburglar.
I currently use Aperture (love it 110%) and have played around with the Lightroom beta.

The Aperture interface seems cleaner and it handles RAW files faster. From what I've seen, Lightroom performs better on slower machines, and Aperture is the better performer on faster machines. (For both, more than 1GB RAM is a necessity.) 2GB of RAM can make up for a slower processor with digital photo editing.
__________________
Canon 1Ds Mk III • Canon 5D MkII
16-35mm f/2.8L II • 24-70mm f/2.8L • 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II
50mm f/1.2L • 85mm f/1.2L • 135mm f/2L • 300mm f/2.8L IS
Grimace is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 26, 2006, 11:13 AM   #21
GoCubsGo
macrumors Nehalem
 
GoCubsGo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Quote:
Originally Posted by carletonmusic
I currently use Aperture (love it 110%) and have played around with the Lightroom beta.

The Aperture interface seems cleaner and it handles RAW files faster. From what I've seen, Lightroom performs better on slower machines, and Aperture is the better performer on faster machines. (For both, more than 1GB RAM is a necessity.) 2GB of RAM can make up for a slower processor with digital photo editing.
That is good to know. I only have a powerbook 1.67 so lightroom is my choice, but I know I'll be buying a powermac towards the end of the year or around this time next year so I want to keep up to date with the products and how they compare to one another.
__________________
Because I'm an ahole.
GoCubsGo is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 26, 2006, 11:49 AM   #22
ahunter3
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
FileMaker Pro
ahunter3 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 27, 2006, 12:55 AM   #23
AmpedPhoto
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
lightroom for me
AmpedPhoto is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 27, 2006, 10:59 AM   #24
neut
macrumors 68000
 
neut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: here (for now)
iPhoto + CS2 (though, to open RAW in CS2 i have to find the actual SRF in Finder ... iPhoto converts it to JPEG).

Anyone know if Aperature supports Sony's RAW format (SRF)? I wasnt to use Aperature, but i do so much compisiting i'm not sure i can justify the cost ... though with more (better?) RAW options in the front end i could cut out some compositing.


peace | neut
__________________
jdubart
Eleven11
organech
Uncle Bud
neut is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 27, 2006, 12:29 PM   #25
ChrisA
macrumors G3
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Redondo Beach, California
Quote:
Originally Posted by Glenn Wolsey
What do you use to catalog your digital images?.
I'm using iPhoto. I found that you really need to develope a "system" with iPhoto and stick to it. My system makes full use of ketwords, comments and smart albums in folders.

I use Image capture to import the phots from the camera to a folder with a name like "2006_03_25". I'll delete the junk and then go to iPhoto and import the folder into iPhoto library. I tell it to copy the file into the library so now I have the files in two systems and so the files are backed up as part of the download/import process. Next I asign keywords, comments and rattings. and do a first pass at minor changes and crops.
ChrisA is offline   0 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > Special Interests > Visual Media > Digital Photography

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Does iPhoto Import or Link? ben1257sb Mac Applications and Mac App Store 4 Nov 19, 2011 10:32 AM
Photo Apps - Not Lightroom, iPhoto, Aperture, or Photoshop BornToMac Mac Applications and Mac App Store 0 Jan 12, 2011 03:47 PM
Poll: Which do you use most - iPhoto, Lightroom, or Aperture? Grimace Digital Photography 57 May 11, 2008 11:46 PM
iPhoto vs. Aperture vs. iView sebpayne Digital Photography 17 Jan 20, 2006 10:06 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:21 AM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Privacy / DMCA contact / Affiliate and FTC Disclosure
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC