In October we will have a new imacs
Anyone think we will see a new iMac in 2014? October perhaps? Or will apple delay it until Broadwell?
In October we will have a new imacs
In October we will have a new imacs
Thunderbolt 2, Geforce 9xx series only 27" iMac will be release this year with pre-orders starting from November because of Intel's desktop chips
Anyone think we will see a new iMac in 2014? October perhaps? Or will apple delay it until Broadwell?
You got one already, albeit at the modest end of the range. Though sneered at by the average geek, it is probably more than adequate for the needs of the average Joe or Jill.
Thunderbolt 2, Geforce 9xx series only 27" iMac will be release this year with pre-orders starting from November because of Intel's desktop chips
I wouldn't call that a new imac it was a downgrade from the current models after almost 1 year. I want a juicy exceedingly expensive ridiculously crammed up 27" 5K 64gb tb2 model with a gpu of 8gb of vram. thats what I call a new iMac
You may want to look into a nMP .
I wouldn't call that a new imac it was a downgrade from the current models after almost 1 year. I want a juicy exceedingly expensive ridiculously crammed up 27" 5K 64gb tb2 model with a gpu of 8gb of vram. thats what I call a new iMac
....none of the Adobe programs actually take advantage of the multiple cores....
Anyone can see for themselves this is incorrect. Just run Activity Monitor or iStat Menus and watch thread count while running Photoshop CC or Premiere Pro. The Adobe software uses dozens of threads. Each runnable thread can occupy a separate core. Frequently every core is under simultaneous heavy load.
As I write this, Photoshop CC on my iMac is using 40 threads, the same number as FCP X.
Well, in that case. How can Final cut pro run 4k movies with 25 filters when after effects cant even play a single mov file without any effects without pre-render to ram ?
I'm not saying AE is a poster child for good multi-threaded programming. I was only responding to your statement that NO Adobe programs actually take advantage of multiple cores.
I use both Premiere Pro CS6 and FCP X extensively. In general FCP is better at exploiting multiple cores, but CS6 is better at exploiting the GPU for effects.
In PP CS6 applying most effects produces a yellow render bar, which usually means GPU implemented (on nVidia) -- it will play at normal speed without software rendering. You need not wait for the render since it's done in hardware.
In FCP X, most common editing and effect operations produce red render bars. The flip side is X is very good at background rendering, so you can often proceed without waiting for the render.
But these are relative differences. Both programs harness multiple cores extensively, as does Photoshop CC.
No AMD because Geforce has the best mGPU with 970M and 980M
Gosh, you are persistent with that rumor! As I've said elsewhere, I hope you're right, but I wouldn't bet money on it. I guess we'll see in a few weeks. (I'm talking about something more than a minimal refresh that Apple wouldn't announce at an event, BTW.)
The rumors are looking a bit different at the moment.
The rumors are looking a bit different at the moment.