Honestly it's been a while since we saw an iPod Touch update. So maybe at the October event we will see an iTouch 6. Any comments? Questions?
Exactly. I highly doubt it costs more than $77 million to design and market the iPod. Discontinuing it is just throwing revenue away.Percentages don't paint the entire picture. Last I heard, the iPod is a $77 million dollar a year business for Apple. Even at only 1% share, 77 million dollars is nothing to scoff at. Why discontinue it? Why not keep selling it and make minor upgrades which make customers happy?!
Take a look at the iTunes 10% contribution. How much of that would disappear if the iPod disappeared?
Take a look at the iTunes 10% contribution. How much of that would disappear if the iPod disappeared?
That's a good point. In alot of wayts, iTunes and iPod are intertwined. Taking away one would surely affect the other.
$0 went into the design and marketing for the iPod Classic and yet Apple saw fit to kill it.Exactly. I highly doubt it costs more than $77 million to design and market the iPod. Discontinuing it is just throwing revenue away.
^ I don't think that logic will translate into the real world. There are alot of teenagers (13-17) that are unemployed and are students. This segment wants Apple products. Either iPhone/iPod/iPad etc, they want it just like us adults do. The problem is their parents are much more likely to make a one time purchase of $149-$199 on an iPod over buying them an iPhone with a monthly contract and cost as well as deal with overages.
That being said, I understand family plans have gotten cheaper and are being pushed by the carriers.
Ultimately, the iPod being a $77 million dollar a year busine
ill a very healthy profit for Apple. Why kill it?
All that I've been hearing is that it is not only teenagers who buy ipods but you're saying that there is a significant percentage of ipods being sold to teens. My personal experience is that every teen and I do mean every teen owns an iPhone and none own ipods. That's not hyperbole. So I guess it remains a mystery.
I guess times have changed. Free iPhones (with contract) haven't been around forever and are sort of a new thing.
Not really. The only free iPhone with a contract I've seen is an 8 gig 5C. That's like crap. Plus people like me CANT afford a monthly contract.
I guess times have changed. Free iPhones (with contract) haven't been around forever and are sort of a new thing.
I didn't say that these iPhones need to be "free". I simply said that every, not virtually every, but actually every teenager I know owns an iPhone instead of an iPod. Most are on their family's plan, the rest are on prepaid... $35-45 a month.Not really. The only free iPhone with a contract I've seen is an 8 gig 5C. That's like crap. Plus people like me CANT afford a monthly contract.
I didn't say that these iPhones need to be "free". I simply said that every, not virtually every, but actually every teenager I know owns an iPhone instead of an iPod. Most are on their family's plan, the rest are on prepaid... $35-45 a month.
I understand that my corner of the country may not be representative of everywhere else, but it is not an affluent area.
I don't see teens flocking to iPods. Neither are the adults, they use Spotify on their phones.
But we'll see soon enough.
I'm with you on that!!!No I mean you're right. The numbers don't lie.
I guess some of us still remember how great the iPod is and don't want to lose it.
I'm with you on that!!!
I've been using a 6G iPod Nano as a watch (with a very nice Lunatik band)... very handy for listening to podcasts and music. I had completely forgotten that at one time iPods had built-in support for crossfading. That was a nice surprise.
The other thing that I've noticed is how the nano sounds better compared to my iPod Touch and iPhone 4.... playing the same files. But maybe it's nothing more than psychological.
As someone who really cares about how music sounds, this is the one department I'm disappointed in Apple with.. they just don't give us great hardware to make our music listening experience better..
I absolutely agree.
With the change from the Wolfson (warm sounding) chip to the Cirrus-Logic (more analytical, cold and flat), the quality and fun-factor of the music listening experienced has decreased.
I truly didn't, and still don't understand that change, except for maybe business related reasons. People still claim the 5.5G iPod as the best sounding of them all.
I love my iPod Classics, but it's more for having the possibility of carrying my music Library around with me in such a small size, than for the quality of the sound.
After a number of years, I am still trying to figure out, which EQ setting works fine with most types of music.
I believe Apple today is more business-centered than anything else, they have great competitors out there launching audiophile-level products, and they don't seem to react to that line of business or public, not anymore.
I absolutely agree.
With the change from the Wolfson (warm sounding) chip to the Cirrus-Logic (more analytical, cold and flat), the quality and fun-factor of the music listening experienced has decreased.
I truly didn't, and still don't understand that change, except for maybe business related reasons. People still claim the 5.5G iPod as the best sounding of them all.
I love my iPod Classics, but it's more for having the possibility of carrying my music Library around with me in such a small size, than for the quality of the sound.
After a number of years, I am still trying to figure out, which EQ setting works fine with most types of music.
I believe Apple today is more business-centered than anything else, they have great competitors out there launching audiophile-level products, and they don't seem to react to that line of business or public, not anymore.
The change had to be because of money because it sure wasn't sound quality.