Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

evanavevan

macrumors member
Original poster
Jun 24, 2010
86
1
Using a late-2013 15" MBPr with the NVDA GPU. I've been using gfxcardstatus (https://gfx.io) to see if the integrated or discrete graphics is running. But I like the scaled resolution for most space (1920 x 1200 effective resolution) and I notice that the UI performance, animations, etc. and overall everything looks smoother when I force it to stay on the discrete GPU.

I'm fully aware that the discrete GPU uses more power and will lead to less battery life, but I'm almost always at home near an outlet, or have my laptop docked into 2 Thunderbolt Displays (which uses the discrete GPU anyway). But when not docked, other than the higher power consumption (and heat) and lower battery life, are there any other possible negative consequences to using the discrete GPU all the time?

P.S. I don't really play games, and haven't noticed any notable heat issues.
 

nateo200

macrumors 68030
Feb 4, 2009
2,906
42
Upstate NY
Using a late-2013 15" MBPr with the NVDA GPU. I've been using gfxcardstatus (https://gfx.io) to see if the integrated or discrete graphics is running. But I like the scaled resolution for most space (1920 x 1200 effective resolution) and I notice that the UI performance, animations, etc. and overall everything looks smoother when I force it to stay on the discrete GPU.

I'm fully aware that the discrete GPU uses more power and will lead to less battery life, but I'm almost always at home near an outlet, or have my laptop docked into 2 Thunderbolt Displays (which uses the discrete GPU anyway). But when not docked, other than the higher power consumption (and heat) and lower battery life, are there any other possible negative consequences to using the discrete GPU all the time?

P.S. I don't really play games, and haven't noticed any notable heat issues.

Probably not a big deal. I've done it quite a bit and honestly I notice no heat differences so long as I'm not doing anything intensive. I use gfxcardstatus too and love being able to keep on discrete only or on integrated only.
 

evanavevan

macrumors member
Original poster
Jun 24, 2010
86
1
Probably not a big deal. I've done it quite a bit and honestly I notice no heat differences so long as I'm not doing anything intensive. I use gfxcardstatus too and love being able to keep on discrete only or on integrated only.

Awesome, glad I'm not the only one!
 

alexmarchuk

macrumors 6502a
Jun 28, 2007
695
271
New Jersey
Just vouching for gfxCardStatus been using it for who knows how long.

On an unrelated note, I use these other nifty utilities:

UltraFan (works on Yosemite as far as I can tell)
Blackmagic Disk Speed Test
 

827538

Cancelled
Jul 3, 2013
2,322
2,833
I spend a huge amount of time in Windows gaming so have probably used the dGPU on mine more than anyone, still rock solid and never gone wrong once.

Plus I have piece of mind as I got a three year warranty for free with mine (student perk).
 

alexmarchuk

macrumors 6502a
Jun 28, 2007
695
271
New Jersey
I spend a huge amount of time in Windows gaming so have probably used the dGPU on mine more than anyone, still rock solid and never gone wrong once.

Plus I have piece of mind as I got a three year warranty for free with mine (student perk).

You're not the only one, mine screams under Windows 7 playing GTA or any other game with some high settings.
 

827538

Cancelled
Jul 3, 2013
2,322
2,833
You're not the only one, mine screams under Windows 7 playing GTA or any other game with some high settings.

Yup, anyone who says the 750M is crap or underpowered clearly has never seen it in action, punches above it's weight and with the right mix of settings games really do run/look glorious under it. Hell I completed Metro Last Light on High with it, sure I wasn't getting stupid-FPS but it was more than enough to enjoy it. I'm just eagerly awaiting the next rMBP update with hopefully a 850/860M in it, would be a day one purchase for me!

----------

The only hit you'll get is battery life. Beyond that, I don't think there should be an issue.

Exactly, Windows 7 isn't great efficiency wise when on battery but I only use it for gaming really. Anything else I do I run under OS X which is super efficient and with this ridiculous PCI-e SSD it takes seconds to switch between the two.

Can't wait for Windows 10 though.
 

alexmarchuk

macrumors 6502a
Jun 28, 2007
695
271
New Jersey
Yup, anyone who says the 750M is crap or underpowered clearly has never seen it in action, punches above it's weight and with the right mix of settings games really do run/look glorious under it. Hell I completed Metro Last Light on High with it, sure I wasn't getting stupid-FPS but it was more than enough to enjoy it. I'm just eagerly awaiting the next rMBP update with hopefully a 850/860M in it, would be a day one purchase for me!

I've got the 650M, still no joke lol.
 

nateo200

macrumors 68030
Feb 4, 2009
2,906
42
Upstate NY
Yup, anyone who says the 750M is crap or underpowered clearly has never seen it in action, punches above it's weight and with the right mix of settings games really do run/look glorious under it. Hell I completed Metro Last Light on High with it, sure I wasn't getting stupid-FPS but it was more than enough to enjoy it. I'm just eagerly awaiting the next rMBP update with hopefully a 850/860M in it, would be a day one purchase for me!

----------



Exactly, Windows 7 isn't great efficiency wise when on battery but I only use it for gaming really. Anything else I do I run under OS X which is super efficient and with this ridiculous PCI-e SSD it takes seconds to switch between the two.

Can't wait for Windows 10 though.
Glad I'm not the only one that likes the dGPU in the rMBP's! I have the 650M, only wish would be for an extra gig of RAM but other than that it does punch above its weight.

I've got the 650M, still no joke lol.

Yeah same. The 650M is probably considered a joke only by extreme gamers and those on Windows...keep in mind that with OS X being tightly integrated with the hardware you get a little bit better performance than a standard Windows machine. I've played games at full 2880x1800 and sure its not 120fps but its playable but I usually play at HD. Its allot more powerful than people think.
 

ayeying

macrumors 601
Dec 5, 2007
4,547
13
Yay Area, CA
Yeah same. The 650M is probably considered a joke only by extreme gamers and those on Windows...keep in mind that with OS X being tightly integrated with the hardware you get a little bit better performance than a standard Windows machine. I've played games at full 2880x1800 and sure its not 120fps but its playable but I usually play at HD. Its allot more powerful than people think.

I feel like that statement is untrue. I noticed a HUGE difference in FPS playing the same games under Windows vs OS X. Perhaps, under applications like Final Cut Pro, OS X is much faster due to the better integration with software and hardware. However, for real games, Windows still wins in terms of performance, even on the same hardware
 

cjmillsnun

macrumors 68020
Aug 28, 2009
2,399
48
I feel like that statement is untrue. I noticed a HUGE difference in FPS playing the same games under Windows vs OS X. Perhaps, under applications like Final Cut Pro, OS X is much faster due to the better integration with software and hardware. However, for real games, Windows still wins in terms of performance, even on the same hardware

I agree. This is where DirectX wins out. If Apple were to introduce Metal for the Mac, and not just iOS, then you may see the scores even out.
 

maflynn

macrumors Haswell
May 3, 2009
73,478
43,405
If you use an external display, then you'll be using the dGPU, as will Windows.

I wish apple designed the iGPU/dGPU differently so we could use the iGPU independently of the dGPU. In other words of the dGPU failed, we'd still have a functioning computer with the iGPU
 

827538

Cancelled
Jul 3, 2013
2,322
2,833
I feel like that statement is untrue. I noticed a HUGE difference in FPS playing the same games under Windows vs OS X. Perhaps, under applications like Final Cut Pro, OS X is much faster due to the better integration with software and hardware. However, for real games, Windows still wins in terms of performance, even on the same hardware

I agree, native DirectX performance is where Windows always wins hands down. For example I've played Civ 5 on both OS X and Windows and on Windows it runs far better. That's the reason I have Windows installed, so I can game. As using a wrapper under OS X as most games do is just crap and OpenGL doesn't have large enough support yet.

I agree. This is where DirectX wins out. If Apple were to introduce Metal for the Mac, and not just iOS, then you may see the scores even out.

You won't get Metal for Mac, it doesn't work like that. It happens on iOS because Apple design their own custom ARM based chips. The equivalent on PC is something like AMD's Mantle, and Nvidia have nothing like that. Plus with the advent of DX12 we will hopefully be seeing efficiency boosts on Windows.
 

alexmarchuk

macrumors 6502a
Jun 28, 2007
695
271
New Jersey
I agree, native DirectX performance is where Windows always wins hands down. For example I've played Civ 5 on both OS X and Windows and on Windows it runs far better. That's the reason I have Windows installed, so I can game. As using a wrapper under OS X as most games do is just crap and OpenGL doesn't have large enough support yet.

Precisely. I notice this with Sims 3 and Civ 5, Windows runs them at 2880x1800 much better.
 

Brian Y

macrumors 68040
Oct 21, 2012
3,776
1,064
If you use an external display, then you'll be using the dGPU, as will Windows.

I wish apple designed the iGPU/dGPU differently so we could use the iGPU independently of the dGPU. In other words of the dGPU failed, we'd still have a functioning computer with the iGPU

Yep, it's rather annoying. Especially as the intel graphics is perfectly capable of driving most external displays (as it does on lesser models).
 

827538

Cancelled
Jul 3, 2013
2,322
2,833
Precisely. I notice this with Sims 3 and Civ 5, Windows runs them at 2880x1800 much better.

I wouldn't run them at 2880x1800, not that it isn't playable, just if I want to run on high settings with good FPS then something like 1920x1200 is a more reasonable compromise. Plus playing at crazy high resolutions makes everything tiny.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.