Register FAQ/Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to the Mac Forums forums. Please read the FAQ if you have questions. Register to participate.

 
Go Back   Mac Forums > Archive > Archives of Old Posts > MacRumors News Discussion (archive)
TouchArcade.com - iPhone Game Reviews and News

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Mar 3, 2006, 01:48 AM   #1
MacRumors
macrumors bot
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Production Fuel Cells in 2nd Half of 2006?

http://www.macrumors.com/images/macrumorsthreadlogo.gif

ExtremeTech reports that Antig Technology and AVC Corp. will be demoing production-ready fuel cell battery technology for laptops at CeBIT next week.

The fuel cells appear to be methanol-based and provide 45 watts of power, weigh 3.7 pounds and reportedly can power a laptop for eight hours with a single cartridge. The fuel cell is the size of a CD-Rom drive and is designed to fit into the media bay of a laptop PC. These fuel cells are reportedly going into production for late 2006. No details on cost or fuel refill information is yet available. A photo is shown here.

This is not the first time fuel cell technology has been promised. NEC was reportedly expecting them in to be production in 2004.

Back in 2003, Apple was rumored to be actively pursuing fuel cell technology for the PowerBook line. Fuel Cells promise long battery life but significant technical hurdles have limited their development.
MacRumors is offline  
Old Mar 3, 2006, 01:56 AM   #2
revjay
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Beautiful Vancouver Island
All Our Problems Are Solved...

There you go iGary...you no longer need to carry an extra battery...all you need is a 3.7 lb fuel cell half the size of a MacBook.

I suppose, once this type of tech. goes into production, size will possibly dwindle and efficiency climb?
__________________
"Sometimes I wish I were you just so I could be friends with me."
1.9 G5 imac; 2.2 MacBook
revjay is offline  
Old Mar 3, 2006, 01:58 AM   #3
bluedevil14
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Send a message via AIM to bluedevil14
thats pretty heavy

3.7 lbs!!!!!!???? Who wants to carry that around? I think carrying around three normal batteries would definitely be lighter
__________________
iMac G4 17" gooseneck 1.25Ghz 512mb 80gb; iMac 2.4Ghz 2gb 250 gb; MB 2Ggz, 1gb, 80gb; MBP 2Ghz, 1gb, 80gb; PB 1ghz 40gb; iPhone 8gb
bluedevil14 is offline  
Old Mar 3, 2006, 02:01 AM   #4
EricNau
macrumors Demi-God
 
EricNau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Sacramento, CA
45 watts of power and 3.7 lbs... The current MacBook Pro battery is 60 watts, and I'm sure it weighs less than that.
__________________
November is Pancreatic Caner Awareness Month
www.PanCan.org | Get Involved
EricNau is offline  
Old Mar 3, 2006, 02:02 AM   #5
Superdrive
macrumors 6502a
 
Superdrive's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Quote:
Originally Posted by bluedevil14
3.7 lbs!!!!!!???? Who wants to carry that around? I think carrying around three normal batteries would definitely be lighter
And less expensive too!

Glad to see technology coming along. I'd still bet it is at least five years before we see any of this in a mainstream product.
Superdrive is offline  
Old Mar 3, 2006, 02:04 AM   #6
Chundles
macrumors Demi-God
 
Chundles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: The Gong, Australia
I hope it's one of those ones that gets the Hydrogen from alcohol - study time would be great. One for me, one for you, two for me, one for you. Glug glug glug.....
__________________
This is going straight to the Pool Room
Chundles is offline  
Old Mar 3, 2006, 02:08 AM   #7
yoda13
macrumors 65816
 
yoda13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Texas
Time to hit the gym again so I can carry my laptop power supply around....
__________________
For over a thousand generations, the Jedi Knights were the guardians of peace and justice in the Old Republic. Before the dark times, before the Empire.
yoda13 is offline  
Old Mar 3, 2006, 02:08 AM   #8
n8236
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
i dunno how i feel about anything methanol near me when i'm on a flight altitude of 39,000 ft lol
n8236 is offline  
Old Mar 3, 2006, 02:11 AM   #9
EricNau
macrumors Demi-God
 
EricNau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Sacramento, CA
Quote:
Originally Posted by n8236
i dunno how i feel about anything methanol near me when i'm on a flight altitude of 39,000 ft lol
It's perfectly safe... until you drop it!
__________________
November is Pancreatic Caner Awareness Month
www.PanCan.org | Get Involved
EricNau is offline  
Old Mar 3, 2006, 02:12 AM   #10
pdpfilms
macrumors 68020
 
pdpfilms's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Vermontana
Hahahaha.

I just have to laugh. I'm sure they'll refine this enough to be usable one day, but i just think it's funny right now...

what if you dropped your laptop?
pdpfilms is offline  
Old Mar 3, 2006, 02:15 AM   #11
revjay
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Beautiful Vancouver Island
No Smoking

Quote:
Originally Posted by EricNau
It's perfectly safe... until your drop it!
Kaboom!
http://www.hiroshima-is.ac.jp/Hirosh...omb_scene2.jpg
__________________
"Sometimes I wish I were you just so I could be friends with me."
1.9 G5 imac; 2.2 MacBook
revjay is offline  
Old Mar 3, 2006, 02:18 AM   #12
darwen
macrumors 6502a
 
darwen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: California, US
Quote:
Originally Posted by pdpfilms
what if you dropped your laptop?
If it fell on you? It would hurt. Lets hope that guy who did the Mag Safe test does not get ahold of one of these.
__________________
Darwen
darwen is offline  
Old Mar 3, 2006, 02:28 AM   #13
lord patton
macrumors 6502a
 
lord patton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Chicago
Quote:
Originally Posted by revjay
I suppose, once this type of tech. goes into production, size will possibly dwindle and efficiency climb?
no, that's not the least bit likely
__________________
15" SR 2.2 MBP 320GB HD 3GB RAM
8 GB iPhone
mesa-boogie dual rectifier
lord patton is offline  
Old Mar 3, 2006, 02:49 AM   #14
tjwett
macrumors 68000
 
tjwett's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Brooklyn, NYC
uh, "in the media bay..."? yeah, reeeal futurey.
__________________
"The spice must flow..."
tjwett is offline  
Old Mar 3, 2006, 02:53 AM   #15
macnews
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Idaho
I just can't see this working long term and seriously doubt Apple would deploy it. It needs to be lighter, thinner (yes, it say CD rom size but that is misleading given the picture on the site), and ideally use a better fuel source such as hydrogen fuel.
macnews is offline  
Old Mar 3, 2006, 02:56 AM   #16
kenzbud
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Seattle, WA
Send a message via AIM to kenzbud
Blah.... Big and bulky.
Do you recharge it like a normal battery or does it have to be filled up with hydrogen?
kenzbud is offline  
Old Mar 3, 2006, 03:18 AM   #17
CanadaRAM
Contributor
 
CanadaRAM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: On the Left Coast - Victoria BC Canada
Quote:
Originally Posted by kenzbud
Blah.... Big and bulky.
Do you recharge it like a normal battery or does it have to be filled up with hydrogen?
Seriously -- did you read any of this before posting? A fuel cell generates electricity from catalyzing a hydrogen-rich, usually liquid fuel source like... the methanol mentioned in this thread, The cell is refuelled by putting in more methanol -- although practically we can expect self-contained fuel cartridges like disposable butane lighters.

Using methanol is less efficient than using pure hydrogen, but containment and recharging with pure hydrogen has some major logistical problems. The other challenge whatever the fuel is what to do with the waste heat from the process.

The point of a fuel cell is not high power, it is moderate power over a long period of time, and recharging with a chemical fuel source so you can be off the grid for days or weeks. It is not a battery replacement for desk to desk or even airline travel (and I'd like to see them answer the question of taking tiny 'jet engines' with methanol 'bombs' onto an aircraft...).
__________________
Expert
Ex = former, no longer. Spurt = a leak, esp. when caused by water pressure. Expert = a has-been drip under pressure.
CanadaRAM is offline  
Old Mar 3, 2006, 03:23 AM   #18
avus
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Quote:
Originally Posted by revjay
Kaboom!
Yet another insensitive person who still thinks nuclear weapons are just big bombs:

http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releas...-abs022306.php

avus is offline  
Old Mar 3, 2006, 04:34 AM   #19
Stridder44
macrumors 68040
 
Stridder44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: California
Quote:
Originally Posted by pdpfilms
what if you dropped your laptop?
http://www.nikhef.nl/~h73/kn1c/ELSTAT/Explosion.jpg
__________________
The Un-Funny Truth About Scientology
(Warning: Graphic images)

MacBook Pro 15.4"/2.5 GHz/250GB/4GB RAM
iMac G4 17"/800 Mhz/80GB/512GB RAM

Last edited by Stridder44 : Mar 3, 2006 at 04:53 AM.
Stridder44 is offline  
Old Mar 3, 2006, 04:52 AM   #20
Staffroomer
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
This sounds way better than the 4 hours on my current iBook
Staffroomer is offline  
Old Mar 3, 2006, 04:53 AM   #21
SeaFox
macrumors 65816
 
SeaFox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Somewhere Else
Quote:
Originally Posted by kenzbud
Blah.... Big and bulky.
Do you recharge it like a normal battery or does it have to be filled up with hydrogen?
Well since it's not a "battery" I don't know how you would recharge it.

Actually the joke of this (if you read the article) is that they haven't designed them to be refilled by the user. So it's even worse than carrying a spare battery (besides the dismal runtime).
__________________
"In the room was the last person on Earth. Suddenly, there was a knock at the door..."
SeaFox is offline  
Old Mar 3, 2006, 06:11 AM   #22
ScottB
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Britain
Fuel cell? That sound very cool, but from the look of the specs it seems like it's not very useful. I guess we won't be seeing these in any practical laptop for a long while.
ScottB is offline  
Old Mar 3, 2006, 06:27 AM   #23
bigandy
macrumors Demi-God
 
bigandy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Soho, London
i can't see this working for another decade at least.

plus they really do need to be able to be refilled by the user, or they're going to make more money selling dead badgers to shove in your battery bay.

*develops business plan*
__________________
"any day that involves cat pee is a really bad day" - iBlue
bigandy is offline  
Old Mar 3, 2006, 07:16 AM   #24
Austin.xstone
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: New Zealand - Ohh Yeah...
As I see it, the battery is the one thing holding everything back, bigger brighter screens? 'Takes more battery'. The sooner that they create something that can replace a battery the better the world will be.

I’m sure that all humans are looking at holding power in little boxes to use later the wrong way – I’m sure that there must be a totally different system - Some one just needs to invent it... good luck on that one...
__________________
iPod G5 30GB Video, 2.8 GHz 512MBWindows Laptop, 1.9 GHz 512MB PC, Watch this space... MacBook - I hope
Austin.xstone is offline  
Old Mar 3, 2006, 07:21 AM   #25
puuukeey
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: tristate area
Send a message via AIM to puuukeey
can't we just pee into it?
puuukeey is offline  

 

Mac Forums > Archive > Archives of Old Posts > MacRumors News Discussion (archive)

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:45 PM.

Mac News | Mac Rumors | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2002-2009, MacRumors.com, LLC