Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

sfwalter

macrumors 68020
Original poster
Jan 6, 2004
2,243
2,065
Dallas Texas
So I have been thinking the new Macbook would make a great in the field device for backing up photos as well as doing some light edits with Lightroom.

Anyone been using Lightroom on the new Macbook? If so how do you like the performance?

Thanks in advance, Scott
 

crucius

macrumors regular
Apr 4, 2010
156
0
Portugal
So I have been thinking the new Macbook would make a great in the field device for backing up photos as well as doing some light edits with Lightroom.

Anyone been using Lightroom on the new Macbook? If so how do you like the performance?

Thanks in advance, Scott

Yup, and it works great (RAW editing). However, I still haven't connected it to an external monitor, so I don't know if it will handle that well.
 

elithrar

macrumors 6502
May 31, 2007
372
3
It's definitely usable, but don't expect the world. It handles 16MP RAW files from my X100T well enough, but takes a while to generate previews and can be a little slow to render 100% after a few edits.

The screen is fantastic though and makes it much easier to get accurate results. Blows the 11" MBA away.
 

newellj

macrumors G3
Oct 15, 2014
8,127
3,030
East of Eden
The screen size is pushing it for me, YMMV. I did a comparative test a while back on two tasks that are admittedly among the slower LR file ops The rMB was slower but a lot less than people who haven't used the machine would like to tell you.

Updated to include time to build 1:1 previews. Operating temps and CPU usage was comparable to previously observed results for the export operation.

I had some time today and ran a comparison of the rMB with some other computers performing an export with Lightroom 5.7. I used a test library containing 215 20mp raw files aggregating ~4.5 gb. The CPU figures are CPU temps and % utilization shown by iStat, averaged by means of the Mk1 eyeball. The CPU temps and %s were roughly equivalent for both the exports and the 1:1 preview builds.

TLDR: the rMB did quite well; for what it is, there is a large degree of awesomeness in this little machine.

rMB (2015) - Core M 1.2 gHz/8 gb
1:1 preview time: 30:04 minutes
Export time: 31.15 minutes
CPU: ~91*C at ~55%
note on exterior temps measured with IR thermometer (note that these are F, not C):
palm rest: 86*F speaker grill: 100*F bottom/base: 92-97*F - the rMB never got more than a tad over body temperature, in spite of running maxed out for almost half an hour.

rMBP 13.3" (late 2013) - i5 2.4 gHz/8 gb
1:1 preview time: 25:17 minutes
Export time: 25:15 minutes
CPU: ~78*C at ~58%

Dell XPS 13 (2013) - i7 2.0 gHz/8 gb
1:1 preview time: not tested
Export time: 25.15 minutes
CPU: not observed

Mac Mini (2012) - i7 (quad) 2.4 gHz/8 gb
1:1 preview time: 16:54 minutes
Export time: 16:55 minutes
CPU: not observed

BYO Z87 - Core i7 4770K @ 3.5 gHz / 32gb
1:1 preview time: 10:08 minutes
Export time: 8:20 minutes
CPU: not observed
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.