Register FAQ / Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   MacRumors Forums > Apple Systems and Services > Windows, Linux & Others on the Mac

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Apr 6, 2006, 01:47 PM   #1
MacRumorUser
macrumors Demi-God
 
MacRumorUser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Ireland
BootCamp v Parallels

Simple differences, not saying ones better than the other (though one is )

BootCamp.

+ Simple to install. Fully functioning, drivers for all components and runs great. Completely native speed.

- Requires you to dual boot, meaning you have to reboot. Could be a pain to some.

Parallels

+ Simple to install, runs much faster than virtual PC, Amazing boot times for windows (10-15 secs) within osX

- NOT FULLY FUNCTIONING. No sound, No Airport. USB support questionable. Graphics still emulated. Still not full Native speed, as it will always be running on top of somthing else meaning things like Memory is limited (you can only assign certain amounts)... Software is going to be hit and miss, forget gaming and until sound works, anything to do with audio is out of the question.


Basically BootCamp allows you to have a full PC working on your machine with all the software running correctly, but you have to come out of OSX

Parallels whilst a move in the right direction is TOO limited in its current status and needs a lot of optimisations yet, but is promising. But at the end of the day your going to be limited to what you can do with it until drivers etc are sorted. And then they will still be emulated



If you want to game, run all windows software NOW then bootcamp is the way to go. If you want to experiement and dont require anything with graphics, sound or software therefore dependant on those, it's good.
__________________
A gentleman is one who never hurts anyone's feelings unintentionally.
MacRumor:User
Microsoft MVP : Macintosh
MacRumorUser is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 14, 2006, 07:15 PM   #2
trickstern
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: la,ca,usa
photoshop w/bootcamp

thanks -this is the first comparison i have seen -

i do a lot of photoshop work, so from what you are saying boot camp seems the way to go, no?
trickstern is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 15, 2006, 02:44 AM   #3
MacRumorsReader
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
I gotta say, for my time and effort, it is Boot Camp all the way.
__________________
I'm a reader, not a poster.

17 3.06 4 500 7200 Matte
MacRumorsReader is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 15, 2006, 11:15 AM   #4
PuNkErX
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
If you are using Photoshop or any higher end programs like that then go with the bootcamp option.

But for me I test software and websites, etc Parallel's works perfect for that. I can watch videos under it too, so I think for a beta software it is pretty good.

So if you are goin gaming, just boot into XP, I don't think there will be any virtualization software good enough to be able to play newer games, Video editing, etc.
PuNkErX is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 15, 2006, 11:25 AM   #5
trainguy77
macrumors 68040
 
trainguy77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Send a message via AIM to trainguy77 Send a message via MSN to trainguy77 Send a message via Yahoo to trainguy77
What I want to happen is a virtualization software that can use the same install as bootcamp. So when I need to check something in IE for windows, or check some info from a windows only program all I would have to do is start up virtualization. Then when I want more power for gaming I would re-boot. This is what I want. I hope its around by the time I get my intel mac.
trainguy77 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 15, 2006, 03:50 PM   #6
trickstern
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: la,ca,usa
thanks guys/gals - much appreciated - boot camp it will be
trickstern is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 15, 2006, 04:16 PM   #7
bousozoku
Moderator emeritus
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Gone but not forgotten.
By the time they're both done and VMWare is available, any of the choices should be good for most work. Parallels already supports OS/2 and Linux.

BootCamp would be better for games or other extremely processor-intensive software.
bousozoku is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 15, 2006, 04:21 PM   #8
ManchesterTrix
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Quote:
Originally Posted by trainguy77
What I want to happen is a virtualization software that can use the same install as bootcamp. So when I need to check something in IE for windows, or check some info from a windows only program all I would have to do is start up virtualization. Then when I want more power for gaming I would re-boot. This is what I want. I hope its around by the time I get my intel mac.
The biggest difficulty is that Windows would see it as two different machines, not to mention the whole video driver issue.
ManchesterTrix is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 15, 2006, 05:12 PM   #9
balamw
Moderator
 
balamw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: New England, USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by ManchesterTrix
The biggest difficulty is that Windows would see it as two different machines, not to mention the whole video driver issue.
This, IMHO, could be the real "secret weapon" apple has up it's sleeve for whatever Boot Camp turns into for Leopard.

Think about it. Unlike other hardware manufacturers or virtualization software companies, they actually have a very limited set of video and other hardware to support. What if they made their XP drivers compatible with both the direct hardware, or the virtualization environment. So that the XP drivers can detect if they are running in a VM and write to the hardware or not depending on what it's running on. This could be handled in the drivers themselves, or using XP's hardware configurations settings (usually used for docked/undocked laptops).

B
__________________
MBA (13" 1.7 GHz 128GB), UMBP (15" SD 2.8 GHz), UMB (13" 2.4 GHz), iMac (17" Yonah), 32GB iPad 3 WiFi+LTE, 64 GB iPad WiFi, 32 GB iPhone 5, Airport Extreme
balamw is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 15, 2006, 08:00 PM   #10
MacRumorUser
Thread Starter
macrumors Demi-God
 
MacRumorUser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Ireland
Quote:
Originally Posted by balamw
This, IMHO, could be the real "secret weapon" apple has up it's sleeve for whatever Boot Camp turns into for Leopard.

Think about it. Unlike other hardware manufacturers or virtualization software companies, they actually have a very limited set of video and other hardware to support. What if they made their XP drivers compatible with both the direct hardware, or the virtualization environment. So that the XP drivers can detect if they are running in a VM and write to the hardware or not depending on what it's running on. This could be handled in the drivers themselves, or using XP's hardware configurations settings (usually used for docked/undocked laptops).

B
Nice idea but wouldnt work, after all they are still going to have to rely on a WINDOWS operating system working flawlessly and just how they want it to... That's too much to ask any Windows OS Funny but ultimatly True.. I detect a blue screen coming up
__________________
A gentleman is one who never hurts anyone's feelings unintentionally.
MacRumor:User
Microsoft MVP : Macintosh
MacRumorUser is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old May 16, 2006, 10:15 AM   #11
barddzen
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Billerica, MA
Limited usage vs gaming machine

Hello,

Browsing this thread and for me, my main requirements would be to run IE, Office, MS Project, Visio, etc. for work and school.

Things that typically don't have a Mac version or equiv.

Right now I lug two laptops around.

Parallels seems fine for the work aspect of things, but when I'd have to VPN into our corporate network, my guess, from the descriptions here, I'd have to use Boot Camp?

Just rtying to flush out the limitations here. I really don't see myself using the machine for gaming (that's what I'm laying down the cash for a PS3), but definitely for business, development, architecture work as well as my home photos, movies, etc.
barddzen is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old May 16, 2006, 11:50 AM   #12
balamw
Moderator
 
balamw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: New England, USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by barddzen
Parallels seems fine for the work aspect of things, but when I'd have to VPN into our corporate network, my guess, from the descriptions here, I'd have to use Boot Camp?
Depends entirely on your company's VPN. The built-in OS X VPN client supports lots of concentrators. I routinely VPN in to the Cisco VPN work from my iBook G4 using the built-in VPN client, and even use Remote Desktop to run things on my XP desktop. Haven't tried Microsoft's Remote Desktop Client on the iMac, but since it'll run in Rosetta I'm not sure it would be much use...

B
__________________
MBA (13" 1.7 GHz 128GB), UMBP (15" SD 2.8 GHz), UMB (13" 2.4 GHz), iMac (17" Yonah), 32GB iPad 3 WiFi+LTE, 64 GB iPad WiFi, 32 GB iPhone 5, Airport Extreme
balamw is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old May 16, 2006, 11:58 AM   #13
Killian
macrumors member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Quote:
Originally Posted by trainguy77
What I want to happen is a virtualization software that can use the same install as bootcamp. So when I need to check something in IE for windows, or check some info from a windows only program all I would have to do is start up virtualization. Then when I want more power for gaming I would re-boot. This is what I want. I hope its around by the time I get my intel mac.

Why don't you just install BootCamp and Paralels? Then if you want to just check something out you can use Paralels, if you want to play games etc, reboot to XP?
__________________
iMac 20" + 250gb HD + 2gb mem + Intel Duo Processor + BootCamp = Happy Bunny!!
Killian is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old May 16, 2006, 12:13 PM   #14
mkrishnan
Moderator emeritus
 
mkrishnan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Grand Rapids, MI, USA
What I'd like to see Apple do, at a minimum, which should actually be very easy to implement, is to allow the system to safe sleep both OSes, so that it could hibernate OS X and defrost XP, and vice versa, and have both operating systems retain state (rather than rebooting).

This still wouldn't be perfect, but it would be full implementation (no emulating), without needing to shut down either OS, and it would only take ... what... 20-30 seconds ... to switch between already booted, apps running, versions of both OSes.

And it seems like this would be very easy to implement, since OS X and XP both already have hibernation functionality....
__________________
Mohan
mkrishnan is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old May 20, 2006, 12:07 PM   #15
trainguy77
macrumors 68040
 
trainguy77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Send a message via AIM to trainguy77 Send a message via MSN to trainguy77 Send a message via Yahoo to trainguy77
Quote:
Originally Posted by Killian
Why don't you just install BootCamp and Paralels? Then if you want to just check something out you can use Paralels, if you want to play games etc, reboot to XP?
But if I install bootcamp first can parallel access the XP partition? If so this is what I want. I don't want two copies of XP.
trainguy77 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old May 31, 2006, 01:48 PM   #16
jjcc543
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: May 2006
Photoshop faster on Parallels than Boot Camp.

It's true. And most other programs are as well. Check it. -> http://www.anandtech.com/mac/showdoc.aspx?i=2740&p=14
jjcc543 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 27, 2006, 09:08 PM   #17
MatBook
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Using audio in Windows (bootcamp)

NOT FULLY FUNCTIONING. No sound, No Airport. USB support questionable. Graphics still emulated. Still not full Native speed, as it will always be running on top of somthing else meaning things like Memory is limited (you can only assign certain amounts)... Software is going to be hit and miss, forget gaming and until sound works, anything to do with audio is out of the question.


I'm about to get a software program for a DJ unit. The software is only compatible on XP (connecting via USB). I will get sound from the actual unit, through and amp/headphones, but you say sound on (parallels) XP is not going to happen.....but bootcamp will do it all fine??

Last edited by MatBook; Jun 27, 2006 at 09:17 PM.
MatBook is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 26, 2007, 06:20 AM   #18
fedra
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
I need little help.

Hi guys!
I need to run a very cool software that is made only for Windows and I have a Mac.

Can you try for me this software and tell me if it works under BootCamp or Parallels?
If yes, then I will install BootCamp/Parallels in my Mac.


The program is called DNA Baser, is 1.3MB and it is located here:
http://www.dnabaser.com/download/download.html
or here: http://www.dnabaser.com/download/DNA...er%20Setup.exe

I will take only 10 seconds to download it and 5-10 seconds to install it. It does not ask to many questions at install, only the destination folder.

Thanks allot.
fedra is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 26, 2007, 09:17 AM   #19
EvilDoc
macrumors 6502a
 
EvilDoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Circumventing the multi-verse...
Send a message via AIM to EvilDoc Send a message via Yahoo to EvilDoc
yes it works in parrallels on an intel iMac 20inch
EvilDoc is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 26, 2007, 10:22 AM   #20
elppa
macrumors 68040
 
elppa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Looks ok on Parallels Build 3120 (which I think is the latest beta).

See attached.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	DNA Baser.jpg
Views:	139
Size:	162.9 KB
ID:	69148  
elppa is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 26, 2007, 12:54 PM   #21
himansk
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
build 3170 is the latest rc3
himansk is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 26, 2007, 06:13 PM   #22
fedra
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by himansk View Post
build 3170 is the latest rc3
Thank you VERY VERY VERY VERY much.

I asked for the same help earlier on Parallels official forum and they treated my like a garbage. I didn't expected to be hated by a moderator just because I asked for somebody that already have the Parallel installed to test a very small program for me.
Nice way to treat their possible clients. Of course I will try BootCamp now, instead of Parallels.

Thank you very much AGAIN, dear Elppa.
fedra is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 27, 2007, 08:13 AM   #23
amin
macrumors 6502a
 
amin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Boston, MA
Quote:
Originally Posted by MacRumorUser View Post
Simple differences, not saying ones better than the other (though one is )...

Parallels whilst a move in the right direction is TOO limited in its current status and needs a lot of optimisations yet, but is promising. But at the end of the day your going to be limited to what you can do with it until drivers etc are sorted. And then they will still be emulated ...

If you want to game, run all windows software NOW then bootcamp is the way to go...
Hmm, wonder which one you prefer . My solution is to run Vista in Boot Camp (it really needs all the RAM it can get - sharing RAM is suboptimal for Vista) and keep a lightweight version of XP in Parallels.
amin is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 27, 2007, 10:25 AM   #24
elppa
macrumors 68040
 
elppa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Quote:
Originally Posted by amin View Post
Hmm, wonder which one you prefer . My solution is to run Vista in Boot Camp (it really needs all the RAM it can get - sharing RAM is suboptimal for Vista) and keep a lightweight version of XP in Parallels.
Or, better still, use one installation of XP for bootcamp and parallels.

At the moment, I don't think there is anything Vista can run that XP can't.
elppa is offline   0 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > Apple Systems and Services > Windows, Linux & Others on the Mac

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Parallels VM vs Parallels Bootcamp Partition davenz Windows, Linux & Others on the Mac 3 Apr 14, 2013 08:38 AM
Parallels VM vs Parallels Bootcamp Partition davenz Windows, Linux & Others on the Mac 1 Apr 14, 2013 05:31 AM
Bootcamp in Parallels or just Parallels? Qwerty11 OS X 10.8 Mountain Lion 15 Nov 4, 2012 10:04 PM
Bootcamp in Parallels vs just Parallels Qwerty11 OS X 3 Nov 3, 2012 01:23 PM
Parallels and Bootcamp BasilFawlty Windows, Linux & Others on the Mac 1 Jun 14, 2012 07:26 AM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:15 PM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC