Register FAQ/Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to the Mac Forums forums. Please read the FAQ if you have questions. Register to participate.

 
Go Back   Mac Forums > Archive > Archives of Old Posts > MacRumors News Discussion (archive)
TouchArcade.com - iPhone Game Reviews and News

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Feb 4, 2003, 09:10 PM   #1
MacRumors
macrumors bot
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
iMac/eMac Rumor Wrapup: Winners and Losers

Apple released new iMacs and price dropped eMacs on Tuesday, Feb 4th, 2003. After each product release, MacRumors provides a wrapup of rumors to reveal the sources of the most accurate information.

Despite rumors of 19" iMacs last year -- Apple doesn't seem to agree. Beyond that, Spymac, MacOSRumors, and MacBidouille posted rumors that iMac would arrive at MacWorld San Francisco. ThinkSecret put a stop to those rumors in the days before MWSF, and this information turned out to be accurate -- MWSF came and went without iMac upgrades.

Attention was drawn towards the PowerMac/Display upgrades in the subsequent weeks, with Thinksecret first suggesting Feb 3rd as a tentative week for iMac updates. Meanwhile MacRumors sources provided a solid date of Feb 4th, as well as definitive details of the high-end iMac upgrade. Thinksecret then posted last minute price point of $1299 for the iMac, filling out the bottom end of the line, as well as details of eMac price drops.


MacNews.net.tc initially posted $999-$1699 specs which were echoed by Appleinsider immediately before the release. These specs were wrong, with no apparent basis, casting further doubts on these sources for future specs.

Summary

As mentioned before, accurate rumors are available... but with the influx of rumor sites, it's often difficult to discern accurate information from pure speculation.

It seems speculation and "predictions" are often passed off as rumors -- these practices should be discouraged and any purely speculative information is frowned upon (unless specifically stated as such), as it simply muddies the water and further incites unreasonable expectations amongst readers.

Some of this may be unavoidable, as frequently, sources of rumors may simply be based on unconfirmed reader contribution which has been known to miss their mark.

Last edited by arn : Feb 4, 2003 at 10:31 PM.
MacRumors is offline  
Old Feb 4, 2003, 09:14 PM   #2
MrMacMan
macrumors 601
 
MrMacMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: 1 Block away from NYC.
Send a message via AIM to MrMacMan
Yeah too many new rumor sites coming out of no where...
I mean there are just getting to be too many 'our vulcan mind tricks' tell us there will be a new iMac released, uh, tommorow. Sure it is based on other rumors, but no ones to back it up.
Arn your doing a great job filtering BS from reality.

Edit: FIRST POST. w00t.
__________________
There is a little Steve in all of us!
-->Folding is Fighting Against Disease and help MacRumors. Join Today!<--
Props to --> Shadowfax For Making My Avatar!
IM Me On AIM Already!
MrMacMan is offline  
Old Feb 4, 2003, 09:16 PM   #3
Freg3000
macrumors 68000
 
Freg3000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: New York
There were correct rumors out there. The only thing that I think everyone got wrong was the clock speed of the base model. Correct me if I'm wrong, (and I am sure someone will if I am ) but didn't ever rumor have a 867 MHz iMac?

Anyway, good job MacRumors. Keep it up.
__________________
FregTK
This Is Momentum.
Freg3000 is offline  
Old Feb 4, 2003, 09:18 PM   #4
arn
macrumors god
 
arn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Send a message via AIM to arn
Quote:
Originally posted by Freg3000
There were correct rumors out there. The only thing that I think everyone got wrong was the clock speed of the base model. Correct me if I'm wrong, (and I am sure someone will if I am ) but didn't ever rumor have a 867 MHz iMac?
Well, MacNews.net.tc posted a low end iMac at 800mhz... but they also reported 17" LCD's in 3 other models.

Hitting one or two numbers in Mhz doesn't count... especially when everything else is wrong. Unique hits... for example if they claimed it would be 823.2 Mhz and it turned out to be true... well, then I'd pay attention.

arn
arn is offline  
Old Feb 4, 2003, 09:23 PM   #5
Freg3000
macrumors 68000
 
Freg3000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: New York
Quote:
Originally posted by arn
Unique hits... for example if they claimed it would be 823.2 Mhz and it turned out to be true... well, then I'd pay attention.

arn
Unique hits...like nailing 12" and 17" Powerbooks @ MWSF ? I am still getting over that one!
__________________
FregTK
This Is Momentum.
Freg3000 is offline  
Old Feb 4, 2003, 09:31 PM   #6
MrMacMan
macrumors 601
 
MrMacMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: 1 Block away from NYC.
Send a message via AIM to MrMacMan
Quote:
Originally posted by arn


Well, MacNews.net.tc posted a low end iMac at 800mhz... but they also reported 17" LCD's in 3 other models.

Hitting one or two numbers in Mhz doesn't count... especially when everything else is wrong. Unique hits... for example if they claimed it would be 823.2 Mhz and it turned out to be true... well, then I'd pay attention.

arn
Is 823.2 even possible?
(just pulling your hypotheical leg)
Yeah the 12 & 17 " Powerbooks were out of no where.
I suppose super hush hush.
__________________
There is a little Steve in all of us!
-->Folding is Fighting Against Disease and help MacRumors. Join Today!<--
Props to --> Shadowfax For Making My Avatar!
IM Me On AIM Already!
MrMacMan is offline  
Old Feb 4, 2003, 09:34 PM   #7
unfaded
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Seattle, WA
MacOSRumours just the other day said "6-8 weeks" for iMac/eMac rumours. Needless to say, they have been deleted from my bookmarks, they're just ridiculous now.
__________________
Carpe Diem,
Jer Mendonsa
unfaded is offline  
Old Feb 4, 2003, 10:16 PM   #8
Rocket Rion
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Austin
People, like me, wanting a new iPod are also losers today.
Rocket Rion is offline  
Old Feb 4, 2003, 10:44 PM   #9
Freg3000
macrumors 68000
 
Freg3000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: New York
Quote:
Originally posted by MrMacman


Is 823.2 even possible?
(just pulling your hypotheical leg)
Well, it would be one strange multiplier....
__________________
FregTK
This Is Momentum.
Freg3000 is offline  
Old Feb 4, 2003, 11:19 PM   #10
reiggin
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Statesville, NC
Send a message via AIM to reiggin
Quote:
Originally posted by unfaded
MacOSRumours just the other day said "6-8 weeks" for iMac/eMac rumours. Needless to say, they have been deleted from my bookmarks, they're just ridiculous now.
they're the most pathetic site out there. just to think... 5 years ago, they were mecca... Ryan Meader, what the heck happened?!?!?!
reiggin is offline  
Old Feb 5, 2003, 12:35 AM   #11
shadowfax
macrumors Demi-God
 
shadowfax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Houston, TX
Send a message via AIM to shadowfax
Quote:
Originally posted by reiggin


they're the most pathetic site out there. just to think... 5 years ago, they were mecca... Ryan Meader, what the heck happened?!?!?!
his contacts died? got laid off?

they are a little weird; anyone who regularly speculates about quad processors lol.
__________________
iMac 3.06 GHz | 4GB RAM | 500 GB ::: Unibody MacBook 2.4 GHz | 4GB RAM| 250GB
80 GB Video iPod ::: 16 GB iPhone 3G
shadowfax is offline  
Old Feb 5, 2003, 02:44 AM   #12
Wardofsky
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Quote:
Originally posted by Rocket Rion
People, like me, wanting a new iPod are also losers today.
Same, sadly.

On the subjects of the New iMacs, if I have an iMac with an AP Extreme card in it, would that still communicate with 802.11b BS (Vice-Verca also)?

And are the new 802.11g any better at distance with out drop outs, snow BS have a range of 50m.
Wardofsky is offline  
Old Feb 5, 2003, 02:49 AM   #13
shadowfax
macrumors Demi-God
 
shadowfax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Houston, TX
Send a message via AIM to shadowfax
Quote:
Originally posted by Wardofsky


Same, sadly.

On the subjects of the New iMacs, if I have an iMac with an AP Extreme card in it, would that still communicate with 802.11b BS (Vice-Verca also)?

And are the new 802.11g any better at distance with out drop outs, snow BS have a range of 50m.
yeah, the technologies talk to each other. as in, your AP extreme will detect the slower BS and downgrade the frequency to that and talk at 802.11b speeds... i can't help you on range, i thought 802.11g wasd shorter range (being 2x the frequency), but i can't speak intelligently on that one.
__________________
iMac 3.06 GHz | 4GB RAM | 500 GB ::: Unibody MacBook 2.4 GHz | 4GB RAM| 250GB
80 GB Video iPod ::: 16 GB iPhone 3G
shadowfax is offline  
Old Feb 5, 2003, 02:53 AM   #14
bentmywookie
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Palo Alto
MacRumors and ThinkSecret!

Although I am not so happy with the iMac upgrades, I will say that the one definitively good thing to come out of it is that MacRumors and ThinkSecret have proven themselves to be really reliable sources of info regarding Apple.

Great job to both of them, keep up the great work and thanks!
bentmywookie is offline  
Old Feb 5, 2003, 03:23 AM   #15
Sun Baked
macrumors 603
 
Sun Baked's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
What happened to the speculation for killing off the 15" iMac low end and adding a 19" iMac on the high end?

All in all, some of the decisions are a little strange for Apple lately...
__________________
May you be plagued by images of Richard Simmons flouncing through you brain, and squat thrusting his way though all waking thoughts.
Sun Baked is offline  
Old Feb 5, 2003, 03:59 AM   #16
daddy-mojo
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: L.A.
Question video out question

So, does anyone know if the s-video/composite out option on the new 17" imac will allow for a tv monitor to be used in final cut pro? This could be my deciding factor as to whether I have to spend twice that to go to a tower (with a fair amount of extras added in). I know that the normal vga out just mirrors the desktop. I'm hoping that s-video out will work the same way as in powerbooks or after market video cards. Thanks in advance.
daddy-mojo is offline  
Old Feb 5, 2003, 04:16 AM   #17
Foocha
macrumors 6502a
 
Foocha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: London
I lost interest in MacOSRumors when they came out with the "Dodecahedron" PowerMac rumor, shortly after the cube was scrapped.
Foocha is offline  
Old Feb 5, 2003, 04:28 AM   #18
MacsRgr8
macrumors 601
 
MacsRgr8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The Netherlands
Re: video out question

Quote:
Originally posted by daddy-mojo
So, does anyone know if the s-video/composite out option on the new 17" imac will allow for a tv monitor to be used in final cut pro? This could be my deciding factor as to whether I have to spend twice that to go to a tower (with a fair amount of extras added in). I know that the normal vga out just mirrors the desktop. I'm hoping that s-video out will work the same way as in powerbooks or after market video cards. Thanks in advance.
"VGA display adapter Video out support
Need to connect to an external VGA display, projector or TV? That’s easy. Both iMac models feature mini-VGA output ports that work with an optional Apple VGA display adapter, and both support video mirroring. You can mirror your projects to an external display or projector — perfect for presentations and for sharing your ideas. Additionally, the 17-inch iMac comes with support for S-Video and composite video signals, so you can display your multimedia projects on a big-screen TV: simply connect your TV to the video output port via the optional Apple Video Adapter, and you’re on television."

Hmmm: "both support video mirroring"... it seems that there is no option to use the TV as a second monitor...
__________________
Drag and Drop for Windows users:
DRAG your peecee off your desk, and DROP it in the trash.
MacsRgr8 is offline  
Old Feb 5, 2003, 06:00 AM   #19
michaelyoung
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
We need a clock.

I love the fact that ARN puts the results of the rumors.
Personally, I would love even more context...like:

"The last accurate rumor from MacOSRumors was: Sept 92' - A Color Mac Classic"

Just like a master clock to further indicate reliability. Someone would need a lot of free time to put this together.


That being said, I pretty much only read this site now for rumors. Thanks for the great work!
michaelyoung is offline  
Old Feb 5, 2003, 06:21 AM   #20
aethier
macrumors 6502a
 
aethier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Montréal, Canada
Quote:
Originally posted by Shadowfax


yeah, the technologies talk to each other. as in, your AP extreme will detect the slower BS and downgrade the frequency to that and talk at 802.11b speeds... i can't help you on range, i thought 802.11g wasd shorter range (being 2x the frequency), but i can't speak intelligently on that one.
Im pretty sure that the website says that if you have a airport extreme bs with the airport xcard, it will have a 50 foot range.

But if you have a old airport card with the airport base station you get the normal 150 feet range.

also look into those Dr. BOT antanas that makes the range of your extreme BS 500feet..

for more info justy check the apple website...
aethier is offline  
Old Feb 5, 2003, 06:23 AM   #21
Bear
macrumors 68030
 
Bear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sol III - Terra
Quote:
Originally posted by aethier


Im pretty sure that the website says that if you have a airport extreme bs with the airport xcard, it will have a 50 foot range.

But if you have a old airport card with the airport base station you get the normal 150 feet range.

also look into those Dr. BOT antanas that makes the range of your extreme BS 500feet..

for more info justy check the apple website...
It's shorter ranges for the gigher speed. Get further away and the speed drops off.
__________________
-----Bear
Bear is offline  
Old Feb 5, 2003, 07:18 AM   #22
daddy-mojo
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: L.A.
Re: Re: video out question

Quote:
Originally posted by MacsRgr8


"VGA display adapter Video out support
Need to connect to an external VGA display, projector or TV? That?s easy. Both iMac models feature mini-VGA output ports that work with an optional Apple VGA display adapter, and both support video mirroring. You can mirror your projects to an external display or projector ? perfect for presentations and for sharing your ideas. Additionally, the 17-inch iMac comes with support for S-Video and composite video signals, so you can display your multimedia projects on a big-screen TV: simply connect your TV to the video output port via the optional Apple Video Adapter, and you?re on television."

Hmmm: "both support video mirroring"... it seems that there is no option to use the TV as a second monitor...
not so much a second monitor but for editing purposes. the imac lcd size is fine for the edit windows, but in final cut pro you can view your canvas window on a television at the same time so you know how the color looks and if your in title safe margins etc. its not really monitor spanning, but not quite mirroring either. i tried calling the apple store, but they really didn't tell me much more then what it says on the site. I guess i need to goto the apple store and see if someone at the genius bar knows. thanks again.
daddy-mojo is offline  
Old Feb 5, 2003, 08:56 AM   #23
rugby
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: chicago
Re: Re: Re: video out question

Apple's official position is that the vga port will do mirror only. However, a quick search of xlr8yourmac's website reveals hacks to enable dual desktops for iMacs.

Quote:
Originally posted by daddy-mojo


not so much a second monitor but for editing purposes. the imac lcd size is fine for the edit windows, but in final cut pro you can view your canvas window on a television at the same time so you know how the color looks and if your in title safe margins etc. its not really monitor spanning, but not quite mirroring either. i tried calling the apple store, but they really didn't tell me much more then what it says on the site. I guess i need to goto the apple store and see if someone at the genius bar knows. thanks again.
rugby is offline  
Old Feb 5, 2003, 09:21 AM   #24
daddy-mojo
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: L.A.
Re: Re: Re: Re: video out question

Quote:
Originally posted by rugby
Apple's official position is that the vga port will do mirror only. However, a quick search of xlr8yourmac's website reveals hacks to enable dual desktops for iMacs.

hmmm...is it a hardware or software hack? I visit xlr8 semi frequently. Couldn't find the link for what you referenced.
daddy-mojo is offline  
Old Feb 5, 2003, 09:56 AM   #25
NicoMan
macrumors 6502a
 
NicoMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Malmö, Sweden
Slot Loading drives?

A lot of people were, like, POSITIVE, that the new iMacs were going to come out with slot-loading drives. What happened to those guys??

NicoMan
NicoMan is offline  

 

Mac Forums > Archive > Archives of Old Posts > MacRumors News Discussion (archive)

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:25 PM.

Mac News | Mac Rumors | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2002-2009, MacRumors.com, LLC