PortalPlayer Losing Apple's iPod Business? - MacRumors Forums
Register FAQ / Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   MacRumors Forums > Archive > Archives of Old Posts > MacRumors News Discussion (archive)

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Apr 20, 2006, 03:01 AM   #1
MacRumors
macrumors bot
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
PortalPlayer Losing Apple's iPod Business?

http://www.macrumors.com/images/macrumorsthreadlogo.gif

PortalPlayer chips has been at the heart of the iPod since the very beginning and the company has grown substantially because of it. 90% of PortalPlayer's sales are said to be directly due to iPod sales.

According to an announcement today, PortalPlayer revealed that their successor to their current PP5021 media processor chip will not be used by Apple in "its new mid-range and high-end flash-based iPods."

Meanwhile, PortalPlayer believes the current chip "will continue to be used in other members of the iPod family."

Apple's current Flash-based iPods include the iPod shuffle and iPod nano.
MacRumors is offline   0
Old Apr 20, 2006, 03:03 AM   #2
the.snitch
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Auckland, NZ
intel chips perhaps in the next ipod?
the.snitch is offline   0
Old Apr 20, 2006, 03:10 AM   #3
ATG
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Quote:
intel chips perhaps in the next ipod?
LOL.

Does the new high end flash iPod refer to the nano or something else? I never really thought of the nano as high end.
ATG is offline   0
Old Apr 20, 2006, 03:16 AM   #4
bigandy
macrumors G3
 
bigandy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: B'more
maybe apple are leaning toward creating their own controller, and saving money..
__________________
"any day that involves cat pee is a really bad day" - iBlue
bigandy is offline   0
Old Apr 20, 2006, 03:26 AM   #5
kntgsp
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigandy
maybe apple are leaning toward creating their own controller, and saving money..
Seems like the most believable solution I can think of.
kntgsp is offline   0
Old Apr 20, 2006, 03:27 AM   #6
DeadEye686
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Austin
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigandy
maybe apple are leaning toward creating their own controller, and saving money..
And being able to design and possibly patent new features without other companies being able to purchase the controllers for their own mobile devices.
DeadEye686 is offline   0
Old Apr 20, 2006, 03:28 AM   #7
monkeyandy
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
either they might use intel chips for the future or don't expect any wi-fi/bt enabled ipods for a while!
monkeyandy is offline   0
Old Apr 20, 2006, 03:28 AM   #8
the.snitch
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Auckland, NZ
Quote:
Originally Posted by Macrumors
http://www.macrumors.com/images/macrumorsthreadlogo.gif

According to an announcement today, PortalPlayer revealed that their successor to their current PP5021 media processor chip will not be used by Apple in "its new mid-range and high-end flash-based iPods."
Come to think of it, just because the successor of the current chip wont be used in the next ipod, doesn't mean that PortalPlayer is losing Apple's Business.
Perhaps a higher end chip from PortalPlayer will be in the next ipod?
It would make sense if Apple continues to add features. The current interface is too laggy for my liking anyway. Not Snappy enough.
the.snitch is offline   0
Old Apr 20, 2006, 03:34 AM   #9
the.snitch
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Auckland, NZ
How about these chips in the next ipod?

"Intel finally unveils low-voltage chips - April 19, 2006"

http://news.com.com/2061-10791_3-6062775.html

"The Ultra Low Voltage Core Solo chips consume only 5.5 watts of power when running at their maximum"

The specs seem too high for just an ipod though...maybe a true 720p HD video ipod..
the.snitch is offline   0
Old Apr 20, 2006, 03:45 AM   #10
MrCrowbar
macrumors 68000
 
MrCrowbar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Quote:
Originally Posted by the.snitch
The specs seem too high for just an ipod though...maybe a true 720p HD video ipod..
Hmmm 720p works for me .
I tell you, we will get that 8 pounder Steve told us in "Super Secret Apple Rumors"
__________________
MrCrowbar is offline   0
Old Apr 20, 2006, 03:48 AM   #11
darwen
macrumors 6502a
 
darwen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: California, US
Quote:
Originally Posted by Macrumors
PortalPlayer revealed that their successor to their current PP5021 media processor chip will not be used by Apple in "its new mid-range and high-end flash-based iPods."
I wasnt aware that apple had a high end flash player. The Nano is mid and the shuffle is low. There is no high end flash player. Then again, this does say "future products"! Possible leak Does not add up though.
__________________
Darwen
darwen is offline   0
Old Apr 20, 2006, 04:38 AM   #12
Dr.Gargoyle
macrumors 65816
 
Dr.Gargoyle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: lat: 55.7222°N, long: 13.1971°E
Quote:
Originally Posted by Macrumors
http://www.macrumors.com/images/macrumorsthreadlogo.gif
According to an announcement today, PortalPlayer revealed that their successor to their current PP5021 media processor chip will not be used by Apple in "its new mid-range and high-end flash-based iPods."
This could indicate that the new high-end iPods will have additional features. I wonder what that would be...hmmm... cellphone?
__________________
Don't insult the freaks.
Dr.Gargoyle is offline   0
Old Apr 20, 2006, 04:48 AM   #13
monkeyandy
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Quote:
Originally Posted by darwen
I wasnt aware that apple had a high end flash player. The Nano is mid and the shuffle is low. There is no high end flash player. Then again, this does say "future products"! Possible leak Does not add up though.
I agree, but this is a rather interesting article on The Register. Have a read:

http://www.reghardware.co.uk/2006/04...ash_ipod_deal/

monkeyandy is offline   0
Old Apr 20, 2006, 05:29 AM   #14
eXan
macrumors 601
 
eXan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Russia
Send a message via ICQ to eXan Send a message via AIM to eXan Send a message via Skype™ to eXan
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrCrowbar
I tell you, we will get that 8 pounder Steve told us in "Super Secret Apple Rumors"
lol I like that thing. Do you mean the iPod with 7 inch screen SJ talked about at his demo of podacsting in Garage Band?
__________________
My WoW videos
13" Retina MacBook Pro 2.4 GHz | 8 GB | 256 GB | Intel Iris
eXan is offline   0
Old Apr 20, 2006, 06:20 AM   #15
Analog Kid
macrumors 68030
 
Analog Kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Quote:
Originally Posted by Macrumors
According to an announcement today, PortalPlayer revealed that their successor to their current PP5021 media processor chip will not be used by Apple in "its new mid-range and high-end flash-based iPods."

Meanwhile, PortalPlayer believes the current chip "will continue to be used in other members of the iPod family."
It's referring to Apple's mid and high end flash players, not how they compare with the market in general. My guess is that this means Nano and Apple is cost reducing the unit by going with another source.

I really doubt Apple will go with a self made processor. Doesn't make sense... They can easily get a third party to build whatever Apple would want for this trophy product and not have to assume the risk.

I'm sure that's why Apple never just bought PortalPlayer-- they wanted this kind of flexibility. They've never seen the processor as a differentiator.

Still waiting to see Xscale in the iPod. Probably not in the Nanos, but in the HDD based units.
__________________
Only trolls use the word "fanboy".
Analog Kid is offline   0
Old Apr 20, 2006, 07:40 AM   #16
mrgreen4242
macrumors 601
 
mrgreen4242's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Quote:
Originally Posted by ATG
LOL.

Does the new high end flash iPod refer to the nano or something else? I never really thought of the nano as high end.
Why the laugh? The XScale is an Intel chip that could be adapted for use in an iPod, especially if they wanted better video playback, or some PDA like features. I think it is certainly plausible, if not likely.

I'd say that while the nano is currently Apple high end flash player, since it uses PortalPlayer chips and being so tightly designed it would be a PITA to redesign for a whole new CPU architecture, that something else could be in the works. Perhaps a "full sized" flash based player with video playback? There are some new flash thumbdrives out there pushing the 30gb point, if I remember the slashdot article correctly.

EDIT: Just a thought, but it would actually be kinda cool to have a device that is roughly nano sized/shaped but ~2x as thick... with a [GOOD - non cell phone type] camera and wireless connectivity built in. Have 4-6gb of internal media and an SD card slot for expansion... I'd assume the'd have to use another chip that supported camera functions fot such a device.

Same thing goes for an iPhone, which presumably would be the high end flash player.
__________________
Mac Pro 4,1, 8x2.26ghz, 10gb, 128gb SSD, 2x750gb (RAID1), 2tb, ATI6750
iPad air 64gb wifi - 16gb iPhone 5s - AppleTV3

Last edited by mrgreen4242; Apr 20, 2006 at 07:58 AM.
mrgreen4242 is offline   0
Old Apr 20, 2006, 09:05 AM   #17
Evangelion
macrumors 68040
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Quote:
Originally Posted by the.snitch
How about these chips in the next ipod?

"Intel finally unveils low-voltage chips - April 19, 2006"

http://news.com.com/2061-10791_3-6062775.html

"The Ultra Low Voltage Core Solo chips consume only 5.5 watts of power when running at their maximum"

The specs seem too high for just an ipod though...maybe a true 720p HD video ipod..
Uh, that's pretty dumb idea IMO. A full-blown CPU in the iPod?? If there will be something from the Intel-camp in the iPod, I would look out for Xscale.
Evangelion is offline   0
Old Apr 20, 2006, 09:20 AM   #18
jrv3034
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
I have a feeling that Apple wants to move into Flash-based players for their entire lineup ASAP. No more dead HDDs to deal with. Flash is the future, and I agree with the Register article linked above that they'll intro a high-end flash iPod, maybe 10GB, and save the HDD for the touch-screen Video iPod.
jrv3034 is offline   0
Old Apr 20, 2006, 10:10 AM   #19
JDOG_
macrumors 6502a
 
JDOG_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Oakland
Quote:
Originally Posted by the.snitch
...maybe a true 720p HD video ipod..
I would love to see something with a 1280×720 display that can fit in your pocket

I am sad to see them dumping portalplayer, but it makes sense from a business perspective, as having control of all the components is important for maximizing future revenue. I'd be a bit bummed if I were portalplayer, but I'm sure they'll innovate some new tech for other devices.
__________________
XBOX Live Gamertag: Tarengo
Machine: 2.4GHZ Aluminum Macbook
JDOG_ is offline   0
Old Apr 20, 2006, 10:25 AM   #20
blueimac'00
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Brooklyn
If apple used more highend chips in there ipods, and added wireless capabilities or something, then the ipod would be almost like a psp.
blueimac'00 is offline   0
Old Apr 20, 2006, 11:11 AM   #21
killmoms
macrumors 68040
 
killmoms's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Send a message via AIM to killmoms Send a message via Yahoo to killmoms
Wasn't there some new ultra-low-voltage chip capable of decoding at least 640 x 480 H.264 released recently? I seem to recall reading that somewhere... Maybe Apple's trying to find a more powerful video-decoding processor so they can stop selling 320 x 240 crap on the iTMS and at LEAST move up to SD.
__________________
thrillmoms.com - You know it.
Welcome to the family…
Mugi: Mid-2012 15" Retina MBP, 8GB RAM, 256GB SSD
Azusa: 64GB iPhone 5, Nagato: 16GB WiFi Retina iPad Mini
killmoms is offline   0
Old Apr 20, 2006, 11:34 AM   #22
mmmcheese
macrumors 6502a
 
mmmcheese's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Is it maybe a possibility that the new chipset has all sorts of features they have no interest in using, and the current chipset does everything they want? What would be the point of buying more expensive chipsets if the current one does everything you want? This doesn't mean Apple wouldn't add features, just not the ones that PortalPlayer has added.

Something to think about anyway.
mmmcheese is offline   0
Old Apr 20, 2006, 12:26 PM   #23
boncellis
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Salt Lake City
Quote:
Originally Posted by darwen
I wasnt aware that apple had a high end flash player. The Nano is mid and the shuffle is low. There is no high end flash player. Then again, this does say "future products"! Possible leak Does not add up though.
That one troubled me as well. Does "high end" refer to the capacity? If so, the 4 GB Nano is the high end flash player--doesn't really make sense. Maybe this is a hint of things to come, though I think most people already expect a 8 GB Nano to be somewhere in the pipeline. Maybe it will have new features that distinguish it somehow.
boncellis is offline   0
Old Apr 20, 2006, 12:42 PM   #24
Oats
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: New York
Quote:
Originally Posted by Analog Kid
My guess is that this means Nano and Apple is cost reducing the unit by going with another source.
I think many of you are missing the main point....

With PortalPlayer's announcement, it is very likely they are losing 0% of Apple's business.

PortalPlayer is coming out with a SUCCESSOR to their existing media chip... this successor probably has additional features, tailored for additional media capabilities. It is VERY possible that this chip was specifically developed for APPLE for use in its high-end ipod line (read: iPod video). The high-end FLASH ipods, such as the nano, won't use this SUCCESSOR because they don't need the new features from the new chip.... so the FLASH ipods could continue using PortalPlayers current chips.
Oats is offline   0
Old Apr 20, 2006, 12:54 PM   #25
Larshart
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Samsung 32gb Flash

I'm sure in the not to distant future, Apple's deal with Samsung for Flash Memory will come into play with probably a 32GB and a 64GB(2 chips) iPod. As will the use of Leopard's proposed ability to scale down for use on embedded applications, such as Intel's XScale chips (or the new Ultra Low Voltage Core Single Chip). To create an iPod that runs a version of Leopard, plays all your movies and music, and could possibly have VoIP and Cellular phone features.

Larshart is offline   0


 
MacRumors Forums > Archive > Archives of Old Posts > MacRumors News Discussion (archive)

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Losing patience with new iPod and transfers lightning33 iPod 2 Aug 24, 2013 04:50 AM
Ipod touch 4 losing web but wifi signal strong Ipod touch4user iPod touch 4 Jul 2, 2013 08:35 PM
iPod Touch 5G Battery losing 10-20% over night Zmanbaseball2 iPod touch 14 Mar 20, 2013 01:53 PM
5th gen iPod Touch keeps losing wifi connection trung979 iPod touch 6 Jan 12, 2013 09:19 AM
Resolved: Updating a jailbroken iPod without losing Cydia/Installous data Llorenzaccio iPod touch 4 Jan 7, 2013 03:32 PM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:11 AM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC