Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Apr 12, 2001
63,526
30,831
Apple Releases 17'' MacBook Pro



As rumored, Apple announced the 17" MacBook Pro today at the NAB conference.

The new 17-inch MacBook Pro features a stunning aluminum enclosure just one inch thin, weighs only 6.8 pounds, includes a built-in iSight™ video camera for video conferencing on-the-go, and the breakthrough Front Row media experience with Apple Remote. The new 17-inch MacBook Pro also features a MagSafe™ Power Adapter, invented by Apple especially for mobile users.

Specs include:

2.16 Intel Core Duo Processor
667 MHz front-side bus
Up to 2GB of RAM (667 MHz DDR@ SDRAM)
iSight Camera
MagSafe Power Adapter
ATI Mobility Radeon X1600 PCI Express graphics 256MB
Firewire 800, Firewire 400
Bluetooth, Airport Extreme
$2799

Available at the Apple Store and shipping next week.
 

jimN

macrumors 6502a
Jun 23, 2005
941
17
London
just 300 dollars more than the 15" and with faster processor, biiger hard drive, dl superdrive (must be possible within the inch then) and FW800. Can't complain about that.
 

MRU

macrumors Penryn
Aug 23, 2005
25,368
8,948
a better place
Funniest thing is the pricing.

A 15.4" with the 2.16 BTO and 120GB HD comes in at Eur 2,924.68

A 17" with same spec costs Eur 2,694.67

250 Euro cheaper than the 15" ??? That's fecked up. I suspect Apple are going to have to do some price re-structuring in its 15" range as it does not represent good value in its current form.
 

mpw

Guest
Jun 18, 2004
6,363
1
That price seems low when you compare it to the 15". Upgrade the 15" to match the 2.16Ghz and 120Gb HDD of the 17" and it comes out £60 more (UK pricing) and you then get the extra ports, screen and DL 8xSuperdrive on top. I hope this means the 15" is due a price drop.
 

iSee

macrumors 68040
Oct 25, 2004
3,539
272
Wow! Now that it's happened it seems so sudden.
Well, this is great news. Apple is just marching along executing their transition plan...
 

maverick808

macrumors 65816
Jun 30, 2004
1,142
150
Scotland
The tech specs page has been updated and claims 5.5 hours battery for the 17". The 15" info has also been entered and claims 4.5 hours. I get 2.5 hours max on my 15" MBP... anyone get better than that?
 

Tomaz

macrumors 6502
Feb 24, 2004
311
0
Switzerland
is the 17" thicker than the 15" ??
Cause the reason why they didn't put double layer into the 15" was thickness issues, right?
Anyone know ? :confused:
 

jcoffman78

macrumors newbie
Mar 4, 2006
25
0
Bs

Who gives a rats ass about a 17in Macbook Pro. unless you have 2800.00 to blow. Damn you Steve give me my Macbook!!!!!(In Black Preferably)
 

peanut48

macrumors regular
Apr 4, 2006
181
6
huh??

not fair....I want a 12" or 13" macbook now......awwwww come on apple.....I'm dying to switch and cant hold on any longer....
 

odedia

macrumors 65816
Nov 24, 2005
1,044
149
And most probably has none of the annoying 15" revision A problems. Man. They are really getting it out there aren't they...

Maybe I should sell my spankin' new 15" MBP :) :) :)
 

MrCrowbar

macrumors 68020
Jan 12, 2006
2,232
519
Wow, I though it qould be way more expensive. It's really just a few bucks more than the maxed out 15". Well done for FW 800 and the DL drive. I am smitten :eek:
 

aegisdesign

macrumors 6502a
Apr 19, 2005
875
0
Tomaz said:
is the 17" thicker than the 15" ??
Cause the reason why they didn't put double layer into the 15" was thickness issues, right?
Anyone know ? :confused:

Same thickness. However, the 17" is bigger so they can move stuff that would otherwise be under the drive out of the way.

Unless they've now got a thinner dual layer drive of course. In that case I'd guess a quiet 15" upgrade is on the cards.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.