Register FAQ / Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   MacRumors Forums > Archive > Archives of Old Posts > MacBytes.com News Discussion

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Apr 26, 2006, 06:31 PM   #1
MacBytes
macrumors bot
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Invention: Apple's all-seeing screen




Category: Apple Hardware
Link: Invention: Apple's all-seeing screen
Description:: We could soon see a new kind of display screen from computer maker Apple one that simultaneously takes pictures while showing images.

Posted on MacBytes.com
Approved by Mudbug
MacBytes is offline   0
Old Apr 26, 2006, 06:36 PM   #2
mpw
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Wow, I was thinking about putting the iSight camera in the screen just yesterday.
I was thinking that if you could put the camera in the screen eye contact when video calling would be better, if you've got multiple image sensors I guess that would be true even in a 4-way iChat.
mpw is offline   0
Old Apr 26, 2006, 06:43 PM   #3
nicksoper
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Cape Town
I saw this on slashdot, and I was hoping this was going to be published on the front page, so I could try and get the first post.... But my plan was foiled!

Sensors in the screen is cool, but perhaps people are barking up the wrong tree. Perhaps there is more of a motion tracking agenda in apples plans.

Fair enough people can look straight at the camera, it will work that way, but I think thats where the applications of this technology begins.

Imagine more dynamic touch screens that know how far you are away from the screen, and allow for much more input. I mean we've all seen the video of the multi input touch screen (kinda like minority report), I dont have the link to hand.

Apple is known for inovations in human computer interaction, and I wouldn't put it past them to try and use this for more than just an invisible iSight.
__________________
Nicksoper.com
My Surf Photo's Blog
nicksoper is offline   0
Old Apr 26, 2006, 06:49 PM   #4
WildCowboy
Administrator/Editor
 
WildCowboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Quote:
Originally Posted by nicksoper
I saw this on slashdot, and I was hoping this was going to be published on the front page, so I could try and get the first post.... But my plan was foiled!
Don't know that it would make it to the main page again, as it already made it up there when this was first revealed back in January.
__________________
Editor in Chief, MacRumors
WildCowboy is offline   0
Old Apr 26, 2006, 06:55 PM   #5
GeeYouEye
macrumors 68000
 
GeeYouEye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: State of Denial
Send a message via AIM to GeeYouEye Send a message via Yahoo to GeeYouEye
Old news. Still, I'm not sure whether I should be happy or worried that Apple basically has a patent on a telescreen. On the one hand, it is Apple. On the other hand, I'm sure even Apple has it's price.
__________________
I bring order to chaos. You are in chaos Windows, you are the contradiction, a bug wishing to be an OS.
Visit Softyards Software
NEW DEFINITION OF GEEK
Like politics, free speech, computers, entertainment, and more? Join us at Wordforge.net
GeeYouEye is offline   0
Old Apr 26, 2006, 07:01 PM   #6
Daveway
macrumors 68040
 
Daveway's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: New Orleans / Lafayette, La
Send a message via AIM to Daveway
This sounds very scifi, almost too good to be true as of right now. I can't imagine what kind of quality an lcd would offer with this functionality, no good for sure. I keep having ideas of a screen with little dots that resemble dead pixels.

Either way, if you thought the ACDs were expensive, we haven't touched the tip of the pricing iceberg.
__________________
Spare me my life.
Daveway is offline   0
Old Apr 26, 2006, 07:03 PM   #7
mpw
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daveway
...I keep having ideas of a screen with little dots that resemble dead pixels...
Hey iGary, they're watching you!!!
mpw is offline   0
Old Apr 26, 2006, 07:03 PM   #8
GeeYouEye
macrumors 68000
 
GeeYouEye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: State of Denial
Send a message via AIM to GeeYouEye Send a message via Yahoo to GeeYouEye
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daveway
This sounds very scifi, almost too good to be true as of right now. I can't imagine what kind of quality an lcd would offer with this functionality, no good for sure. I keep having ideas of a screen with little dots that resemble dead pixels.

Either way, if you thought the ACDs were expensive, we haven't touched the tip of the pricing iceberg.
Too good to be true? Read 1984.
__________________
I bring order to chaos. You are in chaos Windows, you are the contradiction, a bug wishing to be an OS.
Visit Softyards Software
NEW DEFINITION OF GEEK
Like politics, free speech, computers, entertainment, and more? Join us at Wordforge.net
GeeYouEye is offline   0
Old Apr 26, 2006, 07:36 PM   #9
plinkoman
macrumors 65816
 
plinkoman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: New York
Quote:
Originally Posted by nicksoper
I saw this on slashdot, and I was hoping this was going to be published on the front page, so I could try and get the first post.... But my plan was foiled!
why do you care about getting the first post? trying to get the first post is meaningless, stupid and immature. not to mention against the rules

Quote:
Originally Posted by forum rules
Useless posts. Do not bother making posts with only one or two words (e.g., LOL) or a smilie, or post simply to have the first reply in a thread. Such posts waste everyone's time and will be deleted.
in any case, i'm wondering what the quality would be compared to a traditional camera. it'd certainly be interesting to see.
__________________
15" MacBook Pro | 2.66 GHz i7 | 8GB RAM | HiRes Anti-Glare
2nd Gen iPod touch 16GB
iPad 2 WiFi 32GB - on order
plinkoman is offline   0
Old Apr 26, 2006, 08:13 PM   #10
nagromme
macrumors G4
 
nagromme's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daveway
Either way, if you thought the ACDs were expensive, we haven't touched the tip of the pricing iceberg.
Seriously. Imagine Apple making their own low-volume LCD panels!

The only way I can see this being practical (in, say, 2067) would be Apple licensing it to lots of companies, who sell displays to a mass cross-platform market. Then you have volume and the cost MIGHT come down to close to what a regular LCD costs. But that volume would depend on Windows PCs making good use of something Apple would probably intend for Macs alone.

It's hard for me to see the economics working out, compared to other videoconferencing solutions. Many Apple patents never become products. I think this is probably one of them.

It's neat though But it sounds awkward: the stitching of the images would have to vary depending on your distance to the camera... and an average scene has multiple distances. You couldn't get multiple cameras to see the scene from the same perspective (parallax problem). An object hidden behind your head from one camera would be visible from another camera. It would take more than stitching to make a conventional image out of that. Tiling multiple images taken in different directions from ONE point is one thing (like with QTVR), but this seems much different. I'd be curious to study it more sometime.
nagromme is offline   0
Old Apr 26, 2006, 08:21 PM   #11
nagromme
macrumors G4
 
nagromme's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
It would be neat (talk about expensive!) if EACH pixel's camera had the full quality of an iSight. Only one of them would be needed at a time... but iChat would always transmit from the camera at the center of the video window. So even when you drag the window around, eye contact would be maintained

And if you have a multi-way chat, each person would receive video from the camera in THEIR window. They'd see your head turn right to THEM when you looked at their window. No matter where on the screen the views might be located.

Meanwhile, we'll have to settle for dragging the iChat window to the top of the screen for best eye contact.
nagromme is offline   0
Old Apr 26, 2006, 09:59 PM   #12
Aussie John
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
I guess it might go the same way as the invention I read about where by the screen was the speakers
Aussie John is offline   0
Old Apr 26, 2006, 10:43 PM   #13
Analog Kid
macrumors 68030
 
Analog Kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Quote:
Originally Posted by nicksoper
Sensors in the screen is cool, but perhaps people are barking up the wrong tree. Perhaps there is more of a motion tracking agenda in apples plans.

Fair enough people can look straight at the camera, it will work that way, but I think thats where the applications of this technology begins.

Imagine more dynamic touch screens that know how far you are away from the screen, and allow for much more input. I mean we've all seen the video of the multi input touch screen (kinda like minority report), I dont have the link to hand.

Apple is known for inovations in human computer interaction, and I wouldn't put it past them to try and use this for more than just an invisible iSight.
I think you're probably right. I've been sitting here trying to figure out how they'd get an 30" camera to focus. For what you're talking about, they wouldn't have to. They also wouldn't need sophisticated sensors-- basically just enough to tell if there's a finger on top of it or not.

And yeah, if it were able to read at a moderate distance, you could pull your had away from the screen and the screen could get a 3D perspective of the scene in front of it (parallax across the sensor array).

This also handles the other problem I had which was "geez, that's a lot of trouble to go through for such crappy resolution".

I don't expect to see this anytime soon...
__________________
Only trolls use the word "fanboy".
Analog Kid is offline   0
Old Apr 26, 2006, 11:58 PM   #14
Analog Kid
macrumors 68030
 
Analog Kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Quote:
Originally Posted by nagromme
It's neat though But it sounds awkward: the stitching of the images would have to vary depending on your distance to the camera... and an average scene has multiple distances. You couldn't get multiple cameras to see the scene from the same perspective (parallax problem). An object hidden behind your head from one camera would be visible from another camera. It would take more than stitching to make a conventional image out of that. Tiling multiple images taken in different directions from ONE point is one thing (like with QTVR), but this seems much different. I'd be curious to study it more sometime.
Been going through the same kinds of thoughts... What kind of angle of view would you use? Make it too wide and the pixels overlap too much at a distance, make it two narrow and you get pinholes close in.

I don't think they'd try to squeeze more than one sensor pixel per display pixel, so the parallax problem you're describing would result in blur, I think (each point of the observed object will spread to multiple sensor pixels).
__________________
Only trolls use the word "fanboy".
Analog Kid is offline   0
Old Apr 27, 2006, 12:45 AM   #15
greatdevourer
macrumors 68000
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Quote:
Originally Posted by GeeYouEye
Too good to be true? Read 1984.
Telescreens, anyone?
greatdevourer is offline   0
Old Apr 27, 2006, 03:11 AM   #16
winmacguy
macrumors 68020
 
winmacguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: New Zealand
Quote:
Originally Posted by nicksoper
I saw this on slashdot, and I was hoping this was going to be published on the front page, so I could try and get the first post.... But my plan was foiled!
First post on MacBytes is not a very big deal. I think it is harder to get first post on MR though.
__________________
With Windows iWork, with Apple iCreate
winmacguy is offline   0
Old Apr 27, 2006, 08:19 AM   #17
backupdrummer
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Chi town
Send a message via AIM to backupdrummer Send a message via Yahoo to backupdrummer
Wow if they could build and/or license this Apple would make a killing.

I especially like the idea of using it on cell phones. iPhone anyone?


(sorry had to be done)
__________________
Do brush your teeth.
Don't brush your teeth with peanut butter.
backupdrummer is offline   0
Old Apr 27, 2006, 08:33 AM   #18
calebjohnston
macrumors 68000
 
calebjohnston's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Send a message via AIM to calebjohnston Send a message via MSN to calebjohnston
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daveway
This sounds very scifi, almost too good to be true as of right now. I can't imagine what kind of quality an lcd would offer with this functionality, no good for sure. I keep having ideas of a screen with little dots that resemble dead pixels.

Either way, if you thought the ACDs were expensive, we haven't touched the tip of the pricing iceberg.
Ohhh, I definitely agree with you there. Better start working on selling some of my 39,000 beach homes I guess.

(I'm 18, and have no job. Apparently no life either)
calebjohnston is offline   0
Old Apr 27, 2006, 10:26 AM   #19
shamino
macrumors 68040
 
shamino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Vienna, VA
Quote:
Originally Posted by nagromme
It would be neat (talk about expensive!) if EACH pixel's camera had the full quality of an iSight. Only one of them would be needed at a time... but iChat would always transmit from the camera at the center of the video window. So even when you drag the window around, eye contact would be maintained
Well, that's an interesting approach... And definitely expensive.

See also this post, I wrote in the original thread. Minolta has been experimenting with lenslet arrays for quite some time. A large grid of low-resolution sensors can (when used in conjunction with appropriate software) take pictures with detail equivalent to a traditional element twice the size of the array, and without any focussing requirements (since each lenslet will be small enough to act as a pinhole lens - which doesn't need focussing.)

If you created an array the size of a standard 19" panel, we're talking about a really high resolution camera that's always in focus.

As for selecting images from behind different windows (your iChat scenario), depending on how the firmware is designed, the system could choose to only use the lenslets in a region of the screen. You'd get a lower resolution image, but it would be directional from the location of those lenslets.

I can't wait to get one for myself. (And to all the 1984 fans, are you equally paranoid about the iSight-equipped iMacs? As long as there's an in-use light, so I'll always know when it's on, I really have no problem with this feature.)
__________________
In theory, theory is the same as practice. In practice, it isn't.
shamino is offline   0


 
MacRumors Forums > Archive > Archives of Old Posts > MacBytes.com News Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Where the Bourne stories a CIA invention to discredit leaks? aristotle Politics, Religion, Social Issues 18 Sep 17, 2013 11:11 AM
Invention Squilly Community Discussion 6 Jan 15, 2013 09:07 AM
I need this new invention wknapp0924 iPhone 4 Jan 10, 2013 06:27 PM
Quirky Apple Invention - 24Hrs cuencap Community Discussion 0 Sep 13, 2012 01:13 AM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:53 AM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC