Go Back   MacRumors Forums > Apple Hardware > PowerPC Macs

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Jul 15, 2006, 10:50 AM   #1
Powerbookdriver
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Lake Mary, Florida
Funny isn't it (no respect for G4 Powerbooks)

Isn't it funny how so many individuals are now treating the G4 Powerbooks like second rate pieces of crap. All I hear is MBP this and MBP that, give the G4 Powerbook's their just respect. They were and continue to be good machines that perform their tasks well. The Macbook Pro is a wonderful machine, however, some still perfer the Powerbooks. Maybe I have an emotional attachment to mine and maybe not. One thing I hate is some in here sound like PC owners bragging about their latest buy. I thought being a Mac owner was more a life style rather than an ego trip?

_______________
15" G4 Powerbook 1.67ghz/100g/1.5g ram rev d
G3 Powerbook Pismo 500mhz/80g/384 ram
Ipod 20g 4th gen
Ipod Mini 4g

Last edited by Powerbookdriver; Jul 15, 2006 at 11:01 AM.
Powerbookdriver is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 15, 2006, 11:10 AM   #2
andy89
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Folkestone, England
Send a message via Skype™ to andy89
I totally agree. Theres nothing wrong with G4 powerbooks, yours owns everything I have .
andy89 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 15, 2006, 11:10 AM   #3
thegreatluke
macrumors 6502a
 
thegreatluke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Earth
That's the way it is with every new product and revision.

We Mac users are spoiled, spoiled people.
__________________
Stock MBP 1.83 GHz
Have a nice day.
thegreatluke is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 15, 2006, 11:12 AM   #4
BlizzardBomb
macrumors 68030
 
BlizzardBomb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: England
G4 PBs are definitely not crap. They are still very capable machines. As for people bragging about their latest buy, while there's been more of those kind of threads, I think its been the norm for a while.
__________________
Mid '09 13" MBP, Rev. B iMac G5
Retired: 4th Gen iPod 20 GB, 1st Gen iPod nano 2 GB, iPod classic 80 GB
BlizzardBomb is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 15, 2006, 11:15 AM   #5
andy89
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Folkestone, England
Send a message via Skype™ to andy89
Not every mac user can afford to be spoiled. I started saving for a G4, then the G5's cames out and the price went up, so I had to save up for a bit longer, and now the mac pros are going to come out. But hopefully this time I will have enough for a fully loaded one
andy89 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 15, 2006, 11:25 AM   #6
Powerbookdriver
Thread Starter
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Lake Mary, Florida
I think part of the problem is people today are not satisfied. They are consumed with obtaining more and never really use what they have. It's all about impressing others. We have the need to feel important, so we go out pay for something we don't really need and it gives us that false sense of importance.

Free yourself and be content! I will upgrade when my current Powerbook only when I need too.

_______________
15" G4 Powerbook 1.67ghz/100g/1.5g ram rev d
G3 Powerbook Pismo 500mhz/80g/384 ram
Ipod 20g 4th gen
Ipod Mini 4g
Powerbookdriver is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 15, 2006, 12:20 PM   #7
Skeeball236
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Send a message via AIM to Skeeball236
del
__________________
I heard the colors screaming as they slid down my throat.

Last edited by Skeeball236; Sep 4, 2006 at 11:16 AM.
Skeeball236 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 15, 2006, 12:33 PM   #8
mac000
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
G4's are so '99
mac000 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 15, 2006, 12:36 PM   #9
steamboat26
macrumors 65816
 
steamboat26's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Arlington VA
Send a message via AIM to steamboat26 Send a message via Yahoo to steamboat26
I have a stupid newbie question: why was the G5 processor never implemented in ibooks, powerbooks, or mac minis? Was it just not around long enough, or was it not designed for laptops, or did it run too hot to be used in laptops?
__________________
-Mac Mini duo core 1.66 Ghz, 1 GB RAM, 80 GB HD, Mac OS 10.4.10
-iPod Nano 4 GB Black
-iMac G3 500 Mhz, 384 MB RAM, 20 GB HD, Mac OS 10.3.9
steamboat26 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 15, 2006, 12:48 PM   #10
TheAnswer
macrumors 68030
 
TheAnswer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Orange County, CA
Quote:
Originally Posted by steamboat26
I have a stupid newbie question: why was the G5 processor never implemented in ibooks, powerbooks, or mac minis? Was it just not around long enough, or was it not designed for laptops, or did it run too hot to be used in laptops?
Not designed for laptops and WAY too hot.

I think the fact the G5 never made it to the powerbooks is why people are looking down on the G4s now, because they waited so long for a decent revision. Imagine if the PowerMacs went from G3 to G5, with the difference of two generations of processors, the same situation would probably exist.
TheAnswer is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 15, 2006, 01:13 PM   #11
Passante
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: on the sofa
Well my 12 in PB is starting to look a little old. She's only 3 years old but next to a sexy black MacBook with a gorgeous wide screen.....
__________________
Never switched
Passante is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 15, 2006, 01:19 PM   #12
BlizzardBomb
macrumors 68030
 
BlizzardBomb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: England
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheAnswer
Not designed for laptops and WAY too hot.

I think the fact the G5 never made it to the powerbooks is why people are looking down on the G4s now, because they waited so long for a decent revision. Imagine if the PowerMacs went from G3 to G5, with the difference of two generations of processors, the same situation would probably exist.
No it was not. If PC companies can get P4s in laptops a G5 laptop was easily possible. Look at the iMac for example.
__________________
Mid '09 13" MBP, Rev. B iMac G5
Retired: 4th Gen iPod 20 GB, 1st Gen iPod nano 2 GB, iPod classic 80 GB
BlizzardBomb is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 15, 2006, 01:26 PM   #13
codo
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: England, United Kingdom
Quote:
Originally Posted by Powerbookdriver
I think part of the problem is people today are not satisfied. They are consumed with obtaining more and never really use what they have. It's all about impressing others. We have the need to feel important, so we go out pay for something we don't really need and it gives us that false sense of importance.

Free yourself and be content! I will upgrade when my current Powerbook only when I need too.
You should watch the film/doc "The Corporation", you would probably find it interesting, if you havenít already seen it.
codo is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 15, 2006, 02:03 PM   #14
NorCalLights
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlizzardBomb
No it was not. If PC companies can get P4s in laptops a G5 laptop was easily possible. Look at the iMac for example.
Except that the PC laptops that have desktop processors in them are 2" (or more) thick and sound like helicopters. I'm actually glad that Apple didn't take the easy way out and sacrifice the design of their product to squeeze in a new processor.
NorCalLights is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 15, 2006, 02:10 PM   #15
Electro Funk
macrumors 65816
 
Electro Funk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: The Opium Garden
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlizzardBomb
No it was not. If PC companies can get P4s in laptops a G5 laptop was easily possible. Look at the iMac for example.
actually, yes it was... the G5 ran way too hot to fit in the small form factor of apple portables... the iMac is a desktop... not portable.

do you really think apple just said "F" it .... and just skipped over the g5 upgrades for their portables when their was such a high demand for them
__________________
A casual stroll through the lunatic asylum shows that faith does not prove anything.
Friedrich Nietzche
Electro Funk is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 15, 2006, 02:21 PM   #16
dmw007
macrumors 603
 
dmw007's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Working for MI-6
Quote:
Originally Posted by Powerbookdriver
Isn't it funny how so many individuals are now treating the G4 Powerbooks like second rate pieces of crap. All I hear is MBP this and MBP that, give the G4 Powerbook's their just respect. They were and continue to be good machines that perform their tasks well. The Macbook Pro is a wonderful machine, however, some still perfer the Powerbooks. Maybe I have an emotional attachment to mine and maybe not. One thing I hate is some in here sound like PC owners bragging about their latest buy. I thought being a Mac owner was more a life style rather than an ego trip?

See what happens when a computer company makes the switch from using PowerPC to chips from "evil inside".
__________________
3.2 GHz Mac Pro Nehalem
PowerBook 1400cs/133, 450MHz G4 Cube, 500MHz Pismo
iPhone 3GS, 60GB iPod
dmw007 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 15, 2006, 02:37 PM   #17
Killyp
macrumors 68040
 
Killyp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
I think the reason most people are talking about the MacBook Pros is because so many people have them.

For people like me, it was easier to be able to think that when buying a MacBook Pro, I could move over to the familiar Windows if I didn't like OS X. Obviously, that's not the case, but this seems to be how a lot of people see it...
Killyp is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 15, 2006, 02:40 PM   #18
erikamsterdam
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: amsterdam
I am sorry for the G4 owners, but the Intel machines are *so* much faster that yes, suddenly the G4 is very outdated. It has been outdated for years anyway, there was just nothing else available if you wanted to by a Mac portable.
The only thing you G4 owners can enjoy is lots more software. Still missing quite a bit for Intel, like Flip4Mac or Audacity. Rosetta is not the most stable thing on the planet
erikamsterdam is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 15, 2006, 02:41 PM   #19
Skeeball236
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Send a message via AIM to Skeeball236
del
__________________
I heard the colors screaming as they slid down my throat.

Last edited by Skeeball236; Sep 4, 2006 at 11:17 AM.
Skeeball236 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 15, 2006, 02:43 PM   #20
UKnjb
macrumors 6502a
 
UKnjb's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: London, UK
Quote:
Originally Posted by Powerbookdriver
I think part of the problem is people today are not satisfied. They are consumed with obtaining more and never really use what they have. It's all about impressing others. We have the need to feel important, so we go out pay for something we don't really need and it gives us that false sense of importance.

Free yourself and be content! I will upgrade when my current Powerbook only when I need too.
FWIW, I so agree with you on your main points (maybe not the "impressing others"; I neither know nor care about that). I also have a Powerbook G4 (Al) and Powermac G4 and they do all I want or need. And for similar reasons, I am still chundering on with Panther - no obvious need to go to Tiger. Everything does me just fine, as I hope yours does you.
__________________
"I like this place and willingly could waste my time in it" - (As You Like It. Act II, Scene IV).
Al PB G4 & PM G4 + --- Stuff
UKnjb is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 15, 2006, 02:51 PM   #21
Dane D.
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: ohio
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skeeball236
Titanium Powerbooks are pieces of crap....
Couldn't agree more. I use a Ti667Mhz coupled to a BetterLight Super 8k scanback camera system. Long boot time, unstable when running camera software, color of screen is nowhere the color on the LaCie 19" hooked into the video port, even after calibration. I still use OS 9.2.2 for the camera system because it is SCSI, using a Ratoc SCSI card CB31. Adaptec card wouldn't even work in it. Plus, I ran that Geekbench mark program that was posted in the forums last a couple of days, it's slower than my G4/466 digital audio unit.
__________________
B/WG3/1.1GHzRevB,OS9.2.2,OS10.4.6
iMacG3/600,OS9.2.2,OS10.2.8
eMacG4/USB2.0,OS10.4.11
MacBookPro 13",OS10.8
Dane D. is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 15, 2006, 02:53 PM   #22
dextertangocci
macrumors 68000
 
dextertangocci's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Cape Town, South Africa
Send a message via Skype™ to dextertangocci
Quote:
Originally Posted by andy89
Not every mac user can afford to be spoiled. I started saving for a G4, then the G5's cames out and the price went up, so I had to save up for a bit longer, and now the mac pros are going to come out. But hopefully this time I will have enough for a fully loaded one
Wow, you are patient!
dextertangocci is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 15, 2006, 02:57 PM   #23
iGary
Guest
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Randy's House
What I love is how the same people that were poo-pooing Intel with every fiber of their being last year all of the sudden think Intel is the best thing since sliced bread.

You still can't run Adobe or Macromedia for crap on an Intel chip.

I love both my PPC machines.
iGary is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 15, 2006, 03:05 PM   #24
dextertangocci
macrumors 68000
 
dextertangocci's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Cape Town, South Africa
Send a message via Skype™ to dextertangocci
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skeeball236
Titanium Powerbooks are pieces of crap....I've gone through two of them, both died of logic board failure within 3 years. Both had the video fritz problem, which is a precursor to LB failure.

Both were more expensive to repair than what they were worth.

Thank goodness I didn't sell my Pismo, 6 years running strong....
I don't think so! I know someone who is a graphic designer, and still uses his 400Mhz tiBook with 384MB RAM and 10GB HD for ALL his work in photoshop. It still works perfectly (except for the battery, which after like 5 years, only holds a 10 minute chrage) He is only going to upgrade in the next week to a 17" MBP.
dextertangocci is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 15, 2006, 03:07 PM   #25
dextertangocci
macrumors 68000
 
dextertangocci's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Cape Town, South Africa
Send a message via Skype™ to dextertangocci
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlizzardBomb
No it was not. If PC companies can get P4s in laptops a G5 laptop was easily possible. Look at the iMac for example.
The main issue was the battery life. Oh yes, and the heat.

Steve Jobs gave a detailed explanation of why they didn't put a G5 into the PB's at the last Macworld Keynote
dextertangocci is offline   0 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > Apple Hardware > PowerPC Macs

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
iOS Update isn't Notifying Me And isn't Giving Me Red Badge on Settings App help? Dan50 iPhone Tips, Help and Troubleshooting 10 Apr 23, 2014 02:34 AM
Apple should respect the Surface Pro pesos Alternatives to iOS and iOS Devices 74 Nov 5, 2012 07:19 PM
New respect for an old product Lil Chillbil PowerPC Macs 5 Jun 5, 2012 09:25 AM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:08 AM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC