Go Back   MacRumors Forums > Archive > Archives of Old Posts > Macintosh Computers

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Mar 7, 2003, 12:25 AM   #1
TyleRomeo
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: New York
Dual G4 Powerbooks

Anyone wanna start betting on dual G4 powerbooks.

the new G4 chips are supposed to run at 10W a piece, is it that impossible that apple would release dual G4 powerbooks but still maintain their 5 hour battery life?

I think apple will resprt to this tactic since Intel is about to roll out 2.6GHZ mobile chips. I mean the PoweMacs dual configurations looks a little better then their single counterparts.
What do you guys think?

I see it happening most likely early next year. but maybe sometime this fall.

Tyler
__________________
Mac Pro (Early 2008) Dual 2.8GHZ Quad 2GB RAM NVIDIA 8800GT 512MB
Dual 1.25 GHz PowerMac G4; 1.91TB; 2GB RAM ATI 9700 Pro 128MB; Airport
TyleRomeo is offline   0
Old Mar 7, 2003, 12:32 AM   #2
hugemullens
macrumors 6502a
 
hugemullens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Michigan
I don't think it will happen. Apple has got the heat issue down but not far enough. Maybe on the 17", but i dont even think then. By the time a dual g4 powerbook would be in the mix hopefully they will have the 970 in a working mobile chip and give us that instead.
__________________
12" 867 MHz Powerbook
640MB RAM
Combo Drive
hugemullens is offline   0
Old Mar 7, 2003, 12:41 AM   #3
NavyIntel007
macrumors 65816
 
NavyIntel007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Tampa, FL
Send a message via AIM to NavyIntel007 Send a message via Yahoo to NavyIntel007
Fat chance. Although they do say that the future hybrid handheld/phones will be dual processor. But no, Not on your powerbook. Thanks for coming out though.
__________________
Fujitsu T4020
iPod Nano 4 GB (RED)
NavyIntel007 is offline   0
Old Mar 7, 2003, 01:07 AM   #4
ddtlm
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Seems like a PPC-970 makes far more sense, seeing as how they are supposed to dissipate 18W (or something) at 1.2ghz, and be available late this year or early next year.
ddtlm is offline   0
Old Mar 7, 2003, 05:59 AM   #5
jefhatfield
Retired
 
jefhatfield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
a dual tibook/powerbook would definitely make the laptops fully function in the pro realm in terms of sheer computing power as they relate to their more robust desktop counterparts

but by the time the dual g4 is in a laptop, we will be screaming for the mobile 970
jefhatfield is offline   0
Old Mar 7, 2003, 11:12 AM   #6
Chrisnorth
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Yukon, Canada
No Chance

I would say that the chances of this happening are zero to nil.
Chrisnorth is offline   0
Old Mar 7, 2003, 12:17 PM   #7
TyleRomeo
Thread Starter
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: New York
Re: No Chance

Quote:
Originally posted by Chrisnorth
I would say that the chances of this happening are zero to nil.
im curious why it's so hard to acomplish. if the new 970 runs at 18W and the new G4s run at 10W, put two of them together and you have 20W, which is probably less heat then the current 1GHZ 17' powerbook.

Personally, i'd like a dual 1GHZ powerbook in the fall over a 1.25 or 1.33 GHZ single chip one.

Tyler
__________________
Mac Pro (Early 2008) Dual 2.8GHZ Quad 2GB RAM NVIDIA 8800GT 512MB
Dual 1.25 GHz PowerMac G4; 1.91TB; 2GB RAM ATI 9700 Pro 128MB; Airport
TyleRomeo is offline   0
Old Mar 7, 2003, 12:28 PM   #8
FlamDrag
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Western Hemisphere
I'm not so sure it's a matter of "can't" as much as it is "won't" do it.

I think that if the 970 wasn't scheduled for another couple of years (maybe it's not...) and they'd pretty much maxed out the best processor they have THEN they'd go dual in the PB's.

But since it seems likely that they'll go to 1.25, 1.33, 1.42, 970v1 I wouldn't expect them to invest the resources in making a DP PB.

Although one thing to think about is: "What will the first 970 powerbooks look like?" Surely they'll update the case for them. You have to have some sort of announcement to the world that you have the newest and fastest PB. Same for the PM's of course.
__________________
Hook 'em Horns! - Who am I kidding? Boomer Sooner!
FlamDrag is offline   0
Old Mar 7, 2003, 12:29 PM   #9
utilizer
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: In Atlanta!
Send a message via AIM to utilizer
Red face Give it up friends: It ain't gonna happen!

No duals in the portables, not with Motorola but maybe with IBM. Here's what I think will happen:
Come July, we'll see the laptops thrusted to 1.33 Ghz just like the current xServes but this will be the 7457 from Motorola, even though they say that they won't be shipping it until September.
That's perfect for Apple, seeing how they seem to enjoy people waiting for a product that isn't already being manufactured yet!

Let's take a look at this for a moment:
Jan. '03--17 in. PowerBook introed--Feb, Mar, Apr: Products shipped (so we hope, count your blessings!)
Jul. '03--17 in. 1.33 Ghz 7457 introed--Aug, Sept, Oct (so we hope, but count on November!)

Perfect timing for Apple!
utilizer is offline   0
Old Mar 7, 2003, 12:42 PM   #10
jefhatfield
Retired
 
jefhatfield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Re: No Chance

Quote:
Originally posted by Chrisnorth
I would say that the chances of this happening are zero to nil.
does that mean you think the 970 will be in a laptop, or that we will chug along with single processor laptops while the desktops keep the dualie action to themselves
jefhatfield is offline   0
Old Mar 7, 2003, 12:51 PM   #11
macphoria
macrumors 6502a
 
macphoria's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
It won't happen because of heat issue and power consumption.

Heat Issue:
People already complain about fan noises coming from recent PowerBooks. Even if power consumption went down with new chips, cooling TWO processors in even more cramped space is not going to be easy. Fans will come into play, which people despise.

Power Consumption:
Even if new chips consume less power, two will most certainly drain the battery at faster rate. Apple could perhaps come up with new type of battery that can support two processors. But if they were able to do that, I think they would rather go with 1 processor and double the usage time instead.
macphoria is offline   0
Old Mar 7, 2003, 01:28 PM   #12
jefhatfield
Retired
 
jefhatfield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Quote:
Originally posted by macphoria
It won't happen because of heat issue and power consumption.

Heat Issue:
People already complain about fan noises coming from recent PowerBooks. Even if power consumption went down with new chips, cooling TWO processors in even more cramped space is not going to be easy. Fans will come into play, which people despise.

Power Consumption:
Even if new chips consume less power, two will most certainly drain the battery at faster rate. Apple could perhaps come up with new type of battery that can support two processors. But if they were able to do that, I think they would rather go with 1 processor and double the usage time instead.
but the second processor is not always being used

but that second processor could come in handy during high end stuff like photoshop

and if need be, have an option where you can turn off the second processor during battery use if you want and have it automatically default to dual processor use when it gets plugged into the ac adapter

Last edited by jefhatfield; Mar 7, 2003 at 01:32 PM.
jefhatfield is offline   0
Old Mar 7, 2003, 02:26 PM   #13
macphoria
macrumors 6502a
 
macphoria's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
-----but the second processor is not always being used

-----but that second processor could come in handy
-----during high end stuff like photoshop

-----and if need be, have an option where you can turn
-----off the second processor during battery use if you
-----want and have it automatically default to dual
-----processor use when it gets plugged into the ac adapter

What you mentioned makes sense. But I still doubt Apple would allow that much customization of processors to users.
macphoria is offline   0
Old Mar 7, 2003, 02:58 PM   #14
Sun Baked
macrumors G5
 
Sun Baked's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Without a lot of the power management features of the G3s incorporated into the G4s and 970 -- it doesn't make much sense to incorporate duals into portables.

And it's not just the CPUs sucking power, it's all the support chips, circuits, and memory that's doubled in a dual configuration. It's a little more than just an extra 10 watts of power drain.
__________________
If you are the type of person who solves all their problems with a hammer, because it is the only tool in your toolbox. It would be wise of you to never get in an argument with a gunsmith.
Sun Baked is offline   0
Old Mar 7, 2003, 04:00 PM   #15
monkeydo_jb
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Columbia, MO
What if?

Well my idea is a little out there, but nothing Apple couldn't handle.

They should make docking stations for the powerbook. Simple. However the docking station would contain a second processor.

This would allow you to keep your battery life, have more speed (only at your desk, though ) and keep the heat down.

It may be hard to accomplish, but at least it would satisfy some of you.


Just an idea......



-jeff


I guess a removable base would work, as well.
monkeydo_jb is offline   0
Old Mar 7, 2003, 04:03 PM   #16
Chrisnorth
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Yukon, Canada
Re: Re: No Chance

Quote:
Originally posted by jefhatfield
does that mean you think the 970 will be in a laptop, or that we will chug along with single processor laptops while the desktops keep the dualie action to themselves
Apple is in an interesting position; they own an entire market niche. That is, they aren't just another PC player. Ultimately, this is both good and bad. They make the decisions on how much rope to use at any given time. They can take enough rope to hang themselves, or so little that they loose audience interest. I think that Apple is very good at apportioning just enough.

Building dual processor power books would be like taking too much rope. Their laptops are comparable to the best that the PC world has to offer and one of their advntages is long battery life. Multiprocessor architechture in a power book would negate this.

Another reason to doubt this is that with the latest Power Book introductions, the next units to concentrate on will either be the desktop line or new consumer devices like iPod. Apple must balance its resources wisely by developing new products in a balanced way, and the Power Macs and iMacs are in the greatest need of an overhaul at this time.

I think that the powerbooks will langush now until the 970 is introduced.

Beyond all of that, I just have a gut feeling that without a major change in processor technology, dual processor powerbooks just won't happen.
Chrisnorth is offline   0
Old Mar 8, 2003, 08:17 AM   #17
KingArthur
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Marion, Ohio
Send a message via AIM to KingArthur
Re: What if?

Quote:
Originally posted by monkeydo_jb
Well my idea is a little out there, but nothing Apple couldn't handle.

They should make docking stations for the powerbook. Simple. However the docking station would contain a second processor.

This would allow you to keep your battery life, have more speed (only at your desk, though ) and keep the heat down.
Does this remind anyone else of a similar Apple product? I think they called that the DUO?! My friend had one Anyway, I don't think that Apple will resort back to that for quite a while unless the PC market started doing that. Most people would rather just get a second computer for that that has more computing power and expandability.

Also, battery life. Not only are you talking about twice the processors draining from it, but you are also talking about twice the power being drained by FANS!

Also, Utilizer, I think that your time frame makes good sense. At least you are not one of those people who is expecting the 970 in a laptop this year Sorry, just had to bring up old flames (j/k).
__________________
Remember: Bugs fly through open Windows.

PM6500, 128MB, 40GB, Zip, CD, Ext CD-RW, 3.5in floppy, OS9.1, No Complaints!

P4Mobile, 256DDR, 20GB, CD-RW, WinXP, Lots of Problems ;-)
KingArthur is offline   0
Old Mar 9, 2003, 08:52 PM   #18
utilizer
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: In Atlanta!
Send a message via AIM to utilizer
Re: Re: What if?

Quote:
Originally posted by KingArthur


Also, Utilizer, I think that your time frame makes good sense. At least you are not one of those people who is expecting the 970 in a laptop this year Sorry, just had to bring up old flames (j/k).
Yeah, I figure it's good to be pessimistic about the 970 chances of getting into an Apple machine this year. Personally, I think IBM will want to have any of their supplies available for their own workstations (the Blades) and not have to worry about Apple until early next year.
Believe me, I've learned about being disappointed. I thought the G5s would be here in the summer MWNY of 2001 (yep, that one with the DVD software being the star of the show!)
utilizer is offline   0
Old Mar 9, 2003, 09:00 PM   #19
macphoria
macrumors 6502a
 
macphoria's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
IBM 970 processor should become available in at least Power Macs within this year. If G5/970 does not materialize this year, Apple would be making monumental mistake.
macphoria is offline   0
Old Mar 10, 2003, 09:19 AM   #20
Over Achiever
macrumors 68000
 
Over Achiever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Toledo, OH, formerly Twin Cities, MN
Send a message via AIM to Over Achiever Send a message via Yahoo to Over Achiever Send a message via Skype™ to Over Achiever
"This is the year of the laptop"

Ok, so it may have been hype, but think about it...it makes some sense. I expect the 970 to hit laptops shortly after the desktops get them. I'd be surprised if they didn't.

As for duals...when Apple switches to the 970, I expect them to go away from duals, as it isn't really needed anymore to compete w/ the PC market.
__________________
"Good judgment comes from experience. Experience comes from bad judgment."
Panasonic Lumix GF1 11" MBA | Dell XT Google Nexus One
Over Achiever is offline   0
Old Mar 11, 2003, 01:14 PM   #21
Rustus Maximus
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
I think we'll see 970 desktop systems intro'd at MWNY...and the laptop 970's will get intro'd shortly after IBM goes to the .09 micron process for the 970.

The PowerBook will go 970 since it falls into the professional user category. I just can't see the sense in a dualie PB, not with the 970 right around the corner.

Rustus
__________________
"Love keeps her in the air when she oughtta fall down..."
Rustus Maximus is offline   0
Old Mar 11, 2003, 07:39 PM   #22
jefhatfield
Retired
 
jefhatfield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Quote:
Originally posted by Rustus Maximus
I think we'll see 970 desktop systems intro'd at MWNY...and the laptop 970's will get intro'd shortly after IBM goes to the .09 micron process for the 970.

The PowerBook will go 970 since it falls into the professional user category. I just can't see the sense in a dualie PB, not with the 970 right around the corner.

Rustus
i hope you are right

i don't see why our desktop brethern/sisteren have to be the only ones with access to dual G4s

...it's ok if it only works in dual mode plugged in...some of us need the laptop if we travel, go to class, or live in a small living space
jefhatfield is offline   0
Old Mar 11, 2003, 08:24 PM   #23
Catfish_Man
macrumors 68030
 
Catfish_Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Portland, OR
Send a message via AIM to Catfish_Man
A dual 1GHz 7457 would probably use less power than a 1GHz 7455 (Moto's pages seem to indicate that a 1GHz 7455 is around 30 watts, while a 1GHz 7457 is about 10). Also, the 7457 is a smaller chip. I think duals in the 17" is quite reasonable, although probably not in the 15" and definitely not in the 12" (I think the 12" will get L3 cache when the 7457 comes out). It also might be practical to do a single 867MHz 7447 iBook.
Catfish_Man is offline   0
Old Mar 11, 2003, 08:26 PM   #24
jefhatfield
Retired
 
jefhatfield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Quote:
Originally posted by Catfish_Man
A dual 1GHz 7457 would probably use less power than a 1GHz 7455 (Moto's pages seem to indicate that a 1GHz 7455 is around 30 watts, while a 1GHz 7457 is about 10). Also, the 7457 is a smaller chip. I think duals in the 17" is quite reasonable, although probably not in the 15" and definitely not in the 12" (I think the 12" will get L3 cache when the 7457 comes out). It also might be practical to do a single 867MHz 7447 iBook.
i think mac based graphics pros can live with a dualie in the 17" powerbook
jefhatfield is offline   0
Old Mar 11, 2003, 09:28 PM   #25
ddtlm
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Catfish_Man:

Quote:
Also, the 7457 is a smaller chip.
No, it is pin-compatible and therefore will take the same space.

Quote:
I think duals in the 17" is quite reasonable, although probably not in the 15" and definitely not in the 12"
Yeah they could do duals but it would be stupid with the PPC-970 looming. Compared to 2 G4's, a PPC-970 would probably be cheaper and certainly be faster for most tasks, while consuming less power.
ddtlm is offline   0


 
MacRumors Forums > Archive > Archives of Old Posts > Macintosh Computers

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Barefeats tests Dual X5690 Maxed Out Mac Pro, with Dual D700s...check it out MacVidCards Mac Pro 4 Oct 30, 2013 04:48 PM
Dual Core and Dual CPU G5s keremtezcan PowerPC Macs 8 Jul 17, 2013 12:24 PM
Dual thunderbolt ports with adapters = dual gigabit NIC? ohkuipo MacBook Pro 1 Jun 12, 2012 03:18 AM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:57 AM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC