Using Bootcamp and Parallels w/One XP Install?

Technically yes, as Windows is still only installed on one 'computer', although obviously Activation might get a bit confused and you'll probably have to phone Microsoft every so often for telephone activation.

It is absolutely possible.
But is it absolutely legal? Someone smarter than me will have to prove that.

To me, as long as you can only use xp in one form at a time (ie. you cant use boot camp AND parallels at the SAME time), it seem legal.

quasar720 said:

Would it be possible for me to install XP on a drive in bay 2 using Boot Camp and also have Parallels point to the same XP install?

Click to expand...

I think the previous posters might have misunderstood what you were asking, or I did. What I gathered was.. can you crate a partition using BootCamp, install Windows on it, and then install Parallels and point Parallels at the BootCamp'd Windows partition as it's VM? Is that what you were asking?

No, it is not possible. Parallels creates it's own virtual disks. It's not possible to point it at an existing partition that has a Windows install. Especially if you created a partition that is NTFS formatted. Well, MAYBE if it's FAT32, but I'm not about to nuke/reinstall my Windows install via BootCamp to test.

This would be extremely useful. VMWare can do it in Windows or Linux...

Hopefully it'll show up in the next release. I'm submitting a feature request to them later to allow this.

Yes, I run parallels for excel and other vital apps while i use bootcamp for my games. It works very well because parallels saves me a lot of time w/o rebooting and i can have mulitple screens for info.

I like my current setup a lot because I also installed VirtueDesktops and I can hotkey switch to Parallels fullscreen and back so it doesn't take up any space in my osx screen. I highly suggest this setup. Also, don't forget to install Parallels Tools, it makes Parallels run seamless w/ osx via mouse wise etc.

Most of you, except Yellow have missed the point of the Original Poster's question.


You cannot have Parallels run off or point towards a Bootcamp install. Parallels requires it's own virtual drive that it uses, and can only run XP if it's installed there.

On another note, I've never gotten Parallels to work on my Mac Pro. It gives me a kernel panic everytime I try.

Digidesign said:

On another note, I've never gotten Parallels to work on my Mac Pro. It gives me a kernel panic everytime I try.

Click to expand...

Were you using one of the release candidate builds or the original released versions?

Mac Pro support is not there in the released version IIRC.

I've always suggested that Macs could ahve an easier time of this since the main reason you can't do this is that the virtualized hardware wants different drivers than the bare metail version. Since Apple controls the hardware more than generic PC vendors they could have a better time writing drivers that could support both cases.

How does VMWare deal with this issue? Do they always use the virtualized drivers even on bare metal?

B

I remember reading on the Parallels forum that it was in their roadmap for the next general release of Parallels to enable booting and running from a real disk partition instead of a disk image.

Presumaby you could run from the "bootcamp" partition, but how this would actually work remains to be seen.

quasar720 said:

This is exactly what I was talking about. Installing XP twice would be a waste of resources. It seems like there would be a way for both programs to use the same install giving you either quick, virtualized access or direct, bootable access.

Click to expand...

Unfortunately, in it's current incarnation, Parallels does not support this.
But they've been pretty pro-active in their support of Windows on the Mac, so I don't see any reason why they won't make this available in the future.

n8236 said:

Yes, I run parallels for excel and other vital apps while i use bootcamp for my games. It works very well because parallels saves me a lot of time w/o rebooting and i can have mulitple screens for info.

I like my current setup a lot because I also installed VirtueDesktops and I can hotkey switch to Parallels fullscreen and back so it doesn't take up any space in my osx screen. I highly suggest this setup. Also, don't forget to install Parallels Tools, it makes Parallels run seamless w/ osx via mouse wise etc.

Click to expand...

So do you have 2 windows partitions then? I am not familiar w/ parallels, so any help here would be appreciated. When I get my new iMac I want to run AutoCad in parallels and would like to run a game every once in awhile in bootcamp. Does that mean you have 2 windows partitions?

iKWICK7 said:

So do you have 2 windows partitions then? I am not familiar w/ parallels, so any help here would be appreciated. When I get my new iMac I want to run AutoCad in parallels and would like to run a game every once in awhile in bootcamp. Does that mean you have 2 windows partitions?

Click to expand...

No - one partition for OS X, one partition for windows (bootcamp). Parallels uses a disk image which resides inside OS X - no partition for this needed.

Scottyk9 said:

No - one partition for OS X, one partition for windows (bootcamp). Parallels uses a disk image which resides inside OS X - no partition for this needed.

Click to expand...

Sounds good enough- looks like I have a lot of tinkering to do this weekend (hopefully)!

iKWICK7 said:

Sounds good enough- looks like I have a lot of tinkering to do this weekend (hopefully)!

Click to expand...

Note also that, unlike Boot Camp, you can host your Parallels VM on an external drive without any issues... so you need not always need to have your image around.

B

In the setup I described, I believe is quite convenient. In a touch of a hot-key I can switch over to Excel via Parallels and work on whatever I need.

The amount of resources used is quite insignificant considering how much time and effort it saves. On idle, Parallels uses 10-20% CPU and around 100 mb of active ram. I have two 2gbs on ram on my mbp so I always have Parallels running side-by-side.

With every build, Parallels is being optimized, and expect it to work very well q1 of 07. If you frequent the Parallels boards, you can see there are still a host of misc issues and concerns to be solved, but for the most part the Parallels team has been busting their ass and I think they deserve a lot of credit.

One of the issues I ran into was when plugging in a regular flash drive while Parallels was running. Parallels would immediately take host of it so it won't show up in OSX unless I turned off Parallels. A poll showing the most wanted features on their next big releaase was either 3D emulation or USB 2.0 support. I think both are equally important, but Crossover has some exciting stuff going for them as well.

n8236 said:

but for the most part the Parallels team has been busting their ass and I think they deserve a lot of credit.

Click to expand...

I couldn't agree more.

balamw said:

Were you using one of the release candidate builds or the original released versions?

Click to expand...

I downloaded the current version at the website:
Desktop for Mac 1848. Installed, then after I run Parallels, as soon as I click on the green arrow to start up my XP drive, I get a kernel panic.

I'll check the support there for help. Thanks though.

Digidesign said:

I downloaded the current version at the website:

Click to expand...

Are you on a Mac Pro? That version doesn't support the Mac Pro. You need to download a more recent build of Parallels.

balamw said:

Note also that, unlike Boot Camp, you can host your Parallels VM on an external drive without any issues... so you need not always need to have your image around.
B

Click to expand...

That is fantastic news! I was planning on using my external drive for backup, but maybe I will now leave some room on it for parallels.

p.s.- my 24" arrived today

Digidesign said:

I downloaded the current version at the website:
Desktop for Mac 1848.

Click to expand...

Build 1922 is the latest build at the link I provided, you need that to run on the Mac Pro. Good Luck!

B

balamw said:

Build 1922 is the latest build at the link I provided, you need that to run on the Mac Pro. Good Luck!

B

Click to expand...

Thanks Balamw and Yellow, I was running an incorrect version for the Mac Pro. I'll try out Build 1922 tonight.