Register FAQ / Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   MacRumors Forums > Apple Hardware > PowerPC Macs

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Oct 5, 2006, 06:42 AM   #1
steelfist
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
IBM releases 50% power consumption PPC CPUs.

http://www.tgdaily.com/2006/10/04/ibm_powerpc_lowpower/

Just a thought: TOO Late!

the creepy thing is that IBM has complete dominance over the console market.

the cpus aren't suitable for the macs right now. it's not fast enough despite it's heavy improvement.
steelfist is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 5, 2006, 06:45 AM   #2
generik
Banned
 
generik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Minitrue
Even if PPC for computers outstrip x86 in terms of performance in the future, I'd still prefer Apple stay with the rest of the computing world. There is just this sense of stability when you can run Windows natively on your machine.
generik is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 5, 2006, 06:50 AM   #3
Mord
macrumors G4
 
Mord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Old York
The 970GX has been out for a while now, and a lower power G3 is a big "whoopty do" affair.
Mord is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 5, 2006, 06:53 AM   #4
thewhitehart
macrumors 6502a
 
thewhitehart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: The town without George Bailey
Send a message via AIM to thewhitehart Send a message via Yahoo to thewhitehart
Yay, Powerbook G5's next Tuesday.
__________________
Have a great summer! - Winnie Cooper
thewhitehart is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 5, 2006, 07:12 AM   #5
Queso
macrumors 603
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Quote:
Originally Posted by generik
There is just this sense of stability when you can run Windows natively on your machine.
That's the first time I've seen the words Windows and stability in the same sentence without an expletive also being used

It would be good if processor upgrade manufacturers could get these onto cards for G4s though.
Queso is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 5, 2006, 07:22 AM   #6
bousozoku
Moderator emeritus
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Gone but not forgotten.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mord
The 970GX has been out for a while now, and a lower power G3 is a big "whoopty do" affair.
Though, the 970GX wasn't up to 2.5 GHz last I saw--it was only 1.1 GHz. That would be quite a jump for someone's PowerMac G3 or iBook G3.
bousozoku is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 5, 2006, 07:54 AM   #7
keysersoze
macrumors 68000
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: NH
Quote:
Originally Posted by bousozoku
Though, the 970GX wasn't up to 2.5 GHz last I saw--it was only 1.1 GHz. That would be quite a jump for someone's PowerMac G3 or iBook G3.
Do you see any possibility of this winding up in some upgrade card or something? Or have they written that off? Just curious.
__________________
i love brits

keysersoze is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 5, 2006, 11:00 AM   #8
dmw007
macrumors 603
 
dmw007's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Working for MI-6
Quote:
Originally Posted by steelfist
Just a thought: TOO Late!
My thoughts exactly.


Oh well, I am glad for the switch to Intel.
__________________
3.2 GHz Mac Pro Nehalem
PowerBook 1400cs/133, 450MHz G4 Cube, 500MHz Pismo
iPhone 3GS, 60GB iPod
dmw007 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 5, 2006, 12:58 PM   #9
MisterMe
macrumors G4
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by steelfist
....

Just a thought: TOO Late!

the creepy thing is that IBM has complete dominance over the console market.

the cpus aren't suitable for the macs right now. it's not fast enough despite it's heavy improvement.
Not too late at all. The PPC are very popular in the embedded processor market. By your own admission, derivatives of this processor now own the gaming console market with all three major manufacturers using them. There is nothing creepy about using the best tool for the job.
__________________
Neither a borrower nor a lender be
For loan oft loses both itself and friend
William Shakespeare from Hamlet
MisterMe is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 5, 2006, 02:33 PM   #10
bousozoku
Moderator emeritus
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Gone but not forgotten.
Quote:
Originally Posted by keysersoze
Do you see any possibility of this winding up in some upgrade card or something? Or have they written that off? Just curious.
I see PowerLogix buying a few to try. I really don't think they'll work well in the iBook but they could certainly work in a PowerMac with some aggressive cooling such as they've used for the G4 upgrades for the high end.

IBM's G3s had better floating point processing than a G4 of the same speed and they were better on power so it would be a good computer for those who can't afford to upgrade those older machines. Not everyone needed AltiVec.
bousozoku is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 5, 2006, 03:51 PM   #11
simie
macrumors 6502a
 
simie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Sitting
http://www-03.ibm.com/press/us/en/pr...ease/20381.wss

970GX is 1.2 to 2.5GHz
__________________
Paul Rigby
Illustrator and commercial artist ~ visit his website
simie is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 5, 2006, 04:13 PM   #12
dongmin
macrumors 68000
 
dongmin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Quote:
Originally Posted by bousozoku
Though, the 970GX wasn't up to 2.5 GHz last I saw--it was only 1.1 GHz. That would be quite a jump for someone's PowerMac G3 or iBook G3.
You're confused. The 970GX is the successor to the 970FX which went into the G5 Power Macs. The FX previously topped out at 2.7 ghz so 2.5 ghz is actually a step backwards (although it may be more power efficient).

The "G3" chip, the 750CL tops out at 1.0 ghz. Again, not that big of an improvement. I believe the last G3 iBooks topped out at 900 mhz.
dongmin is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 5, 2006, 04:42 PM   #13
bousozoku
Moderator emeritus
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Gone but not forgotten.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dongmin
You're confused. The 970GX is the successor to the 970FX which went into the G5 Power Macs. The FX previously topped out at 2.7 ghz so 2.5 ghz is actually a step backwards (although it may be more power efficient).

The "G3" chip, the 750CL tops out at 1.0 ghz. Again, not that big of an improvement. I believe the last G3 iBooks topped out at 900 mhz.
You're right. I saw the 750 and the GX and merged the two. I should blame my pain meds but they're not that effective anymore.
bousozoku is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 6, 2006, 03:54 AM   #14
Lollypop
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Johannesburg, South Africa
Send a message via AIM to Lollypop Send a message via MSN to Lollypop Send a message via Yahoo to Lollypop Send a message via Skype™ to Lollypop
Quote:
Originally Posted by generik
Even if PPC for computers outstrip x86 in terms of performance in the future, I'd still prefer Apple stay with the rest of the computing world. There is just this sense of stability when you can run Windows natively on your machine.
What is the world comming to.. really running windows on a mac! I do think it is good that we went intel, at least now the dell people cant question our speed anymore, windows never came into the equasion for me!
__________________
What do you get when u cross a nun with apple? A computer that will never go down on you!!
Lollypop is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 6, 2006, 04:05 AM   #15
Queso
macrumors 603
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
I'd rather they kept it working on both architectures going forward. Intel are going to whip IBM's ass on the speed front in both laptops and desktops, but think what type of device Apple could bring out with a low-power embedded G5 at a decent speed.

It won't happen though
Queso is offline   0 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > Apple Hardware > PowerPC Macs

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New Pro - power consumption marclondon Mac Pro 11 May 28, 2014 09:43 AM
Power Mac G5 power issues - Red lights on CPUs gavinstubbs09 PowerPC Macs 10 Mar 23, 2014 05:34 PM
10.9.2 power consumption during sleep zorinlynx OS X Mavericks (10.9) 3 Feb 26, 2014 09:22 AM
SSD Power Consumption Silverrune MacBook Pro 4 Jul 25, 2012 01:22 PM
iPhone 5 power consumption jacapp iPhone 8 Jun 15, 2012 10:48 AM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:19 AM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC