Go Back   MacRumors Forums > Archive > Archives of Old Posts > MacBytes.com News Discussion

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Oct 12, 2006, 02:54 PM   #1
MacBytes
macrumors bot
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Can a Widescreen iPod Jump Start the eBook Revolution?




Category: History
Link: Can a Widescreen iPod Jump Start the eBook Revolution?
Description:: none

Posted on MacBytes.com
Approved by Mudbug
MacBytes is offline   0
Old Oct 12, 2006, 03:09 PM   #2
jephrey
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
I always thought it'd be cool if apple could use the text-to-speech on the iPod. It'd almost be like a book on tape but take the space of a text file. Only problem would be the lacking vocal inflections and different voices. It'd be cool if in a text doc, you could set the colors of the text to be associated with different voices. The new voices in OSX sound pretty smooth. Black=narrator (you can set to man/woman), and other colors are set at the top of the text file almost like code. You could have articles and stuff you download read to you by the pod. That's better for car driving anyway.

I suppose smaller paperbacks are about 4" wide, so reading would work pretty good.

J
jephrey is offline   0
Old Oct 12, 2006, 03:21 PM   #3
gloss
macrumors 601
 
gloss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: around/about
Send a message via AIM to gloss
Sony's Reader looks like the way to go.
__________________
when you say it's all over / hell yeah anyway
gloss is offline   0
Old Oct 12, 2006, 03:36 PM   #4
ghall
macrumors 68040
 
ghall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Rhode Island
Send a message via AIM to ghall
Personally, I greatly dislike the concept of eBooks. Sure it will save lots of trees, and lots of money, but nothing beats turing off the computer, and reading a good book. Another problem I see are eGraphic Novels. I read a lot of graphic novels and they just whouldn't translate well into digital format.
ghall is offline   0
Old Oct 12, 2006, 04:06 PM   #5
Snowy_River
macrumors 68030
 
Snowy_River's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Corvallis, OR
Send a message via AIM to Snowy_River Send a message via Yahoo to Snowy_River
Did anyone notice that this article was classified as "History"? Shouldn't it be "Opinion", or something like that?
Snowy_River is offline   0
Old Oct 12, 2006, 06:18 PM   #6
billyboy
macrumors 65816
 
billyboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: In my head
The author makes a reference to the fact that scrolls probably had lots of advantages over the book format when the bible came out. He also implies that not all the best (older) ideas are kept in preference to lesser (newer) ones. VHS, Windows, Heinz baked beans, etc are all examples that back up that theory.

However, I doubt Apple are relying on a jammy success with a wide screen iPod that takes the ebook world by storm without meaning to. I presume their marketing department is a little more focussed and professional and are banking big time on a success with an innovational and better idea of interest to a specific market segment? Unless of course Apple are going the MS 'hit and miss' route.
__________________
The Pisstakers find the funny side of stodgy web, & tech
Info on web search
billyboy is offline   0
Old Oct 12, 2006, 06:33 PM   #7
tk421
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snowy_River
Did anyone notice that this article was classified as "History"? Shouldn't it be "Opinion", or something like that?
Definitely. Especially when one considers that no accurate history even exists in the article. Take this passsage:

Quote:
That began to change when the Bible was published 1900 years ago. The book form was particularly suited to the Bible, scrolls did not admit page numbers, chapters were separate scrolls and scrolls were bulkier and more difficult to hide.
What absurdity. This statement is full of so many false statements, I don't know where to begin!!

The Bible wasn't published 1900 years ago, it didn't even exist The writings now contained in the Bible were not compiled together and canonized for some time - hundreds of years. Even then, the books were not divided into chapters and verses until Medieval times! Even today, page numbers don't match from Bible to Bible. It depends who published it, what translation it is, and if there are footnotes, etc.

While it is true that early Christians preferred the codex (pages and a spine, like a book) to the scroll, the "publication" of the Bible had nothing to do with their adoption as the dominant literary form.

Did the author of the article do any research?

Last edited by tk421; Oct 12, 2006 at 06:38 PM.
tk421 is offline   0
Old Oct 12, 2006, 08:51 PM   #8
Mudbug
Administrator emeritus
 
Mudbug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: North Central Colorado
Send a message via AIM to Mudbug Send a message via Skype™ to Mudbug
I fixed the front page history tag - oversight on my part.
__________________
I think I understand what you're talking about, but where are we going to find a duck and a rubber hose at this time of night?
Mudbug is offline   0
Old Oct 12, 2006, 09:14 PM   #9
nagromme
macrumors G5
 
nagromme's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
I like conventional books, but I'm not afraid of them going away: they won't.

And alongside books, I would also enjoy reading on my iPod. I'd probably use that more than video. Because I don't carry a book everywhere I go... but if it's on your iPod, you have it.
nagromme is offline   0
Old Oct 12, 2006, 11:55 PM   #10
Some_Big_Spoon
macrumors 6502a
 
Some_Big_Spoon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: New York, NY
Send a message via AIM to Some_Big_Spoon
a widesceen ipod with input would jumpstart dozens of industries. All Apple has to do is get off their duffs and get it out the door.
__________________
Celebrating 10 years as a MacRumors member.
Some_Big_Spoon is offline   0
Old Oct 13, 2006, 09:07 AM   #11
Don't panic
macrumors 68040
 
Don't panic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: having a drink at Milliways
I am not convinced. the article starts from a questionable (and completely unsupported) statement: that scrolls were 'inherently better' than books and goes on missing completely on why the book format was successful, especially in the current shape (the paperback): it works.

it's easy on the eyes, cheap, portable, rugged, you can have a substantial amount of information right under your eyes simultaneously (typically two pages) and it's easy to quickly move around.

The e-book can obviously add a lot to it (meta references, basically unlimited size, cost), but it needs to retain the main characteristics that make books work: large enough to be able to 'read' a few paragraph at the time, and 'pleasant' to read (LCD and other current monitors are not easy on the eyes).

Any iPod-like device will not cut it, for now: way too little text space and too hard to read.

Eventually paper-based reading material will mostly disappear, but electronic books will become successful, IMO, when a medium is developed that 'mimics' paper in how 'easy' it is to read and how portable
it is. I think the e-ink flexible displays are more likely to illustrate the right direction rather than the iPod
__________________
I do not believe in lot of things, but I do believe in duct tape.
Miles Straume
linky to stonyc's ww table
Don't panic is offline   0
Old Oct 13, 2006, 09:44 AM   #12
shecky
Guest
 
shecky's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Obviously you're not a golfer.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Don't panic
Eventually paper-based reading material will mostly disappear
i think this is extremely unlikely. i think its possible that some "throw away" printed media like newspapers, magazines may diminish significantly over time (but not within our lifetimes) but books will always be better on paper, and people will continue to demand them as such. the whole "print is dead" statement (which you are not saying, but others do) is ridiculous.

while i could agree more with an electronic device that mimics paper, i would much sooner believe an artificial material that is identical to paper but does not use natural fibers from trees and the like.
shecky is offline   0
Old Oct 13, 2006, 12:48 PM   #13
nagromme
macrumors G5
 
nagromme's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
I believe that printed books WILL be completely dead. For a few wealthy eccentrics, around 2060
nagromme is offline   0
Old Oct 13, 2006, 12:51 PM   #14
shecky
Guest
 
shecky's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Obviously you're not a golfer.
not gonna happen.
shecky is offline   0
Old Oct 13, 2006, 02:00 PM   #15
OutThere
macrumors 603
 
OutThere's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: NYC
There will be no eBook revolution. At least not soon.

Believe it or not there are several truths:
-Reading on a screen still sucks ass.
-Scrolling through something is a pain. Flipping pages is easy.
-Books are tough as hell. You can toss them in the back of your car, in your bag, or whatever. Throw them around. Do that with an iPod and report back.
-Books are equalized (to an extent) around the world. You can get a book pretty much anywhere. Not so with computers/electronics.
-What happens when your battery dies?
-Without printed books what do you do when there is no power/internet?
-All of a sudden people will be compelled to steal your books.
-If you lose your eBook iPod, you're out hundreds of dollars (as opposed to losing a book)

it's a process that will take an extremely long time, if it happens. I'd imagine more friendly types of printing and paper, more recycling programs and sustainable type publishing before we start reading on screens. And, when something like eBooks do take hold, I bet they will resemble real books and not iPods.
__________________
puisqu'on est jeune et con, puisqu'ils sont vieux et fous. . .
OutThere is offline   0
Old Oct 13, 2006, 02:05 PM   #16
FleurDuMal
macrumors 68000
 
FleurDuMal's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: London Town
Reading on an iPod?

Ew. No.

FleurDuMal is offline   0
Old Oct 15, 2006, 11:48 AM   #17
Konfabulation
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Toronto
eBooks suck to read on a large computer screen, let alone a tiny iPod screen. Not gonna happen.
__________________
15.4" MacBook Pro | 2.33 Ghz Intel Core 2 Duo | 2 GB ram | 160 GB HD | 6x DL SuperDrive | matte screen

12" PB | G4 1.33 Ghz | 756 MB | 60 GB HD
Konfabulation is offline   0
Old Oct 15, 2006, 10:44 PM   #18
akadmon
macrumors 68000
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: New England
Quote:
Originally Posted by Konfabulation
eBooks suck to read on a large computer screen, let alone a tiny iPod screen. Not gonna happen.
I think you're FOS. I love reading ebooks on my Pocket PC -- just love it! Still, without a touch screen, reading ebooks on an iPod would be severely hobbled. Yes -- I would ditch my Pocket PC in an instant if Apple came out with a iPod that had PDA functionality.
akadmon is offline   0


 
MacRumors Forums > Archive > Archives of Old Posts > MacBytes.com News Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Deus Ex Human Revolution Crashing on Start up suicidal nun Mac and PC Games 9 Mar 3, 2014 02:31 PM
Do you plan to jump from Android, keeping iPhone, or jump to Android? Starfyre Alternatives to iOS and iOS Devices 192 Sep 11, 2013 02:49 PM
Jump start MacBook Pro without keyboard 2009 2.66GHz? joecool99 MacBook Pro 2 Feb 10, 2013 06:00 PM
Babu Jump -- Jump For Your Life!! y3k00000 iPhone and iPod touch Apps 1 Nov 7, 2012 07:48 AM
Kung-Fu Jump: Jump with Actions HuaXuCC iPhone and iPod touch Apps 3 Sep 4, 2012 02:14 AM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:13 AM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC