Go Back   MacRumors Forums > Archive > Archives of Old Posts > MacBytes.com News Discussion

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Oct 23, 2006, 08:23 AM   #1
MacBytes
macrumors bot
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
October 23, 1999: Mac OS 9 Released




Category: History
Link: October 23, 1999: Mac OS 9 Released
Description:: none

Posted on MacBytes.com
Approved by Mudbug
MacBytes is offline   0
Old Oct 23, 2006, 08:35 AM   #2
Warbrain
macrumors 603
 
Warbrain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Chicago, IL
The good ol' days...
__________________
WARBRAIN
Twitter | Blog
Warbrain is offline   0
Old Oct 23, 2006, 03:03 PM   #3
MacsRgr8
macrumors 604
 
MacsRgr8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The Netherlands
Quote:
Originally Posted by Warbrain
The good ol' days...
Do you really mean that?

I must admit, I was pretty new to Macs back then, but seeing Mac OS 8.5 evolve into Mac OS 9 was not very impressive IMHO.
Back then Mac OS X Server 1.0 (Rhapsody) was looking pretty cool, but Mac OS 9 was more of the same. Same bad memory management, no SMP support (apart from some plug-ins for apps like Photoshop) etc.
Apple was in need of a completely new OS, and was getting it in the form of Mac OS X. No 10.0 yet... no Aqua yet... more importantly: no Carbon yet.

But it came... oh boy.. did it come!!!
__________________
Steve Jobs. 1955 - 2011. My Hero.
MacsRgr8 is offline   0
Old Oct 23, 2006, 03:06 PM   #4
iGav
macrumors G3
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Quote:
Originally Posted by MacsRgr8
Do you really mean that?

I must admit, I was pretty new to Macs back then, but seeing Mac OS 8.5 evolve into Mac OS 9 was not very impressive IMHO.
Back then Mac OS X Server 1.0 (Rhapsody) was looking pretty cool, but Mac OS 9 was more of the same. Same bad memory management, no SMP support (apart from some plug-ins for apps like Photoshop) etc.
Apple was in need of a completely new OS, and was getting it in the form of Mac OS X. No 10.0 yet... no Aqua yet... more importantly: no Carbon yet.

But it came... oh boy.. did it come!!!
It was still better than Windows though.
__________________
Me.
iGav is offline   0
Old Oct 23, 2006, 03:10 PM   #5
MacsRgr8
macrumors 604
 
MacsRgr8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The Netherlands
Quote:
Originally Posted by iGav
It was still better than Windows though.
Ooh yes.
That it be, that it be....

Windows ME. Anyone remember that ghastly OS?
__________________
Steve Jobs. 1955 - 2011. My Hero.
MacsRgr8 is offline   0
Old Oct 23, 2006, 03:49 PM   #6
impierced
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Quote:
Originally Posted by MacsRgr8
Apple was in need of a completely new OS...
Though Rhapsody was hardly a new OS.

NextStep (68k) -> OpenStep (Intel) -> Rhapsody (PPC) ... Mac OS X
impierced is offline   0
Old Oct 23, 2006, 03:54 PM   #7
bartelby
macrumors Core
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Quote:
Originally Posted by MacsRgr8
Do you really mean that?

I must admit, I was pretty new to Macs back then, but seeing Mac OS 8.5 evolve into Mac OS 9 was not very impressive IMHO.
Back then Mac OS X Server 1.0 (Rhapsody) was looking pretty cool, but Mac OS 9 was more of the same. Same bad memory management, no SMP support (apart from some plug-ins for apps like Photoshop) etc.
Apple was in need of a completely new OS, and was getting it in the form of Mac OS X. No 10.0 yet... no Aqua yet... more importantly: no Carbon yet.

But it came... oh boy.. did it come!!!
I started with OS 7.5. I just remember it was pretty crap. 8.5 wasn't much better. 9 was nice. I didn't migrate to OS X until 10.2 and I hated it for about 4 months
bartelby is offline   0
Old Oct 23, 2006, 04:03 PM   #8
MacsRgr8
macrumors 604
 
MacsRgr8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The Netherlands
Quote:
Originally Posted by impierced
Though Rhapsody was hardly a new OS.

NextStep (68k) -> OpenStep (Intel) -> Rhapsody (PPC) ... Mac OS X
True. Rhapsody is not the real new part (except for a "platinum theme", making it look like Mac OS 9).....
But Carbon did make it a bit new. It made it "accessible" for developers. Only with carbonisation was it possible for the developers to make some "enhancements" to their software to make it run natively on new Mac OS X 10.x.
In the Rhapsody environment the developers had to re-write their apps from scratch to make it run natively.
Carbon made Mac OS X big. It delivered (amongst others) Office v X and many of Adobe's apps. Without these giants, Mac OS X wouldn't have made it.
So, Mac OS X 10.x is a bit new, and you're right: Rhapsody wasn't really
__________________
Steve Jobs. 1955 - 2011. My Hero.
MacsRgr8 is offline   0
Old Oct 24, 2006, 07:44 AM   #9
mainstreetmark
macrumors 68020
 
mainstreetmark's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Saint Augustine, FL
I always felt that OS9 was just an appetizer for OSX. Apple didn't want an OS9, but they had to have SOMETHING out there. They chucked in a few useless features, and suddenly it was a "major revision".

Nothing close to the massive update between system 6, and system 7, when OS# really came of age.

(OS#? I guess I'm using that to mean "not OS X")
__________________
iTunesRegistry.com <--don't bother, it's dead.
mainstreetmark is offline   0


 
MacRumors Forums > Archive > Archives of Old Posts > MacBytes.com News Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mac Mini October 2012 oldhifi Mac mini 3 Dec 17, 2013 05:51 PM
U.S. Mac Sales Continue to Sag Ahead of October Updates MacRumors MacRumors.com News Discussion 165 Oct 22, 2013 06:15 PM
9to5Mac states the obvious, Mavericks released at the end of October Sky Blue OS X Mavericks (10.9) 1 Sep 6, 2013 08:08 AM
iMac released with 13 mbp in october? enytuand Wasteland 2 Sep 12, 2012 03:12 PM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:39 PM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC