Register FAQ/Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to the Mac Forums forums. Please read the FAQ if you have questions. Register to participate.

 
Go Back   Mac Forums > Archive > Archives of Old Posts > MacRumors News Discussion (archive)
TouchArcade.com - iPhone Game Reviews and News

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Nov 13, 2006, 08:08 AM   #1
MacRumors
macrumors bot
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
iTunes Album Credit for Singles

http://www.macrumors.com/images/macrumorsthreadlogo.gif

A CNet blog claims that Apple is working with labels to provide more incentive for customers to purchase full albums -- or at least not penalize them for buying singles ahead of time.

At present, if you purchase an iTunes single ($.99), and then later purchase the full album ($9.99), you are double paying for that single ($10.98). According to their sources, CNet states that in the future iTunes customers may get credit for any singles previously purchased when buying a full album.

Quote:
"In the interest of more consumer-friendly transactions, that makes some sense," McGuire said. "In the end that's dependent on whether I see value in those other eight songs."
MacRumors is offline  
Old Nov 13, 2006, 08:09 AM   #2
Warbrain
macrumors 68040
 
Warbrain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Chicago, IL
I read this over the weekend and I can't wait for it to happen. It'll be great. So many times have I bought the single and then the album.
__________________
WARBRAIN
Twitter | Blog
MacBook, 2.1 GHz C2D, 4 GB RAM, 500 GB HDD
iPhone 3G 8 GB
Warbrain is offline  
Old Nov 13, 2006, 08:09 AM   #3
SpaceMagic
macrumors 68000
 
SpaceMagic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Munich, Germany
I've often thought this and eventually just ended up downloading each of the album's songs individually. Sometimes however this means you don't get the Album only tracks!
__________________
MacBook 2Ghz Core2Duo, 320GB HD, 3.3GB RAM + 24" LG LCD
SpaceMagic is offline  
Old Nov 13, 2006, 08:11 AM   #4
paddy
macrumors 6502a
 
paddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: I measc mo dhaoine
What, record companies doing something nice for consumers?!?!
__________________
The meek may inherit the earth but they won't keep it for very long.
paddy is offline  
Old Nov 13, 2006, 08:19 AM   #5
Belly-laughs
macrumors 6502a
 
Belly-laughs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Send a message via AIM to Belly-laughs
Looks like Apple have tons of negotiation muscle despite of MS´ attempt of bribing the music biz. Must have something to do with market share…
Belly-laughs is online now  
Old Nov 13, 2006, 08:25 AM   #6
Squonk
macrumors 65816
 
Squonk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Great idea!!! That would make me more likely to purchase songs online!
__________________
iSwitched in 1988
MP quad 2.8 (4GB/1.5TB/ATI 2600), iPhone, iPods

Squonk is offline  
Old Nov 13, 2006, 08:26 AM   #7
fixyourthinking
macrumors 6502a
 
fixyourthinking's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Greenville SC
Send a message via Yahoo to fixyourthinking
I hope they also get rid of ANY album only purchases. The only way to get a song off of the Chicken Little soundtrack was to buy the whole album through iTunes.

It was a great cover of Simon & Garfunkel's "All I Know" by Five For Fighting - I paid the $9.99 for it because I happened to have won a few iTunes gift cards.
__________________
WWW.FIXYOURTHINKING.COM
fixyourthinking is offline  
Old Nov 13, 2006, 08:32 AM   #8
DTphonehome
macrumors 6502a
 
DTphonehome's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: NYC
This is already being done if you "pre-order" certain whole albums (such as Tenacious D "Pick of Destiny")...you get the single now, and the rest of the album when it's released.

EDIT: Oh, now I see the difference...in this new scheme you won't actually have to buy the whole album to get the single...you can just get the single now for 99 cents, then the rest of the album for the remainder if you want it at a later time. Cool.

Last edited by DTphonehome : Nov 13, 2006 at 08:51 AM. Reason: I was ensmartenated.
DTphonehome is offline  
Old Nov 13, 2006, 08:34 AM   #9
boringName
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Everybody wins

This will make me far less hesitant to buy singles, and more likely to buy the full album (which I admit to not doing just to be spitefull).

So, the record companies make more money, and I require less therapy
boringName is offline  
Old Nov 13, 2006, 08:38 AM   #10
spicyapple
macrumors 68000
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Perhaps now they can do away with Album-only pricing, considering it was a measure against people only buying one song but instead prevented people from buying any song at all!
spicyapple is offline  
Old Nov 13, 2006, 08:39 AM   #11
~Shard~
macrumors Demi-God
 
~Shard~'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: 1123.6536.5321
Send a message via Skype™ to ~Shard~
This makes sense and it is also good customer service. I'm surprised Apple hasn't implemented a policy like this already, so here's hoping they do so in the very near future.
__________________
My riches consist not in the extent of my possessions, but in the fewness of my wants.
- J. Brotherton
~Shard~ is offline  
Old Nov 13, 2006, 08:42 AM   #12
CallmeKenneth
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Mega-City 1, Sector 41
A great idea

Makes sense to me. There's gotta be a catch, though. Seems too altruisitic a move by big corporate companies..


_________________
Alternative Mac History Mactimewarp
CallmeKenneth is offline  
Old Nov 13, 2006, 08:43 AM   #13
reallynotnick
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Quote:
Originally Posted by spicyapple View Post
Perhaps now they can do away with Album-only pricing, considering it was a measure against people only buying one song but instead prevented people from buying any song at all!
Do you mean album-only songs? Not pricing.

Even if they do do this I don't think album only songs will go away. I do hope this happens though even if I may not use it very much or at all.
reallynotnick is offline  
Old Nov 13, 2006, 08:48 AM   #14
Rojo
macrumors 65816
 
Rojo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: New York City
I have done this so many times, it's sad.
If they could retroactively offer back-credit for customers who have bought singles and then full albums, I'd probably get $40-50 worth of credit.

I was very happy when they started to not penalize singles-buyers if they pre-bought the whole album. But then again, sometimes I'm not sure if I WANT the whole album before sampling it, so this new method will be a LOT cooler.
Rojo is offline  
Old Nov 13, 2006, 08:55 AM   #15
The Monkey
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Sounds like a way to ward off some potential antitrust problems to me.
The Monkey is offline  
Old Nov 13, 2006, 08:58 AM   #16
spicyapple
macrumors 68000
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Monkey View Post
Sounds like a way to ward off some potential antitrust problems to me.
Can't see it as such since the consumer isn't strong-armed into buying singles or full albums. Apple probably got a lot of input from customers and saw that it probably made more sense to offer album pricing minus single song purchases.
spicyapple is offline  
Old Nov 13, 2006, 09:01 AM   #17
dobbin
macrumors 6502a
 
dobbin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: England
Quote:
Originally Posted by CallmeKenneth View Post
Makes sense to me. There's gotta be a catch, though. Seems too altruisitic a move by big corporate companies..
I'm sure it is designed to sell more singles and albums rather than just to be altruistic!

This is aimed at getting people who do not currently buy singles and albums to do so, rather than to give a discount to people who already buy both.

I have often bought 1 or 2 songs from an album, but I rarely buy a whole album (and if I do, I often go out and buy the CD). If I could get £2-3 discount off the album download price, then I might be temtped I suppose.
dobbin is offline  
Old Nov 13, 2006, 09:04 AM   #18
The Monkey
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Quote:
Originally Posted by spicyapple View Post
Can't see it as such since the consumer isn't strong-armed into buying singles or full albums. Apple probably got a lot of input from customers and saw that it probably made more sense to offer album pricing minus single song purchases.

Probably right, but it arguably is a tying problem and best avoided.
The Monkey is offline  
Old Nov 13, 2006, 09:14 AM   #19
ASP272
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Nashville, TN
Send a message via AIM to ASP272 Send a message via Yahoo to ASP272
This is already happening

I bought the Evanescence single for "Call Me When You're Sober" a few days before I pre-ordered the album. When I pre-ordered the album the charge for the single came off (I was never charged for it). Plus, maybe a glitch, they allowed me to download the single AGAIN as part of the pre-order of the album. So in the end I got the single for "Call Me . . ." and the album and another copy of "Call Me . . ." (the album version) again all for $9.99. This being a new album I think they are already setting this in place. That's my 2 cents.
__________________
"It was a bug, Dave."
ASP272 is offline  
Old Nov 13, 2006, 09:15 AM   #20
Ashapalan
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: England
Thanks to buying singles and then going on to buy the album, i have lost around £5. That's almost another full album. So this news is music to my ears.
__________________
Mac Mini
iPhone
Ashapalan is offline  
Old Nov 13, 2006, 09:30 AM   #21
iSee
macrumors 65816
 
iSee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
I hope this is really true.
I also hope they do the same thing for TV shows.

I do think this will help overall sales. I would already have bought the Lost season pass but I couldn't stomach paying again for four episodes I already bought.
iSee is offline  
Old Nov 13, 2006, 09:47 AM   #22
Parky
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
I made this suggestion to Apple over a year ago directly to a friend who works in the iTunes Store development team.

He said they had been trying to get this sorted for a while, even back then.

So it could be 100% true, I hope it is.

Ian
Parky is offline  
Old Nov 13, 2006, 09:53 AM   #23
settledown
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: pittsburgh
I'm Down.

That just sounds fair. I'm sure Apple needs to tweak the buying protocols of the iTunes Store, but I bet they can do it.

Wonder if it will be retroactive.
__________________
sig.'s waste time and brain bandwidth
settledown is offline  
Old Nov 13, 2006, 10:07 AM   #24
dernhelm
macrumors 65816
 
dernhelm's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: middle earth
'Bout time! Wonder if this applies to past-purchased songs, or only future purchased songs...
__________________
Five exclamation marks, the sure sign of an insane mind. --Terry Pratchett
dernhelm is offline  
Old Nov 13, 2006, 10:20 AM   #25
twoodcc
macrumors 603
 
twoodcc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Right side of wrong
Send a message via AIM to twoodcc Send a message via MSN to twoodcc
Quote:
Originally Posted by paddy View Post
What, record companies doing something nice for consumers?!?!
yeah i know, it's unbelievable
__________________
tville pump
Smarter than the average bear
twoodcc is offline  

 

Mac Forums > Archive > Archives of Old Posts > MacRumors News Discussion (archive)

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:43 PM.

Mac News | Mac Rumors | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2002-2009, MacRumors.com, LLC