Register FAQ/Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to the Mac Forums forums. Please read the FAQ if you have questions. Register to participate.

 
Go Back   Mac Forums > Archive > Archives of Old Posts > MacRumors News Discussion (archive)
TouchArcade.com - iPhone Game Reviews and News

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Nov 13, 2006, 01:18 PM   #1
MacRumors
macrumors bot
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Core 2 Duo MacBook Also Supporting 802.11n?

http://www.macrumors.com/images/macrumorsthreadlogo.gif

Continuing a recent trend, Apple appears to have included another draft 802.11n-compatible wireless card in their recently released Core 2 Duo based MacBook computers. According to ThinkSecret, the wireless chipset is the Atheros AR5008E, apparently the same series as is in the Core 2 Duo MacBook Pros. Apple first introduced draft 802.11n compliant chipsets with the Core 2 Duo iMac, however the iMac uses a Broadcom chipset.

Apple has yet to release any Mac OS X drivers to allow the full speed of the devices to be realized. It is currently thought that Apple's iTV will employ 802.11n.
MacRumors is offline  
Old Nov 13, 2006, 01:19 PM   #2
Eidorian
macrumors G3
 
Eidorian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Indiana
Send a message via AIM to Eidorian
Nice to see the 802.11n cards in there. I just hope the standard doesn't change that much.
__________________
MRoogle it!
hikari T7500 2.2 GHz / 4 GB / 320 GB / GMA X3100 / 10.5.8
chobimaru Core i5 750 2.66 GHz / 4 GB / 640 GB / 4830 / Windows 7
Eidorian is offline  
Old Nov 13, 2006, 01:22 PM   #3
Josias
macrumors 68000
 
Josias's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Denmark
Though the N card won't run at full speed until Apple makes a firmware update, will they still have the range capabilities that N sports, or will they have normal 802.11g range?
Josias is offline  
Old Nov 13, 2006, 01:22 PM   #4
AndyM
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Might it just be that chipsets that support just G and no type of N are not as available or offer no cost advantage?
AndyM is offline  
Old Nov 13, 2006, 01:24 PM   #5
Eidorian
macrumors G3
 
Eidorian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Indiana
Send a message via AIM to Eidorian
Quote:
Originally Posted by Josias View Post
Though the N card won't run at full speed until Apple makes a firmware update, will they still have the range capabilities that N sports, or will they have normal 802.11g range?
Nope, you need full N hardware. (Cards & router)

Quote:
Originally Posted by AndyM View Post
Might it just be that chipsets that support just G and no type of N are not as available or offer no cost advantage?
It's likely.
__________________
MRoogle it!
hikari T7500 2.2 GHz / 4 GB / 320 GB / GMA X3100 / 10.5.8
chobimaru Core i5 750 2.66 GHz / 4 GB / 640 GB / 4830 / Windows 7
Eidorian is offline  
Old Nov 13, 2006, 01:25 PM   #6
dashiel
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
this is so apple can release iTV in Q1 of next year. jobs will say something like:

oh there is one more thing, we've got HD in itunes now. of course HD takes up a lot of bandwidth so iTV ships with 802.11n draft. we'll be selling an adapter for those of you with older macs, but for anyone who bought a mac in the last 6 months -- you've already got it.
dashiel is offline  
Old Nov 13, 2006, 01:25 PM   #7
Multimedia
Banned
 
Multimedia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Santa Cruz CA, Silicon Beach
Send a message via AIM to Multimedia Send a message via Yahoo to Multimedia Send a message via Skype™ to Multimedia
Not Surprised • Part Of The Leopard "Secrets" No Doubt

Leopard will probably unleash the real capability in this hardware with a firmware update as well.
Multimedia is offline  
Old Nov 13, 2006, 01:27 PM   #8
Eidorian
macrumors G3
 
Eidorian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Indiana
Send a message via AIM to Eidorian
Quote:
Originally Posted by Multimedia View Post
Leopard will probably unleash the real capability in this hardware with a firmware update as well.
Now that is interesting.
__________________
MRoogle it!
hikari T7500 2.2 GHz / 4 GB / 320 GB / GMA X3100 / 10.5.8
chobimaru Core i5 750 2.66 GHz / 4 GB / 640 GB / 4830 / Windows 7
Eidorian is offline  
Old Nov 13, 2006, 01:27 PM   #9
theheyes
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Manchester
Does anyone know if Apple actually plans to enable these in the future with an update or are they simply just the card theyre using these days?
theheyes is offline  
Old Nov 13, 2006, 01:27 PM   #10
Josias
macrumors 68000
 
Josias's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Denmark
Allright, so when I get the next AirPort Basestation with N, will I be able to recieve better signal with my G-only CD MacBook?
Josias is offline  
Old Nov 13, 2006, 01:27 PM   #11
AppliedVisual
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Quote:
Originally Posted by AndyM View Post
Might it just be that chipsets that support just G and no type of N are not as available or offer no cost advantage?
The changes within the chipsets to support "n" are very minimal and the new chips are readily available for about the same price as their a/b/g only counterparts. It makes sense for Apple to put them in - if everything goes OK and 802.11n is ratified without too many changes from its current form, then all the C2D Mac systems can take advantage of it. If for some reason "n" takes longer and goes through more dramatic changes (which is somewhat doubtful), then nothing is really lost.
AppliedVisual is offline  
Old Nov 13, 2006, 01:29 PM   #12
sartinsauce
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Quote:
Originally Posted by dashiel View Post
this is so apple can release iTV in Q1 of next year. jobs will say something like:

oh there is one more thing, we've got HD in itunes now. of course HD takes up a lot of bandwidth so iTV ships with 802.11n draft. we'll be selling an adapter for those of you with older macs, but for anyone who bought a mac in the last 6 months -- you've already got it.
That's a nice idea. Do you think that the MWSF Keynote will also include a product that vastly increases everyone's ISP bandwidth? Or will we have to spend a day and a half downloading bad movies in HiDef?
sartinsauce is offline  
Old Nov 13, 2006, 01:30 PM   #13
Eidorian
macrumors G3
 
Eidorian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Indiana
Send a message via AIM to Eidorian
Quote:
Originally Posted by Josias View Post
Allright, so when I get the next AirPort Basestation with N, will I be able to recieve better signal with my G-only CD MacBook?
No, you'll still need an 'n' wireless card.

Quote:
Originally Posted by AppliedVisual View Post
The changes within the chipsets to support "n" are very minimal and the new chips are readily available for about the same price as their a/b/g only counterparts. It makes sense for Apple to put them in - if everything goes OK and 802.11n is ratified without too many changes from its current form, then all the C2D Mac systems can take advantage of it. If for some reason "n" takes longer and goes through more dramatic changes (which is somewhat doubtful), then nothing is really lost.
I have to agree here. Just as long as no drastic changes are made.

Quote:
Originally Posted by sartinsauce View Post
That's a nice idea. Do you think that the MWSF Keynote will also include a product that vastly increases everyone's ISP bandwidth? Or will we have to spend a day and a half downloading bad movies in HiDef?
Apple will make your tubes faster how? XD
__________________
MRoogle it!
hikari T7500 2.2 GHz / 4 GB / 320 GB / GMA X3100 / 10.5.8
chobimaru Core i5 750 2.66 GHz / 4 GB / 640 GB / 4830 / Windows 7
Eidorian is offline  
Old Nov 13, 2006, 01:31 PM   #14
Squonk
macrumors 65816
 
Squonk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
As expected

There are going to be a lot of happy people when Apple enables these cards along with new routers and iTV. Wahoo!
__________________
iSwitched in 1988
MP quad 2.8 (4GB/1.5TB/ATI 2600), iPhone, iPods

Squonk is offline  
Old Nov 13, 2006, 01:33 PM   #15
matthemercyless
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
This was pretty much expected, but good to know, as it does raise another couple of questions...when will the mac mini be upgraded to the draft N spec, and will it also be bumped to C2D

Will we see a new airtunes device and a new airport extreme base station to take advantage of the new technology?

I would expect it may be a good move to upgade the mini before the holiday season, and introduce new airport type products in January.

Sound reasonable enough?
matthemercyless is offline  
Old Nov 13, 2006, 01:34 PM   #16
AndyM
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Quote:
Originally Posted by AppliedVisual View Post
The changes within the chipsets to support "n" are very minimal and the new chips are readily available for about the same price as their a/b/g only counterparts. It makes sense for Apple to put them in - if everything goes OK and 802.11n is ratified without too many changes from its current form, then all the C2D Mac systems can take advantage of it. If for some reason "n" takes longer and goes through more dramatic changes (which is somewhat doubtful), then nothing is really lost.
My point exactly.

Now let the hundreds of posts about how Apple secretly plans to enable N for all the users!
AndyM is offline  
Old Nov 13, 2006, 01:34 PM   #17
AppliedVisual
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Quote:
Originally Posted by sartinsauce View Post
That's a nice idea. Do you think that the MWSF Keynote will also include a product that vastly increases everyone's ISP bandwidth? Or will we have to spend a day and a half downloading bad movies in HiDef?
Increasing bandwidth of peoples' net connections is between the people and their ISPs. Nothing Apple can really do... For those of us with good internet connections, I say bring on the HD! And for those who are still stuck with crappy internet, all I can say is that I feel for you, really I do... I was stuck with no broadband (other than overpriced and crappy satellite service) until I moved about 8 months ago. But now my 8Mbps connection can download HD content just fine and it costs me less than $30/month.
AppliedVisual is offline  
Old Nov 13, 2006, 01:35 PM   #18
Josias
macrumors 68000
 
Josias's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Denmark
Eidorian: Since the base station will have better range, and will be backwards compatible, I know it won't give me same range and speed as with a N card, but since the N base will broadcast better than a G base, won't I get a better range anyway?
Josias is offline  
Old Nov 13, 2006, 01:46 PM   #19
sartinsauce
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Quote:
Originally Posted by AppliedVisual View Post
Increasing bandwidth of peoples' net connections is between the people and their ISPs. Nothing Apple can really do... For those of us with good internet connections, I say bring on the HD! And for those who are still stuck with crappy internet, all I can say is that I feel for you, really I do... I was stuck with no broadband (other than overpriced and crappy satellite service) until I moved about 8 months ago. But now my 8Mbps connection can download HD content just fine and it costs me less than $30/month.
Yeah, you guys aren't too good at the sarcasm, are you?

Do you really think I expect Apple to do that?

If so, please sign here __________________ to buy this bridge in Brooklyn for $100...
sartinsauce is offline  
Old Nov 13, 2006, 01:50 PM   #20
powerboy
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Quote:
Originally Posted by Josias View Post
Since the base station will have better range, and will be backwards compatible, I know it won't give me same range and speed as with a N card, but since the N base will broadcast better than a G base, won't I get a better range anyway?
Yes. I have a Belkin Pre-N router that I use with computers with G cards and the range is much better than the G routers I have used. Of course, using N cards would certainly improve the range even more.
powerboy is offline  
Old Nov 13, 2006, 01:51 PM   #21
Fredou51
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Kingston, Ontario, Canada
Quote:
Originally Posted by Macrumors View Post
http://www.macrumors.com/images/macrumorsthreadlogo.gif
Apple first introduced draft 802.11n compliant chipsets with the Core 2 Duo iMac, however the iMac uses a Broadcom chipset.
I thought the first Mac to have a 802.11n compliant chipset was the Mac Pro?

Frederic
__________________
Mac Pro 2x2.66Ghz, 6GB, 1.75 TB, x1900XT, Airport/BT, 23" ACD
8 GB iPhone
80 GB iPod Classic
Fredou51 is offline  
Old Nov 13, 2006, 01:52 PM   #22
Eidorian
macrumors G3
 
Eidorian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Indiana
Send a message via AIM to Eidorian
Quote:
Originally Posted by Josias View Post
Eidorian: Since the base station will have better range, and will be backwards compatible, I know it won't give me same range and speed as with a N card, but since the N base will broadcast better than a G base, won't I get a better range anyway?
NO, you're STILL going to need a N card in your laptop. Depending on how N turns out it might not even operate on the same frequency as G.
__________________
MRoogle it!
hikari T7500 2.2 GHz / 4 GB / 320 GB / GMA X3100 / 10.5.8
chobimaru Core i5 750 2.66 GHz / 4 GB / 640 GB / 4830 / Windows 7
Eidorian is offline  
Old Nov 13, 2006, 01:55 PM   #23
Josias
macrumors 68000
 
Josias's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Denmark
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fredou51 View Post
I thought the first Mac to have a 802.11n compliant chipset was the Mac Pro?

Frederic
No, there have been no such reports, but it will be easy to upgrade to an N card I should believe.

BTW, you have my dream MacPro
Josias is offline  
Old Nov 13, 2006, 02:22 PM   #24
Daringescape
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: CA
So, I have a pre-N router right now. Will I see any advantages with this card as the macbook is configured currently?
__________________
Dual 2Ghz G5 - 15" MBP - 30GB Video iPod

Daringescape is offline  
Old Nov 13, 2006, 02:26 PM   #25
imacintel
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eidorian View Post
Now that is interesting.
Know what else is interesting? Your short annoying posts.


imacintel is offline  

 

Mac Forums > Archive > Archives of Old Posts > MacRumors News Discussion (archive)

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:10 AM.

Mac News | Mac Rumors | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2002-2009, MacRumors.com, LLC