Register FAQ/Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to the Mac Forums forums. Please read the FAQ if you have questions. Register to participate.

 
Go Back   Mac Forums > Archive > Archives of Old Posts > MacRumors News Discussion (archive)
TouchArcade.com - iPhone Game Reviews and News

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Nov 22, 2006, 02:14 AM   #1
MacRumors
macrumors bot
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Palm CEO on Apple iPhone Threat

http://www.macrumors.com/images/macrumorsthreadlogo.gif

MercuryNews.com reports on comments by Palm's CEO Ed Colligan on the persistent rumors that Apple will be introducing a Apple phone in the near future.

Overall, Colligan was not concerned about Apple's possible entry into the smart-phone market.

Quote:
"We've learned and struggled for a few years here figuring out how to make a decent phone,'' he said. "PC guys are not going to just figure this out. They're not going to just walk in.''
Colligan does theorize that Apple might offer their phone with Wifi technology and distribute the phone in Apple stores rather than through the traditional wireless carriers, such as Cingular or Verizon.

Apple has been rumored to have paired with Cingular for their 2007 launch of the iPhone. Recent announcements, however, have cast some doubt on this arrangement.
MacRumors is offline  
Old Nov 22, 2006, 02:22 AM   #2
Alex Urchin
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Wasn't it exactly the same story with the iPod?
Alex Urchin is offline  
Old Nov 22, 2006, 02:22 AM   #3
Chaszmyr
macrumors Demi-God
 
Chaszmyr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Boulder, CO
Send a message via AIM to Chaszmyr
Just because Palm thinks it's that hard to make a phone doesn't necessarily mean that Apple would have had the same difficulties.
Chaszmyr is online now  
Old Nov 22, 2006, 02:23 AM   #4
amols
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Yeah sure...I hope they do know who makes iPods
__________________
-iMac G4 700Mhz 160GB HD
-MBP 2.16 Ghz 160GB HD
-iPod 3G 40GB, 4G 60GB, 5G 60GB, Mini 6GB, Nano white 4GB, Nano black 4GB
-Canon Powershot S3 IS

Last edited by Doctor Q : Nov 22, 2006 at 02:43 AM. Reason: no need to repeat first post
amols is offline  
Old Nov 22, 2006, 02:25 AM   #5
kansast
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Quote:
"We've learned and struggled for a few years here figuring out how to make a decent phone,'' he said. "PC guys are not going to just figure this out. They're not going to just walk in.''
I wonder if it will be interesting to revisit this quote in a year or two ?
One can hope.
kansast is offline  
Old Nov 22, 2006, 02:26 AM   #6
G5Unit
macrumors 68020
 
G5Unit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: I'm calling the cops
Send a message via AIM to G5Unit
Hasen't Apple been working on the iPhone for "a few years" at least?
__________________
flickr
yannikr

i am not here to do what has already been done.
G5Unit is offline  
Old Nov 22, 2006, 02:27 AM   #7
spicyapple
macrumors 68000
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Urchin View Post
wasn't it exactly the same story with the ipod?
It would be fun to speculate what features Apple brings to the iPhone that could revolutionize the cell phone industry? My guess is 1) ease of use in updating contacts, calendar, emails 2) iPod music integration 3) high quality 640x480 mpeg4 videos and 4) leveraging in flash memory pricing
spicyapple is offline  
Old Nov 22, 2006, 02:29 AM   #8
baxterbrittle
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
They do know whom they're talking about right? I mean they say PC manufacturers yet palm are producing windows mobile pieces of junk. Windows mobile is the biggest piece of shite operating system - it would not be hard to come up with something a lot better (for Apple at least). And the Palm OS is very dear to my heart, but not exactly cutting edge and palm don't even own that anymore.

Palm are washed out, end of story.
__________________
15" PB G4 1GHz WUXGA, G4 667, iBook G3 500, PowerMac G4 733 DA x 2, 7100, 9600, Color Classic 300MHz. Thinkpad A31P, A30P, T42, P4D 2.8, Acer 3680.
baxterbrittle is offline  
Old Nov 22, 2006, 02:31 AM   #9
Old Smuggler
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
palms os is severely outdated
the only thing they have going for them is the abundance of software out
i own a palm and will ditch it when something pda, osx feel comes from apple

if apple makes their phone centered on a PDA and Confrencing rather than
"its an ipod and a phone"
i think they will gain some substantial ground

having the ability to use the pda phone as an ipod would not be out of the question but solely a ipod phone ? i think they would be cutting their profits to a certain age group of potential buyers
Old Smuggler is offline  
Old Nov 22, 2006, 02:32 AM   #10
Object-X
macrumors 6502a
 
Object-X's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
One hit wonder

The problem with Palm is they are on their way out. They got what? Treo? How long can that last? PDAs are over. So it's all about the phones now.

They have to be worried. Apple has the midas touch. Whatever Apple get's into they change. Apple has a way of innovation that changes all of the dynamics. They weren't the first with the iPod, but their entrance into digital music has changed the whole music industry, not just digital music players.

Apple could very well do the same thing with an Apple branded phone. Integrating it into the whole computer experiance in ways we can't even predict. To claim it takes years to make a phone "right" is just proof that Palm has very little to offer.

The future of phone technology is going to change rapidly and dramically over the next few years. Apple can make billions of dollars in this market. They are going to go for it, and they will leverage their existing products to make it happen and to offer something new. Everyone is fixated on the iPod, but it's the integration with OS X that has the most interesting potential.

Video iChat on your phone? Internet services? Email? Address? Calendar? Have you used a Palm or Blackberry? They are OK for what they do, but they could be so much better...a lot better. What they are missing is exactly what Apple has to offer -- and it isn't music.
Object-X is offline  
Old Nov 22, 2006, 02:33 AM   #11
CHROMEDOME
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Bay Area/LA
Send a message via AIM to CHROMEDOME
Quote:
Originally Posted by spicyapple View Post
It would be fun to speculate what features Apple brings to the iPhone that could revolutionize the cell phone industry? My guess is 1) ease of use in updating contacts, calendar, emails 2) iPod music integration 3) high quality 640x480 mpeg4 videos and 4) leveraging in flash memory pricing
Ok...and the MSRP for that phone would be 800 bucks with a 10 year contract with cingular.

People need to realize that apple products are somewhat overpriced so I can see a great apple phone with great features but with a contract the phone is going to be extremely expensive.
CHROMEDOME is offline  
Old Nov 22, 2006, 02:34 AM   #12
Mechcozmo
macrumors 601
 
Mechcozmo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Send a message via AIM to Mechcozmo
blah blah blah Our hardware is incredibly expensive for what you can do with it blah blah blah Our software is older than XP blah blah blah blah Our new software is more delayed than Vista blah blah blah Our products kicked the Newton's arse a decade ago blah blah blah Apple can't beat the clear market leader blah blah blah

I've been waiting for Palm OS 6 to come out for just about five years now. I'm not buying a new Palm... I'll just stick to my b0rked Tungsten|T. Programmed life expectancy, ha! But damn, that Soylent Green is tasty!
__________________
This is not the signature you're looking for.
This is not the signature we're looking for.
You can scroll down now.
You can scroll down now.
Mechcozmo is offline  
Old Nov 22, 2006, 02:34 AM   #13
caliguy
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Smuggler View Post
palms os is severely outdated
the only thing they have going for them is the abundance of software out
i own a palm and will ditch it when something pda, osx feel comes from apple

if apple makes their phone centered on a PDA and Confrencing rather than
"its an ipod and a phone"
i think they will gain some substantial ground

having the ability to use the pda phone as an ipod would not be out of the question but solely a ipod phone ? i think they would be cutting their profits to a certain age group of potential buyers
Yeah exactly, I totally agree. I've never been turned on by the iPhone/iPod 2-in-1 rumours. To me, iLife integration and conferencing is way more important. I actually prefer they keep the two (iPod+iPhone) separate. I don't want my music listening to be disturbed by calls.
caliguy is offline  
Old Nov 22, 2006, 02:50 AM   #14
miketcool
macrumors 6502a
 
miketcool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Did Apple say the same thing when someone challenged their Newton?
miketcool is offline  
Old Nov 22, 2006, 03:16 AM   #15
yankeedoodle
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Urchin View Post
Wasn't it exactly the same story with the iPod?
Yep. And Palm doen't even know how to make a PDA right... Sorry, just my 2 cents and as much as I hate Microsoft: If there is one single thing that Microsoft's dullness department has overlooked so far it's the Pocket PC... Have a look at them next time you are in a store, compare them; have a look at their multitasking features, watch online TV on them -- they are by far not perfect and tend to crash (that's the Microsoft part in it) -- but they are still worlds better than any Palm out there.

I wish Apple would not only enter the phone business but also come back into the PDA market and show the Microsoft folks how to do it the Apple way. The Newton was fantastic and much ahead of it's time. In 1993 people just didn't know how to handle a PDA and didn't know how to integrate it into their daily workflow. Today, we are used to carry our iPods around wherever we go -- so if Apple could manage to enter the phone and PDA business via the iPod as a well known, emotionally positive vector (people buy the iPod because they want to listen to music and find out that it can also do much more than just play back U2 tracks), they could have a tremendous success.
__________________
No keyboard detected.
Press F10 to proceed.
yankeedoodle is offline  
Old Nov 22, 2006, 03:35 AM   #16
rikers_mailbox
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: LA-la-land
Apple doesn't need to deliver a revolutionary phone-like device to grab marketshare. It's more about integrating a device within the system... and that is something Apple is good at.

Phones, new features, and additional functionality are a dime-a-dozen. New bells and whistles are added all the time, that's not what the market needs. Someone (hopefully Apple!) needs to take some of these advancements and deliver a products that integrates them in a logical and intuative way.
rikers_mailbox is offline  
Old Nov 22, 2006, 03:46 AM   #17
PODshady
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Springfield, IL
Send a message via AIM to PODshady
I would buy a Palm Treo BUT their GUI needs a lot of work.... it is very ugly and this could be the reason that they have found it "difficult" to get people to like their smart-phones. If Apple comes out with an iPhone (and I hope they do) it would blow anything Palm can come up with out of the water. Apple is well known for well designed products and if the iPhone's GUI is even half has nice as the GUI in Mac OS X it will be way better than the Palm Treo and all those Windows Mobile devices.
__________________
Some of My Apple Products:
8GB iPhone
15" MacBook Pro, 2.33GHz Intel Core 2 Duo, 2GB DDR2 SDRAM, 200GB HD, Glossy Screen
PODshady is offline  
Old Nov 22, 2006, 03:55 AM   #18
Belly-laughs
macrumors 6502a
 
Belly-laughs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Send a message via AIM to Belly-laughs
Quote:
"PC guys are not going to just figure this out. They're not going to just walk in.''
Not PC guys, but good industrial and interface designers will. Starting with a clean sheet with little or no knowledge on the subject is an advantage; you tend to have different perceptions on how things work/could work. This gives a far greater idea base with simpler implementations as a result.

Advantage Apple.
Belly-laughs is offline  
Old Nov 22, 2006, 03:55 AM   #19
LordJohnWhorfin
macrumors member
 
Join Date: May 2002
oops

Last edited by LordJohnWhorfin : Nov 22, 2006 at 04:01 AM.
LordJohnWhorfin is offline  
Old Nov 22, 2006, 03:56 AM   #20
glowingstar
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: San Leandro, CA
Send a message via AIM to glowingstar
HEY! who's he calling a "PC guy"??!
glowingstar is offline  
Old Nov 22, 2006, 03:57 AM   #21
LordJohnWhorfin
macrumors member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Colligan is right

There's absolutely no reason for concern. It's not like Palm has any market share left to worry about.
LordJohnWhorfin is offline  
Old Nov 22, 2006, 05:27 AM   #22
geese
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: London, UK
[quote=Macrumors;3080145"We've learned and struggled for a few years here figuring out how to make a decent phone,'' he said. "PC guys are not going to just figure this out. They're not going to just walk in.'' .[/QUOTE]

I remember the head of Atari saying something similar about Sony's Playstation.
__________________
Look at some random photos
geese is offline  
Old Nov 22, 2006, 05:52 AM   #23
FarmerBob
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chaszmyr View Post
Just because Palm thinks it's that hard to make a phone doesn't necessarily mean that Apple would have had the same difficulties.
Apple can't make a proper OS much less a working phone. Get real. They have a ton of really good patents, as per all the latest leaks, but it will be a very long time before we see, if at all, them all together in the iPhone we would expect from Apple.

And Cingular is long out of the picture. They went elsewhere.

Also having been part of the cellular revolution, I know full well that the individual carriers will want the operations software of the "iPhone" contoured to their liking so much that it will defeat the purpose of the piece. Over the years many manufacturers have pulled phones from carriers because the level of bastardization of the phone software that the carrier required messed up the phone so much that the phone maker didn't want to be blamed for an inferior product. In the US there is no such thing as a truly accepted fully operational unlocked unit. Elsewhere in the world that is mostly how you buy a phone. Phone first, then a carrier. Not the other way around.
FarmerBob is offline  
Old Nov 22, 2006, 06:03 AM   #24
dernhelm
macrumors 65816
 
dernhelm's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: middle earth
Quote:
Originally Posted by G5Unit View Post
Hasen't Apple been working on the iPhone for "a few years" at least?
No, the rumor mill has been grinding on the iPhone for several years. Apple hasn't necessarily been working on it for that long.
__________________
Five exclamation marks, the sure sign of an insane mind. --Terry Pratchett
dernhelm is offline  
Old Nov 22, 2006, 06:15 AM   #25
rt_brained
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Creativille
From The Desk Of Steve Jobs:
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	ohpehneeohn.gif
Views:	144
Size:	6.3 KB
ID:	62559  
__________________
User has logged off
rt_brained is offline  

 

Mac Forums > Archive > Archives of Old Posts > MacRumors News Discussion (archive)

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:09 PM.

Mac News | Mac Rumors | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2002-2009, MacRumors.com, LLC