Register FAQ/Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to the Mac Forums forums. Please read the FAQ if you have questions. Register to participate.

 
Go Back   Mac Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion
TouchArcade.com - iPhone Game Reviews and News

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Dec 3, 2006, 10:42 AM   #26
Mantat
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Montréal (Canada)
Seriously, this sucks.

I was hoping for awifi phone. It would have been much more Apple like to do something different. Now they are just going for small size which is totaly useless to me. It will only mean that it is going to be even easier to lose/forget it in my coat pocket...

Wifi phone are the future, just imagine: as long as you have access to a wifi network, you get free service! And with the coverage offered by wifi-max, if shouldnt be a problem in the 2-3 next years.

There is one such phone availlable in japan right now (cant find the link) it is using Skype and look very Apple like.
__________________
Cinephotography with the 5D: Canon 5D Tips
Ruby on Rails plugin directory:The Rail Station
Mantat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 3, 2006, 10:44 AM   #27
X5-452
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, Canada
If the 8GB version was indeed the smartphone version, then it should exclusively have the slide out keyboard and not the simpler 4GB regular phone. The two battery idea is genius, now I won't have to worry about running out of juice because I was listening to music. Plus I'm sure there are other cool features about it not mentioned. I can see it resembling the nano in terms of hight and width but we'll see. I'm excited. I just wish I had dished out $283 bones back in October for the Samsung T609.
__________________
iPhone | 32GB 3GS, OS v3.1
MacBook | 2.0Ghz Intel Core Duo
Camera | Canon SD870 IS silver
X5-452 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 3, 2006, 10:44 AM   #28
gloss
macrumors 68040
 
gloss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: around/about
Send a message via AIM to gloss
At the same time, a wi-fi phone would be horribly limiting. Cell phones can be sold worldwide - only select areas have broad wireless access.
__________________
'cuz we do what we've gotta do real well, and we've got the fever to tell.
gloss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 3, 2006, 10:46 AM   #29
randyharris
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
If true, this is the best rumornews I've read in a long time!
__________________
Randy at MacSeven.com
randyharris is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 3, 2006, 10:46 AM   #30
dan-o-mac
macrumors 6502a
 
dan-o-mac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Send a message via AIM to dan-o-mac Send a message via Skype™ to dan-o-mac
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mantat View Post
Seriously, this sucks.

I was hoping for awifi phone. It would have been much more Apple like to do something different. Now they are just going for small size which is totaly useless to me. It will only mean that it is going to be even easier to lose/forget it in my coat pocket...

Wifi phone are the future, just imagine: as long as you have access to a wifi network, you get free service! And with the coverage offered by wifi-max, if shouldnt be a problem in the 2-3 next years.

There is one such phone availlable in japan right now (cant find the link) it is using Skype and look very Apple like.
Sounds like a great idea if you live in the future.
dan-o-mac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 3, 2006, 10:47 AM   #31
freeny
macrumors 68000
 
freeny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Location: Location:
Ill believe it when I see it.
freeny is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 3, 2006, 10:47 AM   #32
CEAbiscuit
macrumors 6502a
 
CEAbiscuit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: The Kitchen
Interesting but the only thing that makes it shakey for me is the "all providers" claim. An iphone intro with both GSM and CDMA in the same phone? Two different models? Would love to see it, but for all carriers I have doubts. Especially with Verizon and Alltel's clugey software requirements.
__________________
Les: It was almost as if they were...organized!!
Mr Carlson: As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly.
CEAbiscuit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 3, 2006, 10:48 AM   #33
dekator
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Krautistan
This thing better kick ass... well, from the sound of it, it will. I'd like Apple to produce something unique, yet versatile and compatible.
__________________
malum meum bonum est
dekator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 3, 2006, 10:48 AM   #34
gloss
macrumors 68040
 
gloss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: around/about
Send a message via AIM to gloss
Quote:
Originally Posted by freeny View Post
Ill believe it when I see it.
I love that people are still saying this. The expectations have grown so huge for an Apple-branded cell phone that the worst thing Apple could possibly do is NOT release one. Every technology outlet on the internet has mentioned it at one point or another, and there's a sort of tacit assumption that 'Yeah, it's coming.' If Steve were to come out and say 'Nope, it's not.', their stock would tank overnight.
__________________
'cuz we do what we've gotta do real well, and we've got the fever to tell.
gloss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 3, 2006, 10:48 AM   #35
puckhead193
macrumors 601
 
puckhead193's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: NY
i hope their is a smart phone version....
__________________
20" iMac C2D - 2.33GHz, 3 GB ram, ATI X1600 256 MB VRAM
15" pb 1.5 GHZ Rev. C
30 gig ipod 3rd gen, 60 gig 5g ipod ~ white, silver 2GB nano, 64 gig iPod Touch
puckhead193 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 3, 2006, 10:51 AM   #36
Eraserhead
Contributor
 
Eraserhead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Oxford, UK
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mantat View Post
Seriously, this sucks.

I was hoping for awifi phone. It would have been much more Apple like to do something different. Now they are just going for small size which is totaly useless to me. It will only mean that it is going to be even easier to lose/forget it in my coat pocket...
Although cool, WiFi isn't huge with open networks, at least in the UK, but if the $450 one had WiFi that'd be cool for home use.
Eraserhead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 3, 2006, 10:53 AM   #37
Chundles
macrumors Demi-God
 
Chundles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: The Gong, Australia
Quote:
Originally Posted by CEAbiscuit View Post
Interesting but the only thing that makes it shakey for me is the "all providers" claim. An iphone intro with both GSM and CDMA in the same phone? Two different models? Would love to see it, but for all carriers I have doubts. Especially with Verizon and Alltel's clugey software requirements.
Yeah but who uses CDMA? Talk about old tech.

I hope it's a 3G phone so it can make use of fast mobile internet in conjunction with a mobile version of the iTunes Store. Download to your iPhone on the go, come home and it will sync your song back to your computer.

Here on Telstra's NextG service (regular old 3G but on 850MHz for better range) they offer dual-downloads so when you download a song to your phone it simultaneously downloads a higher bit rate version to your laptop. Don't know how much it costs but knowing Telstra it'll be astronomical. Good idea though but I'd rather have a phone with good storage and the same bit rate on both laptop and phone.

But forget about CDMA, I didn't think anyone but the farmers out in the scrub used CDMA and even they gave that up ages ago when satellite phones became cheap.

My mind still boggles that your telcos can dictate access to the phone's features. You shouldn't need to worry about what provider you use when you consider which phone. Sure some providers may get exclusive deals but if a phone is offered by multiple providers it should have access to all the features that it would have if it were unlocked.
__________________
This is going straight to the Pool Room
Chundles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 3, 2006, 10:53 AM   #38
insidergrin
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Kevin Rose knows his sh*t

If your a member of Revision 3 and have seen the latest Diggnation you would know this is true. You could tell and he hinted to saying that he has seen the phone and i felt like i wanted to just YELL at him to TELL US ALL! Because he didnt want to screw his source hinting to the truth of this phone and the details. You can see the pocast here: http://revision3.com/diggnation/2006-11-30,
For now only if your a member you can watch the video or else you could just download the audio and listen foward to the 38th minute. I wish he had just called his source and rumored to all of us about the iphone.
insidergrin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 3, 2006, 10:56 AM   #39
Buschmaster
macrumors 65816
 
Buschmaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Minnesota
Send a message via AIM to Buschmaster
Quote:
Originally Posted by freeny View Post
Ill believe it when I see it.
Funny thing to hear from a frequent at a rumors site.


I'm not due for a phone for a while from my contract, but if this phone were really awesome, I'd get it for sure, I know it'd sync and sing with my MacBook... That's the most exciting prospect to me.
__________________
White MacBook (9400m), 2.0 GHz, 160GB HDD, 4GB RAM
iPhone 3G 16GB White
www.mintapps.com
Buschmaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 3, 2006, 10:58 AM   #40
OdduWon
macrumors 6502a
 
OdduWon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: CaliVerse
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chaszmyr View Post
It sounds like everything we've been hoping for (most of us anyway). Lets pop the champagne!

The only concern is... Why would the 8gb model cost $200 more than the 4gb model? ... It could point to one of them being a smart phone, and the other not...Instead, i think this "slide out keyboard" would really be the keypad for dialing, and the surface of the device would have a screen and a click wheel, like several mockups have shown. This makes an otherwise credible seeming source seem less credible.
agreed, the reason for the price gap will be the intelligence in the higher phone. but it could also be the inclusion of a killer hands-free set. with all the research going on at apple lately ( itv,earbuds,fm/tuner,shuffelizing and isight) i think we can expect the TelePod to be the culmination of these labors.

As for slidout keyboards, if it is nano sized it will definitely have one and it will be as slick as the click wheel does anyone think this will be too small??? Ichat and photobooth mobile. how hard would it be to run a mobile iclip? put together your friday night video playlist or compose a vblog for Youtube.

but then again the pod products are about celebrating the Mac not becomming one. YET
__________________
"Don't Sprung Me Bro!"

Last edited by OdduWon : Dec 3, 2006 at 11:05 AM.
OdduWon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 3, 2006, 11:00 AM   #41
dan-o-mac
macrumors 6502a
 
dan-o-mac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Send a message via AIM to dan-o-mac Send a message via Skype™ to dan-o-mac
Quote:
Originally Posted by insidergrin View Post
If your a member of Revision 3 and have seen the latest Diggnation you would know this is true. You could tell and he hinted to saying that he has seen the phone and i felt like i wanted to just YELL at him to TELL US ALL! Because he didnt want to screw his source hinting to the truth of this phone and the details. You can see the pocast here: http://revision3.com/diggnation/2006-11-30,
For now only if your a member you can watch the video or else you could just download the audio and listen foward to the 38th minute. I wish he had just called his source and rumored to all of us about the iphone.
Or you can get the video from here.

http://www.diggdown.net/
dan-o-mac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 3, 2006, 11:02 AM   #42
job
macrumors 68040
 
job's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: in transit
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chundles View Post
Yeah but who uses CDMA? Talk about old tech.

But forget about CDMA, I didn't think anyone but the farmers out in the scrub used CDMA and even they gave that up ages ago when satellite phones became cheap.
I thought Verizon still used CDMA.

Anyone want to correct me?
job is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 3, 2006, 11:14 AM   #43
timon
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Tustin, CA
Quote:
Originally Posted by job View Post
I thought Verizon still used CDMA.

Anyone want to correct me?
Your quite right. In the US CDMA, i.e., Verizon, has about half of the market so leaving CDMA out could really hurt sales.

What will be interesting is if Apple does release a CDMA phone will they do it through Verizon or own their own. If through Verizon will Apple let Verizon force them to cripple the phone features? If they go on their own then will Verizon let you connect to the network? I've heard that they won't but them maybe Apple is ready to take them to court. One the other hand I've been told by one Verison rep they will but won't give you any technical support.
timon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 3, 2006, 11:15 AM   #44
mmzplanet
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Florida
Send a message via AIM to mmzplanet
Quote:
Originally Posted by job View Post
I thought Verizon still used CDMA.

Anyone want to correct me?
Yes they do.

CDMA is a great technology (If you use GPS, you use CDMA tech), GSM (a form of TDMA) has advantages too. Those who blatently bash one or the other don't really know anything or they work for a cell company that uses one of them.

But will VZW keep their mitts off the OS? .... doubtful. But maybe they will surrender to iPods marketshare.
mmzplanet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 3, 2006, 11:16 AM   #45
calyxman
macrumors 6502a
 
calyxman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Quote:
Originally Posted by job View Post
I thought Verizon still used CDMA.

Anyone want to correct me?
Yes they do, and I believe Alltell does as well.
__________________
+iBook Surgery before and after.
iBook G3 600 Mhz/640 MB RAM, PC 100/20 GB 5400 rpm Seagate Momentus/OS 9.2.2, OS 10.4.9
calyxman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 3, 2006, 11:19 AM   #46
JohnGalt
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: at my computer, silly....sheesh
Quote:
Originally Posted by arn View Post
There's large gap between 4GB and 8GB ($249 -> $449), if previous rumors are to be believed... there will be a lowerend "just phone" and a higher end "smart phone"

arn
You are correct. Given the $100 difference between a 4GB & 8GB iPod today, and that 8GB nanos are rumored to not be selling as well as hoped, doubling the price difference doesn't seem to make sense

It also isn't typical of Apple's marketing group who usually has price points that make it easy to start out thinking you're going to buy an iPod shuffle but walk out the door with a quad PowerMac.....
__________________
X
"Do Not Let the Hero in Your Soul Perish...."
17" PB/1.33GHz/2 GB RAM/20" Cinema/bells, whistles, kitchen sink, iThis, iThat...
JohnGalt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 3, 2006, 11:21 AM   #47
randomlinh
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnGalt View Post
You are correct. Given the $100 difference between a 4GB & 8GB iPod today, and that 8GB nanos are rumored to not be selling as well as hoped, doubling the price difference doesn't seem to make sense

It also isn't typical of Apple's marketing group who usually has price points that make it easy to start out thinking you're going to buy an iPod shuffle but walk out the door with a quad PowerMac.....
$100 price difference? I thought it was only $50.. and everyone I know who bought a nano bought the 8GB one.
randomlinh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 3, 2006, 11:24 AM   #48
kansast
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Wondering how well sales will be. I know that buying a new cell phone ain't quite as easy as say buying a new iPod. I think of all the people I know who have 'newer' cell phones, and they all complain about not being able to figure out how to use all the features.. I use most the features on my phone, but I'm constantly amazed at how lame the User Interface is.. I keep waiting for apple to come out with their version of the 'consumer' iPhone. And an interface that kicks ass. About time for me to get a new phone anyway :-)
kansast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 3, 2006, 11:30 AM   #49
Ahheck01
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Foremost in my mind is in-car use. Right now we have adapters to interface our iPods with our head units. We also have adapters to have our cell phones become handsfree, integrating with our head units. I think a HUGE selling point of the iPhone would be the ability to have one universal connection to head units where we interface our iPhones' music with our head unit, while at the same time having it automatically mute itself for incoming calls with the whole handsfree thing.

This will be an awesome product if they don't half-arse the phone and the mp3 player in order to combine them.

-Evan
Ahheck01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 3, 2006, 11:31 AM   #50
freeny
macrumors 68000
 
freeny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Location: Location:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Buschmaster View Post
Funny thing to hear from a frequent at a rumors site.
Not that I don't believe of its existence, its just the rumors of the iPhone have taken on a life of their own. To the point that you really cant believe anything. I will reserve my right to make judgments on the thing for when it is released.

Im not a "cell-phone person" mostly because I haven't seen one that has ever inspired me to do more than to make a phone call...
freeny is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Mac Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:25 PM.

Mac News | Mac Rumors | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2002-2009, MacRumors.com, LLC