Register FAQ/Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to the Mac Forums forums. Please read the FAQ if you have questions. Register to participate.

 
Go Back   Mac Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion
TouchArcade.com - iPhone Game Reviews and News

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Dec 4, 2006, 03:40 AM   #1
MacRumors
macrumors bot
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Ultra-thin 12'' MacBook Pro?



Macscoop/MacOSXRumors claims that Apple is finishing development on a 12" MacBook Pro described as "ultra-thin":

Quote:
The new laptop should be even thinner and weigh less than the current models in the MacBook Pro line-up. In spite of this very tiny and lightweight form-factor, the miniaturized MacBook Pro should keep its built-in optical drive and sport a dual-core processor, providing unequalled size/performance ratio in the PC industry, sources told MacScoop.
This "ultra-portable" MacBook Pro is estimated to be priced in the $1700-$1800 range and sport a 12" widescreen display.

The introduction of 12" MacBook Pro would fill a gap left by the 12" PowerBook model, which was dropped during the transition to Intel in early 2006. Apple retooled their laptop models which previously offered 12" / 14" iBooks and 12" / 15" / 17" PowerBooks to a lineup with 13" MacBooks and 15" / 17" MacBook Pros.

One analyst made similar claims in mid-2006. At that time, analyst Benjamin Reitzes stated that Apple was working on an "ultra-portable PC" to be delivered by Macworld San Francisco 2007. Reitzes included comments about incorporating the use of NAND Flash memory to speed up boot times. This concept of Flash-based latops was revisited in September 2006 by Appleinsider -- with expectations that NAND flash would make their way into the next revision of MacBooks due in 2007. While these rumors line up with each other, MacScoop makes no mention of Flash memory in this upcoming "ultra-thin" laptop.

MacScoop/MacOSXRumors cites "reliable" sources for this report and has had a recent history of some accurate reports with predictions of 23" (24") iMacs as well as Leopard info pre-WWDC.

Last edited by arn : Dec 4, 2006 at 03:49 AM.
MacRumors is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 4, 2006, 03:46 AM   #2
doraemonkey
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: France
Ah this would be great. My 12 inch G4 powerbook isn't holding out that well. Even though I don't do that much intensive work, I task switch a lot and I spend a lots of time looking at the rainbow ball. I do carry it with me everywhere, and a portable has to be just that... portable. I do plug it into a 20 inch monitor at work though.

Here's hoping that they give us a new ultra portable!
doraemonkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 4, 2006, 03:47 AM   #3
BlueRevolution
macrumors 68040
 
BlueRevolution's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ailleurs
I thought the point of getting rid of the 12" PowerBooks was to get rid of the iBook/PowerBook buying dilemma. Still, I would love to see Apple add an ultrathin. I would be surprised if they could keep the optical drive, though.
__________________
"In its majestic equality, the law forbids rich and poor alike to sleep under bridges, beg in the streets and steal a loaf of bread." —Anatole France
BlueRevolution is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 4, 2006, 03:49 AM   #4
oceanzen
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Brighton, UK
PERFECT

I was currently going to go for the 13" MB mainly because I like the form, as they have similar power but now I'll seriously consider the 12" - Hope they have better graphics than the MB

Last edited by oceanzen : Dec 4, 2006 at 08:31 AM.
oceanzen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 4, 2006, 03:49 AM   #5
doraemonkey
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: France
I'd almost go on to say that a cd-dvd drive isn't necessary, I don't use mine much at all. I could just leave a cd-dvd drive at work or at home. DVD movies I could just burn, and most file transfers are done now adays with a USB key.

But, if the optical drive is thin enough and doesn't take much room why not...
doraemonkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 4, 2006, 03:50 AM   #6
arn
macrumors god
 
arn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Send a message via AIM to arn
some people were probably hoping for smaller.... but a 12" widescreen would probably feel significantly smaller than a 12" 4:3

(fixed the 15"/14" mistake)

arn
arn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 4, 2006, 03:53 AM   #7
doraemonkey
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: France
Hey, another thought...

Why 12 inch? The keyboard should be a minimum width to be comfortable. And on the current 12" there is enough room in the frame to use a true 13". So they could in theory use the 13 inch of the Macbook, but reduce the bulk of the machine to sell it as a Pro.

I would go for it... especially if there was a good video card included.
doraemonkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 4, 2006, 03:54 AM   #8
Analog Kid
macrumors 68000
 
Analog Kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
12" widescreen? Oy! I hope it's pixel dense... My biggest complaint about the old 12" is that 1024x768 just isn't enough to work with.
__________________
"Quick to judge, quick to anger, slow to understand...
Ignorance and Prejudice and Fear walk hand-in-hand."
--Peart
Analog Kid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 4, 2006, 03:55 AM   #9
RoadKill
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: LONDON UK
I hope this is true. I have a 20" iMac and a 13" macbook for traveling but sometimes it's just a little bit too big, especially on UK pendolino trains!

Also hope that the glossy screen is a option so I can buy a matte one and it has a fantastic battery life (8hrs :-) ) ok ok I know I'm living in la-la land with the battery but I would buy a laptop with 1/2 the performance of my macbook if the battery life was doubled (as long as i could also watch the odd dvd)

My previous notebook was a 800MHz G4 iBook and that was more than enough cpu for my on the road needs.
RoadKill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 4, 2006, 03:57 AM   #10
aswitcher
macrumors 601
 
aswitcher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Sydney OZ
Send a message via AIM to aswitcher
Looks like a pretty wild Macworld coming up
__________________
Never underestimate the Geekfactor
Switcher since June '04
iPhone 3G | 24" Alu iMac | 15" MacBookPro | Elgato EyeTV/IceTV | SecuritySpy User
aswitcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 4, 2006, 03:58 AM   #11
matthewHUB
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
ok so i think we can guess that the reason it's no smaller than 12" is that they want to keep the full size keyboard. And i agree with Arn that 12" 16:9 feels a lot smaller than the 4:3.

Been looking to replace my g4 12" powerbook... this may make me keep it till wwdc 2007.

So would this be a pro machine?? or skimp on features for ultraportability?

price seems reasonable. ugh it's 4am and i need to get to bed. Darn Macrumors!
matthewHUB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 4, 2006, 03:58 AM   #12
erockerboy
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: SEA, WA, US
Man, I will be stoked if this one turns out to be true. I love my 12" G4 PBook but it's definitely getting a bit long in the tooth. Would be great to have a new Intel speed demon in a similar form factor.

Bring it!!!
erockerboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 4, 2006, 03:58 AM   #13
hsvguy
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: May 2004
Bring it on - that's really all that needs to be said
hsvguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 4, 2006, 04:00 AM   #14
emotion
macrumors 68030
 
emotion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Manchester, UK
Balls, I was holding out for something ike this and pulled the trigger on a macbook.

I suspect a small mbp would sport the L7400 which is only 1.5GHz (though still 4MB cache).
emotion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 4, 2006, 04:02 AM   #15
matthewHUB
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Name?

Would this still be part of the macbook pro line?

New name?

Macbook mini. I called it first.
matthewHUB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 4, 2006, 04:04 AM   #16
balamw
macrumors 601
 
balamw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: New England, USA
The next five weeks are going to seem REAALLLY looong.

B
__________________
UMBP (15" SD 2.8 GHz), UMB (13" 2.4 GHz), iMac (17" Yonah), 16GB iPhone 3G, 8GB 3G Nano, Airport Extreme, Time Capsule, TV
balamw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 4, 2006, 04:08 AM   #17
Philberttheduck
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: HB, CA
It'll probably be a 12.1" WS or at worse 11.1" WS. I hope it has on-par speeds of the MBPs, and not sacrifice any GHZ loss.
__________________
MBP 15.4" 2.2Ghz | iMac 20" 2.0GHz CD | Nano 4GB | Classic 160GB | JailBroken 3G iPhone 16GB
Philberttheduck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 4, 2006, 04:20 AM   #18
joelypolly
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Melbourne, Aus
Send a message via ICQ to joelypolly
omg my dream is almost true

Now if this baby supports 30" ACD then I will buy it in a heart beat.... as soon as I get the heart going from the shock of apple actually releasing this.
__________________
- MacBook Pro - Canon 30D - 28-300mm Canon L
Flickr|Blog
joelypolly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 4, 2006, 04:21 AM   #19
LostPacket
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Canada, eh
I thought the optical drive was the limiting factor for thickness. Has a manufacturer come out with an ultra thin drive recently? What are the ultra-thin PC laptops using, if any?

Edit: I just lost my newbie status. *pats back*
LostPacket is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 4, 2006, 04:23 AM   #20
dnedved
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Amsterdam, NL
Sweet! If the screen will swing all the way back around so it can be used like a tablet I'll definitely be ordering one. Why the heck are they putting an optical drive in what would otherwise be an ultra-portable? Just put a few USB ports on it and people who want an optical drive can plug one in every year or two when they need legacy media! I don't want to pay the price for the drive, and I certainly don't want the extra weight and space for something I won't use that often.
dnedved is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 4, 2006, 04:25 AM   #21
emotion
macrumors 68030
 
emotion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Manchester, UK
Quote:
Originally Posted by matthewHUB View Post
Would this still be part of the macbook pro line?

New name?

Macbook mini. I called it first.
Macbook Nano. I called that first.
emotion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 4, 2006, 04:25 AM   #22
mhar4
macrumors member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: London
Quote:
Originally Posted by doraemonkey View Post
Ah this would be great. My 12 inch G4 powerbook isn't holding out that well. Even though I don't do that much intensive work, I task switch a lot and I spend a lots of time looking at the rainbow ball. I do carry it with me everywhere, and a portable has to be just that... portable. I do plug it into a 20 inch monitor at work though.
I finally just upgraded the memory of my 12" PowerBook to 1.25GB and have had nary a sight of the beachball since. It's really a new lease of life and gives me pause before an upgrade. Not that one of these 12" MBPs don't sound very attractive, though!
__________________
"Go off and rule the universe from beyond the grave... or check into a psycho ward, whichever comes first, eh?"
mhar4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 4, 2006, 04:29 AM   #23
bluebomberman
macrumors 6502a
 
bluebomberman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Queens, NYC
It's almost unfair that all this new stuff's poised to come out right after the holiday season...I keep on thinking I'm going to buy something, but the little voice in my head says:

Wait for Macworld
__________________
Treo 700p.
bluebomberman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 4, 2006, 04:30 AM   #24
MAcNIAC
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Australia
arghhhhhhhhhhhh !!!!

i just bought a 15" MBP because there is no 12"PB replacement - i will spew if this is true.
__________________
MBP 2.33 GHz, 2GB RAM, 256 MB X1600, leopard
MAcNIAC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 4, 2006, 04:31 AM   #25
PodHead
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Boise, ID
I really wish I could afford to wait for this to become truth or not. This is exactly what I need. A pro model with portability, that would be awesome. Especially if it played nice with my 20" widescreen monitor. Dedicated video would be nice too. Guess I'll just keep the Macbook in decent shape, then....EBAY!!
__________________
Macbook 2.0Ghz 2GB RAM 200GB HD
6G 80GB iPod Classic
1G 16GB iPod Touch


Last edited by PodHead : Dec 4, 2006 at 04:39 AM.
PodHead is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Mac Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:24 PM.

Mac News | Mac Rumors | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2002-2009, MacRumors.com, LLC