As far as speed goes, I'd would estimate that the Core Duo MacMini and 2.3 GHz PowerMac G5 have about the same processing power, with the PowerMac being better at certain tasks.
Hmm, dont think so. A CoreDuo 2.0 - maybe 2.16 estimates to dual-core 2.3 G5.
Hi,
I was thinking about a new mac mini or a new mac pro 2x2Ghz .
difference in price and power are neat.
I work with 10 mepgapixel photography raw files on my current pc and I'm moving into mac.
I was very struggled with these tw models, but now I'm seeing that some otther friends are using a max out mac mini ( 2GB and 160 HD) and photshop / lightroom run good. for backup there are external hardisks.
I'm really thinking about it cause the two-processor power of the mac pro is really over that I need to work with my photography.
a dual processor is must perfoer on video editing and 3d-modeling or maybe mathematics.
I really need all that power ?
I'm waiting the core 2 duo mac mini (maybe apple also update a 7200 rpm or maybe give the ability to add more that 2 GB on the mini).
bye
There's really no free space in mini to include more RAM slots in it. The only option is to allow 2 GB sticks, but those are expensive.
Mac mini isn't really ment for such serious tasks (RAW photography). If you plan to use Aperture (and I highly recommend it), you'd better go with Mac Pro. Aperture demands really fast machine! It feels ok with 2-core processor, but with all power Mac Pro has (and Quad G5) it feels comfortable.
You'll want to expand your RAM to at least 3 GB, prefferably - 4 for 10 MP RAWs, especially with Aperture.
Or you could get a C2D iMac, even if you already have a screen, you can have a dual-monitor setup.
Speaking of dual monitors: you can attach only 1 display to the mini, but up to 8 to the Mac Pro (with additional graphics cards of course)