|
|
| Welcome to the Mac Forums forums. Please read the FAQ if you have questions. Register to participate. |
|
|||||||
| TouchArcade.com - iPhone Game Reviews and News |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
macrumors bot
Join Date: Apr 2001
|
Beatles and Apple? Feb 4th Superbowl Announcement?
![]() TorontoSun is reporting that Apple and EMI are on the verge of announcing the digital release of the Beatles' catalog. Quote:
As previously reported, the remastered Beatles collection is expected to be exclusive to the iTunes Store for three months. The article also claims that Apple has a "special" announcement scheduled for a Super Bowl commercial on February 4th. Many have noted that Steve Jobs used Beatles songs to demonstrate the iPhone during the Macworld San Francisco 2007 keynote, possibily hinting at an imminent annonucement. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
macrumors 6502a
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: La Jolla, CA
|
bring it on!
but, it this really a big deal?
__________________
MacPro 2.8 Octo, 30" and 23" Cinema Displays, PB 550,MacBook Pro 2.2, iPod 1G, Shuffle 2G, iPhone 3G |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
macrumors 6502a
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Oslo, Norway
|
I have to agree, a lot of hype. Donīt most of the fans already own all their recordings on vinyl AND CDīs already?
I know my father do
__________________
2.8ghz MP Octo 2,66ghz MBP, Express card slot! 12" iBook 1.2ghz 60GB HD & 768RAM www.sombrafilm.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
macrumors 6502
Join Date: Mar 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
macrumors 6502a
Join Date: May 2004
|
It would be a huge missed opportunity to announce the Beatles on iTunes during the Super Bowl and then not have the songs available for another 10 days. If they spend the cash on a Super Bowl spot, they should make the songs available as soon as the ad hits the air.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
macrumors regular
|
Wow... no one's really as excited about this as I am? I can't wait to buy their music when it becomes available.
Superbowl commercial too. Nice. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
macrumors 601
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: New England, USA
|
__________________
UMBP (15" SD 2.8 GHz), UMB (13" 2.4 GHz), iMac (17" Yonah), 16GB iPhone 3G, 8GB 3G Nano, Airport Extreme, Time Capsule, TV
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
macrumors 6502
Join Date: Mar 2004
|
Quote:
Would love to see that program again! Must see if available on DVD... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
macrumors 6502
Join Date: Mar 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
macrumors regular
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Denver, CO
|
Maybe not, but I'll bet you a Coke they announce a new iPod (widescreen?) with it.
That's a big deal.
__________________
Vista 2.0, Available Now.
X |
|
|
|
| MrFirework |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by MrFirework |
|
|
#11 | |
|
macrumors 601
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: New England, USA
|
Quote:
B
__________________
UMBP (15" SD 2.8 GHz), UMB (13" 2.4 GHz), iMac (17" Yonah), 16GB iPhone 3G, 8GB 3G Nano, Airport Extreme, Time Capsule, TV
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
macrumors regular
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: BC
|
Quote:
If Apple doesn't come out with a large screen iPod before June they'll have kissed a large chunk of revenue goodbye. I don't think they're that stupid. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | ||
|
macrumors 601
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: New England, USA
|
Quote:
IF Apple releases a widescreen HDD based iPod It'll have to be very different from the iPhone so as not to cannibalize their own sales. They might be able to pull it off if they release a slightly longer iPod to accommodate the larger screen and keep the mini's smaller click wheel as some of the mock ups have shown. No touchscreen, no wireless, just an iPod. OK maybe it would still have the accelerometer to switch between portrait and landscape. I could also see a move from the polycarbonate+metal to nano/mini like anodized aluminum with colors. Nothing that would eat into iPhone sales until fall at the earliest, but we shall see. Quote:
![]() B
__________________
UMBP (15" SD 2.8 GHz), UMB (13" 2.4 GHz), iMac (17" Yonah), 16GB iPhone 3G, 8GB 3G Nano, Airport Extreme, Time Capsule, TV
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
macrumors 6502a
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Georgia
|
Quote:
Apple likes to differentiate its lines: * iPod shuffle is portable and easy to use, but you give up screen and capacity. * iPod nano gains the screen and some capacity. * iPod gives you more screen and capacity. * widescreen iPod gives you even more screen and more capacity. * iPhone gives you Internet and telephone but less capacity. Lots of different features sets and price points, but it's not too complicated for consumers to understand. (On the other hand, I don't really see any reason to keep the iPod around after the widescreen comes onto the market unless there would be a huge price gap between the biggest nano and the smallest widescreen.)
__________________
* 17-inch PowerBook, 1.5 GHz G4, OS X 10.5.4 * 2 GB iPod nano silver with Nike+ (his) * 1 GB iPod shuffle pink (hers) Yes we can! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
macrumors 68040
Join Date: Jan 2005
|
Mark my words: yes they will. iPod is getting old. And no, true video iPod is not an alternative to the iPhone. iPod is not a replacement for iPhone. iPhone just MIGHT replace iPod for some users, but not vice versa. And even then, I don't think that no-one is going to buy a $499 - $599 phone just so they could use it as a video iPod. That's why it makes sense to release a true video iPod, based on iPhone-technology (but without the camera, WiFi and phone) and with bigger storage-space.
__________________
Anyone who thinks that Obama is a "Marxist" is so clueless that it's scary. Consider getting some education. |
|
|
|
| Evangelion |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Evangelion |
|
|
#16 |
|
macrumors 601
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: New England, USA
|
I don't doubt we'll see a refreshed iPod soon, just not one that has anywhere near the "wow factor" of the iPhone. The stuff you want to get rid of in the iPhone to make it cheaper, isn't sufficiently expensive. The display and battery in the iPhone make up a big chunk of the cost.
Just think about it this way the 8 GB nano and the 30 GB iPod are the same price, how do you think that comes about? The HDD costs less than the flash, but the larger display and battery offset that difference. If you want an HDD based iPod with the iPhone's display and UI you'll need a bigger battery than the iPhone which will offset the cost of removing the camera, phone and WiFi, result in making the device cost as much as the iPhone without the Cingular "contribution"/subsidy of the device cost. Or, just wait for the components to come down in price as the iPhone becomes routine. No one's going to buy a $700 iPod, even if it did have 100+GB of storage. I hope I'm wrong, but a Powerbook G5 would surprise me less. B
__________________
UMBP (15" SD 2.8 GHz), UMB (13" 2.4 GHz), iMac (17" Yonah), 16GB iPhone 3G, 8GB 3G Nano, Airport Extreme, Time Capsule, TV
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
macrumors member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Georgia, U.S.
|
Quote:
__________________
2GB iPod Nano (2Gen) Gateway PC (6 years old) Future: 2.0 GHz Macbook C2D(White), 1GB ram, 80 HD SmartVegan.net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
macrumors member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Philadelphia, PA
|
i was wondering why jobs used the beatles a few times during the keynote, considering he had their album covers and everything on the iphone even though you cant get their music through itunes.
im glad that we may finally be able to get beatles music online. |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
macrumors newbie
|
Supercomputer at the Superbowl
I'm remembering the awesome PowerMac G4 commercial with the tanks guarding it from... Super Bowl XXXIV?
Maybe we'll get to see our 8-core Mac Pros. |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
macrumors 6502
|
Yeah like I said in another post, BBC World Service on the radio did a story about the new EMI chief and said he was working on a deal to embrace more digital distribution, including the Beatles catalog.
__________________
We are the Macintosh. Lower your firewall, and surrender your PC. We will add your cultural distinctiveness to our own. Resistance is futile. |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
macrumors 6502
Join Date: Jul 2005
|
so there are still some people who don't have Beatles' album? geez.
having Beatles under iTunes is more of marketing tools than anything....I don't think the actual sales of their songs would be that good. |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
macrumors member
Join Date: Dec 2006
|
Since these are being remastered for the first time in 15 years, (If they ever have been) they will sound better than ever. Certainly they will go to reproducing original packaging and graphics, which many do not have, rather botched cut-up CD graphics.
There may be extras as booklets or bonus tracks. It WILL be a big deal. With 3 months head start, people will associate the Beatles with Apple/EMI Apple, iTMS and the iPod. That cant be bad. Plus during the Super bowl. On another note, I thought Michael Jacksons rights lapsed back to Apple Corps-sacreligeously, he allowed the songs to be used to hawk tennis shoes, instant breakfast, deoderant and SUV's. There are some things you just dont do, with iconic music. As for "who would want to buy compressed Beatles music?" Well Apple has just sold their 2-Billionth 'compressed' songtrack...so somebody seems not to mind. |
|
|
|
| seashellz2 |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by seashellz2 |
|
|
#23 |
|
macrumors 6502a
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Georgia
|
I called this one yesterday and have been trying to will The Beatles into iTunes existence here for months.
Finally! Yay!
__________________
* 17-inch PowerBook, 1.5 GHz G4, OS X 10.5.4 * 2 GB iPod nano silver with Nike+ (his) * 1 GB iPod shuffle pink (hers) Yes we can! |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
macrumors 6502
Join Date: Mar 2004
|
from the article...
"The second strong possibility is that the entire state-of-the art, 24-bit remastered UK catalogue will hit stores the first week of June, .." and we will be clamouring to buy it in compressed MP3/AAC form? The point being???? If the remasters are that good, why would I want it in anything less that 16bit/44.1? And if available in a higher bit depth/sample rate (DVD???) form, then that would be teh way to go. All in all, a bit underwhelming. And much though I appreciate the Beatles place in musical history, is this REALLY that much of a deal? |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | ||
|
macrumors 6502
Join Date: Nov 2003
|
Quote:
Quote:
the beatles are the same thing for music. their appeal is universal. not to mention for boomers who have been hesitant with this MP3 thing it will draw them in by the millions. |
||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|