Register FAQ/Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to the Mac Forums forums. Please read the FAQ if you have questions. Register to participate.

 
Go Back   Mac Forums > Apple Hardware > iPod and iTunes Discussion
TouchArcade.com - iPhone Game Reviews and News

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Feb 12, 2007, 03:37 PM   #1
Flowbee
macrumors 68030
 
Flowbee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Alameda, CA
Apple Corps Confirms Beatles Coming To iTunes

Couldn't find a link to this here yet...

Reporter Roger Friedman claims Apple Corps executive Neil Aspinall confirmed to him that the Beatles core catalog has been remastered and is ready to release via online music stores. No dates given. He also says that no one online store will get an exclusive deal.

Here's the link (Foxnews.com)

If you'd rather not visit Foxnews.com, I've written about the story on my site and included all of the relevant quotes.
__________________
Podophile.com >> Home of Nike+iPod hacks and FAQs.
Flowbee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 12, 2007, 03:41 PM   #2
psychofreak
Retired
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: London
Meh...anticlimax galore...
psychofreak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 12, 2007, 03:42 PM   #3
bartelby
macrumors Demi-God
 
bartelby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: somewhere
Oooh, I can hardly contain my excitement... oh no, wait... I can...
__________________
It was so real. Like I woke up in Wonderland. All sort of terrifying.
Search before you post: MRoogle
bartelby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 12, 2007, 04:24 PM   #4
Flowbee
Thread Starter
macrumors 68030
 
Flowbee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Alameda, CA
Obviously, we've all assumed this was happening, but the real news is that Apple Corps is saying iTunes won't get the exclusive deal that has been rumored for months. No exclusive deal, no Beatles-edition iPod? We'll see...
__________________
Podophile.com >> Home of Nike+iPod hacks and FAQs.
Flowbee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 12, 2007, 04:28 PM   #5
psychofreak
Retired
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: London
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flowbee View Post
Obviously, we've all assumed this was happening, but the real news is that Apple Corps is saying iTunes won't get the exclusive deal that has been rumored for months. No exclusive deal, no Beatles-edition iPod? We'll see...
Are U2 exclusive? Because they have a U2 iPod...why do you connect the two?
psychofreak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 12, 2007, 04:52 PM   #6
Flowbee
Thread Starter
macrumors 68030
 
Flowbee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Alameda, CA
Quote:
Originally Posted by psychofreak View Post
Are U2 exclusive? Because they have a U2 iPod...why do you connect the two?
First off, the rumors have connected the two. And it makes sense that an exclusive deal would add some juice to Beatles iPod announcement.

U2 released the song Vertigo exclusively on iTunes prior to the announcement of the U2 iPod. They also let Apple sell an exclusive digital box set in conjunction with the release of the U2 iPod.

I'm not making any predictions. Just pointing out that one part of the "Beatles on iTunes" rumor appears to be wrong, and maybe that says something about the other Beatles rumors.
__________________
Podophile.com >> Home of Nike+iPod hacks and FAQs.
Flowbee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 12, 2007, 10:18 PM   #7
backsidetailsli
macrumors 65816
 
backsidetailsli's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Toronto!
**** the beatles
they were in the right place at the right time
over rated and over hyped.

why are they even in the news here? why not write about every artist that is or isnt on itunes?
__________________
Check My Band Out!
www.thegoodratsradio.com

Last edited by Doctor Q : Feb 12, 2007 at 11:40 PM. Reason: language
backsidetailsli is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 12, 2007, 10:22 PM   #8
EricNau
macrumors Demi-God
 
EricNau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Sacramento, CA
I never expected an exclusive license between iTunes and the Beatles. I always figured it would be all or none.
EricNau is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 12, 2007, 10:27 PM   #9
Alex3231
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: West Hartford, CT
Send a message via AIM to Alex3231
so does that mean that the beatles are going to get money from the iTunes and iPod sales or something like that?
__________________
"It's kind of fun to do the impossible.” ~ Walt Disney
Alex3231 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 12, 2007, 10:30 PM   #10
macfan881
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
first off i wont belive any story that comes off of that station what so ever till i hear its ben confirmed by steve himself
macfan881 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 12, 2007, 10:32 PM   #11
mrkramer
macrumors 68020
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex3231 View Post
so does that mean that the beatles are going to get money from the iTunes and iPod sales or something like that?
They will get money from sales of their songs on iTunes, but not from iPods unless there is a beatles iPod.
mrkramer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 12, 2007, 10:33 PM   #12
Alex3231
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: West Hartford, CT
Send a message via AIM to Alex3231
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrkramer View Post
They will get money from sales of their songs on iTunes, but not from iPods unless there is a beatles iPod.
Good. Because I do love Paul, Ringo, John and George except they and their familes really don't need to be any richer.
__________________
"It's kind of fun to do the impossible.” ~ Walt Disney
Alex3231 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 12, 2007, 10:38 PM   #13
BillyShears
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
The Beatles are exceptional

Quote:
Originally Posted by backsidetailsli View Post
**** the beatles
they were in the right place at the right time
over rated and over hyped.

why are they even in the news here? why not write about every artist that is or isnt on itunes?
The Beatles are a very popular band that are not yet on any music service. Regardless of your opinion of them, having them exclusively on iTunes would be beneficial for Apple. It's also of interest because of the trademark settlement.

Last edited by Doctor Q : Feb 12, 2007 at 11:47 PM. Reason: edited quote
BillyShears is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 12, 2007, 10:41 PM   #14
Whistleway
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Why the heck does it need to be exclusive?

What's wrong with some of the posters here?
Whistleway is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 12, 2007, 10:46 PM   #15
Digitalclips
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sarasota, Florida
Quote:
Originally Posted by Whistleway View Post
Why the heck does it need to be exclusive?

What's wrong with some of the posters here?
How about all Ringo's vocal tracks being allowed out on Zunes ands Apple have the rest ...
Digitalclips is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 12, 2007, 10:46 PM   #16
bigjohn
macrumors Demi-God
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Arcadia, CA
First, I thought Michael Jackson or Sony or someone else owned the rights to the Beatles catalog...

Second, if you like the Beatles, just buy the CD, get your high quality non-DRM version for the same price, and rip it into whatever format you like.

It astounds me why people spend so much time fretting over iTunes music store announcements - paying 99 cents for a low-fi version of a song is a total rip.
__________________
Big John
iPhone3Gs, 4 iPods, Mac Pro (2x2.26 Nehalem), old Macbook Pro, Mini, iBook G3, Power Mac 7100/66, Apple IIe
bigjohn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 12, 2007, 10:59 PM   #17
Analog Kid
macrumors 68000
 
Analog Kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
For some reason the "How PC of them!" comment turned me off to the whole article. I don't see anything there I'd trust-- just some guy trying to make it sound like he hung out with Aspinall on the weekend. "Dude, that Allen Klein guy totally screwed up Hey Jude..."

Whatever... Big news is next story down: Police Reunion Tour! Woohoo!
__________________
"Quick to judge, quick to anger, slow to understand...
Ignorance and Prejudice and Fear walk hand-in-hand."
--Peart
Analog Kid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 12, 2007, 11:00 PM   #18
quigleybc
macrumors 68030
 
quigleybc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Beautiful Vancouver British Columbia, Canada
Send a message via Skype™ to quigleybc
wake me when there is something interesting on page 1
__________________
Black Book
Black iPhone
powermacg5 * iPod touch,nano,shuffle,3g * etc...
quigleybc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 12, 2007, 11:01 PM   #19
Rot'nApple
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: R-O-C-K 'n the USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by backsidetailsli View Post
**** the beatles
Envy just doesn't suit some people

Quote:
they were in the right place at the right time
True, but talent played a big part because without it, they would not have been the Mega Band they became

Quote:
over rated and over hyped.
Better to be that, then under rated and no hype

Quote:
why are they even in the news here? why not write about every artist that is or isnt on itunes?
First, "Artist" can be very elusively defined. What is music to some, is pure noise pollution to others, but that's my .02

Last edited by Doctor Q : Feb 12, 2007 at 11:48 PM. Reason: edited quote
Rot'nApple is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 12, 2007, 11:10 PM   #20
Digitalclips
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sarasota, Florida
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flowbee View Post

Reporter Roger Friedman claims Apple Corps executive Neil Aspinall confirmed to him that the Beatles core catalog has been remastered and is ready to release via online music stores. No dates given. He also says that no one online store will get an exclusive deal.
It says this on the Fox site... go figure??

"Now that Aspinall has “won” his longstanding lawsuit with Apple Inc. (formerly Apple Computer), he says downloaded Beatle songs will be coming to us soon."
Digitalclips is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 12, 2007, 11:12 PM   #21
Curtis72
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigjohn View Post
First, I thought Michael Jackson or Sony or someone else owned the rights to the Beatles catalog...

Second, if you like the Beatles, just buy the CD, get your high quality non-DRM version for the same price, and rip it into whatever format you like.

It astounds me why people spend so much time fretting over iTunes music store announcements - paying 99 cents for a low-fi version of a song is a total rip.
A few AAC and MP3's (even low bit rate ones) sound great. It all depends on the song. But I have given up with trying to find CD singles in record stores.

As for Apple paying Apple Corps for each iTunes song/iPod sold. That is complete crap. Apple, Inc won the case. The Beatles were appealing. Apple, Inc had the upper hand.
Curtis72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 12, 2007, 11:15 PM   #22
Digitalclips
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sarasota, Florida
Quote:
Originally Posted by Analog Kid View Post
Whatever... Big news is next story down: Police Reunion Tour! Woohoo!
Talking of which, I did laugh at the joke on the Grammy's about some rappers leaving quickly when they heard the Police had arrived ..."
Digitalclips is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 12, 2007, 11:18 PM   #23
Mgkwho
macrumors 6502a
 
Mgkwho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cleveland (Home) Chicago (School)
So it's not an if but when...and we know iTunes will definitely carry the Beatles...

all we need is love, this Valentines Day.

okay, and like 12 other albums...

-=|Mgkwho
__________________
MacBook Pro 17"
Mgkwho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 12, 2007, 11:19 PM   #24
Alex3231
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: West Hartford, CT
Send a message via AIM to Alex3231
Quote:
Originally Posted by Digitalclips View Post
Talking of which, I did laugh at the joke on the Grammy's about some rappers leaving quickly when they heard the Police had arrived ..."
oh my god that is pretty funny!
__________________
"It's kind of fun to do the impossible.” ~ Walt Disney
Alex3231 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 12, 2007, 11:25 PM   #25
SeaFox
macrumors 65816
 
SeaFox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Somewhere Else
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigjohn View Post
First, I thought Michael Jackson or Sony or someone else owned the rights to the Beatles catalog...
He owns the rights to some of the printed (sheet) music catalog, not the recordings that become the albums. And he really doesn't own them at the moment, as I think they are now in the hands of his creditors while he pays off his debts.

Quote:
Second, if you like the Beatles, just buy the CD, get your high quality non-DRM version for the same price, and rip it into whatever format you like.
Exactly. Funny, I have many Beatles albums, but for some reason I have not ripped then to iTunes, but I have almost all my other CDs.
__________________
"In the room was the last person on Earth. Suddenly, there was a knock at the door..."
SeaFox is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Mac Forums > Apple Hardware > iPod and iTunes Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:04 PM.

Mac News | Mac Rumors | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2002-2009, MacRumors.com, LLC