Register FAQ/Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to the Mac Forums forums. Please read the FAQ if you have questions. Register to participate.

 
Go Back   Mac Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion
TouchArcade.com - iPhone Game Reviews and News

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread  
Old Apr 16, 2007, 10:53 AM   #1
MacRumors
macrumors bot
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Patent: Apple Media Hub?



Arstechnica explores a recent Apple patent entitled "Multi-media center for computing systems". In the patent, Apple describes a system involving a central multimedia hub which can use various external "modules". These modules would be controlled by a centralized user interface on the hub itself.

The modules could be any sort of media device - such as an iPod, DVD player, or HD DVD player. The central multimedia hub would coordinate and consolidate all the devices under one user interface.

Quote:
The clear benefit to the segmented system with external modules—as opposed to an all-in-one device—is that it would allow customers to add on whatever extra functionality they prefer to the main device. This would allow power users to have all variety of extra modules for storing, playing, and streaming media—all through a centralized control hub—while more "average" users could settle for the simplicity of the main Apple TV-like device and just one or two extra modules as they see fit for their lifestyles.
Other reports on this same patent speculate that Apple may be thinking of using the iPhone as a remote control for this sort of media hub.
MacRumors is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 16, 2007, 10:57 AM   #2
emotion
macrumors 68030
 
emotion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Manchester, UK
Interesting approach. Like Hifi separates under your TV.

If there's a PVR, I'm in.
emotion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 16, 2007, 10:58 AM   #3
twoodcc
macrumors 603
 
twoodcc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Right side of wrong
Send a message via AIM to twoodcc Send a message via MSN to twoodcc
sounds neat! i might be interested in something like this
__________________
tville pump
Smarter than the average bear
twoodcc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 16, 2007, 10:59 AM   #4
clevin
macrumors 601
 
clevin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
its ok to patent everything,
but if all these stuff get materialized, apple is going down the tube, an phone and tv topset can delay leopard for 4 months, plus a bunch of side products may or may not be successful, god knows what apple is thinking.
clevin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 16, 2007, 10:59 AM   #5
mattscott306
macrumors 68040
 
mattscott306's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Apple's continuing to innovate the multimedia market, its great.
__________________
I'm sleepy.
mattscott306 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 16, 2007, 10:59 AM   #6
knowledg333
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Sherwood Park, Alberta, Canada
Send a message via MSN to knowledg333 Send a message via Skype™ to knowledg333
LoL. I just posted this in the Apple TV forum.

I'm all for it.
knowledg333 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 16, 2007, 11:00 AM   #7
Chaszmyr
macrumors Demi-God
 
Chaszmyr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Boulder, CO
Send a message via AIM to Chaszmyr
Quote:
Originally Posted by clevin View Post
its ok to patent everything,
but if all these stuff get materialized, apple is going down the tube, an phone and tv topset would can leopard for 4 month, plus a bunch of side products may or may not be successful, god knows what apple is thinking.
They're probably thinking something very similar to what they were thinking when they made the iPod.
Chaszmyr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 16, 2007, 11:00 AM   #8
brad.c
macrumors Demi-God
 
brad.c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: 44.244273,7.769737
The real question: will this be out in time for Fathers Day?
__________________
Excuse me. Where do you keep your "Self Help" books?
brad.c is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 16, 2007, 11:02 AM   #9
clevin
macrumors 601
 
clevin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chaszmyr View Post
They're probably thinking something very similar to what they were thinking when they made the iPod.
well, i hope they think a little about their G4 cube or newton next time trying to expand their business.

Quote:
The real question: will this be out in time for Fathers Day?
2012? maybe

most patents eventually go nowhere.
clevin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 16, 2007, 11:12 AM   #10
Clive At Five
macrumors 65816
 
Clive At Five's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: St. Paul, MN
I agree that this is some sort of "ultimate form" of tv. Face it, tv is just not going to cut it for the 97% of us who aren't iTS whores. As much as I hate to admit it, we still need optical media (when will we move to flash for our media distribution?!) and until Apple competes in this realm (or offers a wide selection of high-quality media content on iTS), it will never be a complete solution to the "digital home."

-Clive
__________________
My Mod: G4 Cube + Atom 330 CPU + Wiimote = Ultimate HTPC!
Clive At Five is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 16, 2007, 11:13 AM   #11
MacVault
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Planet Earth
Send a message via AIM to MacVault Send a message via Yahoo to MacVault Send a message via Skype™ to MacVault
Quote:
Originally Posted by clevin View Post
well, i hope they think a little about their G4 cube or newton next time trying to expand their business.


2012? maybe

most patents eventually go nowhere.
What use would we have for that in 2012... that's the end of the world according to the Mayan calendar
__________________
GabSlab.com
MacVault is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 16, 2007, 11:15 AM   #12
thedonga
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
I was wondering what that USB port was really for ......
thedonga is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 16, 2007, 11:20 AM   #13
McGarvels
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Irvine, CA
Send a message via AIM to McGarvels
Quote:
Originally Posted by MacVault View Post
What use would we have for that in 2012... that's the end of the world according to the Mayan calendar
Those pesky Myans and their calendar ruining all of our fun...

That whole story is pretty interesting though, I just saw a show about it on the History Channel ( I think it was on Decoding the Past, that show rocks).
__________________
EQUALITY FOR ALL
McGarvels is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 16, 2007, 11:22 AM   #14
ironring2006
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Fredericton, NB, Canada
I don't think this is so much a new product as it is patenting the evolution of the tv/mac mini/front row.

What they are patenting is the entire system and how it is all going to integrate and be operable from a single interface. You're going to be able to operate anything through front row. The iPods and iPhones are your floating peripherals. Your tv will be statically fixed to your big screen. Your Mac is going to be somewhere else in this whole setup, but it doesn't matter as long as it is in your local network.

Now, here are some scenarios that I can think of off the top of my head. Whenever an iPod or iPhone is within range of something running front row, it will show up as a source. Pipe music to your home theatre setup or take a video call on your iPhone and have it show up on your big screen. Download music from itms on your wireless iPod on the bus/train, come home and sync it to your tv or your Mac, whatever one you have set up as your central storage.

But here's also what I think they will be doing based on this patent. They've already shown the ability to put pressure on other manufacturers to accept iPod integration. Now think of tv integration. Plug that new HD-DVD player into your tv or mac mini and have it also show up as a source in front row. What about what comes after HD-DVD? Plug that media device into an tv or mac mini and it'll show up in the sources list. New hardware, same consistent interface for all.

They're not patenting a single new device, they're patenting the whole system. Peripherals to displays to storage to input devices. Apple is all about the end to end model.
__________________
4GB (Black) Nano, 512MB Shuffle
White MB C2D 2GHz 2GB RAM, 80GB HDD
PC's: XP Desktop, XP Media Server, IBM Thinkpad T20
ironring2006 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 16, 2007, 11:27 AM   #15
freddiecable
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Sweden
from the description it sounds as it's the "missing link". aTV is somewhat limiting in the current incarnation.
freddiecable is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 16, 2007, 11:35 AM   #16
Sprung
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: California
Multi-Media System

01-07-2007, 02:49 PM
My addition for 'Mac World Guess & Tell' would be a 'Core' Mac Mini Media Center , and here is why.
http://forums.macrumors.com/showpost...4&postcount=75

04-13-2007, 12:26 PM
On another note, one could imagine how Apple TV, iPhone, and 64bit architecture Mac, with a fast 'bus', could 'nicely work together'.
http://forums.macrumors.com/showpost...6&postcount=55

Thanks for FCP'n'stuff! ...and the frosting was a drag NHRA, that is. Great day and thanks to MR for a fun lead-up.

See you in June.
__________________
I want Nobody to control my life! How about you?
http://www.NobodyForPresident.org
Sprung is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 16, 2007, 11:38 AM   #17
dantehicks42
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by clevin View Post
its ok to patent everything,
but if all these stuff get materialized, apple is going down the tube, an phone and tv topset can delay leopard for 4 months, plus a bunch of side products may or may not be successful, god knows what apple is thinking.
I agree with you. Another possible patent aiming at the electronics segment. I think Apple should make sure their iPhone lives up to the hype, cause if not, it'll be hard to come back.

Then again, as an TV owner, I sure hope they improve it, cause it needs it, even though I'll probably have to change the hardware to do so.
dantehicks42 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 16, 2007, 11:42 AM   #18
kalisphoenix
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Quote:
Originally Posted by Macrumors View Post
In the patent, Apple describes a system involving a central multimedia hub which can use various external "modules". These modules would be controlled by a centralized user interface on the hub itself.
Holy Buttnuggets, Batman!

Perhaps this "hub" could be called a "Mac mini," the "modules" could interface with the "hub" through "USB" or "Firewire," and the "centralized user interface" could be called "OS X!"

These Apple patent writers never fail to blow my #$%^ing mind.
kalisphoenix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 16, 2007, 11:42 AM   #19
Darkroom
macrumors 68000
 
Darkroom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Montréal, Canada
iPhone for remote would be a big ass remote... i'm still waiting for apple to replace the IR Apple Remote with a remote enabled iPod Nano. or at least a Bluetooth Apple Remote... IR is so 70s...
Darkroom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 16, 2007, 11:44 AM   #20
miketcool
macrumors 6502a
 
miketcool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Yeah....
Apple pulled their OS X team to make my $500 iPhone a remote. Featuring the most advanced technologies to control my dvd player. I am sure that was the last thing Jobs intended the iPhone to be.
WIDESCREEN IPOD
REVOLUTIONARY PHONE
BREAKTHROUGH INTERNET DEVICE
TV REMOTE CONTROL
FANCY PAPERWEIGHT
JEALOUSY METER
AIRPLANE WHEEL CHUCK
miketcool is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 16, 2007, 11:45 AM   #21
johnee
macrumors 6502a
 
johnee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: well, i'm not from the UK, but people will like me more if I say I am.
This would be nice to have one interface for all components. I wonder if they will push for a spec to provide SEAMLESS integration of non-apple components? I doubt they would, since this hub would be a selling point for apple branded modules.
__________________
are you hypocritical?
"Jesus..said..sell all thou has,and give to the poor.. hardly shall they who have riches enter the kingdom of God"
i'm atheist
johnee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 16, 2007, 11:49 AM   #22
yzp
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Quebec
omnigraffle yeah!
__________________
expect the unexpected!
YZ![*.*]
yzp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 16, 2007, 11:53 AM   #23
yzp
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Quebec
Quote:
Originally Posted by yzp View Post
so 70s
hahaha true


Quote:
scheme
omnigraffle yeah!
__________________
expect the unexpected!
YZ![*.*]
yzp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 16, 2007, 11:54 AM   #24
surferfromuk
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
IMHO pretty much all the crap to the left of the box marked 'display' can be stuck on a tiny weeny VLSI chip and stuck inside the back of an Apple Brand LCD TV!!!
__________________
Why do I love Apple - Simple. They make products that enhance my life in a positive way.
surferfromuk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 16, 2007, 11:55 AM   #25
badcrumble
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
We're already seeing the very beginnings of this. Think of the stackable form factors of the Mac mini, TV, and AirPort Extreme base station. Looking at this makes me think we should get ready to see a whole lot more stuff in a similar form factor.
badcrumble is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Mac Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:52 PM.

Mac News | Mac Rumors | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2002-2009, MacRumors.com, LLC