|
|
| Welcome to the Mac Forums forums. Please read the FAQ if you have questions. Register to participate. |
|
|||||||
| TouchArcade.com - iPhone Game Reviews and News |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 | |
|
macrumors bot
Join Date: Apr 2001
|
Apple Working On Automated Desktop Pictures
![]() Various sites are reporting on a patent application released today (number 20070085854) entitled "System and method for computing a desktop picture." The abstract reads: Quote:
Apple suggests that situations such as logging in or out, waking from sleep, or coming out from a screen-saver are currently too jarring, and the invention hopes to make this experience more seamless. Also mentioned is a tool that would allow designers to edit and specify the user experience. Apple also seems to be conscious about system resources, mentioning several times about opportunities to free resources for use by other applications. Patent applications can provide interesting insight into what concepts or technologies Apple is working on in their labs, however readers are reminded that only a subset of these applications will make it into final shipping products. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
macrumors 6502a
|
I don't find coming out of sleep, booting up or coming out of the screen saver too jarring. Oh well, whatever works.
__________________
Bill: "W-what's that?" > Steve: "It's an iHouse!" > Bill: "But it's got no windows." > Steve: "Exactly! Hahahaha...hahahahaha!" |
|
|
|
| Maccus Aurelius |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Maccus Aurelius |
|
|
#4 |
|
macrumors regular
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: the nexus of the universe
|
really impressive technology. seems rather obvious for evolution of the os, but to read more on it and the possible uses of this feature. i would be hopeful to see this feature on a beta @ wwdc07. in that same statement, i would have to include disappointment if this was one of the top secret features.
can't wait to see it.
__________________
- come what may, all bad fortune is to be conquered by endurance - virgil
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
macrumors regular
Join Date: Feb 2007
|
I'd be interested to see what factors could be used to influence that background image. Are we talking about a visualization like what we see in iTunes (although probably slower) that takes certain events into account (like the cpu utilization, or sound output), or could it be the desktop interacting with windows on top of it (similar to the ripple effect when adding a widget to the dashboard)?
Considering Apple's love of fading reflections in things like Coverflow, I can definitely picture something similar with the desktop. I hope that if they implement it, they'll put enough effort into design so that the options we have will all be usable and really improve the experience. Apple's generally been good at giving us only a few very good choices, as opposed to MS giving users the ability to tweak everything and leaving it up to users to make sane choices.
__________________
Home: iMac C2D 2.16GHz, 20" w/19" LCD, MBP 2.2, 2GB, 200GB, iPod Touch 32GB (2g) Work: Mac Pro 2x3.2Ghz Quad, 16GB, 3.5TB, 30" and 23" ACDs |
|
|
|
| KingofAwesome |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by KingofAwesome |
|
|
#6 |
|
macrumors 65816
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: London
|
What so you wouldnt need to wake from sleep or turn the computer on? Just press a button or move the mouse and its there? I dont really understand xD
__________________
Aluminum 20" iMac 2.0ghz 2gb, 15" Macbook Pro 2.33ghz 3gb, D90 18-105mm 55-200mm 50mm, Silver iPod Shuffle, Black iPhone 3g 16GB |
|
|
|
| Mac-Addict |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Mac-Addict |
|
|
#7 |
|
macrumors member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: NYC
|
Does that mean there is a posibility of having animated icons aswell?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
macrumors 68000
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Rural America
|
|
|
|
|
| ziggyonice |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by ziggyonice |
|
|
#9 |
|
macrumors 6502
Join Date: Jun 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
macrumors 6502a
|
What am I missing??
I guess I don't get it. What the heck is so "jarring" when logging in/out of an account in Mac OS X??? I hope this is not the kind of stuff Steve meant when he said "Top Secret Features". I hope this is not what is delaying Leopard til October. I mean, DAMN! Instead of this crap why doesn't Apple do some things that matter - like make it easy to administer a network of 10,000 Macs! Like a real competitor to Active Directory. Like really pursue the enterprise. Like work on making generic PC drivers work with OS X so I can buy a mini tower from Dell for ~$600 and run a supported version of OS X.
__________________
GabSlab.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
macrumors 68040
|
Its like the cube transition from fast user switching.
In fact that is probably what this refers to.
__________________
The future ain't what it used to be. |
|
|
|
| MongoTheGeek |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by MongoTheGeek |
|
|
#12 |
|
macrumors regular
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: All over the place
|
I don't mean to curb our enthusiasm (the idea sounds terrific) but isn't this a feature that "sort of" exists in Vista?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
macrumors 6502a
|
Ok, so we have that already. What's this new thing about? I'm all for non-"jarring" user interfaces. I guess I just don't get what this is about.
__________________
GabSlab.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
macrumors 68020
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Vermontana
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
macrumors 6502
|
Probably this wouldn't address actually turning the computer on and off. The screen will still have to go from black to your desktop image at some point.
__________________
"There are three kinds of people: those who can count and those who can't." |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
macrumors 6502
|
Constantly-updating desktop?
Quote:
Additionally, it could refer to a desktop that is in constant motion, or constantly reacting to user input, or constantly able to display updating information.
__________________
"There are three kinds of people: those who can count and those who can't." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
macrumors 6502a
|
Quote:
__________________
GabSlab.com |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
macrumors 6502
|
Quote:
welcome to a year ago. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
macrumors 68000
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Saint Augustine, FL
|
To quote that caveman in the commercials,
"Uh....... what?" Maybe everything's gonna do stuff like the transition between normal mode and Frontrow. |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
macrumors 68000
Join Date: Mar 2003
|
Talk of picture "recipies" brought to mind Core Image-- it's Applespeak for how CI calculates pictures on the fly by passing it through a bunch of filters. It's how Aperture gets away with only storing master images and computing modified images on the fly. The patent does reference CI in the detailed description. Core Animation might figure into this too, but the patent was filed 10/05 which I think was before Core Animation was really in development, no?
A lot of talk about not having to put the background image in RAM since it can be computed on the fly. Is that really such a big deal?
__________________
"Quick to judge, quick to anger, slow to understand... Ignorance and Prejudice and Fear walk hand-in-hand." --Peart |
|
|
|
| Analog Kid |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Analog Kid |
|
|
#21 |
|
macrumors newbie
Join Date: Jun 2003
|
For remote logins?
One other possibility for this patent... perhaps it's to enable remote logins. If the desktop was proceduralized enough, it'd take less bandwidth. With powerful clients taking on the burden of display, it'd mean you could have your Mac wherever you had a network connection to it.
Just a thought. |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
macrumors 68020
Join Date: Aug 2005
|
![]() An example. |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 | |
|
Demi-God (Editor)
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
macrumors Demi-God
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: On top of the Storm Peaks waiting for the Time-Lost Proto Drake
|
This would work great for spaces/windows virtualization
Each space has it's own desktop picture.Transitioning from one space to another space that has a different desktop picture. |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
macrumors 6502
Join Date: Apr 2006
|
This may be either a really dumb question or a brilliant one.
So, when they say the transitions are too "jarring", are they referring to the user experience or to the hardware/system? From my limited knowledge and perception, it almost sounds to me like it's something that would make these transitions smoother for the computer, with a sort of side-effect of making the screen transition more smoothly for the user. Of course, I don't know what I'm talking about. It just seems like a waste of resources to say "the cut between desktop and screen saver just doesn't LOOK smooth enough. Let's fix it!" when there are so many other things waiting to be worked on.
|
|
|
|
| ready2switch |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by ready2switch |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|