Register FAQ/Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to the Mac Forums forums. Please read the FAQ if you have questions. Register to participate.

 
Go Back   Mac Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion
TouchArcade.com - iPhone Game Reviews and News

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread  
Old May 10, 2007, 11:32 AM   #1
MacRumors
macrumors bot
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Patent: Multisided Full Screen Touch iPod



Appleinsider details a new patent applicaton from Apple which explores the possibility of seperating the display from the touch interface by placing the touch screen interface on the back of the device.

Apple describes the problems related to the use of a touch interface screen in the more traditional screen + touch interface together. The problems include obscuring the screen with your hand and introducing smudges onto the screen.

Instead the use of "back side touch" would eliminate these issues but still provide user interface feedback with the use of an on-screen cursor which identifies where the touch-interface is being used.

Quote:
More specifically, a force-sensitive touch-surface is provided on a first or back-side surface of the device through which a user provides input (e.g., cursor manipulation and control element selection/activation)," the company wrote. "On a second or front-side surface, a display element is used to present one or more control elements and a cursor that is controlled through manipulation of the back-side touch-surface.
The patent is credited to John Elias who was one of the founders of Fingerworks, a company who had done much work in the field of touch-interfaces. Apple acquired Fingerworks in 2005.
MacRumors is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 10, 2007, 11:34 AM   #2
gallagb
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: MA
Send a message via AIM to gallagb Send a message via Yahoo to gallagb
another cool hint----

of something we might never see.

or maybe we will- neat though
gallagb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 10, 2007, 11:35 AM   #3
sachamun
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Send a message via Skype™ to sachamun
Interesting, but I really don't like the idea of using such a device. I'd rather wait for better, more durable touch screens.
sachamun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 10, 2007, 11:35 AM   #4
MattG
macrumors 68030
 
MattG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Sounds good..bring it on!
MattG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 10, 2007, 11:35 AM   #5
mmzplanet
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Florida
Send a message via AIM to mmzplanet
i dunno about having to flip it that much....you would still touch the front.
mmzplanet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 10, 2007, 11:37 AM   #6
arn
macrumors god
 
arn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Send a message via AIM to arn
Quote:
Originally Posted by mmzplanet View Post
i dunno about having to flip it that much....you would still touch the front.
you wouldn't flip it. you would touch in on the back and still look at it from the front. read the description again.

arn
arn is online now   Reply With Quote
Old May 10, 2007, 11:38 AM   #7
IEatApples
macrumors Demi-God
 
IEatApples's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Northern Hemisphere (Hamar, Norway)
Send a message via MSN to IEatApples Send a message via Yahoo to IEatApples Send a message via Skype™ to IEatApples
I think it's gonna work!

Brilliant even!
__________________
You think that's air you're breathing now?
*It's Mac OS*
Mac Pro 2,8GHz Quad, GTX 285, 6GB RAM, 2,25 TB HDD, Dell 2408WFP
MySpace
IEatApples is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 10, 2007, 11:39 AM   #8
iMikeT
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: California
I'm willing to bet a Power Book G5 that we will never see this.
iMikeT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 10, 2007, 11:39 AM   #9
P-Worm
macrumors 68000
 
P-Worm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
This just seems a bit awkward to me. How easy is it to select thing you can't really see? Sure the is a cursor to let you know where you are touching, but I'd rather not fumble around like that.

P-Worm
__________________
Follow my show The Movie Audit as well as watch my other videos on my YouTube Channel!
P-Worm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 10, 2007, 11:45 AM   #10
Bye Bye Baby
macrumors 6502a
 
Bye Bye Baby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Roma-Italia
If you think of it...

Quote:
Originally Posted by P-Worm View Post
This just seems a bit awkward to me. How easy is it to select thing you can't really see? Sure the is a cursor to let you know where you are touching, but I'd rather not fumble around like that.

P-Worm
If you think about it though, when you use the scroll wheel on your ipod, do you look at the wheel or the screen? Personally I am not even thinking about the scroll wheel when I use the ipod. I am not sure that putting it on the back may make such a difference.
Bye Bye Baby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 10, 2007, 11:56 AM   #11
koobcamuk
macrumors 68020
 
koobcamuk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
OK... does anyone else wonder how the hell to hold the thing if you're looking at the whole of the front and controlling it via all of the back?

holding it could be a nightmare... you'd touch the front screen anyway - just holding it!
__________________
|| Get Dropbox! || Photos || My Ph.D ||
koobcamuk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 10, 2007, 12:49 PM   #12
JPark
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bye Bye Baby View Post
If you think about it though, when you use the scroll wheel on your ipod, do you look at the wheel or the screen? Personally I am not even thinking about the scroll wheel when I use the ipod. I am not sure that putting it on the back may make such a difference.
Imagine how you'd have to hold it in order to control it from the back but watch the front. It would be a pretty lame product IMO. This one's never making it past the patent stage.
__________________
Question Authority, but obey bumper stickers.
JPark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 10, 2007, 12:27 PM   #13
dontmatter
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: SEATTLE, BABY! (or a nice little liberal arts college campus in the middle of nowhere...)
Quote:
Originally Posted by P-Worm View Post
This just seems a bit awkward to me. How easy is it to select thing you can't really see? Sure the is a cursor to let you know where you are touching, but I'd rather not fumble around like that.

P-Worm
You can't see anything but a representative cursor when you're using a mouse, right? Particularly with a thin device, this could be great.
__________________
Insert witticism here. Or spelling correction.
dontmatter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 10, 2007, 12:33 PM   #14
jonharris200
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: London, UK
I thought of it first*! Apple, my door is open!

Quote:
Originally Posted by jonharris200 View Post
How about a scroll wheel on the back of an iPod Video?

As you use the familiar circular and five-way push button mechanism on the back of the iPod, a digital version of the scroll wheel appears on the screen at the front.

This would obviously not be a full-blown user input such as a keyboard/mouse combination provides, but it could be a handy way of keeping a scroll wheel on the iPod while enlarging the screen... and avoiding greasy fingerprints.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Appleinsider
In one embodiment of the invention, Apple said it could incorporate the functionality of click-wheel on the device's force-sensitive touch-surface via an etched or raised outline. When the user activates the rear-side click-wheel, a navigation menu and click-wheel will be shown on the front side.
* post #141 on that thread
__________________
For more info, please visit the 500 thread. Alternatively, try Page 3. But whatever you do, live different.

Last edited by jonharris200 : May 10, 2007 at 01:35 PM.
jonharris200 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 10, 2007, 12:34 PM   #15
iSee
macrumors 65816
 
iSee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
This is just a trackpad positioned on the back of the device.
I'm not sure this is innovative enough to really be patentable. If a display becomes large enough to cover an entire side of a device, where else are the controls going to go?

Edit: Ah Ha! Read the post immediately before this one: prior art (pun intended!): Patent application DENIED!
iSee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 10, 2007, 01:17 PM   #16
bretm
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Quote:
Originally Posted by P-Worm View Post
This just seems a bit awkward to me. How easy is it to select thing you can't really see? Sure the is a cursor to let you know where you are touching, but I'd rather not fumble around like that.

P-Worm
Oh, yeah. Like a mouse? How awkward.
bretm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 10, 2007, 03:16 PM   #17
gonnabuyamac
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
i've been trying to hold my nano with this whole screen on the back idea, and i actually think it's doable. it would take some getting used to, but i'd definitely buy one. - i didn't see it in the drawings, but i would think that the typical placement for the headphone jack could be in the way if you have to hold it sideways - but i really wouldn't want the cord jutting out from the middle of the thing either. hopefully they'll include bluetooth headphones.
gonnabuyamac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 11, 2007, 11:58 AM   #18
IHateUserNames
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: behind you
Quote:
Originally Posted by P-Worm View Post
This just seems a bit awkward to me. How easy is it to select thing you can't really see?
The touch-sensitive area on the back will probably be something that works like a track pad.
Who looks at his track pad when working with a laptop computer? You just look at the cursor on your display while touching the track pad with your hands. Plain and simple.
This new iPod will work the same (with the exception that the track pad will be located on the back of the device, which makes sense because you hold an iPod in your hand). Brilliant idea. Bring it on, Steve!
IHateUserNames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 11, 2007, 04:30 PM   #19
RRK
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: USA/Ohio/Columbus
Quote:
Originally Posted by IHateUserNames View Post
The touch-sensitive area on the back will probably be something that works like a track pad.
Who looks at his track pad when working with a laptop computer? You just look at the cursor on your display while touching the track pad with your hands. Plain and simple.
This new iPod will work the same (with the exception that the track pad will be located on the back of the device, which makes sense because you hold an iPod in your hand). Brilliant idea. Bring it on, Steve!
It's not a trackpad, the patent shows a keyboard. What you do on the back would be mirrored on the display on the front, like a graphics tablet, not just pushing around a curser like a mouse/trackball/trackpad.
__________________
Woz Signature Edition Apple IIgs, Power Macintosh 7100, 333mhz G3 iMac (rev. d), 1ghz 17" G4 iMac, 2.8ghz 24" Intel iMac
RRK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 10, 2007, 11:45 AM   #20
amac4me
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
If we see this iPod at some point in the future, you can bet it will be released AFTER the release of the iPhone.

No way Apple would release a new generation iPod that could take away sales from the iPhone.
__________________
Switch To A Mac
http://switchtoamac.com
amac4me is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 10, 2007, 11:49 AM   #21
whenpaulsparks
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Tallahassee, FL
did anyone notice how screwy the letters are arranged?
whenpaulsparks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 10, 2007, 11:55 AM   #22
RRK
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: USA/Ohio/Columbus
I have doubts about this one. I can see controlling a curser in this way but can you actually believe that we would be able to type using a virtual keyboard on the back while looking at the keys on the front. Presuming you will have two handed typing like Blackberrys and such and are using your forefingers to hold the device then your thumbs are above the screen. You will have to type with your middle fingers.
__________________
Woz Signature Edition Apple IIgs, Power Macintosh 7100, 333mhz G3 iMac (rev. d), 1ghz 17" G4 iMac, 2.8ghz 24" Intel iMac
RRK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 10, 2007, 07:48 PM   #23
ezekielrage_99
macrumors 68020
 
ezekielrage_99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Quote:
Originally Posted by mmzplanet View Post
i dunno about having to flip it that much....you would still touch the front.
I thought the same way about the first iPod's navigation system (e.g. it being clunky), but I do think Apple does a ver good job at implementing a controls for their hardware.
__________________
"There is a world elsewhere" - Coriolanus
ezekielrage_99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 10, 2007, 08:35 PM   #24
EagerDragon
macrumors 68010
 
EagerDragon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: MA, USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by mmzplanet View Post
i dunno about having to flip it that much....you would still touch the front.
I don't think so. Hold the current iPod in your hand, and use your index finger to carress the back of the unit. Move it up/down then left to right, pretty natural. Doing circles is not bad but takes getting used to it.

I think this patten has potential. However I think it maybe to block others from doing a similat interface.

The longer Apple prevents others, the longer it will have the market and the more time it has to innovate again and leap once more over the competition.

Just my opinion.
__________________
Security is a state of mind, Nothing can ever be fully secured and be functional.
Therefore iBricks are fully secured.
EagerDragon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 10, 2007, 11:36 AM   #25
notsofatjames
macrumors 6502a
 
notsofatjames's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Wales, UK
Send a message via MSN to notsofatjames Send a message via Yahoo to notsofatjames
how wierd would it be to touch the back of the iPod to control the front. I dont think it would catch on.
__________________
Search before you post: MRoogle
notsofatjames is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Mac Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:21 PM.

Mac News | Mac Rumors | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2002-2009, MacRumors.com, LLC