Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

finger11

macrumors member
Original poster
Hi all,

This is my first new post (have replied to others) and I just want to say that this community has been invaluable for me as I prepare for the switch.

I'm going to be a proud new owner of a MBP as soon as the new ones are announced and I can't wait.

I've done my research and have the following strategy for my drives and formats. My question is, do you think my strategy is a good one? It's not the kind of thing that can be easily changed so I was looking for some advice. For the purposes of this post, assume my internal drive is 200 gigs and my external 400 gigs.

On the internal drive drive I will have a 150 gig partition formatted HFS+ for OS X and a 50 gig partition formatted NTFS for Boot Camp. On my external I will have 3 partitions: A 150 gig partition in HFS+ for backup of my internal, a 50 gig partition in NTFS for backup of my internal, and a 200 gig partition in NTFS for data for use when working in both OS X and Windows (using NTFS-3g for write access to this partition when in OS X).

My concerns are:
1. reliability of NTFS-3g - can I be certain to be able to write from OS X to the 200 gig NTFS partition?
2. The lack of backup for the 200 gig NTFS partition - I guess this can't be taken care off without purchasing yet another external drive.

A more general question I have is why everyone is so down on FAT32 and loving NTFS. Other than the 4 gig/file limit (which is a serious limitation indeed), I can't find definitive reasoning against FAT32. And if I was to forgo NTFS for FAT32, I wouldn't need to use NTFS-3g.

Anyways, thanks for the advice guys.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.