Should the Apple TV be in the Buyer's Guide? It has seen hardware updates and is kind of like an iPod for the TV. Or are there other requirements for it to make it there?
Well, (for now at least) it would be useless, because we have no idea how long the product cycle will be.
Revisiting this topic again... the iPhone is in the buyers guide and its "days since update" is sitting at 0. The Apple TV has actually seen an update, whereas the iPhone was just released and there have been no updates save software. Using this justification the iPhone should be removed from the buyers guide.
My opinion is a variation on EricNau's. I think it would be useful to have, because that would be the appropriate place to point out that we don't know yet how often the Apple TV will be updated. In other words, no news is news.
Yeah, but the difference is that the iPhone gets news stories all the time, whereas we haven't heard squat about Apple TV for a long time.
Also thinking about it buyers guides for software like iLife/iWork, Final Cut/Express, Filemaker, Logic/Express, iTunes, Safari, and possibly Adobe CSx and MS Office, might also be useful.
That would also be helpful but maybe two separate buyer's guide one for hardware and the other for software.
This is a frequently asked question, and I've been meaning to write up something on it.
The problem with the Apple TV is it's not a lifecycle type device. In that the Apple TV is more of an appliance. It does what it does. Plays iTunes content and that's that.
There's no reason for it to get a faster processor. There's no reason to ugprade its graphics hardware etc... Any feature upgrades can be done via software.
The only possibility is really a full revamp to make it a DVR or something and I don't think that's predictable, at least not in the usual way.
I'll write something about it soonish.
arn
It would be a practically useless guide. No rumors are circulating, it's only 'a hobby,' and there is no existing product cycle because all that's changed in four years is the addition of a laughably small HDD upgrade.
It would be a practically useless guide. No rumors are circulating, it's only 'a hobby,' and there is no existing product cycle because all that's changed in four years is the addition of a laughably small HDD upgrade.
There's no reason for it to get a faster processor. There's no reason to ugprade its graphics hardware etc... Any feature upgrades can be done via software.
How can you say that...