Register FAQ/Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to the Mac Forums forums. Please read the FAQ if you have questions. Register to participate.

 
Go Back   Mac Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors' Page 2 News Discussion
TouchArcade.com - iPhone Game Reviews and News

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread  
Old Jul 24, 2007, 10:45 AM   #1
MacRumors
macrumors bot
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Details of Apple's iPhone Revenue Sharing with AT&T?



TheStreet claims to have financial details about the widely rumored revenue sharing between Apple and AT&T. AT&T has been rumored to give Apple a piece of the iPhone's monthly revenue as part of the agreement. This revenue sharing demand was listed as one of the reasons Verizon rejected the iPhone.

TheStreet claims that according to "people close to the companies", Apple receives between a $150-$200 bounty per iPhone plus $9 a month over the life of the 2 year contract.

This figure is significantly higher than analyst guesses previously published.

TheStreet's track record with Apple rumors has been remarkably poor, with previous claims including:

- AT&T/Cingular to Give Away 18 Months of iPhone Service
- Steve Jobs to Take a Leave of Absence

Neither of which have come true.

Article Link
MacRumors is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 24, 2007, 10:46 AM   #2
NemoMac
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
So does Apple get their loot even if you cancel the iPhone EDGE data plan? I guess it probably wouldn't be data-plan specific.
NemoMac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 24, 2007, 12:45 PM   #3
chr1s60
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: California
If this is true then Apple should have some pretty big earnings for this past quarter and the upcoming quarter.

This is probably why Verizon rejected the iPhone, but they didn't look at the big picture. Look at the large percentage of iPhone users that came from other companies or are simply new buyers. Even giving however many dollars per subscriber AT&T is still going to make big money off this deal because of all the new monthly subscriptions. Even though they won't admit it, I think Verizon wishes they would have taken this deal now.
chr1s60 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 24, 2007, 01:07 PM   #4
megfilmworks
macrumors 68000
 
megfilmworks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Sherman Oaks
I think, if this is true, it shows just how big a player Apple was even before the iPhone.
EMI, Universal, ATT etc, all struggle with their Apple negotiations. These are corps that are used to telling everyone else what to do.
__________________
17" MacBook Pro 2.33 - Dual G5 w/ Pro Tools
iPod Gen1 - Nano Gen1 - iPhone Gen1 - iPhone 3G
DA42 G1000 Gen1
BE G58 (2008)
megfilmworks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 24, 2007, 01:09 PM   #5
megfilmworks
macrumors 68000
 
megfilmworks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Sherman Oaks
Quote:
Originally Posted by chr1s60 View Post
If this is true then Apple should have some pretty big earnings for this past quarter and the upcoming quarter.

This is probably why Verizon rejected the iPhone, but they didn't look at the big picture. Look at the large percentage of iPhone users that came from other companies or are simply new buyers. Even giving however many dollars per subscriber AT&T is still going to make big money off this deal because of all the new monthly subscriptions. Even though they won't admit it, I think Verizon wishes they would have taken this deal now.
We assume Verizon rejected the offer....I think it could have been Apple that rejected the deal....just look at Europe, where cell service is very big biz
__________________
17" MacBook Pro 2.33 - Dual G5 w/ Pro Tools
iPod Gen1 - Nano Gen1 - iPhone Gen1 - iPhone 3G
DA42 G1000 Gen1
BE G58 (2008)
megfilmworks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 24, 2007, 01:55 PM   #6
distortedloop
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
One only need look at the man who started TheStreet.com to understand why it is not a very accurate predictor. Jim Cramer may have been an fantastic hedge fund manager (I say may have been because despite his claims of phenomenal success year after year, no outside party has been able to substantiate that claim), but he's got no crystal ball these days.

Cramer's performance with his public portfolio (Action Alerts Plus) is pathetic, and one website that compares Cramer's stock picks to a monkey's, the monkey has a better rate of return.

Always consider the source.

Last edited by distortedloop : Jul 24, 2007 at 05:12 PM.
distortedloop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 24, 2007, 03:45 PM   #7
twoodcc
macrumors 603
 
twoodcc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Right side of wrong
Send a message via AIM to twoodcc Send a message via MSN to twoodcc
considering the source, i doubt this is true.
__________________
tville pump
Smarter than the average bear
twoodcc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 25, 2007, 07:02 AM   #8
fastbite
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: London
Quote:
Originally Posted by twoodcc View Post
considering the source, i doubt this is true.
Yes the source may de dodgy at best -- best still they feel like believable numbers.
__________________
If the movie is a turkey, stuff it! http://www.turkeyornot.com/
fastbite is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 25, 2007, 12:50 PM   #9
pacohaas
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Quote:
Originally Posted by Macrumors View Post
Details of Apple's iPhone Revenue Sharing with AT&T?
What kind of question is that? Is the answer yes?
pacohaas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 25, 2007, 12:56 PM   #10
waterskier2007
macrumors 65816
 
waterskier2007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: White Lake, MI
Send a message via AIM to waterskier2007
it seems to me that apple should get more than 150-200 per iphone sale. that seems low
__________________
2.4Ghz 15" Macbook Pro
iPod Shuffle : 16 GB iPhone 3G : 80GB iPod Classic

Nikon D60 : 18-55 mm VR : 55-200 mm VR
waterskier2007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 27, 2007, 09:22 AM   #11
Yankees 4 Life
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: College Station, Tx
Send a message via AIM to Yankees 4 Life
Quote:
Originally Posted by waterskier2007 View Post
it seems to me that apple should get more than 150-200 per iphone sale. that seems low
hey this is saying they get an additional 150-200 on top of the 250 in profit. Thats too good to be true.
__________________
That thing is the most expensive phone out there! $599 for a phone? It won’t even sell enough to break even!-Steve Balmer
“An A-Bomb, From A-Rod”
Yankees 4 Life is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Mac Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors' Page 2 News Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:23 PM.

Mac News | Mac Rumors | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2002-2009, MacRumors.com, LLC