|
|
| Welcome to the Mac Forums forums. Please read the FAQ if you have questions. Register to participate. |
|
|||||||
| TouchArcade.com - iPhone Game Reviews and News |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
macrumors bot
Join Date: Apr 2001
|
1.3MP iSight in iMacs Too
![]() Xlr8yourMac notes that the new iMac's iSight carries the same higher resolution (1280x1024) as the newest MacBook Pros. Apple's iChat still only supports 640x480 resolution, but the hardware is capable of 1280x1024. Article Link |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
macrumors 6502a
|
Good to know.
![]() Hopefully iChat will support that res soon.
__________________
The sooner you learn to love me, as much as I love me, the sooner we'll all get along.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
macrumors 6502a
|
Yeah I hope so too. But they should give you a choice cos it will be a bandwitch killer for some people on slower networks
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Contributor
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Oxford, UK
|
|
|
|
|
| Eraserhead |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Eraserhead |
|
|
#5 |
|
Demi-God (Moderator)
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Grand Rapids, MI, USA
|
So does the Macbook (not pro) still have the old cam, or does it have the new one?
__________________
Mohan |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
macrumors 65816
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Stavanger, Norway
|
Quote:
This would be a reason for me to hold out, since I have a 10mbps connection to the internet.. HD webchat would be nice..
__________________
A computer you had to learn how to use was a bad idea from its birth.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
macrumors 6502a
Join Date: Jun 2007
|
Maybe Leopard will enable higher resolution in iChat?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
macrumors regular
Join Date: Aug 2005
|
Maybe it is my imagination, but photo booth does look better on the new iMacs. It's probably photo booth downscaling causing the image to look sharper.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
macrumors 6502
Join Date: Oct 2005
|
Quote:
Really I don't think 1.3MP video chatting is that feasible, I still have trouble with 640x480 and I am on cable (the problem is upload speeds). Chances are they are just using these cameras as they cost the same or less as the old ones. I have to wonder how it will effect PQ though, it's not like their is an amazing large CCD or great optics on it. Hope it does not hurt low light shots. |
|
|
|
|
| reallynotnick |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by reallynotnick |
|
|
#10 |
|
macrumors regular
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: at home, where ever.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
macrumors 65816
Join Date: Apr 2007
|
Anyone know if Photobooth supports the full resolution?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
macrumors 68000
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Montréal, Canada
|
totally... and this find supports your thinking...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
macrumors Demi-God
|
My iSight camera freaks out. It goes green and then I have to restart the app to make it work.
__________________
The Internet; where men are women, women are men, and children are the FBI. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
macrumors 601
|
what would the bandwidth requirements be on a 1.3 mega pixel streaming video?
__________________
grr...argh... |
|
|
|
| siurpeeman |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by siurpeeman |
|
|
#15 |
|
macrumors 68020
|
I really wish Apple would announce a new stand-alone iSight...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
macrumors member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Rotterdam, the Netherlands
|
calculation
Quote:
But on the other hand: 640 x 480 x 20 frames/s x 24 bits = 147 Mbit/s So there is some major compression going on anyway. Let's say you need a 1Mbit/s upload for the standard iSight, then you would need at least a 4Mbit/s upload for the high resolution iSight. That's not available to the public here in the Netherlands I think. Maybe in some places like university backbones. All theory though, I don't even own an iSight!
|
|
|
|
|
| netherfred |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by netherfred |
|
|
#17 |
|
macrumors 603
|
awesome! the isights keep getting better
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
macrumors 65816
|
What's the MP rating of the camera in the newest old iMacs?
__________________
Unibody 15.4" MacBook Pro 2.8 GHz, 4 GB RAM 20" iMac G5 2 GHz, 2 GB RAM 1G iPod touch 32 GB, OS 3 blog | Twitter | No tea for me. |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
macrumors 6502
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Longmont, CO
|
Quote:
__________________
15" MacBook Pro: 2.4GHz Core 2 Duo, 4GB DDR2, 500GB Seagate 7200.4, GeForce 8600GT 256MB, OS X 10.5.7, Windows Vista iPhone 3G 16GB, Sony Alpha A300 |
|
|
|
|
| LoneWolf121188 |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by LoneWolf121188 |
|
|
#21 |
|
macrumors regular
Join Date: Jul 2007
|
Awesome
This is very cool, I've been waiting for the isight to get kicked up a notch.
Now I just need to sell my old iMac so I can afford a new one
__________________
iMac 20" Core 2 Duo (256mb Graphics Card & 2GB RAM Upgrades) Macbook Core 2 Duo iPod Video 5.5g 80gb (With iPod Linux) iPod Shuffle 1st gen (eww) |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: CANADA? eh?
|
oh
how can u proove this? can iMovie record in this?
|
|
|
|
| Eric Lewis |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Eric Lewis |
|
|
#23 |
|
macrumors 6502a
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Diego, CA
|
The hardware been there since the C2D iMacs, that's for sure. I don't even know why this is news...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
macrumors regular
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Quebec
|
probably because of customer's bandwidth...
__________________
expect the unexpected! YZ![*.*] |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|