Go Back   MacRumors Forums > Archive > Archives of Old Posts > MacBytes.com News Discussion

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Aug 7, 2003, 01:35 PM   #1
MacBytes
macrumors bot
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
'So, seriously, are Apple and Sun viable partners, or is th...


Category: Opinion and Speculation
Link: 'So, seriously, are Apple and Sun viable partners, or is this exercise a distracting PR ruse? Let's have a look.'

Posted on MacBytes.com

Approved by arn
MacBytes is offline   0
Old Aug 7, 2003, 01:37 PM   #2
tiktokfx
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: DC Metropolitan Area
Someone commented on this on another site

Schwartz, the guy who made the comments, orginally founded Lighthouse Design, one of the (few) major producers of NeXTStep software. So it could be personal bias to some extent, and not representative of corporate interest.
tiktokfx is offline   0
Old Aug 7, 2003, 02:05 PM   #3
Sayhey
macrumors 68000
 
Sayhey's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: San Francisco
The Snapple rumors live! All it takes is a few words of praise and they're partners. Problem is figuring out how to get them together is a lot harder than the rumors. I'd love to see Apple buy up Sun, but I don't think any company outside of Redmond has those kind of resources. Unfortuately, a joint hatred of Microsoft does not a partnership make.
Sayhey is offline   0
Old Aug 7, 2003, 02:59 PM   #4
granex
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
long history

Ad tictokfx suggests, there is a much longer history here between the personalities than this author seems to know. Those longterm NeXTies among us were constantly used to rumors (and realities) about interactions between NeXT and Sun. I think that it can be fairly said that at one point Sun got pretty close to NeXT, but in the end tried to screw them pretty hard (i.e., no more competition). I'm sure that there must be some bad blood between Jobs and McNeally (but that is probably true of Jobs and many folks).
granex is offline   0
Old Aug 7, 2003, 03:28 PM   #5
Sayhey
macrumors 68000
 
Sayhey's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: San Francisco
Re: long history

Quote:
Originally posted by granex
Ad tictokfx suggests, there is a much longer history here between the personalities than this author seems to know. Those longterm NeXTies among us were constantly used to rumors (and realities) about interactions between NeXT and Sun. I think that it can be fairly said that at one point Sun got pretty close to NeXT, but in the end tried to screw them pretty hard (i.e., no more competition). I'm sure that there must be some bad blood between Jobs and McNeally (but that is probably true of Jobs and many folks).
Or McNealy and many folks! All the rumors I've heard suggest he would give Jobs' ego a run for the money.
Sayhey is offline   0
Old Aug 7, 2003, 03:58 PM   #6
granex
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
long history

darn reset double post
granex is offline   0
Old Aug 7, 2003, 04:39 PM   #7
daveL
macrumors 68020
 
daveL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Montana
There's always been a tie between the two companies. For instance, Sun employees can purchase Apple hardware at a 10% discount, and generally 50% of Apple software, although sometimes it's less. Recently (end of June?), Sun employees that require a new laptop (you better have a *real* good reason, these days) can now order a couple different Mac configs.

However, I see the new G5 PM as some serious competition for Sun's desktop workstation line. Unless there's some apps that you need that don't run on Macs, I'd go with the G5 for most uses.

Apple buying Sun is silly. Sun is twice the size, even with their recent revenue contractions, and they have nearly $5B is cash and securities. As Scott has said recently, you'd need about $25B to buy Sun. Apple, at $6B in annual revenue ain't gonna do it.

On the other side, Sun has zero interest in buying Apple, IMO. Sun doesn't play in the consumer space, at all, and doesn't want to.
__________________
-daveL
daveL is offline   0
Old Aug 7, 2003, 05:21 PM   #8
bennetsaysargh
macrumors 68020
 
bennetsaysargh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: New York
Send a message via AIM to bennetsaysargh
well, if apple wanted to get into the high end server business, i'm sure they could team up
bennetsaysargh is offline   0
Old Aug 7, 2003, 05:27 PM   #9
daveL
macrumors 68020
 
daveL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Montana
Quote:
Originally posted by bennetsaysargh
well, if apple wanted to get into the high end server business, i'm sure they could team up
Yeh, the high-end server business is right where you want to be these days, as Sun struggles to make a profit and keep revenues from eroding further.
__________________
-daveL
daveL is offline   0
Old Aug 7, 2003, 06:45 PM   #10
Ambrose Chapel
macrumors 65816
 
Ambrose Chapel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Massachusetts
what was your take on this line:

Quote:
Where Steve Jobs, who has a shiny operating system with nowhere to go
is this talking about the high-end server market? i was kind of puzzled... i guess the author is discounting the x-serve?
Ambrose Chapel is offline   0
Old Aug 7, 2003, 07:31 PM   #11
Bear
macrumors G3
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sol III - Terra
Quote:
Originally posted by Ambrose Chapel
what was your take on this line:



is this talking about the high-end server market? i was kind of puzzled... i guess the author is discounting the x-serve?
The X-Serve is a server.

The Sun F15K is a high end server. It can contain up to 106 processors and up to 576GB of ram.

In rough equivalence the X-Serve matches up to Suns V210 server (also 1 rack unit and dual procs, but can conatain 8GB of ram)
__________________
-----Bear
Bear is offline   0
Old Aug 7, 2003, 07:45 PM   #12
Sayhey
macrumors 68000
 
Sayhey's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: San Francisco
Quote:
Originally posted by Ambrose Chapel
what was your take on this line:

Where Steve Jobs, who has a shiny operating system with nowhere to go


is this talking about the high-end server market? i was kind of puzzled... i guess the author is discounting the x-serve?
I took it to mean the inability of Apple to break into new markets or raise its market share. Apple can't get any respect no matter how "shiny" its OS.
Sayhey is offline   0
Old Aug 7, 2003, 08:40 PM   #13
Ambrose Chapel
macrumors 65816
 
Ambrose Chapel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Massachusetts
Quote:
Originally posted by Bear
The X-Serve is a server.

The Sun F15K is a high end server. It can contain up to 106 processors and up to 576GB of ram.

In rough equivalence the X-Serve matches up to Suns V210 server (also 1 rack unit and dual procs, but can conatain 8GB of ram)
i didn't mean that the author should consider the x-serve as a high-end server. but i guess that is the market he was referring to. do you think apple has any interest in pursuing that market?

Quote:
Originally posted by Sayhey
I took it to mean the inability of Apple to break into new markets or raise its market share. Apple can't get any respect no matter how "shiny" its OS.
but the scientific community is taking a bigger interest in apple now that it has embraced unix. not sure if they buy servers or power macs though.
Ambrose Chapel is offline   0
Old Aug 7, 2003, 11:13 PM   #14
Sayhey
macrumors 68000
 
Sayhey's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: San Francisco
Quote:
Originally posted by Ambrose Chapel
...but the scientific community is taking a bigger interest in apple now that it has embraced unix. not sure if they buy servers or power macs though.
Didn't mean to say the author's take on Apple was correct. I hope you're right and I do think Apple has products and a strategy that has a chance of making a breakthrough. It's just that most writers feel they have to take a cynical view towards Apple and it seem to me that was what this one was doing.
Sayhey is offline   0
Old Aug 8, 2003, 07:39 PM   #15
Ambrose Chapel
macrumors 65816
 
Ambrose Chapel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Massachusetts
Quote:
Originally posted by Sayhey
It's just that most writers feel they have to take a cynical view towards Apple and it seem to me that was what this one was doing.
Yeah you're right about that...I'll be idealistic and assume that the author was just referring to high end servers.
Ambrose Chapel is offline   0


 
MacRumors Forums > Archive > Archives of Old Posts > MacBytes.com News Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Vevo Partners with Apple to Stream iTunes Festival from SXSW MacRumors iOS Blog Discussion 3 Mar 11, 2014 11:10 PM
Apple's CarPlay Requires 'Relatively Light' Integration for Third-Party App Partners MacRumors MacRumors.com News Discussion 28 Mar 7, 2014 08:33 AM
Apple to Add New Assembly Partners to Bolster Production of iOS Devices MacRumors MacRumors.com News Discussion 25 Nov 6, 2013 08:13 PM
Amid Apple Campus 2 Cost Concerns, Foster + Partners Reportedly Taking on Apple Retail Store Projects MacRumors MacRumors.com News Discussion 87 Apr 14, 2013 04:43 PM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:08 PM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC