|
|
| Welcome to the Mac Forums forums. Please read the FAQ if you have questions. Register to participate. |
|
|||||||
| TouchArcade.com - iPhone Game Reviews and News |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
macrumors bot
Join Date: Apr 2001
|
PowerBooks, iMacs, PowerMacs
MacNews.net.tc provides a "weekend roundup", but it is unclear what is speculation/old rumors/new rumors.
The site claims that PowerMac G5s will be updated in January up to 1.8GHz, 2.0GHz, and 2.2GHz. Previous claims from this site included 1.4GHz, 1.6GHz, and 1.8GHz PowerMacs at WWDC, which were incorrect. PowerBooks are pegged at 1GHz and 1.33GHz speeds in a week, but previous claims from the same site have included 1.1GHz and 1.3GHz PowerBooks (July 19) as well as 1.25GHz and 1.33GHz PowerBooks (July 22). Top speeds on the 7457 has been (presumably) confirmed to be 1.3GHz based on Motorola documents. Also mentioned is the announcement of a "creative sound" iApp... a rumor that has also seen many previous incarnations Last edited by arn : Aug 10, 2003 at 06:11 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
macrumors 68040
|
Here's our weekly PowerBook rumor.
__________________
iMac, therefore, iAm. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
macrumors 6502a
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
|
Looks like rumor recycling to me, especially this one:
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
macrumors 68020
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Montana
|
The G5 part doesn't work, for me. Sure, Apple has provided small speed bumps like this in the past, but that's only because Moto gave them no choice. I wouldn't even bother with a 10% speed bump. I think the Jan/Feb timing is probable, but the high-end will be 2.5 GHz or so, and the low-end will move up to 2.0 GHz. Just guessing, of course.
__________________
-daveL |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
macrumors 6502a
|
Quote:
__________________
girls are pretty. |
|
|
|
|
| Wonder Boy |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Wonder Boy |
|
|
#6 |
|
macrumors 68020
|
i think they have something going on with sound studio. that shoudln't be hard to buy for apple
|
|
|
|
| bennetsaysargh |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by bennetsaysargh |
|
|
#7 | |
|
macrumors member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Australia
|
Quote:
__________________
If 95% of people make a bad decision, it's still a bad decision. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
macrumors 68020
|
wait a sec, where are the iMac rumors in ths? is it the new G4 chips?
|
|
|
|
| bennetsaysargh |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by bennetsaysargh |
|
|
#9 | |
|
macrumors regular
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Brisbane, Australia
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
macrumors 65816
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Oak Park, IL
|
A simple music making/mixing iApp would be cool, and it'd be a great PR opportunity for Apple. Since iMovie, iTunes, iPhoto, and iDVD all have PC incarnations, something new would really help the whole "iApp"/"iLife" thing look good.
That said, it does look like a bit of a Soundtrack-related rumor. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
macrumors 6502a
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Charles City, Iowa
|
Quote:
__________________
"...I know it's hard when you're up to your armpits in alligators to remember you came here to drain the swamp." - Ronald Reagan February 10, 1982 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
macrumors newbie
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Australia
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
macrumors 6502
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: SF Bay area
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
| neutrino23 |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by neutrino23 |
|
|
#14 | |
|
macrumors regular
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: LA
|
Suffice?
Quote:
2. ProTools Free is fine for playing around, but you have to at least step up to LE if you want to be able to capture live sound with any success/quality. 3. ProTools dominates the market just like Avid does. When Final Cut Pro came out everyone said there was no room for it as a professional app because Avid dominates the market. BUT... FCP has found a nice niche as a an inexpensive alternative and works very well for a lot of prosumer projects. (I will still use an Avid if every time if there is a client sitting behind me though. When they get to FCP 5 or 6 maybe it will be ready.) 4. Ask any good engineer what they think of the sound quality with ProTools and they will tell you it sucks. Why do they use it? For the same reason people use Wintell PCs - Compatability, Familiarty, and Cost. 5. There are always alternatives to the crap that dominates the market. MOTU's Digital Performer program coupled with their Hardware I/Os is much better than the comparable ProTools rig. 6. Apple is usually one step ahead of us and what is the latest feature they think we will need? Digital audio I/O built right in to the new G5s. Why wouldn't they want to give us a Pro audio app for our "Digital Hub?" They continue to make 2 programs for every task - an iApp and a Pro version. My 2 cents. |
|
|
|
|
| actionslacks |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by actionslacks |
|
|
#15 |
|
macrumors 603
Join Date: May 2002
|
All depends on the bus speed, while 167 MHz is most likely there have been rumors that the 7457 can be pushed to 200 MHz.
On the Motorola chart the min/max freq for the 7457 is stated as 500 - 1333 MHz for the 1300 MHz 7457 Part (Table 8 7457EC/D Rev 1 pdf). With the 167 MHz bus (@ 6 / 6.5 / 7 / 7.5 / 8) we get 1002, 1086, 1169, 1253, 1336 MHz The 200 MHz bus (@ 5 / 5.5 / 6 / 6.5) yields 1000, 1100, 1200, 1300 MHz All will come down to how they're marketed, what final G4 ships in them, and whether the bus has been bumped up a notch. * - italics off the standard Motorola chart yet within rumor range.
__________________
May you be plagued by images of Richard Simmons flouncing through you brain, and squat thrusting his way though all waking thoughts.
Last edited by Sun Baked : Aug 11, 2003 at 03:37 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
macrumors regular
Join Date: Aug 2003
|
Quote:
Soundtrack was introduced as part of Final Cut Pro 4, and is now a standalone app that fits nicely into the Final Cut Express part of the market. In iLife, you have iMovie, with rather limited abilities soundwise - ie. import from iTunes... a really simplified and cut down version of Soundtrack would fit in nicely alongside the existing apps. Which would give an almost clean and consistent application line up at all levels... (the only real puzzle is the halfway house pricing on DVD Studio Pro - logic would dictate that they produce a 'DVD Studio Express' with just the Basic (/Extended?) interface and feature set around the price of FCE, and DVD Studio Pro with *everything* around the FCP price mark). |
|
|
|
|
| grahamtriggs |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by grahamtriggs |
|
|
#17 | |
|
macrumors 6502
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: East Windsor, CT
|
Quote:
(current G3 can do 1Ghz with 200MHz FSB).
__________________
iBook 800 combo 60GB 7200rpm 640MB airport OS X 10.3 "Panther" iPod 10GB (2nd gen) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
macrumors regular
Join Date: Aug 2003
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
| grahamtriggs |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by grahamtriggs |
|
|
#19 |
|
macrumors 68040
|
well i guess it's good to see that another site is still claiming new PowerBook on the 18th. although they could just be repeating what other people are saying now...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
macrumors 68000
|
Quote:
(This is not to say that I wouldn't like to see a sound iApp from Apple. I love Audacity for its capabilities, but v1 really isn't that exciting, and v 1.1 and 1.2 are still rather unstable. I know that anything that came from Apple would be far more stable and reliable than these - although its feature set might leave me cold...) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 | |
|
macrumors regular
Join Date: Aug 2003
|
Quote:
The point is that within the iApps themselves there are limited options for putting a soundtrack to a movie, and even in the free/cheap market space, there aren't a great deal of options. |
|
|
|
|
| grahamtriggs |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by grahamtriggs |
|
|
#22 | |
|
macrumors member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Zurich, Switzerland
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
macrumors 6502
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Copenhagen
|
making it all up!
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 | |
|
macrumors 6502a
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Outer-Roa
|
Quote:
But more bang for your buck is not the only reason to wait for Rev. B. There's surely gonna be a host of technical glitches lurking in the new design - as has been noted before, its probably gonna have more dust sucking power than a turbocharged streetcleaner with those 9 fans and that cheesegrater grill slurping it all up. Can it live on my floor? Hell, looking down closely at it now, I'm not sure I can
__________________
If Apple really wanted to secure their OS to their own hardware, they might have tried something stronger than limmericks |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
|
macrumors 6502a
|
Quote:
a) Moto would make G4s that supported faster FSB for embedded apps (like Cisco's routers which I'm sure would appreciate extra bandwidth), and b) Apple wouldn't be selling G5s with 1GHz FSB. Since Moto doesn't market ANY variation of the G4 with a faster FSB, and since Apple has designed a cutting edge system controller for the G5, I think it's safe to say that the FSB issues with the G4 rest squarely on Moto's shoulders. JMHO. Ffakr
__________________
... don't blame me, I'm just a stupid Ffakr. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|