|
|
| Welcome to the Mac Forums forums. Please read the FAQ if you have questions. Register to participate. |
|
|||||||
| TouchArcade.com - iPhone Game Reviews and News |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
macrumors bot
Join Date: Apr 2001
|
Leopard Under The Hood And Requirements Analysis
![]() With Mac OS 10.5 "Leopard's" formal announcement, many readers have been reading through Leopard's list of over 300 new features and their associated technical requirements. With the list being quite extensive, we will attempt to analyze some of the less talked about points here. Under The Hood Leopard has seen many enhancements that many users may not be immediately aware of. AutoFS claims to multi-thread the practice of mounting and dismounting network filesystems, which should virtually eliminate the familiar spinning beach ball network users may have become familiar with. Leopard will also include various security enhancements aimed at tracking applications (including potential malware), including application signing similar to what Microsoft has done in Windows. System Requirements Leopard is the first release of the Mac OS to exclude all G3 class machines, and it also will exclude many G4 class machines as well. In order to run Leopard, a user must have a G4 (867Mhz+), any G5, or any Intel processor. Also, while most features of Leopard appear to be universal, some will require more advanced system requirements or an Intel system. Below is a comparison chart comparing Tiger's system requirements vs. Leopard's. Requirement : Mac OS 10.4 "Tiger" : Mac OS 10.5 "Leopard" Processor : G3, G4, G5, Intel : G4 (867+), G5, Intel RAM : 256 MB : 512 MB Disk Space : 3 GB : 9 GB Miscellaneous : Built-in Firewire required : Photobooth backdrop effects require Intel Core Duo or faster, Boot Camp requires Intel Mac, Front Row requires built-in IR, DVD Player requires 1.6 GHz processor for improved de-interlacing If you plan on buying Leopard at a retail store on the night of the 26th, be sure to check our new Leopard Meetup forum to meet other MacRumors members. Article Link |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
macrumors 6502
|
yay for faster network drive mounts!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
macrumors 6502a
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Texas, USA
|
So does this mean front row will refuse to run without the IR port or that it will run and just not be as functional as it could be?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
macrumors 6502a
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: NJ USA
|
A 1.6Ghz processor required for DVD Player deinterlacing? Ouch.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
macrumors regular
|
If only I had a car... I could be there 3 hours early.
__________________
Unibody MBP 2.53GHz/4GB/320GB/512MB, BB Storm, WD 1TB & Seagate 1TB HDDs, 23.6" Asus 1080p display |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
macrumors 65816
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Paddyland
|
9 gigs for the OS? Boo!!!!!
__________________
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
macrumors regular
Join Date: Apr 2007
|
Well at least my new MBP won't have trouble running it :P
Anyone have any idea how much disk space Leopard requires without all the drivers/other language support etc? |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Demi-God (Editor)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
macrumors 68020
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Vermontana
|
So no Photobooth backdrops for G4s or G5s? I somehow have a hard time believing that my G5 Quad can't handle a backdrop.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
macrumors 601
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Somewhere In The Universe
|
I asked this before but no one answered. Apple says the 800MHz machines are too slow, so why are the 867's okay? What kind of difference does 67MHz make?
__________________
"This gate's plastic." Captain Carter, Stargate SG-1, "Touchstone" Mini/MacBook/iPhone/ TVOlympus E-420/E-500, Canon 20D |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
macrumors regular
|
9 gigs!???
|
|
|
|
| i_am_a_cow |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by i_am_a_cow |
|
|
#12 |
|
macrumors regular
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Brighton, UK
|
What were the 'secret' features Jobs mentioned last year? I've lost track!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
macrumors 6502
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
macrumors regular
|
So does this mean it will take up 9 gigs of what i have, or will it take up 6 gigs since i wont be using tiger anymore?
__________________
Blackbook 2.16ghz 2gb 160gb. X-240 speakers 750gb Western Digital external 320gb Western Digital external (powered by usb) 30gb 5g ipod |
|
|
|
| tennismanclay |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by tennismanclay |
|
|
#15 |
|
macrumors G3
|
Oh so true. NFS has had too many file ghosting issues lately in 10.4.10.
Drive space is cheap.
__________________
MRoogle it!
hikari T7500 2.2 GHz / 4 GB / 320 GB / GMA X3100 / 10.5.8 chobimaru Core i5 750 2.66 GHz / 4 GB / 640 GB / 4830 / Windows 7 |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
macrumors 6502
Join Date: Jun 2007
|
Quote:
![]() 1.6GHz for DVD Player, so I am guessing that I can still play DVD except it will not include the advance de-interlacing feature. I am fine with that. ![]() Some of these requirements are insane when compared to Tiger.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
macrumors 65816
Join Date: Sep 2003
|
3-4GB.
__________________
- Mac Pro 2x2.8Ghz, 8GB, 8800GT - MBA 1.6/60 |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
macrumors 65816
Join Date: Apr 2004
|
9 Gigs... Why is this alot? There are hard drives now that are 1TB large. Why is 9GB such a concern?
__________________
Sergeant United States Marine Corps |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
macrumors regular
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: New Jersey
|
Quote:
I completely agree! I don't see how a 32 bit intel can out pace a 64 bit loaded G5 tower!? ![]() I hope this little chart isn't the whole truth.
__________________
Go on complain about whatever Apple is/isn't doing. Now think about life with out Apple........
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
Demi-God (Moderator)
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Grand Rapids, MI, USA
|
Quote:
If it makes you feel better, 99%+ chance that something like XPostFacto will let you install Leopard on an 800MHz iBook if you so desire. It's a tough tradeoff. Have you ever watched how Microsoft handles requirements? When XP came out, it was completely baffling whether or not it would work on a given computer unless you were told explicitly by your OEM that your model was supported. Vista likewise. So at least Apple is keeping it relatively simple.
__________________
Mohan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 | |
|
macrumors Demi-God
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: On top of the Storm Peaks waiting for the Time-Lost Proto Drake
|
Quote:
Command-Escape |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
macrumors 65816
Join Date: Apr 2004
|
Quote:
Intel Processors use SSE, SSE2, and SSE3. Advanced instructions for multi-media. How do you know that these backdrops arent coded heavly with SSE? Thus, Making the G4/G5 unable to execute these tasks.
__________________
Sergeant United States Marine Corps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
macrumors 65816
|
9 Gb is crazy, all those features use up that much more hard drive space? Yikes. I'd like to know ram usage as well, on average if it will use more or about the same.
Either way, I can't wait to hear early reviews this should be a great upgrade!
__________________
Xbox Gamertag: Foxglove9 | Wii Code: 1187 4485 4656 9972 2.16 Ghz MacBook C2D HP Mini 110 running OS X |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
macrumors 6502a
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: A World of my Own; UK
|
Can Anyone With Hands-On Experience Confirm ...
... Whether the 10.4.10 Airport bug is eliminated in 10.5 ...?
I'm most impressed with many aspects of Leopard, and I can see definite advantages to upgrading my three-Mac network at home ... Except that I've had to roll back two of the machines to 10.4.9 thanks to the Airport bug, and I'm not shelling out a wedge of cash for a multiple-seat license if it's going to break my wireless network. Any news, people? Thanks! Jim
__________________
Professional Comic Book Letterer: Samples Not So Professional Artist: Scribblings |
|
|
|
| Jim Campbell |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Jim Campbell |
|
|
#25 |
|
macrumors 68030
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Florida Resident
|
Leopard (Last PPC OS)
I bet this is the last version to support PPC. Universal apps will eventually disappear and one of the new secret 300 features for 10.6 is that the binaries are smaller and uses less memory.
|
|
|
|
| BornAgainMac |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by BornAgainMac |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|