Register FAQ/Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to the Mac Forums forums. Please read the FAQ if you have questions. Register to participate.

 
Go Back   Mac Forums > Archive > Archives of Old Posts > MacRumors News Discussion (archive)
TouchArcade.com - iPhone Game Reviews and News

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Sep 9, 2003, 09:40 AM   #1
MacRumors
macrumors bot
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
WMP 9: Open and on Mac this Fall

A Reuters article reports that Microsoft will be opening the specifications for its Windows Media video format, allowing other companies to implement the technology. The video format was submitted for review by the Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers on Monday. This review process is reported to take 6-12 months.

By opening the specification, Microsoft could increase the adoption of Windows Media 9.

As previously reported, Microsoft is already working on bringing Windows Media Player 9 to Mac OS X. Beta News managed to get some commentary from a Microsoft representative who narrowed the target date for the OS X release to "sometime this fall".
MacRumors is offline  
Old Sep 9, 2003, 09:44 AM   #2
DanUk2003
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Worthing, UK
since when has anything Microsoft made become a universally-accepted "standard"...!!!
DanUk2003 is offline  
Old Sep 9, 2003, 09:44 AM   #3
Matthé
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
trailers

movietrailers in windows media anyone?
__________________
Matthématique
Matthé is offline  
Old Sep 9, 2003, 09:45 AM   #4
encro
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: bendigo.victoria.au
Send a message via AIM to encro Send a message via MSN to encro Send a message via Skype™ to encro
Well that is great news. Microsoft looks like they are changing for the better.

We will have options with plugins for .wmv and .wma.

We may even be able to play them with the QuickTime frameworks
encro is offline  
Old Sep 9, 2003, 09:48 AM   #5
encro
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: bendigo.victoria.au
Send a message via AIM to encro Send a message via MSN to encro Send a message via Skype™ to encro
Is Fall = spring or autumn?
encro is offline  
Old Sep 9, 2003, 09:52 AM   #6
AppleMatt
macrumors 68000
 
AppleMatt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: UK
fall = autumn

Please Microsoft, performance. Please please please.

AppleMatt
__________________
Avatar by edesignuk.
AppleMatt is offline  
Old Sep 9, 2003, 09:55 AM   #7
nagromme
macrumors 601
 
nagromme's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Blinking blue dot
All well and good, I approve of wider compatibility and I approve of MS porting things to Mac... but don't expect me to accept DRM based on anything from Microsoft! No thank you.

This is the kind of thing you have to be suspicious of with MS: a play for control. But at least it's a legal play for control this time!
__________________
nagromme
Would you like a treatment?
nagromme is offline  
Old Sep 9, 2003, 09:59 AM   #8
encro
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: bendigo.victoria.au
Send a message via AIM to encro Send a message via MSN to encro Send a message via Skype™ to encro
Quote:
Originally posted by AppleMatt
fall = autumn

Please Microsoft, performance. Please please please.

AppleMatt
Thanks for the helper.

While we are speeding up MS apps: Entourage also needs a massive performance increase. Its so incredibly sluggish but have to use it because of a much better feature set than Mail/iCal/Address Book Combination.
encro is offline  
Old Sep 9, 2003, 10:01 AM   #9
Lord Bodak
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Virginia Beach, VA USA
From the article:
Quote:
With open standards, other software companies could create applications that use Microsoft's video-encoding technology, although they would have to pay a license fee, which Usher said would be "low-cost and straightforward."
So it's an "open standard" but there will be license fees?
Lord Bodak is offline  
Old Sep 9, 2003, 10:04 AM   #10
arn
macrumors god
 
arn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Send a message via AIM to arn
Quote:
Originally posted by Lord Bodak
From the article:


So it's an "open standard" but there will be license fees?
That's how MPEG4 is.

arn
arn is online now  
Old Sep 9, 2003, 10:07 AM   #11
dricci
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Quote:
Originally posted by Lord Bodak
So it's an "open standard" but there will be license fees?
Sorta like MPEG-4 and AAC

Edit: Arn beat me to it!
dricci is offline  
Old Sep 9, 2003, 10:20 AM   #12
Powerbook G5
macrumors 68040
 
Powerbook G5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: St Augustine, FL
Send a message via AIM to Powerbook G5 Send a message via Yahoo to Powerbook G5
This is great and all...but I have never liked WMP/WMA formatted media, anyway. Does this mean this will be popping up more often? *shudders* I much rather keep my QT movie trailers, thank you very much!
__________________
iMac, therefore, iAm.
Powerbook G5 is offline  
Old Sep 9, 2003, 10:20 AM   #13
Lord Bodak
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Virginia Beach, VA USA
Quote:
Originally posted by dricci
Sorta like MPEG-4 and AAC

Edit: Arn beat me to it!
Aren't there open implementations of MPEG-4 though? Even if it's through reverse engineering. I can't imagine Microsoft allowing the VideoLAN people or anyone developing a WMV client without paying the fee.

Or I may be totally off base
Lord Bodak is offline  
Old Sep 9, 2003, 10:21 AM   #14
Photorun
Banned
 
Photorun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: NYC
As someone mentioned, by "open standard" I hope this means Quicktime can now be made to play WMP files. That way I don't need their crappy media player on my machine.
Photorun is offline  
Old Sep 9, 2003, 10:22 AM   #15
bikertwin
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: This Old House
Quote:
Originally posted by dricci
Sorta like MPEG-4 and AAC

Edit: Arn beat me to it!
Sure, but those are by consortia--so the standards are contributed to by a multitude of companies, and a multitude of companies benefit from the fees.

Same thing with Compact Disc, DVD Video, DVD-R, DVD+RW, Compact Cassette, PCI, SCSI, etc.

But I guess if you have a monopoly, you are the consortium.

If the studios are smart, they'll point to the new Asian governments' Linux project and tell MS that they need to provide a free Linux player for it to be considered a standard. Of course, that still doesn't help Apple.
bikertwin is offline  
Old Sep 9, 2003, 10:22 AM   #16
luiss
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Target: MPEG4

This is obviously a play against MPEG4 technologies. Bring them in with cheap license fees, and then.....
luiss is offline  
Old Sep 9, 2003, 10:29 AM   #17
dho
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: California
Send a message via AIM to dho
As far as WMP and its "standards" I could not care less. I use VLC as my primary player, which plays just about everything already.

IMHO...

VLC: Best for playing and broadcasting

Quicktime:Nothing exciting

Quicktime Pro: Best(cheap) way to convert video

WMP: nothing exciting
__________________
"Dont do schoo
Stay in milk
Drink your drugs"

~Mr. T

Last edited by dho : Sep 9, 2003 at 10:41 AM.
dho is offline  
Old Sep 9, 2003, 10:34 AM   #18
SiliconAddict
macrumors 601
 
SiliconAddict's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Burnsville, Minnesota, USA
Cool

Quote:
Originally posted by encro
Well that is great news. Microsoft looks like they are changing for the better.

Fool me once shame on you, Fool me 9,836 times shame on me. Its nice the MP9 will be on the Mac, more options is always a good thing, and that they are opening up the spec but at this point I no longer take anything Microsoft says or does at face value. 9 times out of 10 there is a hidden motive or agenda that will rear its ugly head at some point.
When dealing with MS walk softly and carry a googleplex of lawyers and open source code.
I want to beleve this is the real deal but there is this little voice in me saying You’ll be sooooooorrrrrry
__________________
-iPod Video 160GB
-MacBook Pro Core 2 Duo 2.33Ghz/3GB RAM/250GB

-Newton 4700 (a.k.a iPaq 4700)
-Dell 2405FPW 24" Widescreen
SiliconAddict is offline  
Old Sep 9, 2003, 10:47 AM   #19
Powerbook G5
macrumors 68040
 
Powerbook G5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: St Augustine, FL
Send a message via AIM to Powerbook G5 Send a message via Yahoo to Powerbook G5
I am also very cautious. Microsoft hates open standards so the one reason they could be doing this is to possibly find a legal way to be the only player in town with once it becomes more widespread and "accepted". I personally never liked WMP, the files are usually slow, crash or lock up, skip, or just aren't the same quality as any other option when given the option to choose the format to download. Not only that, but with the DRM being used and Microsoft's ever unforgiving EULA, it just doesn't sound good.
__________________
iMac, therefore, iAm.
Powerbook G5 is offline  
Old Sep 9, 2003, 10:48 AM   #20
gopy
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Quote:
Originally posted by SiliconAddict
When dealing with MS walk softly and carry a googleplex of lawyers and open source code.
Not to be picky or anything, but "Google" is the search engine, while "googol" is the number. (I think I remember the guy who named the number saying something to the effect that he was annoyed by the misspelling, but not terribly...)
Related note:
Quote:
According to Webster's Dictionary, the name was coined in 1938 by Milton Sirotta, the nine-year-old nephew of American mathematician, Edward Kasner.
tom
gopy is offline  
Old Sep 9, 2003, 10:50 AM   #21
e-coli
macrumors 65816
 
e-coli's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Brooklyn
WMP is complete junk.

But MS opening their formats can't be at all bad.
e-coli is offline  
Old Sep 9, 2003, 11:40 AM   #22
mstecker
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Philadelphia
Send a message via AIM to mstecker
How is this bad news?

I get no end of amusement from seeing the knee-jerk microsoft bashing around here. A story in which

- Microsoft announces opening of its format
- Microsoft announces support of WMP9 for the Mac

gets more negative than positive ratings? Sure, you might like to see them make the standard more open, but how is this bad news? I just don't get it.
mstecker is offline  
Old Sep 9, 2003, 11:46 AM   #23
SiliconAddict
macrumors 601
 
SiliconAddict's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Burnsville, Minnesota, USA
Quote:
Originally posted by gopy
Not to be picky or anything, but "Google" is the search engine, while "googol" is the number. (I think I remember the guy who named the number saying something to the effect that he was annoyed by the misspelling, but not terribly...)
tom
*shrugs* I was being lazy. I figured it wasn't spelled like the website
__________________
-iPod Video 160GB
-MacBook Pro Core 2 Duo 2.33Ghz/3GB RAM/250GB

-Newton 4700 (a.k.a iPaq 4700)
-Dell 2405FPW 24" Widescreen
SiliconAddict is offline  
Old Sep 9, 2003, 11:52 AM   #24
montecristo
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Gotham
Quote:
Originally posted by SiliconAddict
Fool me once shame on you, Fool me 9,836 times shame on me. Its nice the MP9 will be on the Mac, more options is always a good thing, and that they are opening up the spec but at this point I no longer take anything Microsoft says or does at face value. 9 times out of 10 there is a hidden motive or agenda that will rear its ugly head at some point.
I don't know if I am missing something, but it seems to me that the hidden motive (not so hidden) is to become more of, or as much of, as standard as Quicktime is. Don't the two products have pretty much completely overlapping uses? (Sure Quicktime might be better now, but that's precisely the problem in the eyes of M$). They also want to target Real, I'm sure. If they really want to be "open", loosen up on Office and Windows....
montecristo is offline  
Old Sep 9, 2003, 12:01 PM   #25
gopy
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Quote:
Originally posted by SiliconAddict
*shrugs* I was being lazy. I figured it wasn't spelled like the website
Well, give it a year, they'll probably both be the same....
gopy is offline  

 

Mac Forums > Archive > Archives of Old Posts > MacRumors News Discussion (archive)

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:53 PM.

Mac News | Mac Rumors | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2002-2009, MacRumors.com, LLC