|
|
| Welcome to the Mac Forums forums. Please read the FAQ if you have questions. Register to participate. |
|
|||||||
| TouchArcade.com - iPhone Game Reviews and News |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 | |
|
Demi-God (Moderator emeritus)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Great(?) Britain
|
Google Press Conference Today: Mobile "Android" Platform
Quote:
Last edited by edesignuk : Nov 5, 2007 at 11:52 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
macrumors 601
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Redondo Beach, California
|
A little more ionfo....
http://www.usatoday.com/tech/wireles...le-phone_N.htm |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
macrumors 68040
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Somewhere designing devices and UIs for over thirty years
|
Sigh. And I dislike programming in Java. I was really hoping they'd come out with a universally ported browser with easy widget programming.
But if I'm able to give or sell an app to zillions of phones, plus my own, without hassles, then I'm for a global OS. Also, I like their emphasis on a customizable UI. Quote:
I think the biggest deal of any phone OS is the ability for personalization. Everyone has their own idea of what's important to them. This is Apple's giant mistake so far... and a good reason why so many jailbreak their phone... people want to customize their phone, and arrange things to their liking. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
macrumors Demi-God
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: On top of the Storm Peaks waiting for the Time-Lost Proto Drake
|
I'd like to be a fly on the wall of the room Eric Schmidt and Steve Jobs are in right now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
macrumors 68000
Join Date: Jun 2007
|
Quote:
What you mention about customizing is fine for a small percentage of people. Most just want it to work as easily as possible. This phone and the customization will actually be a hinderance because you just know what verizon will do to this. Will a person be able to undo the verizon interface to make it more like them? Sounds like yes. But the vast majority will not. This phone so far sounds like openmoko backed by bigger and more companies. Openmoko and this phone will appeal to those that like to tweak out their phone. But an emphasis on a customziable interface will be the thing makes it only slightly more easier to use then the moto POS out there now. And not demonstrably better like the iphone and its consistan UI has brought us. edit: And i would like to add that come Feb. Apple's 3rd party support will prob. take care of a good chunk of those that like to customize without buying a phone from the Android platform. |
|
|
|
|
| plumbingandtech |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by plumbingandtech |
|
|
#6 |
|
macrumors Demi-God
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: St. Louis, MO
|
Awesome! Google? T-Mobile? Count me in. I should be due for a discounted upgrade sometime in 2008 With T-Mobile, so this is awesome.
Sounds like this might be a true open platform phone.
__________________
2.66 GHz quad core Mac Pro, 3 GB RAM, 2x500GB WD Black (RAID0), 2x1TB WD Black (RAID1), LG Blu-Ray Burner, GT120, Dell U2410 13" Unibody MacBook 2.4 GHz 120 GB iPod Classic; 16 GB iPhone 3G |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | ||||
|
macrumors 68040
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Somewhere designing devices and UIs for over thirty years
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by kdarling : Nov 5, 2007 at 12:56 PM. |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
macrumors 68020
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: West Coast
|
So much for Apple's (rather short) stint as mobile darlings...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
macrumors 68030
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: AR
|
I read through Engadget's coverage of the announcement. It appears that Google is providing the core operating system, and other engineering such as the user interface is up to the individual carrier.
So, it's up to Motorola, HTC, etc to create a compelling user interface with a bundled application set. It doesn't sound all that exciting other than the fact that third-party applications will be portable from one Android-based phone to another. At the most, an Android-based phone will interface and sync with Google's desktop software (Gears) and web-based services (Gmail, Calendar, Docs and Spreadsheets). Meh. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
macrumors 6502
Join Date: Jan 2006
|
Yes!
Put some pressure on Apple!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
macrumors 6502
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: MI
|
This is exciting but like most everyone, I can't wait to see it instead of hear about it. I was super tempted to purchase an iPhone recently since my contract is coming to expire soon and visual voice would be so useful with the business I'm in right now, but I can wait and see, hope HTC has some attractive offerings.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
macrumors 601
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: NJ
|
Cool.....MS, Palm,Apple and Symbian(Nokia) feel the heat.
__________________
"We can't all be heroes because somebody has to sit on the curb and clap as they go by." Will Rogers |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Demi-God (Moderator)
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Grand Rapids, MI, USA
|
It's curious that, unless I'm mistaken, the USA Today article's list of confederates to Google lists no carriers that use GSM at all. EDIT: Never mind, I see that Deutsche Telekom is listed elsewhere as being involved....
__________________
Mohan |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
macrumors regular
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Brussels, Belgium
|
What is Google's motivation in this? How will they 'monetize' this? Surely excellent integration with Google web services isn't really worth the R&D costs of developing Android? I haven't really read about this but I don't really see it. I might be missing something here...
__________________
Black Macbook: 2.16Ghz/2Gb RAM/160GB HD
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
macrumors 68020
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Claremont, CA
|
1. Apple was first to market with a real computer and communicator in your hand, and based on a recent cross-country trip I did, AT&T EDGE despite its limitations is fast enough and vastly available nearly everywhere.
2. Apple has the obvuious patent ands ease of use leqad. 3. Apple has the obvious *nix (MICRO-BSD) lead in software and "services". It is well supported by medium to high end software vendors (via mac) and as people shift from focus on entry cost to total cost, Apple will continue to dominate the top 30% of the revenue tier. 4. Open is good in one way, but closed in another. Closed is better for uneducated and untrained end users. Open is far better for VAR's, Hobbiests, and Large-scale businesses (large now defined to address the internet era). 5. Apple will make a 28% margin on what they sell. The others are unlikely to in light of their low price marketing scheme. Buy Apple stock. Rocketman
__________________
Think Different-ly! ![]() Looking for an iPhone dev with way too much time on her hands for BASIC programs I have.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
macrumors 68030
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Manchester, UK
|
Interesting development that's been coming for a while.
Competition for Apple should keep them on their toes and maybe even wake them up to focussing on their customers and maybe take their eyes of the money pots. A Google OS based phone is 9-12 months off though. Apple can make useful headway in that time if their sensible and they stop doing stuff like trying to break iToner (!). All that might come ver as Apple bashing but it's not. I'm buying an iPhone on Friday still. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
macrumors god
|
thoughts:
- Good to give Apple some high profile competition to keep them motivated - This announcement was remarkably uninformative. We still don't know anything about it. - I don't see how its tied to Google specifically arn |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
macrumors regular
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Brussels, Belgium
|
They're producing the basic OS framework though right?
__________________
Black Macbook: 2.16Ghz/2Gb RAM/160GB HD
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
macrumors 68030
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Manchester, UK
|
Quote:
So, a Google mobile desktop (with ads) coupled with their own mobile-centric linux distribution? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
macrumors regular
Join Date: Jun 2007
|
Stupid stupid Apple and AT&T.
Horrible move, Google is the wave of the future. You can't fight 30 other companies for market share, impossible. The iPhone is amazing, but last time I check, I can't afford an iPhone, nor can millions of other people out there who have cell phones. Better shape up for something Apple, or else your going to end up with your head in your butt.
__________________
As Steve Wozniak once said, "Never trust a computer that you can't throw out a window" iPod touch (16 GB) Jailbroken October 12, 2007
|
|
|
|
| Football1maniac |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Football1maniac |
|
|
#21 |
|
macrumors god
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
macrumors 6502a
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: West Jordan, UT
|
This is great news for the mobile phone market. Cell phones are going to see some major changes in the next 5 years. This is exciting. It'll definitely give Apple some major competition on the iPhone.
__________________
:Macbook Pro 2.8GHz, 4GB RAM, 512MB VRAM :20" Intel Dual Core 2.0GHz, 2GB RAM, 256MB VRAM :1.25GHz G4 Mac Mini w/ 1GB RAM :iPhone 3G |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 | ||
|
macrumors 68030
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Manchester, UK
|
Quote:
Quote:
Whether people like that is another thing. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
macrumors 6502a
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: West Jordan, UT
|
It's probably going to have a lot of the goolge ad stuff that they make so much money on.
__________________
:Macbook Pro 2.8GHz, 4GB RAM, 512MB VRAM :20" Intel Dual Core 2.0GHz, 2GB RAM, 256MB VRAM :1.25GHz G4 Mac Mini w/ 1GB RAM :iPhone 3G |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
macrumors 6502
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Chicago
|
My guess is ads. I could be wrong but I believe that's their core avenue of profit. They will probably deliver ads directly to your phone.
__________________
Hackintosh Core i7 2.66GHz/nVidia GT260/6GB RAM/2 1TB HDD's/Windows 7 & Snow Leopard 10.6.2 - MacBook Core 2 Duo 2GHz 4GB RAM - iPhone 3G 16GB |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|