Register FAQ/Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to the Mac Forums forums. Please read the FAQ if you have questions. Register to participate.

 
Go Back   Mac Forums > Apple Hardware > Desktops > iMac, eMac, Mac mini
TouchArcade.com - iPhone Game Reviews and News

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread  
Old Nov 15, 2007, 02:12 PM   #1
centic
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
iMac Graphics Firmware Update 1.0

Quote:
This update is for 20-inch and 24-inch aluminum iMac computers with the ATI Radeon HD 2600 Pro graphics running Mac OS X 10.4.10 with iMac software update 1.2.1 or Leopard with iMac software update 1.3

It updates the graphics firmware on the ATI Radeon HD 2600 Pro to improve system stability
Installing this now, hopefully it makes my freezing issues go away.. just popped up for me in Software Update
centic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 15, 2007, 02:17 PM   #2
Mindflux
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Austin
Quote:
Originally Posted by centic View Post
Installing this now, hopefully it makes my freezing issues go away.. just popped up for me in Software Update
Where are you seeing this?

Quote:
This update is for 20-inch and 24-inch aluminum iMac computers with the ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO graphics processor, running Mac OS X 10.4.10 with iMac Software Update 1.2.1 for Tiger, or Mac OS X 10.5 with iMac Software Update 1.3 for Leopard.

It updates the graphics firmware on the ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO card to address issues that may have caused the computer to freeze.

Not every 20-inch and 24-inch aluminum iMac computer requires this update. If you are not automatically presented with this update, your computer does not need it.

If you manually download this update and attempt to install it on an ineligible computer, you will receive an error message.

If you manually download the update and receive the following error message when selecting a volume, "You cannot install iMac Graphics Firmware Update on this volume. Your computer does not need this update," one of two conditions exist:

* You have not installed the iMac Software Update 1.2.1 for Tiger or iMac Software Update 1.3 for Leopard. From the Apple menu, select Software Update and install the appropriate software update, and then reinstall iMac Graphics Firmware Update 1.0.

* You have already installed this update.
http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=307008
Mindflux is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 15, 2007, 02:21 PM   #3
Nick12QB
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
It came up on my software update... but I'm not a freezer. Going to wait and see some exit polls before I go through with this one...
Nick12QB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 15, 2007, 02:23 PM   #4
centic
Thread Starter
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
I saw that 10.5.1 came out and checked Software Update and it popped up.

So far so good, but it's only been about 5 minutes so we'll see.
centic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 15, 2007, 02:25 PM   #5
nando2323
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Damm Im all excited but I still have 3 hours before Im off work dammmmm.
__________________
27" AL iMac 2.8 Ghz i7 4GB Ram; 1.66 Mac Mini 2GB 120GB HD HTPC
Nikon D90 18-105VR and 70-300VR
16 GB iPhone 3GS
Website
nando2323 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 15, 2007, 02:27 PM   #6
centic
Thread Starter
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
I've tried a bit, and have yet to even get the pixel artifacts on the screen.. this might be it guys
centic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 15, 2007, 02:31 PM   #7
EMU1337
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
My update for the graphics firmware came up after I did the 10.5.1 update but not when I initially did the software update to get 10.5.1. The 1.2.1 firmware update could be dependent on 10.5.1. Just a thought.
__________________
20" Al iMac 2.4 C2D, 2GB RAM, 500GB HDD, ATI 2600HD
80 GB iPod Video
EMU1337 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 15, 2007, 02:44 PM   #8
drunet
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Raleigh, NC
Send a message via AIM to drunet
so did they just clock down the card to fix the heat issues?
drunet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 15, 2007, 02:47 PM   #9
kkat69
macrumors 68000
 
kkat69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Atlanta, Ga
Quote:
Originally Posted by drunet View Post
so did they just clock down the card to fix the heat issues?
Hold on, lemme drive home, install the update, call the engineer i know at apple and ask him.

At this point I dont believe anyone would really know. Pure speculation seeing as how the card is already clocked down as it is.
__________________
iMac 2.8ghz (Mid 07) | MB SR 2.2ghz (White) | 80g iPod Classic | 2g iPod Nano | Canon Rebel Xti | 8g iPhone3G | 16g iPhone3G
kkat69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 15, 2007, 02:55 PM   #10
nando2323
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by kkat69 View Post
Hold on, lemme drive home, install the update, call the engineer i know at apple and ask him.

At this point I dont believe anyone would really know. Pure speculation seeing as how the card is already clocked down as it is.
Lets not get hostile now. We all just have hopes that this issue is gone for good. Some of us wonder how it was accomplished that's all. Also with the speed of the internet these days, I would not be surprised that someone not within Apple already knows this info.
__________________
27" AL iMac 2.8 Ghz i7 4GB Ram; 1.66 Mac Mini 2GB 120GB HD HTPC
Nikon D90 18-105VR and 70-300VR
16 GB iPhone 3GS
Website
nando2323 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 15, 2007, 03:09 PM   #11
Nick12QB
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
no, i have not updated to 10.5.1 and I have the update.

Im not a freezer but my memory ID was 600, which had significantly more freezers. Possibly, this is the factor that decides who gets the update?

If they did just clock the gfx card down, then is there any point in updating if I don't freeze?

And secondly, doesn't that mean that those who do have the 2600 and don't need it to be underclocked have a better product? what are the legal implications of this... I think if they needed to clock it down they would be forced to give the update to everyone so no one could call foul. Maybe they actually found the problem, and it wasn't heat related.
Nick12QB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 15, 2007, 03:15 PM   #12
kkat69
macrumors 68000
 
kkat69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Atlanta, Ga
Quote:
Originally Posted by nando2323 View Post
Lets not get hostile now. We all just have hopes that this issue is gone for good. Some of us wonder how it was accomplished that's all. Also with the speed of the internet these days, I would not be surprised that someone not within Apple already knows this info.
I'm never hostile, but sarcastic? That's a different story. I'm stuck at work, stuffed from turkey lunch, in front of (above all things) a DELL LAPTOP and I sOooooOOooOooOoOOooOOo wanna go check this update out.

I was talking to a fellow Mac user at work about best steps to get my hardware replaced for this very reason. Hmm hope I don't have to do that now so I'm patiently reading these forums as well as Apple discussions to see how things are going.

Maybe even sneak out of work early to go install it.
__________________
iMac 2.8ghz (Mid 07) | MB SR 2.2ghz (White) | 80g iPod Classic | 2g iPod Nano | Canon Rebel Xti | 8g iPhone3G | 16g iPhone3G
kkat69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 15, 2007, 03:18 PM   #13
kkat69
macrumors 68000
 
kkat69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Atlanta, Ga
For those that don't go regularly to at least read the Apple Discussion forums, so far there (although minimal posts) everyone is pleased with this update.

I'd say give it a day or 2 plus a couple reboots and we'll see if we can truely call it a Success Story.

Surely this is a very welcome update and my hats off to Apple for finally getting it out.
__________________
iMac 2.8ghz (Mid 07) | MB SR 2.2ghz (White) | 80g iPod Classic | 2g iPod Nano | Canon Rebel Xti | 8g iPhone3G | 16g iPhone3G
kkat69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 15, 2007, 03:21 PM   #14
Cobra2001
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: NJ
Quote:
Originally Posted by kkat69 View Post
For those that don't go regularly to at least read the Apple Discussion forums, so far there (although minimal posts) everyone is pleased with this update.

I'd say give it a day or 2 plus a couple reboots and we'll see if we can truely call it a Success Story.

Surely this is a very welcome update and my hats off to Apple for finally getting it out.
Which thread specifically are you reading this in on the Apple forums? This way I can follow along too

Thanks.
Cobra2001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 15, 2007, 03:22 PM   #15
MattyP30
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
I may benchmark my imac before and after as i don't have a freezer and it woul dbe interesting to know if there is any change to the speed of the 2600
MattyP30 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 15, 2007, 03:23 PM   #16
kkat69
macrumors 68000
 
kkat69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Atlanta, Ga
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cobra2001 View Post
Which thread specifically are you reading this in on the Apple forums? This way I can follow along too

Thanks.
First page of Intel iMac discussions has them up at the top.

Quote:
Originally Posted by MattyP30 View Post
I may benchmark my imac before and after as i don't have a freezer and it woul dbe interesting to know if there is any change to the speed of the 2600
Damn good idea. Since I haven't installed yet (I have a freezer but I can get a few days before a freeze most times) I would love to do that as well.

What exactly are you using for the benchmark. I used a tool when I first got my iMac but forgot it's name.
__________________
iMac 2.8ghz (Mid 07) | MB SR 2.2ghz (White) | 80g iPod Classic | 2g iPod Nano | Canon Rebel Xti | 8g iPhone3G | 16g iPhone3G
kkat69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 15, 2007, 03:26 PM   #17
Cobra2001
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: NJ
Quote:
Originally Posted by kkat69 View Post
First page of Intel iMac discussions has them up at the top.
Thanks I found it
Cobra2001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 15, 2007, 03:26 PM   #18
MattyP30
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
i dunno yet - i am new to macs so will do a bit of searching! maybe not even benchmark but something like cpuz but for the mac - which woul djust give me the graphics card info such as mhz etc
MattyP30 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 15, 2007, 03:30 PM   #19
kkat69
macrumors 68000
 
kkat69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Atlanta, Ga
Quote:
Originally Posted by MattyP30 View Post
i dunno yet - i am new to macs so will do a bit of searching! maybe not even benchmark but something like cpuz but for the mac - which woul djust give me the graphics card info such as mhz etc
HA, google to the rescue (as always)

XBENCH was the tool I used. I'll be using it prior to 10.5.1/1.0.

http://www.xbench.com/
__________________
iMac 2.8ghz (Mid 07) | MB SR 2.2ghz (White) | 80g iPod Classic | 2g iPod Nano | Canon Rebel Xti | 8g iPhone3G | 16g iPhone3G
kkat69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 15, 2007, 03:33 PM   #20
teiresias
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Hmmm, I've done the Leopard 10.5.1 update, but have yet to see this graphics firmware update on my 24" iMac.

I've never had a freezing problem though.

Last edited by teiresias : Nov 15, 2007 at 03:43 PM.
teiresias is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 15, 2007, 03:34 PM   #21
JordanNZ
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Quote:
Originally Posted by drunet View Post
so did they just clock down the card to fix the heat issues?
I doubt it, for most I don't think it was a heat issue. Considering only SOME people need to install it, my guess is it fixes the firmware to deal with the type of video memory that was giving people problems.

If you don't have this type of memory.. No update?
JordanNZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 15, 2007, 03:49 PM   #22
luffx
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: WI
please keep us updated.

luffx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 15, 2007, 04:04 PM   #23
kkat69
macrumors 68000
 
kkat69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Atlanta, Ga
Quote:
Originally Posted by luffx View Post
please keep us updated.


So far from Apple Discussions people have been having success.
__________________
iMac 2.8ghz (Mid 07) | MB SR 2.2ghz (White) | 80g iPod Classic | 2g iPod Nano | Canon Rebel Xti | 8g iPhone3G | 16g iPhone3G
kkat69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 15, 2007, 04:10 PM   #24
~Shard~
macrumors Demi-God
 
~Shard~'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: 1123.6536.5321
Send a message via Skype™ to ~Shard~
This is excellent news - now I feel a lot more confident in buying a new iMac! Perhaps I won't have to wait until 2008 to buy one now after alll!
__________________
My riches consist not in the extent of my possessions, but in the fewness of my wants.
- J. Brotherton
~Shard~ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 15, 2007, 04:12 PM   #25
Bambeezer
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Dallas, TX
Finally!!!
Bambeezer is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Mac Forums > Apple Hardware > Desktops > iMac, eMac, Mac mini

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:00 PM.

Mac News | Mac Rumors | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2002-2009, MacRumors.com, LLC