|
|
| Welcome to the Mac Forums forums. Please read the FAQ if you have questions. Register to participate. |
|
|||||||
| TouchArcade.com - iPhone Game Reviews and News |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 | |
|
macrumors bot
Join Date: Apr 2001
|
Advanced Multitouch Gesturing Patents
![]() PCJoint.com points to ongoing research by Apple into multi-touch technologies. The most recent patent applications reveal techniques to recognize both palm and finger contacts in order to react appropriately. PCJoint summarizes the possibilities: Quote:
Article Link |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
macrumors 6502
Join Date: Oct 2005
|
I think there is a world of things we can do with multi-touch, but Apple just has to make sure it stays intuitive. I don't want to have to learn sign language and 300 gestures to get my iPod to do what I am telling it to do. Hopefully some firmware updates come out and we can get some cool new features on our new Apple toys.
__________________
|
|
|
|
| LillieDesigns |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by LillieDesigns |
|
|
#3 |
|
macrumors member
Join Date: Nov 2007
|
Apple DS? Input and output screen?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
macrumors newbie
Join Date: Jul 2007
|
we're definitely gonna see a big change in the way in which one will interact w/ a computer pretty soon. seriously, how much longer can they drag out the mouse/keyboard set-up?
|
|
|
|
| viper002060 |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by viper002060 |
|
|
#5 |
|
macrumors 6502a
Join Date: Jun 2007
|
ĦQue guay! Eso es muy interesante.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
macrumors regular
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Shanghai, China
|
What I hope the most is to get these features through a firmware update in Leopard, because Multitouch is really a "secret feature" that everyone will be happy to own.
On a bigger screen , you'll be able to have less mistakes. My iPod Touch is great, but still made some mistakes some time. Another surprise is how can Apple really handle with texting, this is a delicate work after all
__________________
MBP 2.2ghz iPod Nano 4G(1G) iPod 5G(30G),iPod Shuffle(2G),Sony NW-E407,Creative Muvo2 (4G),iPod Mini(4G),YP-T10(2G),iPod Touch(8G) ,iPod 6G(80G)now
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
macrumors member
Join Date: Apr 2007
|
42 minutes
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
macrumors 68000
Join Date: Jun 2007
|
and the rumored big iphone size thingie makes sense now.
GIMME! |
|
|
|
| plumbingandtech |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by plumbingandtech |
|
|
#9 |
|
macrumors regular
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Dallas, Texas
|
I forsee greater things in the future (near future) for this than just iPhone/iPod use. Imagine a glass (and aluminum, of course) surface that becomes everything we need to manipulate a computer and a media center. Virtual keyboard surface, virtual mouse surface and a virtual remote. The technolgy is already here and in use in the iPhone/iTouch....Apple, it's time to revolutionize the industry (again) with touch sensitive virtual input devices. Physical keyboards, mice and remotes are so 2007...It will be fun to watch other companies caught with their pants down again. While everyone wastes their time trying to copy Apple's iPod, iPhone, iTunes Store, and OS, Apple will once again shock everyone with their creativeness, foresight and innovation.
|
|
|
|
| Pandaboots |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Pandaboots |
|
|
#10 |
|
macrumors member
Join Date: Oct 2007
|
wow so awesome!
__________________
MacBook, 2.2 GHz Santa Rosa, 4 GB of RAM!!! *yessssss*!!!!! ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
macrumors regular
|
umm
I hate to say this But I think the other half of the market, ie. Microsoft and friends have a more promising function for the distant future. While apple has a short terms plan.
is only covering X and Y, while the big M is putting big money in the 'Z'
__________________
(Apples and Oranges) |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
macrumors regular
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Canada
|
What would be cool (and more realistic for the short term), is if some of this is brought into the touchpads on laptops and/or new mice for desktops.
For instance...if it can recognize a "stylus grab" (essentally 3 fingers close together), use this for highlighting text. a "pinch" motion for copy, and reverse for paste. That would let them test the waters a bit before they completly redesign a standard over 30 years old of how we interact with a computer |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
macrumors 6502
Join Date: Oct 2007
|
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPod; U; CPU like Mac OS X; en) AppleWebKit/420.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.0 Mobile/3A110a Safari/419.3)
I'm willing to bet within 3 years we'll be seeing a touch screen MacBook or iMac. Who know maybe Mac OS 11 will be touch-only OS. Knowing apple they could do AMAZING things if they made an OS for computer with multi-touch. One thing troubles me though, that whole article just screamed "microsoft surface" I mean sure apple is the first to make multi-touch commerical. So its tricky to say who Is copying who. |
|
|
|
| applefan69 |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by applefan69 |
|
|
#14 | |
|
macrumors 65816
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: The Road
|
Quote:
It would be very impractical to be reaching 20 or 30 inches across your desktop rubbing your fingers all over your 30" cinema display. Talk about repetitive stress syndrome! About the only good use for multi-touch in a desktop environment would be for a new tablet like device (similar to Wacom's Cintiq) or a display table like microsoft demoed this year. Otherwise think, ipod, iphone, pda, or notebook trackpad.
__________________
It's a shame that 99.9999 % of all lawyers give the others such a bad name. (Universal Truths, I)
|
|
|
|
|
| digitalbiker |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by digitalbiker |
|
|
#15 |
|
macrumors member
Join Date: Nov 2006
|
They'll be scrapping the big cat names soon for something a little more like...Mac OS Touch... I give them a couple of years at least before we see any macTOUCH's though... I hope I'm wrong, but I'd say its still quite a way off, enough time for them to develop the new operating system they'd need to run it all.
BUT HOW MAD WILL IT BE WHEN THEY DO!? On the topic though... microsofts 'surface' technology scaled to a regular operating system would also be pretty sweet... and is no doubt just around the corner as well... which brings up some issues.... It could become quite difficult to move from one machine to another if they go about things differently. For a mac user today with little experience on a windows machine, most tasks are still obvious and more or less the same when using a windows machine. Resizing windows, poining and clicking, selecting text, right clicking etc are all universal. As are many keyboard shortcuts and; typing is a no-brainer. If we move to touch set-ups even the simple things could become difficult no matter how intuitive they are when switching between platforms. I wonder if there will be any formal standards formed or whether they will just evolve... |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
macrumors member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: New Zealand
|
ya mean Zune?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
macrumors 6502
Join Date: Oct 2007
|
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPod; U; CPU like Mac OS X; en) AppleWebKit/420.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.0 Mobile/3A110a Safari/419.3)
Quote:
Now motion sensing is in a way 3d touch interface, so maybe nintendo deserves credit for making that commercial. Cant help but wonder what would happen if nintendo and apple merged, both company's seem rather similiar in most aspects. |
|
|
|
|
| applefan69 |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by applefan69 |
|
|
#18 | |
|
macrumors 65816
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: The Road
|
Microsoft also has been working on a touch surface interface
Quote:
http://www.microsoft.com/surface
__________________
It's a shame that 99.9999 % of all lawyers give the others such a bad name. (Universal Truths, I)
|
|
|
|
|
| digitalbiker |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by digitalbiker |
|
|
#19 | |
|
macrumors 601
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Redondo Beach, California
|
Quote:
http://www.wacom.com/cintiq/ One other idea might be to use the webcam to watch the user's hands. So you would not have to touch the screen. We all can start learning ASL. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | ||
|
Banned
|
Quote:
Last time I checked, most people wouldn't want to use their hand to move a pointer across a 20+ inch screen. Lame. Multi-touch should be for small devices only. I don't see this as something most users will want. Virtual mouse and keyboard? Um....okay. Last time I checked human beings work best with tactile input devices. Good luck typing on a virtual keyboard where you have zero feedback as to what button you have pressed. I'm skeptical to say the least. Quote:
So why would I want to lift my whole arm to move the mouse? Not practical. Never will be. Last edited by Mitthrawnuruodo : May 9, 2008 at 06:43 AM. Reason: Merging, please use MULTIQUOTE and/or EDIT... |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#21 | ||
|
macrumors 6502
Join Date: Oct 2007
|
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPod; U; CPU like Mac OS X; en) AppleWebKit/420.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.0 Mobile/3A110a Safari/419.3)
Quote:
Plus laptops generally only have a max of a 17" screen which people rest on their laps. This means you woyldnt really have to move your arm much. Plus I'm sure there's other advantages in which I'm missing. Last edited by applefan69 : Nov 23, 2007 at 12:34 AM. |
||
|
|
|
| applefan69 |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by applefan69 |
|
|
#22 | |
|
macrumors 65816
|
Quote:
Microsoft demoed Surface months after Apple demoed iPhone. Microsoft released Surface... when? (have they?)... certainly after Apple released iPhone. Neither Surface nor iPhone are 3D interfaces though, which is what you're replying to.... Anyway.. I'm not sure what your point is. (edit:.. oh, I guess when they're talking about working on different axes ('axis's') you could consider the iPhone to do some of that with the accelerometer... but I really wouldn't call that a 3d interface). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 | |
|
macrumors 601
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Burnsville, Minnesota, USA
|
Damn it. You can't patent some of this crap! I mean really. Moving your finger backwards to erase. Good lord this has been don on PDA's for about a decade. Apple is going patent insane.
Quote:
Oh and as for Surface and when it was being developed. Sorry but I've been hearing rumors about this since 2003 when we had reps from MS doing then mobile experience tour for the Pocket PC. I use to lead the Pocket PC user group here in MN and I can tell you that there was rumblings about a gesture based interface back then. At the time it was thought that it was going to ship with the Tablet PC edition of Vista to allow you to interface with the tablet without a pen. This obviously didn't happen. MS HAS been working on this a while. The only reason why they choose now to demo it was because of Apple and Mac fanbois who would immediately bitch that they are ripping Apple off even though the two have NOTHING in common other then using your finger and hand. It was launched early and wasn't ready for prime time simply because of Apple. But frankly Apple's implementation is NOTHING. You do realize that coverflow was purchased by Apple. It didn't originate from them. Right? Really. People do need to end this copy crap. Apple copies MS. MS copies Apple. Apple gets a metric crap ton of technologies from open source. And it goes on and on and on.
__________________
-iPod Video 160GB
-MacBook Pro Core 2 Duo 2.33Ghz/3GB RAM/250GB -Newton 4700 (a.k.a iPaq 4700) -Dell 2405FPW 24" Widescreen Last edited by SiliconAddict : Nov 23, 2007 at 01:32 AM. |
|
|
|
|
| SiliconAddict |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by SiliconAddict |
|
|
#24 | |
|
macrumors 65816
|
Quote:
In the computer world... the mouse conveys our magic tiny gesture to make big movements on the screen. In that sense, why would you ever want to lift your arm to touch the screen... it's so much quicker and easier to grab the mouse (and you don't have to clean the screen afterwards). And yet, I believe touch is a huge part of our near future. I'm not exactly sure why... let's see.... hmmm! Of course, the touch is more natural than the mouse, for anyone untrained. I think the main thing is that the mouse can only ever point at one thing at a time. A finger can also only point at one thing at a time (and a mouse on Windows can have 2 types of click!)... but what happens when you can use multiple fingers or even 2 hands? Basically, it enables a whole raft of new interface methods. Note that the best way of making touch useless is making it work like a mouse. You can still only click one thing, and it's harder to do that! What Apple (& MS) do with Multitouch will be intriguing. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
|
macrumors 6502
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: London
|
Quote:
I think it's also important to point out that the 'coffee table' isn't a consumer device, at least not for the foreseeable future. It's going to turn up in casino's. hotels and fancy winebars. Whereas apple's 1st multi-touch system has been on the market for the last 6 months and combined sales with the iPod touch has probably beaten 2 million sales. There's a lot of huff an puff about who's done what first, but if you ain't shipped a product then its just vaporware. M.
__________________
KISS is a principle i'd love to live by, if only life would allow. ![]() MacPro 06 Quad 2.0GHz, 12GB, 60GB SSD, 3x250GB Stripe, 250GB XP & 2.7TB Drobo.
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|