CrackedButter macrumors 68040 Original poster Sep 30, 2003 #1 At the moment i see FW800 hard drives but why have we not seen optical drives? Can anybody tell me if there are any anyway?
At the moment i see FW800 hard drives but why have we not seen optical drives? Can anybody tell me if there are any anyway?
M Makosuke macrumors 604 Sep 30, 2003 #3 Re: Why are there no FW800 drives to buy Originally posted by CrackedButter At the moment i see FW800 hard drives but why have we not seen optical drives? Click to expand... I assume a big part of the reason is that most optical drives have a transfer rate well below even 50MB/s (even a 52x CD is only theoretically at 8MB/s), so there's absolutely no need for the bandwidth that FW800 provides.
Re: Why are there no FW800 drives to buy Originally posted by CrackedButter At the moment i see FW800 hard drives but why have we not seen optical drives? Click to expand... I assume a big part of the reason is that most optical drives have a transfer rate well below even 50MB/s (even a 52x CD is only theoretically at 8MB/s), so there's absolutely no need for the bandwidth that FW800 provides.
patrick0brien macrumors 68040 Sep 30, 2003 #4 Re: Why are there no FW800 drives to buy Originally posted by CrackedButter At the moment i see FW800 hard drives but why have we not seen optical drives? Can anybody tell me if there are any anyway? Click to expand... -CrackedButter It wouldn't be practical as it is not possible to spin a CD fast enough to saturate your transfer wire (FW400) to the point of requiring FW800. The only way I can think of to break that barrier is to come out with 'wide' lasers capable of reading many - if not all CD tracks at once.
Re: Why are there no FW800 drives to buy Originally posted by CrackedButter At the moment i see FW800 hard drives but why have we not seen optical drives? Can anybody tell me if there are any anyway? Click to expand... -CrackedButter It wouldn't be practical as it is not possible to spin a CD fast enough to saturate your transfer wire (FW400) to the point of requiring FW800. The only way I can think of to break that barrier is to come out with 'wide' lasers capable of reading many - if not all CD tracks at once.
CrackedButter macrumors 68040 Original poster Oct 1, 2003 #5 This is good then, i don't need FW800, not for a while anyway. I'm slowly changing my mind over a PB purchase, and while i was gunning for a 15", i may now jump at the 12".
This is good then, i don't need FW800, not for a while anyway. I'm slowly changing my mind over a PB purchase, and while i was gunning for a 15", i may now jump at the 12".