|
|
| Welcome to the Mac Forums forums. Please read the FAQ if you have questions. Register to participate. |
|
|||||||
| TouchArcade.com - iPhone Game Reviews and News |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
macrumors bot
Join Date: Apr 2001
|
Starbucks iPhone Ordering Concept Design
![]() Multimedia designer, Phil Lu, has created some mockups of an iPhone application that he calls "QuickOrder": ![]() Surprisingly, the mockups were created before the publicized patent application in which Apple explores to-go ordering from the iPhone. The series of images show how such a system might work. Article Link |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
macrumors 6502
Join Date: May 2006
|
coming from a starbucks addict- this looks awesome.
__________________
2.53 GHz 320GB 4GB RAM MacBook Pro, 4G 8GB Silver iPod nano, 32GB White iPhone 3GS |
|
|
|
| JohnnyQuest |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by JohnnyQuest |
|
|
#3 |
|
macrumors 68020
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: DFW, TX
|
Love it!! ... but i always thought that you would be able to pay through itunes .. and have it bill you .. that way you just order it and go .. totally bypassing the payment process .. (and waiting in line)
__________________
Creative Commons - because copyright is broken.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
macrumors 6502
Join Date: May 2006
|
that would be so ridiculously amazing.
__________________
2.53 GHz 320GB 4GB RAM MacBook Pro, 4G 8GB Silver iPod nano, 32GB White iPhone 3GS |
|
|
|
| JohnnyQuest |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by JohnnyQuest |
|
|
#5 |
|
macrumors 68020
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: DFW, TX
|
and why not ... they already have you buying their songs and paying for them through itunes .. why not your order..
__________________
Creative Commons - because copyright is broken.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
macrumors 68030
|
Looks awesome. Im not a huge fan of Starbucks but i would start going there to use this!!
__________________
Innovation distinguishes between a leader and a follower. -Steve Jobs |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
macrumors Demi-God
|
very interesting and neat.
might be a niche market, but i could see it working. |
|
|
|
| PlaceofDis |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by PlaceofDis |
|
|
#8 |
|
macrumors 68030
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
|
And after Apple or Jobs sees that, he's hired
__________________
Help stop children from viewing internet pornography. What happened to all the great leaders? |
|
|
|
| QuarterSwede |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by QuarterSwede |
|
|
#9 |
|
macrumors newbie
Join Date: Sep 2007
|
this would be amazing. so much potential with this sort of thing. though i do agree, billing through itunes would make things so much faster and better.
__________________
macbook pro, 2.4 ghz, 2 gig ram G4 imac, 1.25 ghz, 2 gig ram 8 gig iphone 80 gig ipod classic |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
macrumors 68000
Join Date: Jun 2007
|
They should hire you!
|
|
|
|
| plumbingandtech |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by plumbingandtech |
|
|
#11 |
|
macrumors 6502
Join Date: Nov 2005
|
The amount of creativity that exists in the iPhone community never seize to amaze me.
I can't wait for the official SDK and all the goodie we'll have with it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
macrumors member
Join Date: May 2002
|
Ok. I did a little research. I want to make sure Mac Rumors understands that the difference between a *published* patent application and a *filed* patent application is 18 months. In other words, Apple files a patent and 18 months later that application is published for all to see.
So when you say it predated the application, it has to predate the filing date, not the publication date. Seeing as how it's not been 18 months since we saw the iPhone, this can't exactly predate anything Apple did. I had to look into the original articles you posted, from both macrumors and forbes. It appears the discrepancy shows up again. Forbes says "published" you say "filed." It's not a big deal. Just a semantic issue, really. (and i have no idea if the forbes/macrumors discrepancy is a result of some later editing by forbes. It's not like you would have hand written that excerpt )
|
|
|
|
| Zoboomafoo |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Zoboomafoo |
|
|
#13 |
|
macrumors Demi-God
|
That design is outstanding.
*gets excited for MWSF all over again*
__________________
Victoria Concordia Crescit
|
|
|
|
| gauchogolfer |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by gauchogolfer |
|
|
#14 |
|
macrumors 65816
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: California
|
This would be pretty cool as long as all the people working at Starbucks could handle it without screwing up orders and everything.
__________________
15" MacBook Pro 3.06GHz, iPod 4G 20GB, iPod Classic 120GB, iPod Shuffle 4G, White iPhone 3G S⃣ 16GB,tv 160GB |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
macrumors 6502
|
Hmm...they could organize the drink types like play lists or albums "coffees", "teas" or lattes, frozen or some other categories and then open one up to scroll through the individual drinks like songs in an album.
__________________
Macbook 1.83Ghz 2 Gig RAM 200 Gig HD Hitachi Travelstar and Leopard... www.therainforestsite.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
macrumors 68020
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: DFW, TX
|
I'm sure getting an electronic print out of whats ordered is easier than scribble on a cup...
__________________
Creative Commons - because copyright is broken.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
macrumors 65816
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: London
|
Am I the only one that sees an iPod Touch when looking at those pictures.. you would of thought they would get the correct device first. The AT&T Logo implies its an iPhone but its got a shiny curved edges.
__________________
Aluminum 20" iMac 2.0ghz 2gb, 15" Macbook Pro 2.33ghz 3gb, D90 18-105mm 55-200mm 50mm, Silver iPod Shuffle, Black iPhone 3g 16GB |
|
|
|
| Mac-Addict |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Mac-Addict |
|
|
#18 | |
|
macrumors 68000
Join Date: Jun 2007
|
Quote:
I'm just admiring the concept and the artwork ignoring the little imperfections.
|
|
|
|
|
| plumbingandtech |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by plumbingandtech |
|
|
#19 |
|
macrumors newbie
Join Date: Jun 2007
|
I don't go to Starbucks or drink coffee, but
I find this amazing!
If this takes off, I'll be able to order from Kroger, Papa John's maybe even a mail order bride! |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
macrumors 6502a
|
... and no *thing where you put your ear while talking.* (I forgot what it was called.)
__________________
iPhone 3GS 32gb Black 24" Aluminum iMac, 2.8 GHz, 4gb RAM, 500gb HD 9" Dell Mini 9, 10.5.7 Leopard |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 | |
|
macrumors 68020
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: DFW, TX
|
Quote:
__________________
Creative Commons - because copyright is broken.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
macrumors 65816
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: New York City
|
This looks REALLY cool - and as a Starbucks "grande soy no-water chai" junkie, the potential of this excites me.
But...call me slow, how exactly would this work -- or make a trip to Starbucks any faster? From the looks of it, you enter your order ahead of time, then it generates a semacode, and then that has to be scanned at the counter? Wouldn't you still need to stand in line for that? That just makes a system where it's unnecessary to talk to your barista, which seems awfully anti-social, if you ask me. ![]() And even if you didn't need to stand in line, and you could somehow bypass it (paying through iTunes or something) and just walk up and get your drink...does that mean it's just been sitting there the whole time? Would a barista have to still scan your semacode before giving you your drink? What happens if a lot of people end up ordering this way...would that mean a lot of drinks just waiting around for people to pick them up? I have two Starbucks I frequent regularly. The one near home is super-small and hardly ever has anyone in it. When I go there, there's hardly any time that goes by between entering, ordering/paying, and getting my drink -- it's super-quick already. So an ordering system like this wouldn't be necessary there. The other Starbucks near work is almost ALWAYS over-crowded, however. It's SO chaotic that I can't see how this iPhone ordering system would be more helpful there either. Drinks are always getting messed up, and stuff gets remade all the time. I can only see an additional iPhone system adding to the general confusion and delaying drinks even further. Maybe I'm overthinking this...but was just curious how something like this really makes things any faster or easier. I guess it would have to go through an awkward adjustment period until enough people were doing it this way that it would work smoothly and efficiently. It definitely LOOKS cool. One day we'll be doing EVERYTHING on our iPhones...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
macrumors newbie
Join Date: Aug 2005
|
This looks awesome - now you can not only avoid eye contact with the 'person' behind the counter, but totally escape having to speak to them either!
Oh, and there is no way that Starbucks will ever bring in a policy that sees some customers get their drink quicker just because they have an Apple gadget. This feature just isn't necessary. Unplug for a few minutes, even if only to buy a cup of coffee. |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
macrumors 65816
Join Date: Mar 2005
|
This would completely bypass the impulsive buys at the checkout that Starbucks probably makes a mint on! You know, like gum, bakery, cds, or MINTS.
Cool concept, but defeats a lot of what the cluttered checkout represents... And I agree, it takes away from your daily bonding with another coffeelover (hopefully) on the other side of the counter.
__________________
iSwitched in 1988
MP quad 2.8 (4GB/1.5TB/ATI 2600), iPhone, iPods |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
macrumors 65816
Join Date: Feb 2006
|
this is a neat feature it be nice if other Companys get into this imagine ordering a pizza like this through ur ipod touch/iphone i hope this does expand to other areas than starbucks.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|