Register FAQ/Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to the Mac Forums forums. Please read the FAQ if you have questions. Register to participate.

 
Go Back   Mac Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion
TouchArcade.com - iPhone Game Reviews and News

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread  
Old Jan 14, 2008, 07:13 AM   #1
MacRumors
macrumors bot
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
'MacBook Air' Design Considerations



As the keynote approaches, it seems increasingly likely that Apple will be releasing a slim notebook at Macworld. We've heard more confirmations that the notebook will be called the 'Macbook Air' despite a significant amount of disbelief surrounding the product name.

For Apple to launch an extremely slim MacBook laptop, however, there are a few design considerations that should be recognized. With the reported removal of the optical drive from the body of the machine, it seems clear that Apple is interested in slimming down the laptop as much as possible. In creating a super-slim laptop, there are a few other components that become size-limiting.

While there has been much talk about the move to Solid State (Flash) based drives, these drives carry a significant premium over traditional hard drives. Apple uses 2.5" SATA hard drives in their current MacBooks. Regardless of type of drive used, moving to a 1.8" form factor would be necessary to slim down the laptop further. Apple has a significant amount of experience with the use of these 1.8" drives which are used in the hard drive based iPods. Of note, Samsung's recently announced 1.8" 160GB drive has started shipping this past week for only $199.

Another size constraint would be the Ethernet jack on the laptop itself. We learned that Apple had been exploring this issue through a published patent application that explored the possibility of collapsable external ports. Other manufacturers of thin laptops have used ethernet-usb dongle to avoid housing the ethernet jack on the laptop itself. Similarly, Apple would have to include an attachable ethernet adapter, if their collapsable connectors never graduated from the research lab.

Apple is rumored to be releasing a new slim MacBook at Macworld San Francisco. User conferences begin on January 14th, but the keynote kicks off on January 15th at 9am. We'll have live coverage at MacRumorsLive.com and extended floor coverage at macrumors.com/mwsf.

Article Link

Last edited by arn : Jan 14, 2008 at 07:24 AM.
MacRumors is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 14, 2008, 07:16 AM   #2
aswitcher
macrumors 601
 
aswitcher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Sydney OZ
Send a message via AIM to aswitcher
Mini DVI not DVI?

HDMI a possible replacement for DVI?

FW 400 will stay - this thing needs to boot into target disk mode to allow an external DVD drive with leopard to reinstall when there are issues.
__________________
Never underestimate the Geekfactor
Switcher since June '04
iPhone 3G | 24" Alu iMac | 15" MacBookPro | Elgato EyeTV/IceTV | SecuritySpy User
aswitcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 14, 2008, 07:17 AM   #3
jacktiernan
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Vic, Australia
Aaaaw, stop it! You're getting me soooooooooo excited

Nice little article, can't wait...... only 28 hours to go!
__________________
Wherever I go, here I am
jacktiernan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 14, 2008, 07:19 AM   #4
derrickearl
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
MacBookAir

Thumb resize.

Thumb resize.

Last edited by derrickearl : Jan 14, 2008 at 07:28 AM.
derrickearl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 14, 2008, 07:21 AM   #5
VicMacs
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Dominican Republic
Send a message via ICQ to VicMacs Send a message via AIM to VicMacs
oh I'm so getting one

make that 2
__________________
@ MacWorld

Last edited by edesignuk : Jan 14, 2008 at 07:21 AM. Reason: merge
VicMacs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 14, 2008, 07:23 AM   #6
takao
macrumors 68030
 
takao's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Dornbirn/Innsbruck (Austria)
Send a message via ICQ to takao
hm removing the optical for sure would mean in some regards some size advantage .. the question regarding the 1.8" drives is more on the point of speed ... anybody knows the speeds those drives can get ?

... sure a laptop with both: a small solid state drive for operating system and a 1.8" for the files used as combination might be a solution thoug hthe space saved then wouldn't be as big

on collapsable ports ... i wouldn't be so sure about that .. seems to be more of a hassle mechanically and more prone to break to be really worth it.. put the ethernet jack on a usb dongle and as said you might achieve the same result in heigth reduction
__________________
cause when the world is over we're still the boys from nowhere
and tonight, tonight we're coming home
takao is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 14, 2008, 07:24 AM   #7
goldenlotus
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Boston, MA
This is almost as good as the iphone rumors last year. I'm excited!
goldenlotus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 14, 2008, 07:25 AM   #8
derrickearl
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
The laptop would use Bluetooth, WiFi for communication, and have a USB and iPod style connector. Power can carried from the iPod style connector. A power button is on right side, further simplifying the keyboard area. The keyboard and much of the design cues would come from the new keyboards.
derrickearl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 14, 2008, 07:25 AM   #9
thefunkymunky
macrumors 65816
 
thefunkymunky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Cardiff, Wales, UK
Send a message via ICQ to thefunkymunky Send a message via MSN to thefunkymunky Send a message via Yahoo to thefunkymunky
Quote:
Originally Posted by aswitcher View Post
Mini DVI not DVI?

HDMI a possible replacement for DVI?

FW 400 will stay - this thing needs to boot into target disk mode to allow an external DVD drive with leopard to reinstall when there are issues.
On Intel Macs, the FW400 TG issue can be accomplished with USB2, which has a smaller footprint and more ideally suited to a thin(ner) notebook.
__________________
PSN ID: kraized | facebook
thefunkymunky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 14, 2008, 07:26 AM   #10
Kolind
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Denmark
Is it possible that Apple would get rid of the ethernet port? They were the first to do it with floppy drives, they've dropped the laptop-modems, it seems they are getting rid of the optical drive too - so is it too far fetched that they get rid of the ethernet port and rely on wireless?

I don't think they'll do it (yet), but I wouldn't be surprised either.

Just my 2 ører (Danish currency )
__________________
Practice makes perfect - but how much practice? That is the question...
Kolind is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 14, 2008, 07:27 AM   #11
bigandy
macrumors Demi-God
 
bigandy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Soho, London
Quote:
Originally Posted by thefunkymunky View Post
On Intel Macs, the FW400 TG issue can be accomplished with USB2, which has a smaller footprint and more ideally suited to a thin(ner) notebook.
...however FW400 being removed from this new mac would stop many serious potential suitors from forking out the cash. i'd certainly think twice about a Mac without firewire.
__________________
"any day that involves cat pee is a really bad day" - iBlue
bigandy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 14, 2008, 07:30 AM   #12
backspinner
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Eindhoven
For my work I really need an ethernet port, but not all the time. If carrying an ethernet cable is acceptable, carrying a USB dongle for these occasions is as well.
__________________
By all means, do not use a hammer.
backspinner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 14, 2008, 07:30 AM   #13
nomad01
macrumors 65816
 
nomad01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Birmingham, England
Quote:
Originally Posted by takao View Post
hm removing the optical for sure would mean in some regards some size advantage .. the question regarding the 1.8" drives is more on the point of speed ... anybody knows the speeds those drives can get ?
I'm presuming there will be some performance compromises with something this small. However, if it's more portable than my Macbook I would definitely be in the market for it. I've wanted a small MacOS machine for AGES. When I first returned to Macs years ago it was a choice between a Sony VAIO or a 12" Powerbook. I plumped (thankfully!) for the Powerbook.

Fingers crossed for a compact, reasonably priced Macbook "nano". :-)
nomad01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 14, 2008, 07:30 AM   #14
dobbin
macrumors 6502a
 
dobbin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: England
Quote:
Originally Posted by MacRumors View Post

Another size constraint would be the Ethernet jack on the laptop itself. We learned that Apple had been exploring this issue through a published patent application that explored the possibility of collapsable external ports. Other manufacturers of thin laptops have used ethernet-usb dongle to avoid housing the ethernet jack on the laptop itself. Similarly, Apple would have to include an attachable ethernet adapter, if their collapsable connectors never graduated from the research lab.

Article Link

I've never used the ethernet port on my iBook - surely almost everyone uses wireless these days? Maybe Apple could develop a new "mini-ethernet" port and then use a converter-dongle for the rare occaisions that it's needed?
dobbin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 14, 2008, 07:30 AM   #15
brop52
macrumors 65816
 
brop52's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Michigan
Firewire not on a Mac is blasphemy...
__________________
2.0 GHz Alum MB/4 GB RAM/320 GB HDD
2.93 GHz iMac/4 GB RAM/640 GB HDD
2.4 GHz iMac/4 GB RAM/320 GB HDD
16GB Black iPhone 3G S
brop52 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 14, 2008, 07:32 AM   #16
derrickearl
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigandy View Post
...however FW400 being removed from this new mac would stop many serious potential suitors from forking out the cash. i'd certainly think twice about a Mac without firewire.
How many of those new iPod/PC users that have yet to convert to Mac have Firewire products? This is a perfect product to show users how streamlined Apple can be and pull off an interface and industrial design that makes them forget about how things use to be.

Hold on let me save a copy of this thread on a floppy...
derrickearl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 14, 2008, 07:34 AM   #17
icrew
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
XJack?

If apple needed something smaller than a standard ethernet port, I don't know why they wouldn't just license the X-Jack connector. It's very small, and totally proven technology. See http://www.computerhope.com/jargon/x/xjack.htm for details.
icrew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 14, 2008, 07:34 AM   #18
edesignuk
Demi-God (Moderator emeritus)
 
edesignuk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Great(?) Britain
If this is to happen, I'm not too worried about the speed of a little 1.8" drive or lack of firewire/ethernet ports, separate video card etc. Using SSD storage will just send the price sky rocketing, and i for one can quite live without it for a laptop of this sort.

The soul focus of this design should be about form. Chances are it'll only be rocking a low voltage CPU, it's not designed to be any sort of work horse. So what if the drive is a bit slow? Crappy shared video? For surfing the web and doing emails it doesn't make any difference. Same with Firewire, who cares? No one is going to be editing video on this thing, and if you want an external drive USB2 is up to the job.

It just needs to be small and light, oh, and at a good price. The actual hardware specs aren't all that important, just so long as it can run Leopard half decently.
__________________
V's wise words
Search before you post: MRoogle
edesignuk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 14, 2008, 07:35 AM   #19
ebfoxbat
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
This would SUCK

Let me be the first to say that a wireless laptop would suck.

Do you want to lug around an induction pad with you everywhere you go? It's one thing to have an induction-supporting desk. Some type of standard, then you can toss your laptop, cell, etc. on it.

It's a whole new ballgame when you depend on it. Now...

If the Air has a Mag-Safe connector and the pad uses a traditional Mag-Safe connection then you'd be OK: you could use it as you would a normal laptop while on the road.

Which leads me to my next point. Perhaps Apple is announcing an Induction Charging Standard for all of their products henceforth. One could have an iInduction desk and just toss your iPod, iPhone 2.0, MacBook Air, iWatch, et al on it to charge.
ebfoxbat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 14, 2008, 07:35 AM   #20
kungming2
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by derrickearl View Post
Thumb resize.

Thumb resize.
A bit on the chunky side, this one is.
__________________
MacBook Pro 2.2 GHz - 4GB RAM - 320GB HDD
http://aznplay.com/
kungming2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 14, 2008, 07:36 AM   #21
thefunkymunky
macrumors 65816
 
thefunkymunky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Cardiff, Wales, UK
Send a message via ICQ to thefunkymunky Send a message via MSN to thefunkymunky Send a message via Yahoo to thefunkymunky
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigandy View Post
...however FW400 being removed from this new mac would stop many serious potential suitors from forking out the cash. i'd certainly think twice about a Mac without firewire.
On a sub-notebook I don't excluding FW would be a major disadvantage. It's a sub-notebook after all.
__________________
PSN ID: kraized | facebook
thefunkymunky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 14, 2008, 07:36 AM   #22
Malcster
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Bristol, UK
Whilst fine for iPods and PDA's im pretty sure the performance of the 1.8" drives is simply nowhere near good enough for a full blown computer..

Consider Spotlight indexing, swap partitions etc, im sure it would be a serious bottleneck.
Malcster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 14, 2008, 07:37 AM   #23
edesignuk
Demi-God (Moderator emeritus)
 
edesignuk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Great(?) Britain
Quote:
Originally Posted by Malcster View Post
Whilst fine for iPods and PDA's im pretty sure the performance of the 1.8" drives is simply nowhere near good enough for a full blown computer..
IBM have used them for years in their tiny X series laptops.
__________________
V's wise words
Search before you post: MRoogle
edesignuk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 14, 2008, 07:38 AM   #24
nickane
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Collapsible ports patent looked flimsy. No matter how well this is implemented it doesn't seem as convenient as having the ports behind the hinge. Most likely to me seems an optional USB dongle as ethernet is really uncommon nowadays and wouldn't make sense for a device of this type.

A minute ago, we were all talking about induction charging... Who wants an ethernet port?
nickane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 14, 2008, 07:38 AM   #25
eastcoastsurfer
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by dobbin View Post
I've never used the ethernet port on my iBook - surely almost everyone uses wireless these days?
Except in the business world. Many companies don't have onsite wireless (or it's very firewalled) b/c of the security issues. Getting rid of the ethernet jack would make this machine even less useful for many business users (lack of docking stations are already a negative in this area).
eastcoastsurfer is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Mac Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:57 PM.

Mac News | Mac Rumors | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2002-2009, MacRumors.com, LLC